NSFW Society: "It's disgusting for anything that even looks like a child to be in a sexual situation"

[The Notorious SLAV]

Meanwhile, a mainstream Czech movie from 2022:

Yeah, it's pretty obviously a doll, but still, with how some people get worked up over loli drawings, and other literal drawings and cartoons of female characters who don't look like mannish old hags, the casualness with which a live-action scene like this was made and the seeming lack of controversy over it is hard not to notice. Something tells me it wouldn't be as welcomed if it were gender-flipped.

Cuties also had like half of Twitter seething and raging over it, but from the recaps I've seen of it, I'm really not sure whether that movie had anything like this in it.

 

[mrlunatic]

bookmarked

 

[tired as fuck]

Yeah, it's pretty obviously a doll, but still, with how some people get worked up over loli drawings, and other literal drawings and cartoons of female characters who don't look like mannish old hags,

a lot of lolicons think that fictional 14-16 year old girls are "hags" or "expired goods". I fear these people tbh. Yeah yeah reality is not fiction blah blah don't care. Reality and fiction aren't that detached tbh, the line gets often blurry as hell. And I'm a blue archive player, mind you, OG from 1st Anniversary. I wanna see if there's a study regarding a correlation between consuming lolicon/shotacon porn and committing sexual crimes to children, has to be somewhere. Iirc even on the wikipedia page for lolicon there is a part with a couple of studies cited citing no correlation but trusting only a couple of studies is retarded beyond all limits. I think it's fair to say that porn only leads to more and more depraved shit being consumed, still is this grounds enough for banning all such media on a possibility? You can't even properly ban it cuz the whole world should ban it or else VPN will always bypass and your ISP won't know and/or won't care about pursuing you, too much money.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

a lot of lolicons think that fictional 14-16 year old girls are "hags" or "expired goods". I fear these people tbh. Yeah yeah reality is not fiction blah blah don't care. Reality and fiction aren't that detached tbh, the line gets often blurry as hell. And I'm a blue archive player, mind you, OG from 1st Anniversary.

True. Can't say I'm a fan of it either, I just couldn't not make the comparison in this case.

I wanna see if there's a study regarding a correlation between consuming lolicon/shotacon porn and committing sexual crimes to children, has to be somewhere.

The closest I've found is this, but that was about hentai in general.

"the frequency of hentai pornography use predicts sexually aggressive behaviors in male and female participants"

Mixed-sex weeb rape gangs when:feelsEhh:? The Mediating Role of Rape Myths in the Relationship Between the Use of Hentai Pornography and Sexually Aggressive Strategies: A Study with College Students Remember this thread...

incels.is

I think it's fair to say that porn only leads to more and more depraved shit being consumed,

That's a thing I'd like to see more research on. It makes sense, but I've always been a bit skeptical of how strong that effect is, as I've never experienced anything like that while consuming porn for half of my life at this point. The exact same tame stuff I always liked is what gets me going now with no problem as well.

But of course, I'm just a single individual, so nothing to judge group effects on.

Also, funnily enough, although the porn a single person watches can get worse and worse over time, from what I've seen, the current consensus is that pornographic content overall is not changing at all and is equally perverted and transgressive as it was for decades.

still is this grounds enough for banning all such media on a possibility?

True. Also, that brings to mind violent video games and the attempts to ban or regulate them, especially now that there is growing evidence that usage of violent content/games correlates with everyday sadism.

You can't even properly ban it cuz the whole world should ban it or else VPN will always bypass and your ISP won't know and/or won't care about pursuing you, too much money.

 

[PLS HALP ME]

:choque:

 

[tired as fuck]

True. Also, that brings to mind violent video games and the attempts to ban or regulate them, especially now that there is growing evidence that usage of violent content/games correlates with everyday sadism.

I bet my inceldom it's mostly cross-sectional studies that can't establish causality who would guess sadists would like violent video games

The closest I've found is this, but that was about hentai in general.

Only skimmed it cuz I'm on a tight schedule sorry.

