Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I am NOT a white nationalist of color

Hoodpreet

Hoodpreet

It’s Gone Be Bad My Pajigga
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 8, 2023
Posts
24,398
Online time
4d 18h
I’ve held firmly in this for years. I do not consider myself to be a WN, I do not post in WN spaces, and I seek no form of association whatsoever with that movement. The cornerstone of WN ideology is pro-whiteness and the preservation of the white race. I don’t give a shit about any of that. My goal isn’t to preserve white people; it’s to destroy brown people.

Most whites deserve what they’re getting right now, because a majority of them tolerate it and a significant minority actively support and ask for more of it. You can go on and on about dah jooh this, dah jooh that, but the fact of the matter is Jews would be nowhere if there wasn’t something in the white man’s psyche to exploit. Whites are overly individualistic, open to experience, and prone to moralfaggotry and virtue-signaling thanks to their acclimation to high-trust societies. There was a time when this benefited them. Now it’s their downfall.

Even if no Jews existed, whites would arguably be sold out by other whites. We see this right now with how many virtue-signaling left-wing white cucks actively betray the interests of their own race (and with a profound zealousness and viciousness), and how white capitalists and even petite bourgeoisie will find any excuse to sell out their countries to browns for cheap labor. We also have the fact that even WNs themselves, for however “anti-degeneracy” they claim to be, are by and large woman-worshipping cuckolds. Many even pride themselves on how well they treat foids compared to ethnics (including some WNcels I’ve seen on this very forum).

I recall not too long ago I was watching a video of a white Canadian guy crashing out at jeet migrants in his country, and it was all going good until the nigga started going off at the jeets about “how you treat your own women and shit” :soy::feelstastyman: Like nigga, why the FUCK do you care about how pajeets treat pajeetas??! Since when was that your business, nigga?? Also, have you considered the fact that if you perhaps treated your women more like we treat ours, you wouldn’t be dealing with this birthrate crisis right now??

Gen Z white women are more radical than their male counterparts, just for the other side of the political spectrum. There are UK studies showing white British women perceive the UK as MORE RACIST than non-white women do🤦‍♂️This isn’t even getting into all the antinatalism and how many young WW statistically intend to be childfree for life. There is NO “saving a race” so long as said race continues to live in fear of their own women and refuse to put them in their place. You want your TFR above replacement? Get man enough to slap a bitch first. Start with baby steps.

There’s also all the gay pro-turdie virtue signaling done by Fuentes and the general Christian side of the Dissident Right. Whether it’s simping for disgusting brown countries (including one literally named “Niger”), talking about how “muhh hating brown people is Jewish,” or making retarded fucking comments like “even the most racist man would save a brown man from a burning building” :feelstastyman::soy::feelstastyman:

Speak for yourself, fucker. I wouldn’t even save a brown CHILD from a burning building. Now, I wouldn’t intentionally endanger one either (wouldn’t do that to a child of any race), but I sure as hell am not risking my life for some shitskin that’s one day either gonna nepotismmaxx, import his disgusting family and shitskin wife, and shit out 4 more poo-golbin spawn, multiplying like the absolute fucking TERMITE he is (if he’s my type of brown), or join a gang and get shot dead by age 16 (if he’s the other type of brown). No child deserves to die in a burning building, but I sure as hell am not risking my own life to save a brown child from one. The cost-to-benefit ratio on both an individual and collective scale just isn’t worth it.

Ultimately, Western Europeans (the people currently facing demographic replacement) aren’t necessarily needed to carry on high civilization and culture. Slavs can do it, and so can Northeast Asians. But both the former (besides the Ukrainians, who are instead being directly killed off en masse) and the latter are beginning to experience invasion by turdoids AS WELL, because there’s not one decent place on Earth that inferior, SHIT SKINNED, cockroach-esque fucking SUBHUMANS won’t invade and make identical to whatever nasty dump of a country they fled. It was never about “muh colonialism”; it was always about brown “people’s” inherent crab bucket mentality, seething jealousy, and desire to both mix with and destroy any group better than them, for the sole crime of being better than them.

There can be no world peace, there can be no utopia, there can be nothing until the brown races of the world are finally put to the sword wholesale (or at least dramatically culled). Moreover, as a brown man myself, I’m concerned with the suffering and piss-poor quality that is inherent to the brown experience and spans everything from our looks to the filth and poverty we’re consigned to by fate. And again, it isn’t cause of “muh colonialism.”

Take India – the literal posterboy for third world shitholes in the modern day. India became independent and China became the Communist PRC around the same timeframe. It was during said timeframe that even WESTERN sources were optimistic about the future of India and deeply pessimistic about that of China, due (but not limited) to the fact that China had been ravaged by war and the largest famine in history, whereas India had achieved independence largely peacefully, was politically stable, and had ready-made British institutions. Yet, generations later, we see who became the superpower and who became the super poo-er. The difference is fully in the DNA. China’s average IQ is in the 100s, whereas India’s ranges from the fucking 70s to low 80s depending on the estimate.
1780821469190


Even just looking at the highest IQ subsections of both populations (since caste IQ stratification is very real in curryland), deep temperamental differences are obvious. Preselected Indian immigrants in countries like the US have carried a reputation for scamminess, clannishness/nepotism, and low conscientiousness for decades that the Chinese haven’t. Looking at how the elites of both countries run their respective societies also makes this glaringly obvious.

Temperament is arguably MORE important than IQ due to its higher heritability across social classes (some studies even show it being MORE heritable in lower socioeconomic brackets). A person of average intelligence with a good work ethic can build something, or get somewhere in life. A more intelligent person with a shitty temperament will get nowhere, or at best become a Ted K-esque high-IQ schizo.

China succeeded where India didn’t because Chinese people are genetically superior to Indians. I could get into other parts of the turd world like A(pe)frica and LatAm, and how “kolonealizm n shiet” is no excuse for their sorry state either, but this post is already long as fuck and I can’t be assed.

You don’t have to be pro-white to be anti-brown. Shitskins are a threat to civilization anywhere in the world we go, and we are also a threat to ourselves. Our existential condition is characterized by absolute destitution and misery that we only serve to endlessly spread, spread, and spread some more. Regardless of whether or not whites deserve to exist, brown “people” most certainly do not
 
Last edited:
@whiteboyhair @VanGobbel
 
@Shitskin=Shitlife
 
If there was a button to exterminate all whites and all browns I’d fucking slap that shit like it’s Palutena from Kid Icarus: Uprising’s ass. Whites to me are acceptable collateral to get rid of the absolute MENACE that is the brown races of the world
 
The problem with whites is we have an inordinate amount of unprincipled men amongst us and those that don’t see why having principles is so important.

A principled white race would not allow lisping homosexuals or obvious system plants like Richard Spencer or Nick Fuentes speak for its best interests.

We absolutely deserve our place at the moment under the jew parasatoid’s boot.
 
The biggest problem facing white countries is an aging population. In most white countries, the far right would win if only young men voted.

If we consider that more and more immigrants are becoming citizens, and that women, on top of that, live longer and will be voting for pro-immigration parties for many more years, we are doomed to disappear.
 
@whiteboyhair @VanGobbel
saar stop writing essays pls. either rope or cope, you're not a good writer either. Stop tagging me too. kthxbye
 
I’ve held firmly in this for years. I do not consider myself to be a WN, I do not post in WN spaces, and I seek no form of association whatsoever with that movement. The cornerstone of WN ideology is pro-whiteness and the preservation of the white race. I don’t give a shit about any of that. My goal isn’t to preserve white people; it’s to destroy brown people.

Most whites deserve what they’re getting right now, because a majority of them tolerate it and a significant minority actively support and ask for more of it. You can go on and on about dah jooh this, dah jooh that, but the fact of the matter is Jews would be nowhere if there wasn’t something in the white man’s psyche to exploit. Whites are overly individualistic, open to experience, and prone to moralfaggotry and virtue-signaling thanks to their acclimation to high-trust societies. There was a time when this benefited them. Now it’s their downfall.

Even if no Jews existed, whites would arguably be sold out by other whites. We see this right now with how many virtue-signaling left-wing white cucks actively betray the interests of their own race (and with a profound zealousness and viciousness), and how white capitalists and even petite bourgeoisie will find any excuse to sell out their countries to browns for cheap labor. We also have the fact that even WNs themselves, for however “anti-degeneracy” they claim to be, are by and large woman-worshipping cuckolds. Many even pride themselves on how well they treat foids compared to ethnics (including some WNcels I’ve seen on this very forum).

I recall not too long ago I was watching a video of a white Canadian guy crashing out at jeet migrants in his country, and it was all going good until the nigga started going off at the jeets about “how you treat your own women and shit” :soy::feelstastyman: Like nigga, why the FUCK do you care about how pajeets treat pajeetas??! Since when was that your business, nigga?? Also, have you considered the fact that if you perhaps treated your women more like we treat ours, you wouldn’t be dealing with this birthrate crisis right now??

Gen Z white women are more radical than their male counterparts, just for the other side of the political spectrum. There are UK studies showing white British women perceive the UK as MORE RACIST than non-white women do🤦‍♂️This isn’t even getting into all the antinatalism and how many young WW statistically intend to be childfree for life. There is NO “saving a race” so long as said race continues to live in fear of their own women and refuse to put them in their place. You want your TFR above replacement? Get man enough to slap a bitch first. Start with baby steps.

There’s also all the gay pro-turdie virtue signaling done by Fuentes and the general Christian side of the Dissident Right. Whether it’s simping for disgusting brown countries (including one literally named “Niger”), talking about how “muhh hating brown people is Jewish,” or making retarded fucking comments like “even the most racist man would save a brown man from a burning building” :feelstastyman::soy::feelstastyman:

Speak for yourself, fucker. I wouldn’t even save a brown CHILD from a burning building. Now, I wouldn’t intentionally endanger one either (wouldn’t do that to a child of any race), but I sure as hell am not risking my life for some shitskin that’s one day either gonna nepotismmaxx, import his disgusting family and shitskin wife, and shit out 4 more poo-golbin spawn, multiplying like the absolute fucking TERMITE he is (if he’s my type of brown), or join a gang and get shot dead by age 16 (if he’s the other type of brown). No child deserves to die in a burning building, but I sure as hell am not risking my own life to save a brown child from one. The cost-to-benefit ratio on both an individual and collective scale just isn’t worth it.

Ultimately, Western Europeans (the people currently facing demographic replacement) aren’t necessarily needed to carry on high civilization and culture. Slavs can do it, and so can Northeast Asians. But both the former (besides the Ukrainians, who are instead being directly killed off en masse) and the latter are beginning to experience invasion by turdoids AS WELL, because there’s not one decent place on Earth that inferior, SHIT SKINNED, cockroach-esque fucking SUBHUMANS won’t invade and make identical to whatever nasty dump of a country they fled. It was never about “muh colonialism”; it was always about brown “people’s” inherent crab bucket mentality, seething jealousy, and desire to both mix with and destroy any group better than them, for the sole crime of being better than them.

There can be no world peace, there can be no utopia, there can be nothing until the brown races of the world are finally put to the sword wholesale (or at least dramatically culled). Moreover, as a brown man myself, I’m concerned with the suffering and piss-poor quality that is inherent to the brown experience and spans everything from our looks to the filth and poverty we’re consigned to by fate. And again, it isn’t cause of “muh colonialism.”

Take India – the literal posterboy for third world shitholes in the modern day. India became independent and China became the Communist PRC around the same timeframe. It was during said timeframe that even WESTERN sources were optimistic about the future of India and deeply pessimistic about that of China, due (but not limited) to the fact that China had been ravaged by war and the largest famine in history, whereas India had achieved independence largely peacefully, was politically stable, and had ready-made British institutions. Yet, generations later, we see who became the superpower and who became the super poo-er. The difference is fully in the DNA. China’s average IQ is in the 100s, whereas India’s ranges from the fucking 70s to low 80s depending on the estimate.
View attachment 1743674

Even just looking at the highest IQ subsections of both populations (since caste IQ stratification is very real in curryland), deep temperamental differences are obvious. Preselected Indian immigrants in countries like the US have carried a reputation for scamminess, clannishness/nepotism, and low conscientiousness for decades that the Chinese haven’t. Looking at how the elites of both countries run their respective societies also makes this glaringly obvious.

Temperament is arguably MORE important than IQ due to its higher heritability across social classes (some studies even show it being MORE heritable in lower socioeconomic brackets). A person of average intelligence with a good work ethic can build something, or get somewhere in life. A more intelligent person with a shitty temperament will get nowhere, or at best become a Ted K-esque high-IQ schizo.

China succeeded where India didn’t because Chinese people are genetically superior to Indians. I could get into other parts of the turd world like A(pe)frica and LatAm, and how “kolonealizm n shiet” is no excuse for their sorry state either, but this post is already long as fuck and I can’t be assed.

You don’t have to be pro-white to be anti-brown. Shitskins are a threat to civilization anywhere in the world we go, and we are also a threat to ourselves. Our existential condition is characterized by absolute destitution and misery that we only serve to endlessly spread, spread, and spread some more. Regardless of whether or not whites deserve to exist, brown “people” most certainly do not
I want the preservation of all races in their different spaces and the total destruction of jews (except for @AtrociousCitizen of course).
 
I’ve held firmly in this for years. I do not consider myself to be a WN, I do not post in WN spaces, and I seek no form of association whatsoever with that movement. The cornerstone of WN ideology is pro-whiteness and the preservation of the white race. I don’t give a shit about any of that. My goal isn’t to preserve white people; it’s to destroy brown people.
I sympathize with WN. Kill every last curry, sand, spic, and nigger in America to build a utopia for Eastern Euros, Euro-descended South Americans, and Boers in South Africa, who are actively facing prosecution and genocide. I wish whites could live in an environment where they simply say that shitskins aren’t allowed. White secessionist America can’t come sooner enough.

Primarily, I try my best to fuel white interests for the same reason as you: I want to see shitskins erased from the face of the Earth. I would never support shitskins, even if it means my own death. I’m not involved in any WN spaces either (since I’m not white lol). It would be hypocritical for me, especially given my AASI blood. The one-drop rule applies to me, and I’m 100% a shitskinned pajeet. If I were even partially European, I would be involved in the NS movement. Fighting against white genocide is the right thing to do, and a moral imperative.

Additionally, as you said in your post:

There would be no sentient people left on Earth if whites and East Asians were replaced by shitskins.
 
Last edited:
I sympathize with WN. Kill every last curry, sand, spic, and nigger in America to build a utopia for Eastern Euros, Euro-descended South Americans, and Boers, who are actively facing prosecution and genocide in South Africa. I wish whites could live in an environment where they simply say that shitskins aren’t allowed. White secessionist America can’t come sooner enough.

Primarily, I try my best to fuel white interests for the same reason as you: I want to see shitskins erased from the face of the Earth. I would never support shitskins, even if it means my own death. I’m not involved in any WN spaces either (since I’m not white lol). It would be hypocritical for me, especially given my AASI blood. The one-drop rule applies to me, and I’m 100% a shitskinned pajeet. If I were even partially European, I would be involved in the NS movement. Fighting against white genocide is the right thing to do, and a moral imperative.

Additionally, as you said in your post:


There would be no sentient people left on Earth if whites and East Asians were replaced by shitskins.
You should be the frontline soldier against muh genocide
 
saar stop writing essays pls. either rope or cope, you're not a good writer either. Stop tagging me too. kthxbye
I see. My fault in assuming you could ever be capable of self-awareness or introspection. Have the day you deserve
 
Last edited:
The biggest problem facing white countries is an aging population. In most white countries, the far right would win if only young men voted.

If we consider that more and more immigrants are becoming citizens, and that women, on top of that, live longer and will be voting for pro-immigration parties for many more years, we are doomed to disappear.
Trust me, your white whores are going to vote for Right Whingers in increasing numbers in the coming years. Migrants are the least of your worries. Every solid civilization had migrant slaves.
 
Trust me, your white whores are going to vote for Right Whingers in increasing numbers in the coming years. Migrants are the least of your worries. Every solid civilization had migrant slaves.
"Slaves"

1780856671037


Most kids in Western Europe are brown

In a few years, there will only be brown people left in Europe
 
"Slaves"

View attachment 1743854

Most kids in Western Europe are brown

In a few years, there will only be brown people left in Europe
Enslaved people were the backbone of Roman civilization, performing nearly every conceivable role in the empire. Their work ranged from brutal, deadly manual labor in mines and large agricultural estates (latifundia) to highly skilled white-collar professions, including medicine, accounting, and education.
Because your whores don't breed. You will continue to cope, your white whores will continue to ass-rape you, and you will continue to call her queen for it. To be honest, JBWs deserve this fate. Because of their cuckery, men all over the world continue to suffer.
 
Because your whores don't breed. You will continue to cope, your white whores will continue to ass-rape you, and you will continue to call her queen for it. To be honest, JBWs deserve this fate.
Stop saying "your." 0 white foids belong to me, otherwise, I wouldn't be here.

Because of their cuckery, men all over the world continue to suffer.
What is this cope shit, the rest of the world suffers because they are low IQ retards unable to rebel against anyone, which is why their countries are shitholes
 
I’ve held firmly in this for years. I do not consider myself to be a WN, I do not post in WN spaces, and I seek no form of association whatsoever with that movement. The cornerstone of WN ideology is pro-whiteness and the preservation of the white race. I don’t give a shit about any of that. My goal isn’t to preserve white people; it’s to destroy brown people.

Most whites deserve what they’re getting right now, because a majority of them tolerate it and a significant minority actively support and ask for more of it. You can go on and on about dah jooh this, dah jooh that, but the fact of the matter is Jews would be nowhere if there wasn’t something in the white man’s psyche to exploit. Whites are overly individualistic, open to experience, and prone to moralfaggotry and virtue-signaling thanks to their acclimation to high-trust societies. There was a time when this benefited them. Now it’s their downfall.

Even if no Jews existed, whites would arguably be sold out by other whites. We see this right now with how many virtue-signaling left-wing white cucks actively betray the interests of their own race (and with a profound zealousness and viciousness), and how white capitalists and even petite bourgeoisie will find any excuse to sell out their countries to browns for cheap labor. We also have the fact that even WNs themselves, for however “anti-degeneracy” they claim to be, are by and large woman-worshipping cuckolds. Many even pride themselves on how well they treat foids compared to ethnics (including some WNcels I’ve seen on this very forum).

I recall not too long ago I was watching a video of a white Canadian guy crashing out at jeet migrants in his country, and it was all going good until the nigga started going off at the jeets about “how you treat your own women and shit” :soy::feelstastyman: Like nigga, why the FUCK do you care about how pajeets treat pajeetas??! Since when was that your business, nigga?? Also, have you considered the fact that if you perhaps treated your women more like we treat ours, you wouldn’t be dealing with this birthrate crisis right now??

Gen Z white women are more radical than their male counterparts, just for the other side of the political spectrum. There are UK studies showing white British women perceive the UK as MORE RACIST than non-white women do🤦‍♂️This isn’t even getting into all the antinatalism and how many young WW statistically intend to be childfree for life. There is NO “saving a race” so long as said race continues to live in fear of their own women and refuse to put them in their place. You want your TFR above replacement? Get man enough to slap a bitch first. Start with baby steps.

There’s also all the gay pro-turdie virtue signaling done by Fuentes and the general Christian side of the Dissident Right. Whether it’s simping for disgusting brown countries (including one literally named “Niger”), talking about how “muhh hating brown people is Jewish,” or making retarded fucking comments like “even the most racist man would save a brown man from a burning building” :feelstastyman::soy::feelstastyman:

Speak for yourself, fucker. I wouldn’t even save a brown CHILD from a burning building. Now, I wouldn’t intentionally endanger one either (wouldn’t do that to a child of any race), but I sure as hell am not risking my life for some shitskin that’s one day either gonna nepotismmaxx, import his disgusting family and shitskin wife, and shit out 4 more poo-golbin spawn, multiplying like the absolute fucking TERMITE he is (if he’s my type of brown), or join a gang and get shot dead by age 16 (if he’s the other type of brown). No child deserves to die in a burning building, but I sure as hell am not risking my own life to save a brown child from one. The cost-to-benefit ratio on both an individual and collective scale just isn’t worth it.

Ultimately, Western Europeans (the people currently facing demographic replacement) aren’t necessarily needed to carry on high civilization and culture. Slavs can do it, and so can Northeast Asians. But both the former (besides the Ukrainians, who are instead being directly killed off en masse) and the latter are beginning to experience invasion by turdoids AS WELL, because there’s not one decent place on Earth that inferior, SHIT SKINNED, cockroach-esque fucking SUBHUMANS won’t invade and make identical to whatever nasty dump of a country they fled. It was never about “muh colonialism”; it was always about brown “people’s” inherent crab bucket mentality, seething jealousy, and desire to both mix with and destroy any group better than them, for the sole crime of being better than them.

There can be no world peace, there can be no utopia, there can be nothing until the brown races of the world are finally put to the sword wholesale (or at least dramatically culled). Moreover, as a brown man myself, I’m concerned with the suffering and piss-poor quality that is inherent to the brown experience and spans everything from our looks to the filth and poverty we’re consigned to by fate. And again, it isn’t cause of “muh colonialism.”

Take India – the literal posterboy for third world shitholes in the modern day. India became independent and China became the Communist PRC around the same timeframe. It was during said timeframe that even WESTERN sources were optimistic about the future of India and deeply pessimistic about that of China, due (but not limited) to the fact that China had been ravaged by war and the largest famine in history, whereas India had achieved independence largely peacefully, was politically stable, and had ready-made British institutions. Yet, generations later, we see who became the superpower and who became the super poo-er. The difference is fully in the DNA. China’s average IQ is in the 100s, whereas India’s ranges from the fucking 70s to low 80s depending on the estimate.
View attachment 1743674

Even just looking at the highest IQ subsections of both populations (since caste IQ stratification is very real in curryland), deep temperamental differences are obvious. Preselected Indian immigrants in countries like the US have carried a reputation for scamminess, clannishness/nepotism, and low conscientiousness for decades that the Chinese haven’t. Looking at how the elites of both countries run their respective societies also makes this glaringly obvious.

Temperament is arguably MORE important than IQ due to its higher heritability across social classes (some studies even show it being MORE heritable in lower socioeconomic brackets). A person of average intelligence with a good work ethic can build something, or get somewhere in life. A more intelligent person with a shitty temperament will get nowhere, or at best become a Ted K-esque high-IQ schizo.

China succeeded where India didn’t because Chinese people are genetically superior to Indians. I could get into other parts of the turd world like A(pe)frica and LatAm, and how “kolonealizm n shiet” is no excuse for their sorry state either, but this post is already long as fuck and I can’t be assed.

You don’t have to be pro-white to be anti-brown. Shitskins are a threat to civilization anywhere in the world we go, and we are also a threat to ourselves. Our existential condition is characterized by absolute destitution and misery that we only serve to endlessly spread, spread, and spread some more. Regardless of whether or not whites deserve to exist, brown “people” most certainly do not
i see what do u think of national socialism
 
The biggest problem facing white countries is an aging population. In most white countries, the far right would win if only young men voted.

If we consider that more and more immigrants are becoming citizens, and that women, on top of that, live longer and will be voting for pro-immigration parties for many more years, we are doomed to disappear.
That's why there needs to be age limits on who can vote.
Foids shouldn't be allowed to either.
 
The problem with whites is we have an inordinate amount of unprincipled men amongst us and those that don’t see why having principles is so important.

A principled white race would not allow lisping homosexuals or obvious system plants like Richard Spencer or Nick Fuentes speak for its best interests.

We absolutely deserve our place at the moment under the jew parasatoid’s boot.
💯
 
I am confident that China will find a way to weather any storm, no matter what happens to the rest of the Global North (including the rest of East Asia). I am not concerned that innovation and developments would disappear from a world where only Chinese people remained either, because unlike what is commonly believed they are plenty creative enough and do not just copy, and they are of course highly intelligent as well.

As for the Global South, I think it's ridiculous to suggest that all people there should be eviscerated, because that would not be practical for anyone. But I do think that the entirety of the Global South, and the Global North too really, will have to be heavily rehabilitated by one Global North country eventually (by "rehabilitation" let's imagine the most peaceful, humanitarian and consensual process possible, whatever that could be). I mean, it's inevitable really. Whatever Global North nation ends up ruling the world, let's hope that it's a good and benevolent one, so that the entire world can become one big and beautiful nation.

Until such a time comes to pass everyone should look out for themselves and their country. May the winner take all.
 
Just let chinks run the economy like in SEA and ur good
 
I’ve held firmly in this for years. I do not consider myself to be a WN, I do not post in WN spaces, and I seek no form of association whatsoever with that movement.
I dropped WNism and the "White" LARP and started to concentrate on the ethnic-genetic interests of my own people. It is, after all, a low-IQ movement filled with Nordicists and lowbrow stupidity. I cannot name a single prominent Southern or Eastern European Rightoid who views Northern Europeans as unevoluted, mongrelised apes fit for expulsion, yet I can easily name countless NW European Rightoids who think this of us.
The cornerstone of WN ideology is pro-whiteness and the preservation of the white race. I don’t give a shit about any of that. My goal isn’t to preserve white people; it’s to destroy brown people.
The cornerstone of WN ideology is to kiss Germanics' asses. Their pathological ethno-narcistic bias prevents it from functioning coherently.
Most whites deserve what they’re getting right now, because a majority of them tolerate it and a significant minority actively support and ask for more of it. You can go on and on about dah jooh this, dah jooh that, but the fact of the matter is Jews would be nowhere if there wasn’t something in the white man’s psyche to exploit. Whites are overly individualistic, open to experience, and prone to moralfaggotry and virtue-signaling thanks to their acclimation to high-trust societies. There was a time when this benefited them. Now it’s their downfall.
Quite right, with an important clarification: "white" here is only logically applicable to NW Europeans. This behaviour is also seen in dissident Right spaces as well, and I find it funny when HBDers and wignats babble about "high trust" and "western individualism" and "hajnal lines", but will never quit the shit and pin the blame where it belongs - NW European behaviour. That is, forever groveling to their genetically-encoded love of color while shitting on other Europeans.
Even if no Jews existed, whites would arguably be sold out by other whites. We see this right now with how many virtue-signaling left-wing white cucks actively betray the interests of their own race (and with a profound zealousness and viciousness), and how white capitalists and even petite bourgeoisie will find any excuse to sell out their countries to browns for cheap labor. We also have the fact that even WNs themselves, for however “anti-degeneracy” they claim to be, are by and large woman-worshipping cuckolds. Many even pride themselves on how well they treat foids compared to ethnics (including some WNcels I’ve seen on this very forum).
I agree with your synthesis so far, but RE: WNs you ignore the Anglo/Germanic/Nord elephant in the room with their ethnic pathology I spoke of above. They too mimic leftist hostility toward other Euros defending their racial interests!
There’s also all the gay pro-turdie virtue signaling done by Fuentes and the general Christian side of the Dissident Right. Whether it’s simping for disgusting brown countries (including one literally named “Niger”),
The Sahel States are based (Niger's name notwithstanding). "Simping" for browns is not inherently bad when those browns are acting as effective footsoldiers of Westoid global hegemony. I support any and all forces that chip away at it - being called a Third Worldist for this position is of zero concern to me.
talking about how “muhh hating brown people is Jewish,” or making retarded fucking comments like “even the most racist man would save a brown man from a burning building” :feelstastyman::soy::feelstastyman:
Too WEIRD for an outer-hajnal like me.
Ultimately, Western Europeans (the people currently facing demographic replacement) aren’t necessarily needed to carry on high civilization and culture. Slavs can do it, and so can Northeast Asians.
Germanic Western Europeans (pretty much the "core" ones) were never the carriers of high civilization in the first place. Au contraire, they destroyed civilization and classical order and brought with them a dark age that lasted a millennium. They were practically irrelevant for the entirety of human history until the industrial revolution, and today their countries are deindustrialised and demographically ill, and lack the vitality to reverse course.
But both the former (besides the Ukrainians, who are instead being directly killed off en masse) and the latter are beginning to experience invasion by turdoids AS WELL, because there’s not one decent place on Earth that inferior, SHIT SKINNED, cockroach-esque fucking SUBHUMANS won’t invade and make identical to whatever nasty dump of a country they fled. It was never about “muh colonialism”; it was always about brown “people’s” inherent crab bucket mentality, seething jealousy, and desire to both mix with and destroy any group better than them, for the sole crime of being better than them.
EE has it's own set of problems, to be sure, but it hasn't really been hit with immigration. For all its faults, it might as well be Agartha compared to the current state of the West.
There can be no world peace, there can be no utopia, there can be nothing until the brown races of the world are finally put to the sword wholesale (or at least dramatically culled). Moreover, as a brown man myself, I’m concerned with the suffering and piss-poor quality that is inherent to the brown experience and spans everything from our looks to the filth and poverty we’re consigned to by fate. And again, it isn’t cause of “muh colonialism.”
There will be no world peace or utopia no matter how many brown/black people disappear from the earth (which I'm not completely opposed to in principle - competition is good; war is good), however, as a Balkanoid, I have personally witnessed far less hostility coming from non-Europeans than from the NW Europeans who are our so-called brothers (barring Turks, ofc). This being the case, if we concentrate on immediate local threats, I support pragmatic cooperation with fellow browns against the common enemy.
Take India – the literal posterboy for third world shitholes in the modern day. India became independent and China became the Communist PRC around the same timeframe. It was during said timeframe that even WESTERN sources were optimistic about the future of India and deeply pessimistic about that of China, due (but not limited) to the fact that China had been ravaged by war and the largest famine in history, whereas India had achieved independence largely peacefully, was politically stable, and had ready-made British institutions. Yet, generations later, we see who became the superpower and who became the super poo-er.
Tbf, there was policy execution, faster implementation speed due to authoritarianism, socio-cultural factors (discipline, exam culture, etc.), and simplly timing, which all played roles. Structural issues as well, China became effectively capitalist after Xiaoping, whereas India remained burdened by socialism for decades longer.
The difference is fully in the DNA.
I don't agree that it's fully in the DNA (I can concede that it plays in part a background role in human capital), since India was historically richer per capita or highly comparable to China from the Ancient and Medieval era up until then. Similar for the total economy, but skewed in favour of China.
China’s average IQ is in the 100s,
No. Lynn upwards-adjusted the figures by relying on internet testing and urban samples. Internet users back then in China were not representative of the whole population (and such tests are notoriously easy to game), and the average IQ in cities is a SD higher than in rural areas. I can easily cite contrary data placing the Chinese average in the 70-80 ballpark which, as per Lynn's claim, "do not exist".
whereas India’s ranges from the fucking 70s to low 80s depending on the estimate.
1780821469190
I would serioulsy guard against relying upon any work by Lynn, as virtually every dataset in his book has been cherry-picked. It also isn't a proper journal publication but rather a self-published independent book, and even if he had decided to publish this in a scientific journal, the scientific community wouldn't accept it because the "70s to low 80s" figure is from disproportionately sampling minority subgroups. There are many samples showing 100+ and even more showing 90+ IQ via random testing on India which were conveniently omitted.

This isn't to suggest that Indians are on par with the Chinese, but that the gap is nowhere near as dramatic as Lynn's unreliable data would have you believe, and that with it you often get these "WTF" results.
Even just looking at the highest IQ subsections of both populations (since caste IQ stratification is very real in curryland), deep temperamental differences are obvious. Preselected Indian immigrants in countries like the US have carried a reputation for scamminess, clannishness/nepotism, and low conscientiousness for decades that the Chinese haven’t. Looking at how the elites of both countries run their respective societies also makes this glaringly obvious.
I can agree with the former two, but the Chinese are indeed known for their low conscientiousness. They are a coloured people, and thus reckless, corner-cutting, sloppy, "covid lab leak" scenarios are always a possibility - we can all thank the buck-toothed Chinaman for the pandemic, to cite one example, just as he was responsible for many other diseases throughout history.
 
i'm not white, but the only reason why I see myself aligned with the right wing, rather than leftists is simply because I don't want to get stabbed with a machete by some desert dwellers and I don't want another holodomor. I won't, however, consider myself a WN or a white-adjecent.
 
I don’t trust people who blame and attack whites all the time, they always have some ulterior motive that harms ethnics/blacks more than whites. For example, black wokeists who cape for hoodniggers (that primarily kill other blacks. The world doesn’t revolve around whites lack that tbh, non-whites hate each other way more than they hate whites

Worst as well is how noodlewhore/ethnic/black hoteps foids who yap about the white coloniser always happen to have white bfs
 
That's why there needs to be age limits on who can vote.
Foids shouldn't be allowed to either.
Yes, what do you think the limit should be? Maybe people over 50 won't be allowed to vote.
 
Worst as well is how noodlewhore/ethnic/black hoteps foids who yap about the white coloniser always happen to have white bfs
They are speaking from experience :feelskek:
 
I’ve held firmly in this for years. I do not consider myself to be a WN, I do not post in WN spaces, and I seek no form of association whatsoever with that movement. The cornerstone of WN ideology is pro-whiteness and the preservation of the white race. I don’t give a shit about any of that. My goal isn’t to preserve white people; it’s to destroy brown people.

Most whites deserve what they’re getting right now, because a majority of them tolerate it and a significant minority actively support and ask for more of it. You can go on and on about dah jooh this, dah jooh that, but the fact of the matter is Jews would be nowhere if there wasn’t something in the white man’s psyche to exploit. Whites are overly individualistic, open to experience, and prone to moralfaggotry and virtue-signaling thanks to their acclimation to high-trust societies. There was a time when this benefited them. Now it’s their downfall.

Even if no Jews existed, whites would arguably be sold out by other whites. We see this right now with how many virtue-signaling left-wing white cucks actively betray the interests of their own race (and with a profound zealousness and viciousness), and how white capitalists and even petite bourgeoisie will find any excuse to sell out their countries to browns for cheap labor. We also have the fact that even WNs themselves, for however “anti-degeneracy” they claim to be, are by and large woman-worshipping cuckolds. Many even pride themselves on how well they treat foids compared to ethnics (including some WNcels I’ve seen on this very forum).

I recall not too long ago I was watching a video of a white Canadian guy crashing out at jeet migrants in his country, and it was all going good until the nigga started going off at the jeets about “how you treat your own women and shit” :soy::feelstastyman: Like nigga, why the FUCK do you care about how pajeets treat pajeetas??! Since when was that your business, nigga?? Also, have you considered the fact that if you perhaps treated your women more like we treat ours, you wouldn’t be dealing with this birthrate crisis right now??

Gen Z white women are more radical than their male counterparts, just for the other side of the political spectrum. There are UK studies showing white British women perceive the UK as MORE RACIST than non-white women do🤦‍♂️This isn’t even getting into all the antinatalism and how many young WW statistically intend to be childfree for life. There is NO “saving a race” so long as said race continues to live in fear of their own women and refuse to put them in their place. You want your TFR above replacement? Get man enough to slap a bitch first. Start with baby steps.

There’s also all the gay pro-turdie virtue signaling done by Fuentes and the general Christian side of the Dissident Right. Whether it’s simping for disgusting brown countries (including one literally named “Niger”), talking about how “muhh hating brown people is Jewish,” or making retarded fucking comments like “even the most racist man would save a brown man from a burning building” :feelstastyman::soy::feelstastyman:

Speak for yourself, fucker. I wouldn’t even save a brown CHILD from a burning building. Now, I wouldn’t intentionally endanger one either (wouldn’t do that to a child of any race), but I sure as hell am not risking my life for some shitskin that’s one day either gonna nepotismmaxx, import his disgusting family and shitskin wife, and shit out 4 more poo-golbin spawn, multiplying like the absolute fucking TERMITE he is (if he’s my type of brown), or join a gang and get shot dead by age 16 (if he’s the other type of brown). No child deserves to die in a burning building, but I sure as hell am not risking my own life to save a brown child from one. The cost-to-benefit ratio on both an individual and collective scale just isn’t worth it.

Ultimately, Western Europeans (the people currently facing demographic replacement) aren’t necessarily needed to carry on high civilization and culture. Slavs can do it, and so can Northeast Asians. But both the former (besides the Ukrainians, who are instead being directly killed off en masse) and the latter are beginning to experience invasion by turdoids AS WELL, because there’s not one decent place on Earth that inferior, SHIT SKINNED, cockroach-esque fucking SUBHUMANS won’t invade and make identical to whatever nasty dump of a country they fled. It was never about “muh colonialism”; it was always about brown “people’s” inherent crab bucket mentality, seething jealousy, and desire to both mix with and destroy any group better than them, for the sole crime of being better than them.

There can be no world peace, there can be no utopia, there can be nothing until the brown races of the world are finally put to the sword wholesale (or at least dramatically culled). Moreover, as a brown man myself, I’m concerned with the suffering and piss-poor quality that is inherent to the brown experience and spans everything from our looks to the filth and poverty we’re consigned to by fate. And again, it isn’t cause of “muh colonialism.”

Take India – the literal posterboy for third world shitholes in the modern day. India became independent and China became the Communist PRC around the same timeframe. It was during said timeframe that even WESTERN sources were optimistic about the future of India and deeply pessimistic about that of China, due (but not limited) to the fact that China had been ravaged by war and the largest famine in history, whereas India had achieved independence largely peacefully, was politically stable, and had ready-made British institutions. Yet, generations later, we see who became the superpower and who became the super poo-er. The difference is fully in the DNA. China’s average IQ is in the 100s, whereas India’s ranges from the fucking 70s to low 80s depending on the estimate.
View attachment 1743674

Even just looking at the highest IQ subsections of both populations (since caste IQ stratification is very real in curryland), deep temperamental differences are obvious. Preselected Indian immigrants in countries like the US have carried a reputation for scamminess, clannishness/nepotism, and low conscientiousness for decades that the Chinese haven’t. Looking at how the elites of both countries run their respective societies also makes this glaringly obvious.

Temperament is arguably MORE important than IQ due to its higher heritability across social classes (some studies even show it being MORE heritable in lower socioeconomic brackets). A person of average intelligence with a good work ethic can build something, or get somewhere in life. A more intelligent person with a shitty temperament will get nowhere, or at best become a Ted K-esque high-IQ schizo.

China succeeded where India didn’t because Chinese people are genetically superior to Indians. I could get into other parts of the turd world like A(pe)frica and LatAm, and how “kolonealizm n shiet” is no excuse for their sorry state either, but this post is already long as fuck and I can’t be assed.

You don’t have to be pro-white to be anti-brown. Shitskins are a threat to civilization anywhere in the world we go, and we are also a threat to ourselves. Our existential condition is characterized by absolute destitution and misery that we only serve to endlessly spread, spread, and spread some more. Regardless of whether or not whites deserve to exist, brown “people” most certainly do not
Truthnuke from the slums of Mumbai
 
So, let me get this straight, you'd be ok with white people or Jews to completely genocide brown people?

Just a question
 
You're not necessarily wrong, though you make it sound like you'd be okay with them lynching you slowly and painfully alongside those who act the way they look, when simply living in exhile without having kids (no you don't need to mutilate yourself for that, nor should you have to) and either using a form of escorts or dolls to cope in peace would be better, or simply being shot in the head or going through some sort of euthanasia.
 
I want ethnics to neet in peace or be euthanized, but I don't think they should get any further mistreatment JUST for their physical appearances, unless they bring along their shitty cultures. You know what though? Whatever works. Nothing good comes easy.
 
So, let me get this straight, you'd be ok with white people or Jews to completely genocide brown people?

Just a question
He is, but he talks like they're gonna just quickly shoot him through the brain or euthanize him (which is what should happen). The only real problem is that they're gonna do additional stuff to make your life unnecessary harder before you die as an ethnic. It's like a leper that should be euthanized, but you torture and strangle him on a rope slowly beforehand, as if he chose to be born that way. I feel like me and @wereq are the only ones that see it that way. There is distinct lack of humanity on both sides, physical inhumanity on our side, and inhumanity of a more intangible form on the other.
 
Last edited:
Truthnvke, pajeetland África and south América are all crime ridden nepotistic tribal shitholes
 
So, let me get this straight, you'd be ok with white people or Jews to completely genocide brown people?

Just a question
Yes. I don’t like white people or Jews either, but my hatred for browns – especially curries – far surpasses what I feel for either.

I am not a white nationalist, but me and them have a common enemy
 
some shitskin that’s one day either gonna nepotismmaxx

Preselected Indian immigrants in countries like the US have carried a reputation for scamminess, clannishness/nepotism, and low conscientiousness for decades that the Chinese haven’t.
Thoughts on this table that's been making the rounds recently:waitwhat:? Just asking since I don't think I've seen your take on it yet.

1782685928122


I dropped WNism and the "White" LARP and started to concentrate on the ethnic-genetic interests of my own people. It is, after all, a low-IQ movement filled with Nordicists and lowbrow stupidity. I cannot name a single prominent Southern or Eastern European Rightoid who views Northern Europeans as unevoluted, mongrelised apes fit for expulsion, yet I can easily name countless NW European Rightoids who think this of us.
I understand that, and with the amount of Slavpill posts on how undesirable we are to Western European women I've posted on this forum over time, it would be hypocritical to say that I don't see why an Eastern or a Southern European would give up on WN-ism and just focused on his own group, but the thing is, anti-whites are never going to stop seeing us as white. We can shit on Germans and make it clear that being "white" means nothing to us however much we want, but the moment we'll step outside of Europe, "white" is all we'll ever be.

It's like how people here make fun of the idea of moving away from the blackpill. "You might be done with the blackpill, but the blackpill is not done with you." Similarly, Africans and Asians are never going to even entertain calling native Europeans anything else than a broad "white." Meanwhile, LatAmers and MENAs might troll whites by trying to deconstruct whiteness and be included in it, but the moment any conflict arises, they, just like the previous two groups, will have no illusions of who's white and who isn't. All the "X aren't white" discourse ends the moment a single European like that gets into a fight with the nons saying that. The total lack of any backlash to Eastern and Southern Europeans being denied jobs and kicked out of their jobs for "diversity" reasons all over the West and the world really makes this clear. All nons know exactly who is white and fully agree on it.

None of the Nordicist discourse meant anything for this black supremacist, who simply put Serbs and Latvians as examples of evil Europeans being le racist:soy: against IShowSpeed during his Europe tour:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqNpDlaIvFk


Likewise, I have very little doubt whether this Chink Senator in the US would have any doubt as to what exactly whites are, considering what he talks about:


View: https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2070863719790182573


All that is to say, since we are going to be seen as white no matter what, it doesn't really make sense to just give up on it. Nobody else is giving up on us being white. It is important to keep in mind that we aren't Nords or Germanics and how many of them see us, but in the end, we are white and will always be white, and that is the most important thing in the eyes of everyone else.

I don't know what Balkan country you are from, but since your region is now getting hit with rising South Asian immigration (Subcontinental migrants should be closing in at 1% of Romanian population from some of the statistics shared here I've seen), I'd advise you to wait a few years for decent numbers of them to come there, and then ask any of them whether they would classify you and your country as white or not, whether they believe you are racist and oppressing them, and whether they think any cooperation between your peoples on racial grounds is possible at all. I think we know what answers they'll give.

as a Balkanoid, I have personally witnessed far less hostility coming from non-Europeans than from the NW Europeans who are our so-called brothers (barring Turks, ofc).
Was it direct hostility, or general anti-whiteness though? I've noticed that it's much more uncomfortable and painful when someone is attacking my people directly, which is almost always done only by other Europeans, but that doesn't change the fact that we are included in all the anti-white comments I encounter, even though in those we aren't the primary target and can hide behind that to make it hit softer.

