Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Personality ONLY mattering after a looks threshold was passed shown clear as a day in a graph of a study

  • Thread starter WorthlessSlavicShit
  • Start date
WorthlessSlavicShit

WorthlessSlavicShit

There are no happy endings in Eastern Europe.
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 30, 2022
Posts
13,607
Remember that study where mother and daughter pairs ranked men based on how desirable they were as partners, and the unattractive ones were never chosen no matter what personality traits they supposedly had, which is even mentioned on the incels.wiki's Scientific Blackpill page as proof that you need to pass a certain looks threshold to ever be considered as a partner by a woman?

As I just found out, there was an actual graph made by the researchers showing those preferences:worryfeels:.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/1d1esrn/the_importance_of_physical_attractiveness_to_the/


1721162011794


As predicted in hypothesis 3, only moderately attractive men were ever rated more favorably than attractive men

Although the unattractive man was rated slightly more favorably than the moderately attractive man in condition 4, when he was paired with the respectful traits, this difference was not statistically significant

A good persoynality can push a high-tier normie above a shitty personality Chad, but it can nevER help an incel:feelsUgh:.
 
why are foids still keeping up the pERsonality lie

do they think we still dont know??
 
Lol, there is even a saying in Russia: You are greeted by your clothes, but you are escorted by your mind. If you are scrapped in the appearance phase, no one will care about your personality and mind.
 
It's female nature
 
Is the attractiveness only about PSL in that study or was height also considered ?
 
This shit is common sense
 
Remember that study where mother and daughter pairs ranked men based on how desirable they were as partners, and the unattractive ones were never chosen no matter what personality traits they supposedly had, which is even mentioned on the incels.wiki's Scientific Blackpill page as proof that you need to pass a certain looks threshold to ever be considered as a partner by a woman?

As I just found out, there was an actual graph made by the researchers showing those preferences:worryfeels:.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/1d1esrn/the_importance_of_physical_attractiveness_to_the/


View attachment 1200381



A good persoynality can push a high-tier normie above a shitty personality Chad, but it can nevER help an incel:feelsUgh:.

But muh condition 4.
 
A good persoynality can push a high-tier normie above a shitty personality Chad, but it can nevER help an incel:feelsUgh:.
I don't believe this. The flaws in all studies like these are three which are: the women are asked to give a rating rather than the researchers watching who they choose to fuck, the subjects know they are being watched, and what a normie says is a 5/10 is not what blackpillers do.
 
why are foids still keeping up the pERsonality lie

do they think we still dont know??
Either they know lying works for them or they're literally dazzled & can't even understand their own reasoning.
 
Yes, I've always felt this way.

When normies said personality matters, there was ALWAYS an implied ''as long as you are AT LEAST a solid 5/10, personality could matter''.

If you're genuinely ugly, personality will never save you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top