Men​

A significant relationship between the frequency of hentai pornography use and sexually aggressive behavior was found (B = 0.40, SE = 0.15, 95% CI [0.111, 0.699]). After controlling for the mediator, rape myths endorsement, the direct effect of the frequency of hentai use on sexually aggressive behavior was no longer significant (B = 0.17, SE = 0.13, 95% CI [−0.089, 0.428]). The mediation analysis was statistically significant (B = 0.24, SE = 0.10, 95% CI [0.072, 0.452]), and accounts for a full mediation. The percentage of explained variance of the model was 25% (R2 = .25).
Regarding the intensity of hentai pornography use, it was not a statistically significant predictor of sexually aggressive strategies (B = 0.04, SE = 0.13, 95% CI [−0.226, 0.298]). However, the intensity of hentai use was a predictor of rape myth endorsement (B = 3.51, SE = 1.73, 95% CI [0.114, 6.908]), which in turn successfully predicted sexually aggressive strategies (B = 0.04, SE = 0.003, 95% CI [0.031, 0.043]). An indirect effect was found between hentai pornography use and sexually aggressive strategies when inserting rape myths endorsement as a mediator (B = 0.13, SE = 0.08, 95% CI [0.004, 0.295]). The percentage of explained variance of the model was 23% (R2 = .23).

Women​

The frequency of hentai pornography use significantly predicted sexually aggressive behavior (B = 0.45; SE = 0.18, 95% CI [0.086, 0.809]). After controlling for rape myths endorsement, the direct effect of the frequency of hentai use on sexually aggressive behavior was no longer significant (B = 0.17, SE = 0.15, 95% CI [−0.127, 0.463]). The indirect effect, using rape myths endorsement as a mediator, was statistically significant (B = 0.28, SE = 0.18, 95% CI [0.004, 0.714]), and signified a full mediation. The percentage of explained variance of the model was 37% (R2 = .37).
The intensity of hentai pornography use was not a statistically significant predictor of sexually aggressive strategies (B = 0.07, SE = 0.14, 95% CI [−0.200, 0.347]) nor rape myth endorsement (B = 1.47, SE = 1.26, 95% CI [−1.011, 3.955]), which precludes a mediation relationship.
See Table 3 for the non-standardized regression coefficients, and lower and upper limits of the 95% CI, for the direct, indirect, and total effects, in male and female participants.
Table 3. Non-Standardized Regression Coefficients, and Lower and Upper Limits of the 95% CI for Male and Female Participants That Use Hentai Pornography.

Gender	B	SE B	95% CI
Male
Frequency
a	6.08	1.90	[2.349, 9.803]
b	0.04	0.003	[0.032, 0.045]
c′	0.17	0.15	[−0.127, 0.463]
c	0.40	0.15	[0.111, 0.699]
ab	0.24	0.05	[0.072, 0.452]
Intensity
a	3.51	1.73	[0.114, 6.908]
b	0.04	0.003	[0.032, 0.045]
c′	−0.09	0.12	[−0.325, 0.137]
c	0.04	0.13	[−0.226, 0.298]
ab	0.13	0.08	[0.005, 0.295]
Female
Frequency
a	4.26	1.66	[0.992, 7.524]
b	0.07	0.01	[0.055, 0.076]
c′	0.17	0.13	[−0.089, 0.428]
c	0.45	0.18	[0.086, 0.809]
ab	0.28	0.18	[0.004, 0.714]
Intensity
a	1.47	1.26	[−1.011, 3.955]
b	0.06	0.005	[0.055, 0.074]
c′	−0.02	0.11	[−0.244, 0.202]
c	0.07	0.14	[−0.199, 0.347]
ab	0.07	0.06	[−0.057, 0.292]

Note. a = direct effect hentai pornography use—rape myths endorsement; b = direct effect rape myths endorsement—sexually aggressive behavior; c′ = hentai pornography—use sexually aggressive behavior; c = total effect; ab = indirect effect/mediation model.

Human Pornography​

Bivariate correlations were conducted to establish associations between the frequency and intensity of human pornography use, belief in rape myths, and sexually aggressive behaviors. See Table 4 for the correlation results in male and female participants.
Table 4. Pearson Coefficient for Correlations Between Variables of Interest in Human Pornography.

