@mlcurrycel see, one of your devotees is already chickening out ...
B
You're assuming that I'm referring to communism when I say that the misuse/misunderstanding of an idea is not a point of criticism against the strength of its merits.
I'm not. I'm speaking generally. It's well understood from history that communism (in all of its forms) is a failure, no matter how it's implemented or the nobility of the intentions behind it. Human nature is inherently counter to its precepts, and this is the philosophy's ultimate failing.
Last edited:
Im not the one, but you do you
No, I know what you meant.
What I am saying is that the kind of truthist gnostic scientism you support is the underlying cause of Marxism, and has always been.
Pardon?
Communecel is not yours reddit account?
Stop fighting over nonsense, that's pardon to you. I'm outta here
B
I got that the first time. I didn't address it, because you didn't substantiate the claim and argue for it.
@mlcurrycel: chickening out, like I said ...
I abundantly have in the past ...
Yeah, yeah
Don't fight over nonsense, you too
Don't you know that if a man wants to defend his ideology - he will defend it to the last
I literally founded the subreddit MarxismRodgerism back when Braincels was unbanned
Mods shouldn't pin this thread because OP is biased. They could choose to have a mod created post instead.
Assortative Mating proves genetic and material wealth is intertwined. Ugly rich men impregnate Stacey's and have kids. The best looking kid generally succeeds and has lots of kids and makes lots of money. Tall men get paid more, attractive people get paid more.
Trotsky literally worked with the FBI
Uh huh, and every incel who says mashallah is a devout Muslim and every incel who says damn or thank God is a devout Christian, am I right?
Bro, this is an internet forum for genetic failures, not the United Nations
No, sorry. My accounts were novemberkorea and mlcurrycel. I signed up to novemberkorea with my personal email so the Feds know who I am.
No
Fuck Marxism, Socialism and Collectivism
Fuck Marxism, Socialism and Collectivism
You're telling me you DON'T want a virgin wife assigned to you by the state?
I have my own idea on how to end inceldom. Doesn't involve the state
State mandated girlfriends will never work
My ears are open. What's better? Why won't Marxism Rodgerism work?
get rid of marxism first and we're good.
Maybe I'll make a thread about it
How is the state supposed to assign the fitting partner to millions of man? How is this supposed to function?
This vote shouldn't count because it wasn't created by a mod
@tankcel @ordinaryotaku @MarquisDeSade @Pajeetsingh @LeFrenchCel @Suicel @IronsideCel @Rotter
@Pandaemonium
@tankcel @ordinaryotaku @MarquisDeSade @Pajeetsingh @LeFrenchCel @Suicel @IronsideCel @Rotter
@Pandaemonium
How will the goverment socialise the means of REproduction (pussy)?
I've created many threads, floating ideas and asking for feedback and criticism. Some possibilities are:
- A Blackpill department objectively rating looks and assigning people by looksmatch
- Psychometric analysis and tests to determine personality traits and compatibility
- Genetic tests to screen for recessive genes that may cause deformities
- Etc etc
Still, the logistic and bureaucratic effort will be enormous. And it's still impossible to match such masses of people. And the state wouldn't be able to measure psychiatric compatiblity via psychometric analysis. It would be very superficial.
Then ask for it to be pinned
See how you are dividing the community?
Could've atleast added a basic definition
And the definition shouldn't come from somebody against it. Thread should not be created by either a supporter or opponent.
I proposed an idea. You literally opened a public poll and pestered lurkers to vote. YOU'RE dividing the community.
Nigga, the NSA literally has profiles on all of us. The CIA created their own copy of the NSA and did the same. Facebook and Google have the names and traits of everyone on the planet.
Partnering people is easy compared to internet personalised advertising.
The system doesn't have to be perfect, just better than the current system which is the definition of superficial.
Don't be a debby downer pessimist. Don't be an optomist. Just be realistic.
Could you include a pro-MR thread (one that includes a definition) in the OP and then I will add my reply to it
The results are telling
>googles the term
>first two results are from incels.is
>first two results are from incels.is
No surprise here. MR is a homegrown .is thing>googles the term
>first two results are from incels.is
B
I haven't seen you make those arguments here, tbh.
That's not what this is. He's making a claim (proposition) that a particular philosophy ("gnostic scientism," yet to be clearly defined), which I don't hold since I don't even know what he means exactly, is directly responsible for the Marxist philosophy.
There are a great deal of missing steps in there, some of which I think are going to be quite imaginative.
ComuneCel was OG /r/incels and Beta Revolution is even older from /r9k/
Still, don't fight over nonsense)
No surprise here. MR is a homegrown .is thing>googles the term
>first two results are from incels.is
@Pajeetsingh Back me up
Yeah still no clue what it even means
B
We're not fighting, we're having a discussion. JFL
Good luck to you, friend
Ok, let's go then.
You hold that man can have "knowlege", in the sense that we can "know the truth". I assume here you hold the classic "Justified true belief" (JTB) definition of knowledge (this is what I mean by "truthist gnostic scientism").
What I claim is that this implies the false hope that humanity can control its own destiny through knowledge and, by extension that individuals can control their destiny through knowledge as well. I personally hold the view that the only thing accessible to humans (or to any other living things) are beliefs of varying degrees of credibility. Hard science theories are beliefs of very high reliability and yet they are still only beliefs because they can be revised at any moment and discarded in favor of a better theory.
Holding the false hope that we can control our own destiny through knowledge leads directly, in my view, to the core Marxist idea that the State can beneficially control mankind's destiny.
Ask @mlcurrycel then, so that he can provide a definition
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
