Subhuman Currycel
Major
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2019
- Posts
- 2,468
Water is wet thread but still
Tinder/OLD is now the most common way for people to meet
39% met online however bar/restaurant a lot of people would have contacted online first and then met the number is probably 40-45% in reality
2008 the iPhone was released
2012 tinder was released
This graph is even worse considering the fact that men tend to over report sexual encounters and the fact that the trend has shot upwards + COVID wouldn’t surprise me it this number was in its upper 30%+
the difference in men’s experience vs women’s in online dating
An insane contrast nowhere near comparable
Examples of this
Female perspective
Swipes right on less than 1% of men still has a match rate higher than 60%
Male perspective
Just fucking hilarious not a single positive outcome from 15k swipes
Male perspective
Not even a single date from 45k swipes
Female perspective probably the most fucking ridiculous one
Just be 1/100,000 in men theory
Swipes right on less than 0.5% of men and still is able to match more than 50% absolutely fucking ridiculous
Biological reasoning:
women and men react very different to an abundance of potential partners. The more people to choose from the more demanding women get. Say there are 10 men, women will want to date only the top 3. But that doesn't change when there are 100 or 1,000 or 10,000 or 100,000. They always want the top 3. So in fact, women are not really choosing from 12,000+ men, but let's be generous and say from like 12 out of these 12,000.
Men respond differently like the graph above men consistently right swipe between 40-60% of women regardless of how many they are as a reproductive strategy as the number of potential mates increase, women become more selective whereas men’s criteria hardly changes.
Women have limited resources and men don't. Women HAVE to be picky in terms of who they are dating, because they can only have so many eggs and so many resources to carry and raise a child. They choose the best sperm there is available to them.
Pre online dating we had to operate in social groups for example women could pick out of men they knew in social situations so say among 15-20 men she was acquainted with but now that number is literally how many men are available in an x mile radius which is upwards of thousands in most cases such as in a big city.
this has hit less for millennials because for many this app came out later and many had already settled in relationships but for zoomers this is here from the getgo most have not even turned 18 and OLD is readily available.
If you are a zoomer and live in a more populated city it’s pretty much a wrap if you don’t ascend by highschool because after that most girls will be using tinder and not many couples meet through schools or friends anymore and social situations such as OLD/bars/clubs have a huge emphasis on looks.
RIP Gen Z ngl we will have the highest rates of male dropout rates/depression and suicide.
tinder was Gods mistake on earth fuck this life man.
Tinder/OLD is now the most common way for people to meet
39% met online however bar/restaurant a lot of people would have contacted online first and then met the number is probably 40-45% in reality
2008 the iPhone was released
2012 tinder was released
This graph is even worse considering the fact that men tend to over report sexual encounters and the fact that the trend has shot upwards + COVID wouldn’t surprise me it this number was in its upper 30%+
the difference in men’s experience vs women’s in online dating
An insane contrast nowhere near comparable
Examples of this
Female perspective
Swipes right on less than 1% of men still has a match rate higher than 60%
Male perspective
Just fucking hilarious not a single positive outcome from 15k swipes
Male perspective
Not even a single date from 45k swipes
Female perspective probably the most fucking ridiculous one
Just be 1/100,000 in men theory
Swipes right on less than 0.5% of men and still is able to match more than 50% absolutely fucking ridiculous
Biological reasoning:
women and men react very different to an abundance of potential partners. The more people to choose from the more demanding women get. Say there are 10 men, women will want to date only the top 3. But that doesn't change when there are 100 or 1,000 or 10,000 or 100,000. They always want the top 3. So in fact, women are not really choosing from 12,000+ men, but let's be generous and say from like 12 out of these 12,000.
Men respond differently like the graph above men consistently right swipe between 40-60% of women regardless of how many they are as a reproductive strategy as the number of potential mates increase, women become more selective whereas men’s criteria hardly changes.
Women have limited resources and men don't. Women HAVE to be picky in terms of who they are dating, because they can only have so many eggs and so many resources to carry and raise a child. They choose the best sperm there is available to them.
Pre online dating we had to operate in social groups for example women could pick out of men they knew in social situations so say among 15-20 men she was acquainted with but now that number is literally how many men are available in an x mile radius which is upwards of thousands in most cases such as in a big city.
this has hit less for millennials because for many this app came out later and many had already settled in relationships but for zoomers this is here from the getgo most have not even turned 18 and OLD is readily available.
If you are a zoomer and live in a more populated city it’s pretty much a wrap if you don’t ascend by highschool because after that most girls will be using tinder and not many couples meet through schools or friends anymore and social situations such as OLD/bars/clubs have a huge emphasis on looks.
RIP Gen Z ngl we will have the highest rates of male dropout rates/depression and suicide.
tinder was Gods mistake on earth fuck this life man.