Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment POLL: Who supports Marxism-Rodgerism?

Do you support Marxism-Rodgerism

  • Yes

  • No

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
You are missing something here.

What you are saying here is just as much a refusal to see evidence as those Marxists who say that Pol Pot, Stalin and Mao were "mistakes in the implementation of Socialism" and that the ideology is therefore still valid.
You're assuming that I'm referring to communism when I say that the misuse/misunderstanding of an idea is not a point of criticism against the strength of its merits.

I'm not. I'm speaking generally. It's well understood from history that communism (in all of its forms) is a failure, no matter how it's implemented or the nobility of the intentions behind it. Human nature is inherently counter to its precepts, and this is the philosophy's ultimate failing.
 
Last edited:
You're assuming that I'm referring to communism when I say that the misuse/misunderstanding of an idea is not a point of criticism against it.
No, I know what you meant.

What I am saying is that the kind of truthist gnostic scientism you support is the underlying cause of Marxism, and has always been.
 
What I am saying is that the kind of truthist gnostic scientism you support is the underlying cause of Marxism, and has always been.
I got that the first time. I didn't address it, because you didn't substantiate the claim and argue for it.
 
I got that the first time. I didn't address it, because you didn't substantiate the claim and argue for it.
Don't fight over nonsense, you too

Don't you know that if a man wants to defend his ideology - he will defend it to the last
 
Mods shouldn't pin this thread because OP is biased. They could choose to have a mod created post instead.
 
Marxism-Rodgerism unironically makes more sense than Classical Marxism. Had Marx not been so obsessed with class and saw that the true embodiment of capital is genetic wealth not monetary wealth the world would be much better off.
Assortative Mating proves genetic and material wealth is intertwined. Ugly rich men impregnate Stacey's and have kids. The best looking kid generally succeeds and has lots of kids and makes lots of money. Tall men get paid more, attractive people get paid more.
 
If you are the reincarnation of Stalin, it means you are going to kill everyone who supported you when you gain power.

Clear enough?
Trotsky literally worked with the FBI
 
So you are a religious cult now?

Not surprising, really. Marxists of every description always were
Uh huh, and every incel who says mashallah is a devout Muslim and every incel who says damn or thank God is a devout Christian, am I right?
 
Communecel is not yours reddit account?
No, sorry. My accounts were novemberkorea and mlcurrycel. I signed up to novemberkorea with my personal email so the Feds know who I am.
 
No
Fuck Marxism, Socialism and Collectivism
 
You're telling me you DON'T want a virgin wife assigned to you by the state?
I have my own idea on how to end inceldom. Doesn't involve the state

State mandated girlfriends will never work
 
I have my own idea on how to end inceldom. Doesn't involve the state

State mandated girlfriends will never work
My ears are open. What's better? Why won't Marxism Rodgerism work?
 
get rid of marxism first and we're good.
 
This vote shouldn't count because it wasn't created by a mod

@tankcel @ordinaryotaku @MarquisDeSade @Pajeetsingh @LeFrenchCel @Suicel @IronsideCel @Rotter
@Pandaemonium
 
Maybe I'll make a thread about it

How is the state supposed to assign the fitting partner to millions of man? How is this supposed to function?
I've created many threads, floating ideas and asking for feedback and criticism. Some possibilities are:
  1. A Blackpill department objectively rating looks and assigning people by looksmatch
  2. Psychometric analysis and tests to determine personality traits and compatibility
  3. Genetic tests to screen for recessive genes that may cause deformities
  4. Etc etc
There's lots of possibilities and we can choose one, none, or all of them.
 
I've created many threads, floating ideas and asking for feedback and criticism. Some possibilities are:
  1. A Blackpill department objectively rating looks and assigning people by looksmatch
  2. Psychometric analysis and tests to determine personality traits and compatibility
  3. Genetic tests to screen for recessive genes that may cause deformities
  4. Etc etc
There's lots of possibilities and we can choose one, none, or all of them.
Still, the logistic and bureaucratic effort will be enormous. And it's still impossible to match such masses of people. And the state wouldn't be able to measure psychiatric compatiblity via psychometric analysis. It would be very superficial.
 
This vote shouldn't count because it wasn't created by a mod

@tankcel @ordinaryotaku @MarquisDeSade @Pajeetsingh @LeFrenchCel @Suicel @IronsideCel @Rotter
@Pandaemonium
Then ask for it to be pinned
 
This vote shouldn't count because it wasn't created by a mod

@tankcel @ordinaryotaku @MarquisDeSade @Pajeetsingh @LeFrenchCel @Suicel @IronsideCel @Rotter
@Pandaemonium
See how you are dividing the community?
 
@Caesercel @TheProphetMuscle

Please pin. This is enough of a hot topic right now to deserve it
Could've atleast added a basic definition
 
Could've atleast added a basic definition
And the definition shouldn't come from somebody against it. Thread should not be created by either a supporter or opponent.
 
See how you are dividing the community?
I proposed an idea. You literally opened a public poll and pestered lurkers to vote. YOU'RE dividing the community.
 
Still, the logistic and bureaucratic effort will be enormous. And it's still impossible to match such masses of people. And the state wouldn't be able to measure psychiatric compatiblity via psychometric analysis. It would be very superficial.
Nigga, the NSA literally has profiles on all of us. The CIA created their own copy of the NSA and did the same. Facebook and Google have the names and traits of everyone on the planet.

Partnering people is easy compared to internet personalised advertising.

The system doesn't have to be perfect, just better than the current system which is the definition of superficial.

Don't be a debby downer pessimist. Don't be an optomist. Just be realistic.
 
Could've atleast added a basic definition
Could you include a pro-MR thread (one that includes a definition) in the OP and then I will add my reply to it
 
>googles the term
>first two results are from incels.is

:feelsseriously::feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
 
I abundantly have in the past ...
I haven't seen you make those arguments here, tbh.

Don't fight over nonsense, you too

Don't you know that if a man wants to defend his ideology - he will defend it to the last
That's not what this is. He's making a claim (proposition) that a particular philosophy ("gnostic scientism," yet to be clearly defined), which I don't hold since I don't even know what he means exactly, is directly responsible for the Marxist philosophy.

There are a great deal of missing steps in there, some of which I think are going to be quite imaginative.
 
I haven't seen you make those arguments here, tbh.


That's not what this is. He's making a claim (proposition) that a particular philosophy ("gnostic scientism," yet to be clearly defined), which I don't hold since I don't even know what he means exactly, is directly responsible for the Marxist philosophy.

There are a great deal of missing steps in there, some of which I think are going to be quite imaginative.
Still, don't fight over nonsense)
 
@Pajeetsingh Back me up
 
I haven't seen you make those arguments here, tbh.
Ok, let's go then.

You hold that man can have "knowlege", in the sense that we can "know the truth". I assume here you hold the classic "Justified true belief" (JTB) definition of knowledge (this is what I mean by "truthist gnostic scientism").

What I claim is that this implies the false hope that humanity can control its own destiny through knowledge and, by extension that individuals can control their destiny through knowledge as well. I personally hold the view that the only thing accessible to humans (or to any other living things) are beliefs of varying degrees of credibility. Hard science theories are beliefs of very high reliability and yet they are still only beliefs because they can be revised at any moment and discarded in favor of a better theory.

Holding the false hope that we can control our own destiny through knowledge leads directly, in my view, to the core Marxist idea that the State can beneficially control mankind's destiny.
 

Similar threads

comradespiderman29
Replies
20
Views
225
Vlarke
Vlarke
comradespiderman29
  • Poll
Replies
19
Views
339
wastedcodeine
wastedcodeine
turbosperg
Replies
2
Views
478
IronsideCel
IronsideCel
Gorogorogoro-chan
Replies
26
Views
457
TheCatMan
TheCatMan
proudweeb
Replies
112
Views
4K
RegularManlet
RegularManlet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top