At least the ones deciding on immigration policy don't. Neither do the ones running the things. They really don't care otherwise they would've said so. A country that believes that all it's citizens are equal, irrespective of race, cannot then turn around and claim that their policies must preserve the majority demographic of a single race as some kind of preferential treatment. That would be a contradiction. If that was their belief then they wouldn't have claimed that all their citizens were equal. They would've stated that they are race exclusivists. Your race exclusivity outlook is in complete opposition to the constitution, laws, ideologies and the basic philosophical bedrocks of these liberal democratic nations.
But that wouldn't deter you because you live in a complete fantasy lala land where western nations are actually white nations. Despite them shouting in your ears that they are not. And then you are confused why these supposed white nations of your imagination are not preserving their whitehood, so you blame jews or Santa clause or whoever.
Political emancipation is not the same as material emancipation. This was the point that greycel was making in his jewish question thread. Giving civil rights is a step forward but it's not everything because systemic racism is deeper than that. But yes, a nation that has civil rights and still cares about whites becoming a minority is absurd. There's a reason Trump's rhetoric never specifically mentions race, because that would contradict US constitution, even though his policy motivations are indeed racist to some part in the sense of that deeper systematic racism that goes beyond constitution and civil rights.
So it's not as black and white as it seems. A lot of immigration is allowed but a lot of immigration is also prevented. Things are not overtly racist, like in Nazi Germany, but racial motivations still inform policy, despite whatever the law says.
Last edited:
