my opinion is 2+2=4
It's Over poll: if u ascend, will u use this forum like before without letting the cat out of the bag?
theres no mention of ugliness or non ntness either in "involuntarily" nor in "celibacy"
nigga i gotta sleep
ok
I won't ascend so I guess no
@Regressive
in the space of two replies, you went from claiming the definition proved you right, saying 'I am right because the definition proves I am right' to saying it doesn't matter that it proves you wrong. One reply, claimed it proved you right. The very next reply claimed 'yeah it doesn't but I am still right'
You claimed it proves you right, saw it didn't, then coped around it
The definition proves you wrong
And yet you tried to recover from this argument by saying 'i am right because i have my own definition only 1-2, very sparse users, agree with. Here's an anecdote. A user who agrees. See? It's not cope!'
Anecdote logic is what lookism deniers use against the blackpill. Because it's slimy, and delusional, and lets them think they aren't wrong
The thing I alleged was that you've repeatedly ignored reality and had been completely irrational in order to be right
You defended it by saying 'I am right by the definition'
Then you were shown actually, the definition proves you wrong
And in the NEXT REPLY in the space of TWO REPLIES, you flip, and say 'it does not matter that the definition proves me wrong, I still disagree'
THINK ABOUT IT
That is such an unbelievably biased and egotistical cope
It affirms what I said that no matter how wrong you are, you cannot accept it. You were 100% completely fucking wrong, over the course of two replies, and yet you do not think you were wrong. This shows even if you ARE wrong, you cannot believe it tell you are wrong.
If you read this, you are absolutely 100% going to do something slimy and shitty to get around being rational. Like I alleged. Like you not only failed to disprove, you could not even think of a reason why it was not accurate. Because you are irrational.
THINK ABOUT THIS
IT'S BIASED AS FUCK
in the space of two replies, you went from claiming the definition proved you right, saying 'I am right because the definition proves I am right' to saying it doesn't matter that it proves you wrong. One reply, claimed it proved you right. The very next reply claimed 'yeah it doesn't but I am still right'
You claimed it proves you right, saw it didn't, then coped around it
The definition proves you wrong
And yet you tried to recover from this argument by saying 'i am right because i have my own definition only 1-2, very sparse users, agree with. Here's an anecdote. A user who agrees. See? It's not cope!'
Anecdote logic is what lookism deniers use against the blackpill. Because it's slimy, and delusional, and lets them think they aren't wrong
The thing I alleged was that you've repeatedly ignored reality and had been completely irrational in order to be right
You defended it by saying 'I am right by the definition'
Then you were shown actually, the definition proves you wrong
And in the NEXT REPLY in the space of TWO REPLIES, you flip, and say 'it does not matter that the definition proves me wrong, I still disagree'
THINK ABOUT IT
That is such an unbelievably biased and egotistical cope
It affirms what I said that no matter how wrong you are, you cannot accept it. You were 100% completely fucking wrong, over the course of two replies, and yet you do not think you were wrong. This shows even if you ARE wrong, you cannot believe it tell you are wrong.
If you read this, you are absolutely 100% going to do something slimy and shitty to get around being rational. Like I alleged. Like you not only failed to disprove, you could not even think of a reason why it was not accurate. Because you are irrational.
THINK ABOUT THIS
IT'S BIASED AS FUCK
Last edited:
I always had the bare definition of inceldom in my mind throughout the argument
Not the sites definition
Sites fefinition is wrong imo
Bare definition is right since its without additional interpretations like inclusion of ugliness
Bare definition is right since its without additional interpretations like inclusion of ugliness
way to cut the entirety of my allegation that in the space of two replies you went back on your claim, and instead replied to a tiny part
go to sleep you retard stop desperately trying to save yourself the fate of having to think you were wrong here
you alleged the definition proved you right
i shared that the definition 99% of us believe proves you wrong
and the 1% is you, making up a definition that suits you
that is COPE
you alleged the definition proved you right
i shared that the definition 99% of us believe proves you wrong and suddenly it no longer is about if the definition proves you wrong, but about disagreeing WITH the definition.
the 1% is you, making up a definition that suits you. Making up your OWN definition. Like saying ' I am an umbrella, because my definition of umbrella is that umbrella = human being'. Okay? Is that not clearly a strategy to never be wrong even if you are saying something like 2+2=5? You cannot just make up a new definition to not be wrong.
what pisses me off the most is that you did all of it to avoid the claim that you were being irrational
what do you do? 'yeah bu bu... i am right anyway'.
so even if you are alright to go by your definition
you never had to reply to the idea you had previously acted irrationally
And you did it again, for the same reason; to not be wrong
infact what pisses me off the most is that you cut it out of a reply, that had you not cut down but faced in full, without a shadow of a doubt, proved you were being irrational. You did not face this. You just found a way to cope
How can you possibly read this ^ and not think 'wow, i'm just really fucking biased aren't i'.
It's insane.
Last edited:
I have no clue if your issue is that you DID read and process it proved you wrong, then hid the fact you know you were wrong, and just live with the reality that you were lying, or if you are so biased, you did not even process that you are wrong, but somehow believed the accusation you had acted irrationally was unfounded, yet chose to never address it. Maybe you are such a coper, if you refuse to address the allegation, to you it seems like it isn't true. If it was the first, I hate you and think that logic is for utter copers. If it was the first, you're completely irrational and should have 0 faith in any of your opinions
imagine reading this and outright ignoring it
that is such extreme degrees of bias. You read something that you think is probably true, but you don't like it, so you just IGNORE it
how is THIS a rational reply to it
it's just ignoring it
my primary allegation is that if you are wrong, you do not face it
Here you are seeing you are wrong and not facing it
AND not facing that you are not facing it
it's so fucking biased. You just ignored the message because you knew it was true and said something else. No matter how wrong you are, you do not think you were wrong. If it involves literally pretending you did not read a message, and that is the only thing you can do to not be wrong, that is what you do.
it proves me right when I say you could argue that 2+2=5 and nobody on earth could prove to you the answer is 4
Last edited:
This is exactly what happened to @Llama word by word
If i disappear i either ascended, roped or got locked in an institution
cant imagine how I could ascend
good riddance
What’s the full story that’s brutal
Llama asked me to inform you all you were right as he got cheated on.
Brutal. :feelswhat: https://incels.is/threads/goodbye-is-i-have-escaped.444886/ Not very long after ascending with the skank either from the sounds of things. :feelsUgh: Anyway the dude talks to me at times on Shitscord so if he feels up to providing even more juicy drama details of exactly...
incels.is
Self-improvement. I self-improved so much I was 20x better than before and started thinking and believing I'm the God himself 3 years ago when I was doing good. This lead to delusions, delusions stayed with me, one stupid day I stared at the sun to feel powerful. Made me powerless, fucking sun.
Nah man, because my central acuity is so low
I’ll never ascend, so this poll doesn’t mean much to me
even if some sub5 get extremely lucky and finds woman he will be cheated on very fast and discarded
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
