Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Nazism only likes germans, NOT white people in general

4RAB.GUY

4RAB.GUY

Anti-normies
★★
Joined
Mar 16, 2026
Posts
677
Online time
2d 3h
Neo-nazis and normies think that the ideology of the national socialist party of germany favored all europeans as superior, which is fake and gay, nazis regarded slavs as subhumans, same thing with south europeans (even tho they weren't so harsh with italians for obvious reasons), they also killed gypsies and didn't even consider them and south europeans to be white, also notice how hitler was literally against all white nations especially france and britain, that doesn't indicate he looked at them as superior as germans.

Fun fact: according to hitler, persians, afghans and north indians are closer to germans than other whites, because both share the same ancestors (ancient aryans or proto indo europeans)
 
Last edited:
Fun fact: according to hitler, persians, afghans and north indians are closer to germans than whites, because both share the same ancestors (ancient aryans or proto indo europeans)
Bro stop coping jfl
 
Gypsies are not white.
 
@BasedGoyslopReviews
 
Fun fact: according to hitler, persians, afghans and north indians are closer to germans than other whites, because both share the same ancestors (ancient aryans or proto indo europeans)
According to your rectum*
 
Saying Northern European are closer to pajeets than to Southern Europeans is ridiculously laughable :feelshaha:
I mean it is, but yea some facts are hilarious
 
the concept of white people is retarded anyways. it's based on nothing, it used to mean anglo-saxons / germanica only, then it expanded but left out certain ethic groups in the europe such as italians. nowdays it's just used for all of european decent. it's retarded. the race is caucasian, there is no white people, it's just a matter of a debate and it's different for all. there is no white unity, anglocucks can suck cock.
 
Bro, all of what you said is literally true, you're probably the most sane guy i talked to about this topic.

"Whites" in the past used to only refer to people from north europe and western europe (except ireland) , south europeans and east europeans and Irish people were just considered their own races (mediterraneans and slavs and gaelts) and not all of them really had fair skin especially mediterraneans.

"Whites" now (by the amercunt definition) are basically all europeans including gypsies and italians, and people from european descent

I just think that europeans shouldn't be called white since not all of them have fair skin plus there are multiple non europeans who have fair skin and blonde hair with blue eyes (berbers, North African arabs, pashtuns etc...)
 
Last edited:
Look he only considered national socialism to be for Germanic peoples but after the war kept dragging on and many ethnics answered the call against jews & capitalism, he started coping.
 
You are fucking retarded and don't know shit about Nazi Germany.
 
the concept of white people is retarded anyways. it's based on nothing, it used to mean anglo-saxons / germanica only, then it expanded but left out certain ethic groups in the europe such as italians. nowdays it's just used for all of european decent. it's retarded. the race is caucasian, there is no white people, it's just a matter of a debate and it's different for all. there is no white unity, anglocucks can suck cock.
This is true enough. I've seen enough movies about Sicilian mafia to know that southern Italians are fucking brown as fuck in skin tone. That they are considered 'white' is merely a historical afterthought of post-colonial world.
 
Neo-nazis and normies think that the ideology of the national socialist party of germany favored all europeans as superior, which is fake and gay, nazis regarded slavs as subhumans, same thing with south europeans (even tho they weren't so harsh with italians for obvious reasons), they also killed gypsies and didn't even consider them and south europeans to be white, also notice how hitler was literally against all white nations especially france and britain, that doesn't indicate he looked at them as superior as germans.

Fun fact: according to hitler, persians, afghans and north indians are closer to germans than other whites, because both share the same ancestors (ancient aryans or proto indo europeans)
Only germanic people are true germans to me
 
Spreading pseudo-history/genetics should genuinely incur a ban on here tbh.
Fun fact: according to hitler, persians, afghans and north indians are closer to germans than other whites, because both share the same ancestors (ancient aryans or proto indo europeans)
Completely baseless. Like literally you have 0 proof of this. He had political alliances with Iran, Afghanistan, and Indian decolonization groups, sure. That was pragmatic, not ideological. Also, out of the three groups you mentioned, Afghans are the only ones that have PIE DNA in the same ranges as Europeans. Even the most "Aryan" North Indian castes possess less than 20% on average (placing them below most Southern Europeans), similar thing with Iranians who have even less of that DNA.
Wrong, check this:
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=124791

Modern Aryans are germans, some north europeans, iranians, afghans, pakis, south indian jeets
Source literally says NOTHING to prove your point, you illiterate fucking retard. Learn basic anthropology and population genetics as well the difference between Steppe_EMBA and Steppe_MLBA before you even attempt to speak on this, you miserable clown
 
Last edited:
the concept of white people is retarded anyways. it's based on nothing, it used to mean anglo-saxons / germanica only, then it expanded but left out certain ethic groups in the europe such as italians. nowdays it's just used for all of european decent. it's retarded. the race is caucasian, there is no white people, it's just a matter of a debate and it's different for all. there is no white unity, anglocucks can suck cock.
Bro, all of what you said is literally true, you're probably the most sane guy i talked to about this topic.

"Whites" in the past used to only refer to people from north europe and western europe (except ireland) , south europeans and east europeans and Irish people were just considered their own races (mediterraneans and slavs and gaelts) and not all of them really had fair skin especially mediterraneans.

"Whites" now (by the amercunt definition) are basically all europeans including gypsies and italians, and people from european descent

I just think that europeans shouldn't be called white since not all of them have fair skin plus there are multiple non europeans who have fair skin and blonde hair with blue eyes (berbers, North African arabs, pashtuns etc...)
The first person to delineate the "white race" as a scientific concept was Carl Linnaeus, and from the very beginning it was Pan-European in scope ("Homo sapiens Europeaeus albus"). It never meant Anglos or Germanics only, that's a retarded leftist myth. Italians and Eastern Europeans were indeed at a point considered "lesser Europeans," though, but it was out of the belief that they were admixed with MENAs and East Eurasians respectively, not fully non-white (and even this was an uncommon belief only espoused by Nordicists). Miscegenation laws and Jim Crow that applied to blacks, Natives, Chinese railroad workers, etc. also never applied to Southern and Eastern Europeans.

The "Caucasian race" is far more of a myth than the white/European race, and has literally been debunked by population genetics. West Eurasian peoples (the group that most roughly approximates "Caucasian" in terms of groups it encompasses) includes Europeans, Northern Berbers, Middle Easterners, and Kavkaz. Southern Berbers, East Africans, South Asians, and other groups that fell under "Caucasoid" do not fall within the cluster.
 
Neo-nazis and normies think that the ideology of the national socialist party of germany favored all europeans as superior, which is fake and gay, nazis regarded slavs as subhumans, same thing with south europeans (even tho they weren't so harsh with italians for obvious reasons), they also killed gypsies and didn't even consider them and south europeans to be white, also notice how hitler was literally against all white nations especially france and britain, that doesn't indicate he looked at them as superior as germans.

Fun fact: according to hitler, persians, afghans and north indians are closer to germans than other whites, because both share the same ancestors (ancient aryans or proto indo europeans)
This is very inaccurate but I just have to point out gypsys are Indians not white
 
This is true enough. I've seen enough movies about Sicilian mafia to know that southern Italians are fucking brown as fuck in skin tone. That they are considered 'white' is merely a historical afterthought of post-colonial world.
Sicilians and Southern Italians fall within the European cluster; their dark appearance mostly has to do with high ANF DNA and Mediterranean selection pressure. All three ancestor populations of Europeans (Western Hunter-Gatherers, Anatolian Neolithic Farmers, and Yamnaya-like Steppe peoples) were all originally swarthy; people forget this. It's less that Meds were pigmented over time and more that Nords were depigmented.

