Has anyone here ever encountered an argument against the blackpill which isn’t anecdotal (above) or an obfuscatory platitude (personality)? Genuine question as I have not seen any, simple data tells you racial dating statistics, statistics on matches using certain faces, social papers exploring the degree of testosterone’s effect on facial attractiveness, etc. This is not because the blackpill uses a priori reasoning, it’s because the data defines the blackpill.
where else could such unabashed idiocy be found, and of course subjective and deliberately vacuous language is used by them
