The whole world is fuckin dead
IT IS ALL ABOUT ALONE WOLF TERRORIST STRIKES TBH (IN VIDEO GAME)
Why are you greycel
BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO DESTROY ME AND TAKE MY DREAM AWAY BUT I AM BACK AS HARDCORE SUPER TERRORIST (IN VIDEO GAME)
May I join you for inceldia...
| UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 | #182973348Wednesday, February 03, 2016 10:45 PM CST You are mistaken. No one truly cared about "cyber-bullying", as you claim. They merely cared about mitigating insults from being directed towards themselves. |
| UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 | #183004322Thursday, February 04, 2016 4:51 PM CST I am certain that there are much more productive tasks for you to accomplish than fantasizing about the characteristics of anonymous "females" over the Internet. |
| UnsourcedAnon Join Date: 2016-01-12 Post Count: 563 | #183004579Thursday, February 04, 2016 4:55 PM CST Oh well. It is the fault of the "victims" for behaving negligently. |
The brutality of the blackpill(aka reality)
Human nature is the devil. The genocide against every other human on earth is the only way the cycle can end.....
EvidenceRe: lol, remember when people actually cared about cyberbulying?
UnsourcedAnon
Join Date: 2016-01-12
Post Count: 563#182973348Wednesday, February 03, 2016 10:45 PM CST
You are mistaken. No one truly cared about "cyber-bullying", as you claim. They merely cared about mitigating insults from being directed towards themselves.
|
Re: lol, remember when people actually cared about cyberbulying?
UnsourcedAnon
Join Date: 2016-01-12
Post Count: 563#182973348Wednesday, February 03, 2016 10:45 PM CST
You are mistaken. No one truly cared about "cyber-bullying", as you claim. They merely cared about mitigating insults from being directed towards themselves.
Bring more evidence so normies can knowIt Is Truly Difficult To Live With Such An Enormous IQ
Moronism
Join Date: 2010-02-08
Post Count: 451#183567345Saturday, February 13, 2016 11:26 PM CST
Hello adolescent schoolchildren. Lately, I have explored the territory surrounding my place of dwelling. And during each individual expedition, I noted the magnificent geometrical patterns throughout nature. The mere nodes of a single leaf bind together to form often semi-curved yet white, "embedded" lines. It is beautiful. Upon returning home, I thought excessively about the situation. And then I came to a horrid and unfortunate realization: The vast majority of civilians are incapable of recognizing simple mathematical patterns within nature. I was repulsed by that truthful realization. Mathematics is one of the fundamental components of abstraction. Recognizing the connection of concepts via mathematical knowledge is imperative to understanding the functionality of a system. Basic Calculus describes sequences. Yet, individuals of average intelligence cannot understand simple abstraction without a calculator(And calculators focus only on blatant computation, as computers are computational devices), which they can very rarely utilize efficiently. It is horrible. Nevertheless, returning to the main subject itself, I often displace myself to my local library to review scientific/mathematical books, and determine whether they are fit to be replenished within the finite collection. After analysis, I subsequently inform the menial laborers of my decision. It frequently baffles me that individuals such as Gilbert Strang(Who feigns supposed knowledge of basic Linear Algebra principles) are glorified by the employees there. Gilbert lacks sufficient knowledge of the subject he is speaking about. As does the majority of MIT instructors. They are novices who have gained supposed "credibility" via media manipulation. Linear Algebra is much more abstractly-concrete and fundamental than what Gilbert or his colleagues can convey it to be. Strang's "Linear Algebra" is successful only because of pseudo-pedagogy. Allow me to elaborate in a much more humble manner: I have attained exactly 157 IQ units. My spatial-reasoning greatly exceeds that of the typical individual, and this is evident by the many physics engines that I constructed on Unix-based systems using only C and SDL as my available utility tool. Yet, my proficiency in geometrical/trigonometrical manipulation is a mere thousandth of my overall capabilities. On various occasions, I have also solved many abstract, post-PhD level problems within the ranges of number-theory/model-theory. It is often distressing to visit Internet forums to discuss my intelligence level, given that reference to basic philosophical principles quickly confuses those who have a lower IQ than I. Strangely enough, those same individuals cannot comprehend basic vocabulary words, and they frequently mention the use of a dictionary and/or thesaurus. Why, a dictionary and/or thesaurus is redundant to understand such simplistic terminology. Well, I suppose that I should continue development of my memory-storage algorithm. I intend to simulate OS functionality using RBX.Lua, which should be relatively easy using modules. I can only hope that society stops patronizing individuals such as myself because of our superior intelligence. It is truly terrible.
| ParadigmaticAnon Join Date: 2016-01-25 Post Count: 182 | #182608841Friday, January 29, 2016 5:18 AM CST Certainly. I can provide an example algorithm using custom-notation for you, as shown below: [Struct] GUI_Obj = Instance.Create("TextButtonGUI"); [Array] Items = ("Cookies","Cake","Creme","Crepes"); GUI_Obj:Generate_Buttons(Get_Size(Items)); Sub GUI_Obj:Clicked(){ Foreach([Integer] k = 1; k < Get_Size(Items); k += 1){ GUI_Obj.Button{k} = Items{k}; } }; GUI_OBJ.Display_Name = "Menu"; Therefore you go, this is the typical syntax found in RBX.Lua. Enjoy. |
| ParadigmaticAnon Join Date: 2016-01-25 Post Count: 182 | #182597970Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:21 PM CST A conditional statement would allow you to accomplish this. Presumably, you could create an algorithm such as this: function Check_Gold() Gold = 1; Maximum_Number = 10; if(Gold < Maximum_Num)then Gold = Gold + 1; Increases the value if the variable "Gold" is lesser than the limit; else print("You have reached the gold limitation!"); Event:connect(Check_Gold); |