Also idk the relevance of the "post-colonial world" part. The Nordicist school of thought considered Sicilians and Southern Italians to be mongrelized with MENA populations, which is a half-truth. However, said school of thought was never dominant, which is apparent from the fact that miscegenation and Jim Crow laws that applied to blacks, Indigenous Americans, and East Asian immigrants never applied to any European group
 
Bro stop coping jfl
LOL according to Hitler, africans are closer to germans than whites, because the share the same ancestors
 
the concept of white people is retarded anyways. it's based on nothing, it used to mean anglo-saxons / germanica only, then it expanded but left out certain ethic groups in the europe such as italians. nowdays it's just used for all of european decent. it's retarded. the race is caucasian, there is no white people, it's just a matter of a debate and it's different for all. there is no white unity, anglocucks can suck cock.
True.
1000097306
1000097307


Those foids are from India/Pakistan, yet are considered non white because of non-European context lmao.

They look lighter than many South Italians/Iberians for example.
 
True.
View attachment 1697548View attachment 1697549

Those foids are from India/Pakistan, yet are considered non white because of non-European context lmao.

They look lighter than many South Italians/Iberians for example.
You should see the foids in my class, prolly whiter than all italians, but still considered non white because "tey r sandniggers grrrrr" as eurocucks say
 
I remember reading somewhere that the Nazis were shocked the Slavs had more blue eyes and blonde hair than Germans back home lol

Slavs have the highest rates of blue eyes and blonde hair
 
I remember reading somewhere that the Nazis were shocked the Slavs had more blue eyes and blonde hair than Germans back home lol
The same way europeans are shocked when they see a fair skinned blue eyed middle eastern/north african
 
More or less, though a lot of current-day Neo-Nazis would contest that and, not going to lie, they do have some persuasive evidence, as well as just plain common sense. We know for a fact that Hitler himself was pretty anti-Slavic, at least in his earlier years, being that he was an Austrian who grew up watching a lot of areas where he lived being quite Slavicized and overall just Austria's German-speakers being demographically threatened by Slavs, at least in his eyes. We can guess he carried that with him probably just about his entire life, even if he had softened on it a bit, but how prevalent such attitudes would've been among the wider Nazi party, given how many of them came from purely German environments and didn't have Hitler's instinctive dislike of Slavs, and how much said attitudes would've influenced German policy towards Slavs had they won the war in Europe, is questionable. Especially as the old leadership would inevitably die out over the years.

Miscegenation laws and Jim Crow that applied to blacks, Natives, Chinese railroad workers, etc. also never applied to Southern and Eastern Europeans.
Nor have any of the modern diversity initiatives ever applied to any Europeans.

Nobody in the past has ever treated any Europeans as nonwhite when it came time to prevent non-whites' intermarriage with whites or non-white immigration into white countries, nobody in the present is treating any Europeans as non-white when it comes time to "diversify" neighbourhoods or companies or to define who is the "oppressive white man", but a couple of desperate ethnics on the internet keep spamming that whiteness means nothing because Meds are totally darker than they are (forgetting that race and ethnicity are about genes not skin color), so, that means that if anything, they are actually just about totally white you know:soy::soy::soy:.
 
The same way europeans are shocked when they see a fair skinned blue eyed middle eastern/north african
I don't think anyone is shocked by that anymore tbh, they literally didn't know shit about how genetics work back then
 
Water is wet. Even somebody with the most surface level knowledge on the second world war and the third Reich knows Hitler was a Nordicist.
 
You should see the foids in my class, prolly whiter than all italians, but still considered non white because "tey r sandniggers grrrrr" as eurocucks say
Yes, because being white means being genetically European. I've had a few MENA foids in my uni courses, and one in particular was pretty pale, but that didn't make her any more a part of the white race than it made her and the darker-skinned ones different races, since genetically, they were obviously much closer to each other than they were to any of us Slavs and other random Europeans in there.
 
