Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill "Shitty Personality" Is A Byproduct Of Bad Genetics/Looks

  • Thread starter GlitterSunThaumiel
  • Start date
GlitterSunThaumiel

GlitterSunThaumiel

Greycel
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Posts
59
Your physical apperance - which is a absolute indicator of the quality of your genes - determines the degree of attention and company that you receive in the span of your life - afteral, most people only care about the beautiful ones, specially when you're young. Therefore, it's safe to say that, thanks to this lack of social contact due to the uninterest people have on your weak genes/looks, you're going to grow up to suffer from a serious deficit of social plasticity and fluency - in turn giving you "psychological disorders." The neurological fabric of your's would be damaged to a level in which it would be impossible to even perform normal, every-day interpersonal interactions, dooming you to a lifetime of loneliness and depression. All while the general population of this rotten wolrd blames it on your "shitty personality."
 
Yeah bro bad personality is caused by bad looks. Also confidence is 50% genetic, with life being based on how you look, that makes confidence 100% genetic.
 
Natural selection will get rid of us
 
What do you mean by absolute indicator of the quality your genes, and what even constitutes "genetic quality"? Is an 85 IQ Chad by default superior to a 130 IQ manlet? Why? Because vapid holes that can't make a rational decision to save their lives deem him more desirable and pleasant to look at? That seems rather arbitrary in my opinion
 
normies are retards that expect you to re-invent yourself and restart from scratch 100 times if necessary, good luck with that... when there's nothin g positive in your life to give you the strength in the first place, nor can you see it in the future without creating false hopes which lead to terrible crashes in mood when they turn out to be false LOL.
best of luck!!!!!!! t. normies
 
My personality is Norwood 3
 
What do you mean by absolute indicator of the quality your genes, and what even constitutes "genetic quality"? Is an 85 IQ Chad by default superior to a 130 IQ manlet? Why? Because vapid holes that can't make a rational decision to save their lives deem him more desirable and pleasant to look at? That seems rather arbitrary in my opinion
Too bad that low IQ retard gets to fuck and nut in a foids orifice meanwhile we rot and die alone. I pray an asteroid destroys this planet
 
normies are retards that expect you to re-invent yourself and restart from scratch 100 times if necessary, good luck with that... when there's nothin g positive in your life to give you the strength in the first place, nor can you see it in the future without creating false hopes which lead to terrible crashes in mood when they turn out to be false LOL.
best of luck!!!!!!! t. normies
Taking chad is actually rational when you think about it. Their offspring is more likely to reproduce.
 
Too bad that low IQ retard gets to fuck and nut in a foids orifice meanwhile we rot and die alone. I pray an asteroid destroys this planet
I don't consider myself a smart guy or of great genetic quality. I'm just curious as to what OP's reasoning is.
 
Yeah bro bad personality is caused by bad looks. Also confidence is 50% genetic, with life being based on how you look, that makes confidence 100% genetic.
 
What do you mean by absolute indicator of the quality your genes, and what even constitutes "genetic quality"? Is an 85 IQ Chad by default superior to a 130 IQ manlet? Why? Because vapid holes that can't make a rational decision to save their lives deem him more desirable and pleasant to look at? That seems rather arbitrary in my opinion
85 IQ Chad only exists in movie Idiocracy, IRL Chad is 110+ IQ.
 
I don't consider myself a smart guy or of great genetic quality. I'm just curious as to what OP's reasoning is.
Basically the negative reactions you get from your ugly looks causes your personality and social skills to rot
 
85 IQ Chad only exists in movie Idiocracy, IRL Chad is 110+ IQ.
cope. Just like there're smart incels, there're dumb chads. It's not as absolute as you make it out to be
 
Bu but you just gotta leave it behind. It’s probably your negative vibe that made people bully you. Ask yourself, would you like to be friends with Elliot Rodger. No, he has this toxic, angry vibe.

You need to take responsibility for your actions and admit that 100% of everything is your fault. Not women, not society.
 