Gender		Frequency	Intensity	SABS	ECVS
Male	Frequency	-	−.026	.047	.074
	Intensity	−.026	-	.015	.013
	SABS	.047	.015	-	.481**
	ECVS	.074	.013	.481**	-
Female	Frequency	-	.115**	.109**	.149**
	Intensity	.115**	-	.040	.011
	SABS	.109**	.040	-	.487**
	ECVS	.149*	.011	.487**	-

Note. ECVS = Scale of Beliefs About Sexual Violence; SABS = Sexually Aggressive Behaviors Scale.
*
Correlation is significant at the .05 level (two-tailed). **Correlation is significant at the .01 level (two-tailed).

Men​

No significant relationship was found between the frequency of human pornography use and sexually aggressive behavior (B = 0.15, SE = 0.12, 95% CI [−0.090, 0.399]), nor between the frequency of human pornography use and endorsement of rape myths (B = 3.14, SE = 1.62, 95% CI [−0.045, 6.327]), thus mediation was not possible.
Regarding the intensity of human pornography use, it didn’t predict the report of sexually aggressive strategies (B = 0.04, SE = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.171, 0.259]). Additionally, there wasn’t an indirect effect between human pornography use and sexually aggressive strategies when inserting rape myths endorsement as a mediator (B = 0.02, SE = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.080, 0.135]).

Women​

The frequency of human pornography use significantly predicted sexually aggressive behavior (B = 0.29; SE = 0.11, 95% CI [0.078, 0.499]). After controlling for rape myths endorsement, the direct effect of the frequency of human pornography use on sexually aggressive behavior was no longer significant (B = 0.09, SE = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.091, 0.280]). The indirect effect, using rape myths endorsement as a mediator, was statistically significant (B = 0.19, SE = 0.11, 95% CI [0.034, 0.445]), and signified full mediation. The percentage of explained variance of the model was 1.2% (R2 = .012).
The intensity of human pornography use was not a statistically significant predictor of sexually aggressive strategies (B = 0.09, SE = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.082, 0.256]). Additionally, the indirect effect was not statistically significant (B = 0.12, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [−0.064, 0.112]).
See Table 5 for the non-standardized regression coefficients, and lower and upper limits of the 95% CI, for the direct, indirect, and total effects, in male and female participants.
Table 5. Non-Standardized Regression Coefficients, and Lower and Upper Limits of the 95% CI for Male and Female Participants That Use Human Pornography.

Gender	B	SE B	95% CI
Male
Frequency
a	3.14	1.62	[−0.045, 6.327]
b	0.04	0.003	[0.032, 0.042]
c′	0.04	0.11	[−0.176, 0.252]
c	0.15	0.12	[−0.090, 0.399]
ab	0.12	0.06	[0.007, 0.258]
Intensity
a	0.51	1.44	[−2.314, 3.328]
b	0.04	0.003	[0.032, 0.042]
c′	0.03	0.10	[−0.163, 0.213]
c	0.04	0.11	[−0.171, 0.259]
ab	0.01	0.04	[−0.080, 0.135]
Female
Frequency
a	3.88	1.05	[1.813, 5.938]
b	0.05	0.004	[0.043, 0.057]
c′	0.09	0.09	[−0.091, 0.280]
c	0.29	0.11	[0.078, 0.499]
ab	0.19	0.11	[0.033, 0.445]
Intensity
a	0.23	0.85	[−1.433, 1.898]
b	0.05	0.004	[0.043, 0.057]
c′	0.08	0.07	[−0.072, 0.222]
c	0.09	0.09	[−0.082, 0.256]
ab	0.01	0.04	[−0.064, 0.112]

Note. a = direct effect human pornography use—rape myths endorsement; b = direct effect rape myths endorsement—sexually aggressive behavior; c′ = human pornography—use sexually aggressive behavior; c = total effect; ab = indirect effect/mediation model.

These 95% CIs make me think it's a pretty meh study because the pseudo-R^2 is .25/.37 which is good enough for social "sciences" but well, those CIs are brutal. Need more population to study.

