Yeah, too many autists here. If you're white, 6'2, large frame, and your face doesn't exhibit "ooh gross" at a quick glance (and he's clearly not ugly), then you're HTN/chadlite. You don't need some retarded computer model to analyze your face. Stephen Merchant is 6'8 and if you ran his face through a computer you would get a 2/10 trucel subhuman result. Yet in EVERY photo where he is taken around foids, they crowd towards him:
View attachment 1072776
^ This is a 2/10 or 3/10 face, yet overall he is HTN/chadlite because the results speak for themselves:
View attachment 1072770
View attachment 1072772
View attachment 1072773
View attachment 1072774
View attachment 1072778
^ Women would never look at sub-5 men like this. Even rich ones like Jeff Bezos would never get such admiring glances/gravitation (so stop with the statusmaxxing copes). So Mr Beast being 6'3, frame mogger, and clearly having a better face than Steve Merchant is a chadlite.
Another example:
View attachment 1072779
View attachment 1072780
View attachment 1072781
^ This dude is a chad/gigachad, yet if you ran his face through some retarded face-analyzing model you'll get your usual carthanal tilt, balding, and a tonne of other autistic shit. NONE OF THAT SHIT MATTERS if you're nordic looking, 6'8, framemaxxed, and white. After that, how his face looks is almost completely irrelevant, unless it's severely deformed you're basically a chad on the streets and maybe chadlite on Tinder if you clearly list your height in huge font and have some photos next to short men/women.