Bu but you just gotta leave it behind. It’s probably your negative vibe that made people bully you. Ask yourself, would you like to be friends with Elliot Rodger. No, he has this toxic, angry vibe.

You need to take responsibility for your actions and admit that 100% of everything is your fault. Not women, not society.
Username checks out lol
 
cope. Just like there're smart incels, there're dumb chads. It's not as absolute as you make it out to be
Well, if you see civilization as what it is - a tumor of complexity filled up with surrogate technology that only enslaves people - you can pretty much conclude that the kind of "intelligence" most people praise here is useless at best and dangerous at worse. BTW, IQ has been proven time and time again to be fake in many regards.
Chad has the truer type of smarts - the ones that really can be classified as "genetic quality", since genes are just biological information passed by generation to generation, which makes anything unable to reproduce basically a genetic tumor - he can pass his genes.
 
Strong 51st post.
 
Well, if you see civilization as what it is - a tumor of complexity filled up with surrogate technology that only enslaves people - you can pretty much conclude that the kind of "intelligence" most people praise here is useless at best and dangerous at worse. BTW, IQ has been proven time and time again to be fake in many regards.
Chad has the truer type of smarts - the ones that really can be classified as "genetic quality", since genes are just biological information passed by generation to generation, which makes anything unable to reproduce basically a genetic tumor - he can pass his genes.
nonsense. You can't redefine a well established term to mean something different than its agreed upon definition and then say 'See? Chad is per definition smart'. It doesn't work like that. If you want to suggest an intelligence measurement that's verifiably more accurate than IQ, go ahead. The only thing you've given me thus far is meaningless drivel
 
nonsense. You can't redefine a well established term to mean something different than its agreed upon definition and then say 'See? Chad is per definition smart'. It doesn't work like that. If you want to suggest an intelligence measurement that's verifiably more accurate than IQ, go ahead. The only thing you've given me thus far is meaningless drivel
I'm not redefining anything. IQ has little academic relevance, as we know of it today. My argument still stands, civilization is a fallacious positivism based on sophistry, and that what you call "intelligence" is nothing but an instrument to cohersion. We've existed years upon years without having to take Xanax, but now, thanks to comprehensive designers shoving propaganda and neurosis onto this world, antidepressants are rampant.

You are telling me that someone able to act on his biological objective isn't smarter than someone that simply perpetuates a circle of misery driven by his own totalitarism? What kind of intelligence are you even refering to? Being able to identify shapes and mathemathical symbols in a above average rate, just to build more industrial waste in the future while wageslaving? Is that it?
 
I'm not redefining anything. IQ has little academic relevance, as we know of it today. My argument still stands, civilization is a fallacious positivism based on sophistry, and that what you call "intelligence" is nothing but an instrument to cohersion. We've existed years upon years without having to take Xanax, but now, thanks to comprehensive designers shoving propaganda and neurosis onto this world, antidepressants are rampant.

You are telling me that someone able to act on his biological objective isn't smarter than someone that simply perpetuates a circle of misery driven by his own totalitarism? What kind of intelligence are you even refering to? Being able to identify shapes and mathemathical symbols in a above average rate, just to build more industrial waste in the future while wageslaving? Is that it?
by that logic cancer cells are the most intelligent beings in the universe given their reproductive efficiency and "ability to act on their biological objective".
 
by that logic cancer cells are the most intelligent beings in the universe given their reproductive efficiency and "ability to act on their biological objective".
Not the most eficcient in the univese, though. I bet there are other lifeforms better fit for the task ou there. The thing is, the cancer cells are actually a more dignified "species" than humans are, if you think about it, exactly due to their "ability to act on their biological objective." You replied to me sarcastically, but you don't know how right you are.

They don't spend almost all their lives slaving away in meaningless jobs, they don't waste the little free time they have argueing with each other, they only follow nature. Without nerosis nor the need for Xanax. That's how we should be like.

I mean, cancer is bad by who's point of view anyway? The humans? Why consider humans better than cancer?
 
