The only way to deal with any sort of moral degradation is from above, I attest, nothing else is going to work at this rate in which humanity begets a plummet into the abyss of relativist thinking, Following that, Church and state should reunite for all intents and purposes. None of the world religions really are equipped to handle this mind you, due to the long and painful separation between nature and the divine since the Age Of Reason, in which man, as Rene Descartes believed, was the source of all ontology, which previously had been the domain of God. That's why it has be something a bit more esoteric, something kind of like an Islamist (or so I’m told, various accounts competing) interpretation of the trinity and a distinction between the Jewish God of evil and the redeemer God of Christianity. This type of religious conception is a good way to wash away the residue of Protestantism which has affected most of the United States on a negative level, as per Max Weber stated, paraphrasing that “all religions shape the cultural attitudes of the nation in which they are a host”, concepts such as working ones’ hands to the bone because it happens to be a way in which we worship our Lord and Savior, and using mankind as a tool for God to meld and shape in his image free from conceptions of “free will”, on the contrary, Mankind should be free to pursue his own blessing or damnation, as the blessed will ascend to the throne of God and the damned will fall into the endless abyss, if mankind knows what’s good for him and not damned to suffer because “the state needs useful idiots”.
Atheists and other followers of materialist natural science will gnash their teeth, but you really cannot separate ethics from religion. These same people will claim morals are derived from reason, but what is the source of reason anyways? Was it just pulled out of thin air? because in order to find morality from pure reason you'll have to find the source of reason, which is rooted in psychology, and further back, the consciousness. and where is the source of that? consciousness cannot be measured by mathematical concepts, nor can it be given a physical appearance, and since atheists do not believe God is physically present, then it proceeds from that, that consciousness is nonexistent as well.
How does one define something that is supposed to be existent but cannot be sensed by inference? We can talk all day about sensations, emotions, the ability to think and feel but at the end of the day, they cannot be visualized, or smelt, or touched. But we know they exist as conceptions, much like God is a conception. If you deny the existence of something that cannot be empirically proven, then by following deductions, emotions are not real, ideas are not real, bodily sensations are not real, and consciousness simply does not exist. This method of deduction not only leads to a nihilist worldview, it can spell the end of existence for everyone, including yourself. I suggest that most people that follow this line of thinking also end up cutting ties with humankind, by getting vasectomies and losing their ability not only to sense things around them, but also losing their ability to live and not only that, lose their ability to procure more of themselves so this kind of thinking (which by all means, proves many other things that are unamicable to their worldview) does not infest the rest of humanity. I hope that all lovers of objective morality, even the godless Randians, will eventually come to this conclusion before their souls are smoked in the fiery cauldron of those who failed to attest to their glory of their creator.
Now obviously, as far as I or anyone should be concerned there are really only five legitimate religions, in order of importance they are as follows: Christianity, whose messiah has already appeared to the Gentiles, Judaism, whose messiah has yet to come (however I doubt this figure is in anyway compatible with Jesus, as the behavior of its adherents seem to be in conflict with Christian morality, and it could very well be Lucifer, not to mention, and context is extremely important, that the language of the Talmud points to anything other than objective meaning towards what is considered “ethical” behavior, often throwing barbs at the competing faith of Christianity while claiming the second coming of an omnipresent, omnipotent “liberator of the jewish peoples” calls into question the doctrines in and of themselves), along with Islam, Jainism and the minute Druze faith of Western Asia. each is important to the culture in which it arose. Since the messiah figure acts as a bridge to the divine “One”, every human is imbued with a holy spirit that is more or less the same as the human soul, on could configure those who lack one in their faith of choice or one that is tied to their culture is cut off from divine intervention, but more on that in a minute. Back to the concept of the five valid faiths and the messiah concept, any competing faiths could and shall make claimants for it, but I deny they have a concrete definition of their messiah existing as a separate entity from their God or source of moral teachings, bearing a somewhat Spinozist “all-is-one” mentality which thoroughly needs combated. There also many pagan faiths which also claim more than one figure, of course a deduction must be made to the one which propagates their resolute moral teachings, and this can be done through a thorough reading of their mythological sagas, be it Beowulf or anything similar.
