D
Deleted member 43188
Guest
Many people here have proudly proclaimed that I am just another "Bluepilled Libtard" and no different from an SJW cuck. This is not entirely accurate. I'm actually a Reaganite Conservative and believe he was one of our greatest President. I disagree with him on policy but deeply respect him as a person, the fact that he wouldn't even take off his jacket in the oval office. He truly paid it the respect it deserved.
One thing I strongly disagree with Reagan is the shutting down of mental institutions because "muh spending" and "muh freedom". I totally agree we need balanced budgets, it's something I advocate for deeply, but I do not believe shutting down mental institutions is the way to go about doing this. I also strongly believe in freedom, but I do not believe that one has the freedom to be mentally ill and refuse treatment and help from society. By doing so you are a danger to yourself and others. I see so many people on the streets of NYC talking to themselves, screaming at walls, they are literally "crazy schizos". I sometimes call right-wing extremists "schizos" for some of their far-fetched ideas, but these are actual schizos.
I believe if someone is behavior is off, they should be examined by medical professionals, who, if a tribunal dictates, can be hauled off for compulsory treatment. This idea may sound authoritarian, and perhaps it is, but this was the norm throughout Western history. The freedom of the mentally ill to disrupt society did not offset the freedom of the mentally sound to enjoy their lives. These people truly corrupted the morale of their environment.
I also believe this is good for the mentally ill people. Imagine how many truly mentally ill incels would be saved if they were forced to speak to school counsellers, and those deemed too mentally abnormal were forced to undergo treatment. The treatment doesn't have to involve eletro-shocks like "One Flu Over the Cuckoo Nest", it could simply be mandatory socialization classes, talks with therapists, and ways to normalize them so they may one day have a chance of fitting in and "ascending".
The one danger to this idea is the threat of psychiatric tyranny. Medical elites could use their position of expertise to lock up political dissidents, much like what happened in the Soviet Union. However, I believe the threat of this is greatly overplayed. The Western Institutional structure generally has enough checks and balances and social mechanisms against biases to prevent that. Although our criminal justice system has systemic flaws, it generally works and has held firm for over 200 years. Perhaps a similar system within the psychiatric institutional community would fare well. I am not hear to argue the exact mechanisms for how we would go about implementing these policies, I am just agreeing with the ideas in essence.
What do you think? Are my ideas inherently anti-incel and bluepilled or would this craft a better world, both for normies and the incels we seek to help?
One thing I strongly disagree with Reagan is the shutting down of mental institutions because "muh spending" and "muh freedom". I totally agree we need balanced budgets, it's something I advocate for deeply, but I do not believe shutting down mental institutions is the way to go about doing this. I also strongly believe in freedom, but I do not believe that one has the freedom to be mentally ill and refuse treatment and help from society. By doing so you are a danger to yourself and others. I see so many people on the streets of NYC talking to themselves, screaming at walls, they are literally "crazy schizos". I sometimes call right-wing extremists "schizos" for some of their far-fetched ideas, but these are actual schizos.
I believe if someone is behavior is off, they should be examined by medical professionals, who, if a tribunal dictates, can be hauled off for compulsory treatment. This idea may sound authoritarian, and perhaps it is, but this was the norm throughout Western history. The freedom of the mentally ill to disrupt society did not offset the freedom of the mentally sound to enjoy their lives. These people truly corrupted the morale of their environment.
I also believe this is good for the mentally ill people. Imagine how many truly mentally ill incels would be saved if they were forced to speak to school counsellers, and those deemed too mentally abnormal were forced to undergo treatment. The treatment doesn't have to involve eletro-shocks like "One Flu Over the Cuckoo Nest", it could simply be mandatory socialization classes, talks with therapists, and ways to normalize them so they may one day have a chance of fitting in and "ascending".
The one danger to this idea is the threat of psychiatric tyranny. Medical elites could use their position of expertise to lock up political dissidents, much like what happened in the Soviet Union. However, I believe the threat of this is greatly overplayed. The Western Institutional structure generally has enough checks and balances and social mechanisms against biases to prevent that. Although our criminal justice system has systemic flaws, it generally works and has held firm for over 200 years. Perhaps a similar system within the psychiatric institutional community would fare well. I am not hear to argue the exact mechanisms for how we would go about implementing these policies, I am just agreeing with the ideas in essence.
What do you think? Are my ideas inherently anti-incel and bluepilled or would this craft a better world, both for normies and the incels we seek to help?