I've lurked enough on this forum to see threads being posted stripping women from any accountability of their behavioural hypergamy. Do not be mistaken however, this is something none unique nor confined to just this forum. It seems this has become the go to arguement for big brain normies justifying women's flawed natural impulses. This thread will serve in response to these misguided statements.
Let me start off with explaining why women deserve hate. Hate is often an expression of one's personal grievances towards an individual or collective one believes treated them with injustice, in this case the hording of sex (a necessary resource[see source]) by women to mostly unmerited cliques. In this post sexual liberation, sex and therefore lust is greatly shallow (especially in regards to women[see source]), it isn't rewarded through merit but rather genetics. Women before sexual liberation generally didn't hold jobs, or at least well paying ones. Nowadays however this isn't the case, women are more than ever increasingly participating in the workforce and specifically in white collar jobs it is often mandated by companies to include women in high positions even if not merited. More women included in the workforce results in less men in the workforce therefore men will increasingly not meet women's increasing financial standards. Either women are gonna have to accept a monogamous relationship with a looksmatch partner that earns less than her (Kek! Not gonna happen) or they'll collectively provide for Chad in a polygamous relationship.
Let's see what our feminist "allies" have to say in regards to this.
Ah, it seems they want us to willingly become asexual consoomers whilst they provide for Chad and hoard sex. How can any incel with dignity not hate women? If you don't hate women, my literal piss has more dignity than you.
Now in regards to the logical fallacy of the 'natural' argument. Usually these individuals that argue it's only natural for women to prefer Chad, conclude that because it is natural they're indifferent. Indeed, nature itself is indifferent however we aren't nature nor do we live according to nature. This is why we enjoy societal protection and culture from nature's relentless, merciless indifference. Think about it, if we're to become indifferent to nature as it is then why are male rapists condemned? Is it not 'natural' for men to want to rape? Does a male dog ask for the consent of a female dog? Of course not, because they're living according to nature. You see you can't have it both ways, if you're indifferent to women's hypergamy because it is 'natural', then you also must be indifferent to a man's 'natural' desire to rape women. Notice that it's only ever women who are never held accountable for their abhorrent 'natural' impulses, God forbid someone justifies a man raping a women as merely natural.
Let me start off with explaining why women deserve hate. Hate is often an expression of one's personal grievances towards an individual or collective one believes treated them with injustice, in this case the hording of sex (a necessary resource[see source]) by women to mostly unmerited cliques. In this post sexual liberation, sex and therefore lust is greatly shallow (especially in regards to women[see source]), it isn't rewarded through merit but rather genetics. Women before sexual liberation generally didn't hold jobs, or at least well paying ones. Nowadays however this isn't the case, women are more than ever increasingly participating in the workforce and specifically in white collar jobs it is often mandated by companies to include women in high positions even if not merited. More women included in the workforce results in less men in the workforce therefore men will increasingly not meet women's increasing financial standards. Either women are gonna have to accept a monogamous relationship with a looksmatch partner that earns less than her (Kek! Not gonna happen) or they'll collectively provide for Chad in a polygamous relationship.
Let's see what our feminist "allies" have to say in regards to this.
Ah, it seems they want us to willingly become asexual consoomers whilst they provide for Chad and hoard sex. How can any incel with dignity not hate women? If you don't hate women, my literal piss has more dignity than you.
Now in regards to the logical fallacy of the 'natural' argument. Usually these individuals that argue it's only natural for women to prefer Chad, conclude that because it is natural they're indifferent. Indeed, nature itself is indifferent however we aren't nature nor do we live according to nature. This is why we enjoy societal protection and culture from nature's relentless, merciless indifference. Think about it, if we're to become indifferent to nature as it is then why are male rapists condemned? Is it not 'natural' for men to want to rape? Does a male dog ask for the consent of a female dog? Of course not, because they're living according to nature. You see you can't have it both ways, if you're indifferent to women's hypergamy because it is 'natural', then you also must be indifferent to a man's 'natural' desire to rape women. Notice that it's only ever women who are never held accountable for their abhorrent 'natural' impulses, God forbid someone justifies a man raping a women as merely natural.
. It is quite a powerful force. They constantly tell us we're not entitled to sex, not entitled to their bodies, they constantly tell each other not to settle for non-Chad men.