However, the lovers of material scientism have no such thing, despite the quasi-religious connotations of some brands of Marxism, these idols possess no such magical or supernatural qualities and while some people may have seen the Russian Revolution of 1917 or various anarchist communes as being nothing short of a “miracle” One cannot assume anything other than material changes took place to transform those places into what they became, since communism’s roots lie in the Age Of Reason, centuries and millenia separated from man’s origins. Which were much closer to God than what happened later, each advancement in history drawing a thicker line in the sand between the human and divine its not hard to see what will happen next. Contrary to most liberal historiographers, we are not on an endless road to progress as people such as John Locke and the vile Voltaire suggested, rather we are on a road towards nihilism and death, that every advancement and human achievement its becoming clear we are doing our best to vilify our creator since Adam and Eve betrayed God in the garden of Eden. If we do not stop, our state of existence will be a remoteness from God and Hell and Earth will become one entity. You can see parellels to this and the promotion and popularization of transgenderism, where Tikkun Olam commands that Adam and Eve become one singular creature, as wretched as that sounds. A troublesome problem to dwell on that should influence any reader to become aware of how terrible things will become.
Atheists and other followers of materialist natural science will gnash their teeth, but you really cannot separate ethics from religion. These same people will claim morals are derived from reason, but what is the source of reason anyways? Was it just pulled out of thin air? because in order to find morality from pure reason you'll have to find the source of reason, which is rooted in psychology, and further back, the consciousness. and where is the source of that? consciousness cannot be measured by mathematical concepts, nor can it be given a physical appearance, and since atheists do not believe God is physically present, then it proceeds from that, that consciousness is nonexistent as well.
How does one define something that is supposed to be existent but cannot be sensed by inference? We can talk all day about sensations, emotions, the ability to think and feel but at the end of the day, they cannot be visualized, or smelt, or touched. But we know they exist as conceptions, much like God is a conception. If you deny the existence of something that cannot be empirically proven, then by following deductions, emotions are not real, ideas are not real, bodily sensations are not real, and consciousness simply does not exist. This method of deduction not only leads to a nihilist worldview, it can spell the end of existence for everyone, including yourself. I suggest that most people that follow this line of thinking also end up cutting ties with humankind, by getting vasectomies and losing their ability not only to sense things around them, but also losing their ability to live and not only that, lose their ability to procure more of themselves so this kind of thinking (which by all means, proves many other things that are unamicable to their worldview) does not infest the rest of humanity. I hope that all lovers of objective morality, even the godless Randians, will eventually come to this conclusion before their souls are smoked in the fiery cauldron of those who failed to attest to their glory of their creator.
Now obviously, as far as I or anyone should be concerned there are really only five legitimate religions, in order of importance they are as follows: Christianity, whose messiah has already appeared to the Gentiles, Judaism, whose messiah has yet to come (however I doubt this figure is in anyway compatible with Jesus, as the behavior of its adherents seem to be in conflict with Christian morality, and it could very well be Lucifer, not to mention, and context is extremely important, that the language of the Talmud points to anything other than objective meaning towards what is considered “ethical” behavior, often throwing barbs at the competing faith of Christianity while claiming the second coming of an omnipresent, omnipotent “liberator of the jewish peoples” calls into question the doctrines in and of themselves), along with Islam, Jainism and the minute Druze faith of Western Asia. each is important to the culture in which it arose. Since the messiah figure acts as a bridge to the divine “One”, every human is imbued with a holy spirit that is more or less the same as the human soul, on could configure those who lack one in their faith of choice or one that is tied to their culture is cut off from divine intervention, but more on that in a minute. Back to the concept of the five valid faiths and the messiah concept, any competing faiths could and shall make claimants for it, but I deny they have a concrete definition of their messiah existing as a separate entity from their God or source of moral teachings, bearing a somewhat Spinozist “all-is-one” mentality which thoroughly needs combated. There also many pagan faiths which also claim more than one figure, of course a deduction must be made to the one which propagates their resolute moral teachings, and this can be done through a thorough reading of their mythological sagas, be it Beowulf or anything similar.
However, the lovers of material scientism have no such thing, despite the quasi-religious connotations of some brands of Marxism, these idols possess no such magical or supernatural qualities and while some people may have seen the Russian Revolution of 1917 or various anarchist communes as being nothing short of a “miracle” One cannot assume anything other than material changes took place to transform those places into what they became, since communism’s roots lie in the Age Of Reason, centuries and millenia separated from man’s origins. Which were much closer to God than what happened later, each advancement in history drawing a thicker line in the sand between the human and divine its not hard to see what will happen next. Contrary to most liberal historiographers, we are not on an endless road to progress as people such as John Locke and the vile Voltaire suggested, rather we are on a road towards nihilism and death, that every advancement and human achievement its becoming clear we are doing our best to vilify our creator since Adam and Eve betrayed God in the garden of Eden. If we do not stop, our state of existence will be a remoteness from God and Hell and Earth will become one entity. You can see parellels to this and the promotion and popularization of transgenderism, where Tikkun Olam commands that Adam and Eve become one singular creature, as wretched as that sounds. A troublesome problem to dwell on that should influence any reader to become aware of how terrible things will become.