Not the most eficcient in the univese, though. I bet there are other lifeforms better fit for the task ou there. The thing is, the cancer cells are actually a more dignified "species" than humans are, if you think about it, exactly due to their "ability to act on their biological objective." You replied to me sarcastically, but you don't know how right you are.

They don't spend almost all their lives slaving away in meaningless jobs, they don't waste the little free time they have argueing with each other, they only follow nature. Without nerosis nor the need for Xanax. That's how we should be like.

I mean, cancer is bad by who's point of view anyway? The humans? Why consider humans better than cancer?
Words have meaning to the extent that they have an agreed upon definition by others. By "intelligence" what we really mean is the set of abilities that require lots of interconnected neurons in the brain to perform well in. That is the definition shared by 99.9% of all humans
 
It's hard to develop social skills when you're automatically shunned based on looks/height/physical disability, which means you aren't even getting the opportunities to PRACTICE those skills.
 
Become ugly

Have negative social experiences where you are bullied ostracized or ridiculed for your face

start avoiding people

social skills detoriarate

bitterness anger and hatred develops

everyone seems hostile and cold

You develop depression

Go see a psychologist

normie psychologist gives you tips to think more positively and improve your confidence along with (((antidepressants)))

Start interacting with people again (x100)

Have negative social experiences (x100)

The cycle continues
 
I don't consider myself a smart guy or of great genetic quality. I'm just curious as to what OP's reasoning is.
Based on your spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and sentiments, you're pretty smart.
 
Fuck personality it is just a meme. what matter is looks.
 
Yeah bro bad personality is caused by bad looks. Also confidence is 50% genetic, with life being based on how you look, that makes confidence 100% genetic.
 
Words have meaning to the extent that they have an agreed upon definition by others. By "intelligence" what we really mean is the set of abilities that require lots of interconnected neurons in the brain to perform well in. That is the definition shared by 99.9% of all humans
Oh, so you're still clinging to the semantics? OK, by my definition, a pussy-slayer Chad is smarter than a conformed incel. By the general definition, they have the 50-50 chance to be intelligent. Happy now? The general consensus can be deceiving, though, that's the point. What's good to have a "set of abilities that require lots of interconnected neurons in the brain to perform well in" if you are only slaving to a broken system and being shoved aside like biological waste? Complexity breeds pain - humans shoudn't be living like this, althougt they can, to an extent. You're operating under the assumption that this state of civilization - and "progress" - is desirable to navigate in, when it is actually the testament to how submission is the norm.

Those incels with college majors making above average income while wageslaving over-half their lives in a activity they don't enjoy are considerated good role models within the comunity, but they as "sophistcated" and as "intelligent" as they are stagnated lobotomites. What people call IQ is, in reality, the measurement of how susceptible to this modern stockholm syndrome one is.
 
i think this looks genes is a gigacope, ricecels are ugly af, but they have ultra high iq, meanwhile swedish are handsome, but a bunch of stupid ass cucks
 
Water is wet. People have a higher opinion of you if you're better-looking. The halo effect is real.

That would explain why confident ugly guys are usually low IQ as well. When you can't see the patterns and behaviors of people towards you you can shape your self-image whichever way you want. Blissful ignorance.
 
This is common knowledge at this point.
 
I don't completely agree.I went trough all the things you mentioned,but I used It to learn how to communicate by observing others and how to push people into doing what I want as for ego,it's easy to self inflate It.
 
I don't completely agree.I went trough all the things you mentioned,but I used It to learn how to communicate by observing others and how to push people into doing what I want as for ego,it's easy to self inflate It.
this but less sociopath-esque
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
11
Views
259
Friezacel
Friezacel
Nordicel94
Replies
8
Views
316
Nordicel94
Nordicel94
Shinichi
Replies
6
Views
270
Vesuvius Pumpkin
Vesuvius Pumpkin
Third Eye
Replies
27
Views
786
sexualeconomist
sexualeconomist

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top