Currycel spreading the blackpill
View: https://old.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1fis7ez/its_not_your_fault_if_youre_a_single_man/ :smonk:
incels.is
I found this Reddit post in above thread. I’ve re-posted Reddit OP in this thread as backup since it will inevitably be nuked by bluepilled Reddit mods:
A Review of Reddit OP
As you already know, “normies” do not like statistical data; they have a strong preference for anecdotal evidence, and their anecdotes usually do not correlate with statistical data. They prefer to live in their own romantic fantasies and will cope to horrendously extreme lengths to rationalize their own worldview, even when there is little to no scientific / statistical data to support their own view. Reddit OP has recognized the harshness of the reality of lookism in human society. It is possibly convenient for his future endeavours that he has recognized the
at a young age. It may serve as a reliable guide to decisions that he will make in future if he becomes olderThe aggregate of published research on attitudes towards height and facial attractiveness indicate that looks matter more than all else in human society. This is data. This is not opinion or anecdotes, like Redditors often seem to use as their main type of counter-argument. I’m convinced that people who deny it are either out of touch with human reality, or they are in touch, but they deliberately gaslight others who question the bluepill. I’m not sure what world Redditors live in, but I’m pretty sure it’s not the “real world”. I think even normies & bluepillers who don’t use Reddit are less delusional than normies & bluepillers on Reddit
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZ/comments/1fis7ez/comment/lnjbwxv/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
The first reply to Reddit OP is meaningless. “They’re just studies, not the real world”. This is a prime example what I mean when I say that normies and bluepillers (like this one) reject statistical facts and dismiss it as some kind of insignificant factor in relation to the subject. This quote alone should serve as sufficient evidence to any logical thinker that the first reply to Reddit OP is beyond reason. I’ll spell it out in all caps to make it clear why the first reply to Reddit OP is meaningless. STATISTICAL DATA REFLECTS "THE REAL WORLD" (when no reporting bias is involved); STATISTICAL DATA IS PRETTY MUCH A PRIME INDICATOR TO THE CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS IN "THE REAL WORLD". If Redditors took the time out to do a 30-second search on the kind of males who commit femicides or sexual assaults on women, they would quickly discover that THE VAST MAJORITY OF MALES WHO MURDER OR SEXUALLY ASSAULT WOMEN, HAVE A SEXUAL / ROMANTIC HISTORY WITH WOMEN
Statistically this can only mean IN THE PRESENT STATE OF AFFAIRS, MALES WHO HAVE A SEXUAL / ROMANTIC HISTORY WITH WOMEN, POSE A GREATER THREAT TO THE HEALTH AND SAFTEY OF WOMEN, THAN MALES WHO DON’T HAVE A SEXUAL / ROMANTIC HISTORY WITH WOMEN
This also means WOMEN ARE WAY MORE LIKELY TO BE ASSAULTED OR MURDERED BY A MALE WHO THEY HAVE CLOSE AFFILIATIONS / SEXUAL HISTORY WITH, THAN A MALE WHO THEY AREN’T CLOSE WITH / DON’T HAVE SEXUAL HISTORY WITH. I think most women who actively participate with society, interact with more than one male on a daily basis. But it's not the males who have close / intimate relations with her who are more likely to assault or murder her. A male who has a close / intimate relation with a female, is more of a threat to her life or safety than a male who does not have a close / intimate relation with her. This is a statistical fact
Redditors cannot be reasoned with, because reason is not a part of their intellectual faculty. If anything, they are the closest thing to a real-world NPC. They make arguments based solely on opinion, pass it off as “fact” or “truth”, provide little to no scientific / statistical data to corroborate their argument, mostly use anecdotal evidence to rationalize their argument, fail to demonstrate the cognitive ability to establish links between various artefacts of data that relate to the same topic or theme, and fail to demonstrate the ability to “read in between the lines” in whatever data that’s shown to them. They only echo the politically correct sentiment that’s programmed into their NPC brain, even if how they act IRL seems to indicate they subconsciously have an opposing sentiment. There is the saying, “Do not argue with an idiot, because they will try and drag you down to their level, and if they do, they’ll beat you with experience”
It’s funny how Reddit bots use these argumentative tactics to downplay the “male sexlessness” situation. But when it comes to other subjects, like gun violence (black-on-black violence, white-on-white violence etc.), they’ll virtue-signal and act like they give a fuck about the most affected demographic. Excluding suicide, niggers are way more likely to be gun homicide victims than any other race in the US, and niggas commit the majority of gun homicides in the US. Clearly niggas are the most affected demographic in the United States when it comes to homicides (other than suicide) and violent incidents that involve the use of a firearm. So now you could ask: Why don’t Redditors use the same style of logic to downplay the impact of gun violence on Black communities, or belittle / villify the Black demographic for their involvement in gun violence when the subject matter of “gun violence in the United States” is proposed to them?
As of 2023, the majority of zoomer males in the US are reported as single, and more or less than half of adult zoomer males in the US were reported to have reached adulthood as virgins. Clearly, the “sexlessness” situation has affected a relatively large share of the zoomer male demographic in the US – Similar to how there is a relatively large share of Black victims / Black perpetrators of violent incidents the US that involved the use of a firearm. Yet the apologetic style of argument that Redditors will use to argue in defence of niggas when it comes to the topic of “gun violence in the United States”, they won’t use the same style of apologetics to argue in defence of young zoomer males who are single or sexless in the United States. I wonder why?
Last edited:
