Yes but that isn't the function which Islam serves in my estimation. Rather, it provides a moral, theological and cosmological framework and edifice upon which the ideology of the Blackpill can be constructed. Furthermore, truly Muslim nations that fully embrace the Sharia (Nigeria, Pakistan, Afghanistan and parts of Iraq and Syria) mandate that women live in a state of bondage and be subjugated by men who will always have the prerogative to rape or beat them as it is the will of Allah. Islam is a conduit through which the constructive energies of all incels can pass and be harnessed to achieve something truly magnificent akin to the Caliphate where every soldier of Jihad was entitled to female sex slaves.
Here’s where my cynicism comes in - you are advocating for a postmodern larp.
Human beings fantasize because that’s what it means to be human. And religion is a finicky thing because it’s fundamentally a fantasy that is connected to one’s culture. A fantasy where one engages with deeply held beliefs and feelings personified as various beings and a sense of belonging to something greater, but a fantasy ultimately. An externalized projection of one’s self.
Ultimately, you can’t simply state your incel inspired version of Islam (which you know as well as I do, will never happen, every Arab that comes to the West becomes secularized or socially stagnant) will be the eternal interpretation of a culture even if you did prevail, because just as feelings change, cultures change. Even with an imposing religious authority, cultures ebb and flow with that religious authority.
Your version of Islam will not last.
Look at Singapore. Dubai. Fucking Mecca. Iran in the 70s. Turkey. All of these countries have an Islamic cultural heritage and all view Islam as a part of their identity, but all of them are very Westernized - more Western than America in some regards. What makes their interpretation of Islam more valid than yours?
Even when you are given doctrine that doesn’t contradict itself (spoilers: Islam does, good look telling me how non-Muslim Abrahamics should be treated), the fact of the matter is our own psychology and needs will bend that doctrine and render it something that isn’t consistently true over long periods of time.
I mean fuck dude, compare Catholicism in the 1200s to Catholicism in the Renaissance. It’s like apples and oranges. Women were free to show off their bodies and take off their head coverings in ways never before seen. People painted and sculpted Jesus and the Saints naked. People painted Mary as an innocent princess and Mother. There are was movement and the beauty of the human body expressed as divine.
Meanwhile 1200s Catholicism was like being burned at the stake for daring to depict Mary without a veil.
Who’s to say your version of Islam won’t do the same?