That's a thing I'd like to see more research on. It makes sense, but I've always been a bit skeptical of how strong that effect is, as I've never experienced anything like that while consuming porn for half of my life at this point. The exact same tame stuff I always liked is what gets me going now with no problem as well.

But of course, I'm just a single individual, so nothing to judge group effects on.

Welp it's the opposite for me but generalizing onto the whole population is always finicky. I'm quitting porn tho.

As always thanks for sharing these studies, they're great to look at but at the same time most have methodological issues

 

[mrlunatic]

Can you name the movie?

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

I bet my inceldom it's mostly cross-sectional studies that can't establish causality who would guess sadists would like violent video games

Only skimmed it cuz I'm on a tight schedule sorry.

These 95% CIs make me think it's a pretty meh study because the pseudo-R^2 is .25/.37 which is good enough for social "sciences" but well, those CIs are brutal. Need more population to study.

As always thanks for sharing these studies, they're great to look at but at the same time most have methodological issues

Loving the fact that we got a guy who understands statistics to such an extent here. I only had a few semesters on it, and wouldn't have had the drive to do deep dives like that anyway.

Can you name the movie?

Vyšehrad: Fylm - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[tired as fuck]

Loving the fact that we got a guy who understands statistics to such an extent here

Thank you but I just learn as I go. Next semester I have a couple of statistics courses but they're in mathematics undergrad so it's just theory of measure not this social science stuff.

 

[nazianime]

Mean while 8YO are grabbing their playmates dick, teens send noods and 16yo date college guys. It’s all hypocrisy. Not saying AOC should be abolished but don’t think kids are innocent. There is a lot of kids being born dickhead bullies and underage whores.

 

[CosmicSerialKiller]

Yeah, it's pretty obviously a doll

Doll? What doll?

 

[diffusion]

a lot of lolicons think that fictional 14-16 year old girls are "hags" or "expired goods". I fear these people tbh.

Fearing lolicons who call 16yo drawings 'hags'? That's the most soy shit I've read here in a while

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

Doll? What doll?

The one at 0:08-0:10 in the video, since I doubt that they actually did that with the kid.

 

[CosmicSerialKiller]

The one at 0:08-0:10 in the video, since I doubt that they actually did that with the kid.

Ah, I see.

I assumed it was really the kid face deep in tits, lol. That's some clever film trickery indeed.

 

[yakov]

Meanwhile, a mainstream Czech movie from 2022:

View attachment 1750319

Yeah, it's pretty obviously a doll, but still, with how some people get worked up over loli drawings, and other literal drawings and cartoons of female characters who don't look like mannish old hags, the casualness with which a live-action scene like this was made and the seeming lack of controversy over it is hard not to notice. Something tells me it wouldn't be as welcomed if it were gender-flipped.

Cuties also had like half of Twitter seething and raging over it, but from the recaps I've seen of it, I'm really not sure whether that movie had anything like this in it.

I've never understood what psychology is behind it. Literally every time I see on Twitter or other socials news of type "male pupil got sexually exploited by his female teacher" then niggers in the comments say something like "it should've been me", "where were these teachers when I was younger" and when the roles are reversed the reaction is completely different.

 

[nazianime]

I've never understood what psychology is behind it. Literally every time I see on Twitter or other socials news of type "male pupil got sexually exploited by his female teacher" then niggers in the comments say something like "it should've been me", "where were these teachers when I was younger" and when the roles are reversed the reaction is completely different.

Normies know that men are disproportionately discriminated against. That’s what those comments are saying they wish they got pampered. What 13 year old boy does not want pussy and smoke some weed, a video game or console a phone.

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

I've never understood what psychology is behind it. Literally every time I see on Twitter or other socials news of type "male pupil got sexually exploited by his female teacher" then niggers in the comments say something like "it should've been me", "where were these teachers when I was younger" and when the roles are reversed the reaction is completely different.

Male and female sexuality are seen as completely different things + even young boys are seen as more powerful and agentic than adult women and low-key as the exploitative ones in control during those encounters.

The way heterosexual sex is seen, the woman is giving something precious up to an ugly creature, while the man is the ugly creature who takes something precious from the woman, and that applies even if the former is an adult and the latter a minor, and even when the latter is a minor in general.