Yes, because being white means being genetically European. I've had a few MENA foids in my uni courses, and one in particular was pretty pale, but that didn't make her any more a part of the white race than it made her and the darker-skinned ones different races, since genetically, they were obviously much closer to each other than they were to any of us Slavs and other random Europeans in there.
I think whoever has white skin is just white, however he's not necessarily european, westerners now just play with terms as they make "white" another term for "european"
 
Water is wet. Even somebody with the most surface level knowledge on the second world war and the third Reich knows Hitler was a Nordicist.
Nordicist is different from "only likes Germans" though. Nordicists (like Hitler) consider the average Norwegian, Swede, or Dane superior to the typical Alpinid Southern German or Austrian.
 
Water is wet. Even somebody with the most surface level knowledge on the second world war and the third Reich knows Hitler was a Nordicist.
Sounds like you don't know about neo nazi personalities and groups of today.
 
westerners now just play with terms as they make "white" another term for "european"
The white race since its delineation as a scientific concept always meant being genetically European. I mentioned this to you above. Again, you should have at least basic historical context before you go around trying to give your opinion like its fact
 
The white race since its delineation as a scientific concept always meant being genetically European. I mentioned this to you above. Again, you should have at least basic historical context before you go around trying to give your opinion like its fact
It's just a point of view not necessarily a fact, but still this opinion is obviously more logical than the other one
 
This is very inaccurate but I just have to point out gypsys are Indians not white
I agree, but that's not the point, the point is neo nazis accepted gypsies as white even tho they are immigrants from india who came to europe late, take a look at gypsy crusader, prolly the most popular internet personality who advocates for white supermacy, but he's literally half gypsy half mexican
 
I agree, but that's not the point, the point is neo nazis accepted gypsies as white even tho they are immigrants from india who came to europe late, take a look at gypsy crusader, prolly the most popular internet personality who advocates for white supermacy, but he's literally half gypsy half mexican
NeoNazis didn't consider them white i believe they were also rounded up.
 
It's just a point of view not necessarily a fact, but still this opinion is obviously more logical than the other one
You claimed "white" being used interchangeably with "European" was a recent invention. I mentioned to you that Carl Linnaeus in 1758 was the first man to delineate the white race scientifically as "Homo sapiens Europaeus albus." That proves from the beginning that as long as "white people" has been a taxonomic concept, it has always had a pan-European definition
 
I think whoever has white skin is just white, however he's not necessarily european, westerners now just play with terms as they make "white" another term for "european"
From what I understand it always was just a different term for European though. That's why, as I mentioned above, there had never actually been any wide-scale view of any Europeans as non-white or any non-Europeans as white. The two terms are inevitably linked, since non-Europeans are almost always darker than Europeans and even Meds are lighter-skinned than a very large percentage of the world.

1774311201623


MENAs and Central and Northern Asians can be quite pale, and from what I've seen in some photographs in news stories about Siberia, indigenuous Siberians especially seem to be some of the whitest-skinned people on the planet despite being clearly non-European, but I don't think there was ever a point in history when they would be seen as white as, for Europeans, that term has always been a synonym of "European", and they clearly aren't considered to be so by anyone in the world right now. That is obvious simply from the fact that Western leftists encourage their migration to white countries and no one says that they are privileged whites who don't experience racism.

I agree, but that's not the point, the point is neo nazis accepted gypsies as white even tho they are immigrants from india who came to europe late, take a look at gypsy crusader, prolly the most popular internet personality who advocates for white supermacy, but he's literally half gypsy half mexican
The OG Nazis didn't see them as white and they aren't seen as white by anyone in Europe today.
 
The OG Nazis didn't see them as white and they aren't seen as white by anyone in Europe today
Yea, you can say the neo nazis who accepted gypsies as white are just the american ones, which are a big part of the white superemacist movement
 
The "nazism" term has grown and it's applied to everyone and every nation that has racism and ethnic superiority in its beliefs. For exemple, j00s are nazis.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top