No. Lynn upwards-adjusted the figures by relying on internet testing and urban samples. Internet users back then in China were not representative of the whole population (and such tests are notoriously easy to game), and the average IQ in cities is a SD higher than in rural areas. I can easily cite contrary data placing the Chinese average in the 70-80 ballpark which, as per Lynn's claim, "do not exist".
Feel free to share those:hax:. I've checked for the urban-rural IQ divide quickly, and the first study that showed up did have a decent difference, but with the mean being around 101-102, which was where suburban children's average was, while city dwellers were at around 106, while rural children were at 96 on average.


I'd like it if they were stupider than they claim to be, but frankly, their sheer scientific success is making that a hard sell. In a country with average IQ of 85, almost 85% of population would have an IQ under 100. Given PRC's population, that would give them fewer people with 100+ IQ than Europe (sans Turkey and Russia) would have, along with a much lower GDP per capita (something which correlates with scientific production on a level of 75-85%). Yet, they both produce more scientific papers in general (which admittedly can be skewed and manipulated by them just producing pure junk), as well as more of the top 10% and top 1% most cited scientific research in the world (which would be much harder to fake, especially the latter) than the entirety of Europe even including Turkey and Russia, by a comfortable margin, on smaller GDP per capita and their share is still only growing.

1759064530213-png.1561257
1759068198757-png.1561290
1759068916022-png.1561294



All of that while their per capita scientific productivity is perfectly in line with the Eastern and Southeastern European countries whose GDP per capita is similar to China's, so it's exactly what you'd expect from an IQ 95-100 country with a nominal GDP per capita of around 10,000-20,000, and the PPP one of around 30,000-40,000.

 
I understand that, and with the amount of Slavpill posts on how undesirable we are to Western European women I've posted on this forum over time, it would be hypocritical to say that I don't see why an Eastern or a Southern European would give up on WN-ism and just focused on his own group, but the thing is, anti-whites are never going to stop seeing us as white. We can shit on Germans and make it clear that being "white" means nothing to us however much we want, but the moment we'll step outside of Europe, "white" is all we'll ever be.
100 percent. In fact, the best evidence that WNs and leftists really don't fully believe that we are non-"white" is that if they did really believe it then they would be fervently pro-Southern/Eastern European and, indeed, would give us preference over their own people.
It's like how people here make fun of the idea of moving away from the blackpill. "You might be done with the blackpill, but the blackpill is not done with you." Similarly, Africans and Asians are never going to even entertain calling native Europeans anything else than a broad "white." Meanwhile, LatAmers and MENAs might troll whites by trying to deconstruct whiteness and be included in it, but the moment any conflict arises, they, just like the previous two groups, will have no illusions of who's white and who isn't. All the "X aren't white" discourse ends the moment a single European like that gets into a fight with the nons saying that.
These people are not our friends either, right. But I am absolutely in favor of mass migration from the Third World into Western Europe and other New World Germ-founded shitholes. High time to leave North-Western Europeans to face they destiny they created and which they fully deserve, IMO.

For the record, I don't particularly care about being "white" or not, given that the category is mostly a social construct. The same types you've elucidated tend to fixate almost exclusively on skin tone and would happily classify Caucasians, Turks, Ashkenazi/Sephardi Jews, and other light-skinned West Asians as "white". I've even seen some go so far as to classify Gypsies (!) as "white."
The total lack of any backlash to Eastern and Southern Europeans being denied jobs and kicked out of their jobs for "diversity" reasons all over the West and the world really makes this clear. All nons know exactly who is white and fully agree on it.
We (particularly Slavs) suffer from the opposite pathology. We are treated as inferior precisely because we are similar enough to Western Europeans that it remains politically correct (even fashionable - see Brexit for a shining example), for them to openly dunk on us without backlash. I recall having read papers documenting anti-Slavic discrimination in Western European countries that were eye-opening when I first came across them. I can't pull the specific references from memory atm, but given your familiarity with the Slavpill, I'm sure you know exactly the phenomenon to which I refer.
None of the Nordicist discourse meant anything for this black supremacist, who simply put Serbs and Latvians as examples of evil Europeans being le racist:soy: against IShowSpeed during his Europe tour:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqNpDlaIvFk


Likewise, I have very little doubt whether this Chink Senator in the US would have any doubt as to what exactly whites are, considering what he talks about:


View: https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2070863719790182573


All that is to say, since we are going to be seen as white no matter what, it doesn't really make sense to just give up on it. Nobody else is giving up on us being white. It is important to keep in mind that we aren't Nords or Germanics and how many of them see us, but in the end, we are white and will always be white, and that is the most important thing in the eyes of everyone else.
My point of contention is that you allow these people to dictate your identity and urge me to support a Germanic-centric movement that wants our book purchases and our page views and all other forms of support while attacking our legitimate identities and survival interests of our own ethnies. If you want to broaden your ingroup to include historically/contemporarily aggressive North-West Europeans simply because a bunch of ignorant non-Europeans lump us together, then by all means, knock yourself out. But I would strongly advise against it. Our countries don't have the same geopolitical interests anyway.
I don't know what Balkan country you are from,
I am technically from a South American country with a substantial ex-Yugo (mostly Croatian) diaspora, but I have lived and grown up in Serbia for so long that I might as well be native. And you?
but since your region is now getting hit with rising South Asian immigration (Subcontinental migrants should be closing in at 1% of Romanian population from some of the statistics shared here I've seen),
As far as I know, that's less of a Western Balkan problem than the Chinese and the environmental devastation they inflict on the region (much like how our so-called German ilk's EU policies have deindustrialised and stripped EU Balkanoid nations of agricultural capacity), who are a significantly larger problem than the couple of thousand Desi folks who have arrived so far and still lack any real sway.
I'd advise you to wait a few years for decent numbers of them to come there, and then ask any of them whether they would classify you and your country as white or not, whether they believe you are racist and oppressing them, and whether they think any cooperation between your peoples on racial grounds is possible at all. I think we know what answers they'll give.
Why bother asking any questions? I'd rather tell them that this country is a shithole that pays peanuts, and that they would be far better off getting an H-1B visa for America or Express Entry to Canada.
Was it direct hostility, or general anti-whiteness though?
My dear, the post was referring to WNism.
I've noticed that it's much more uncomfortable and painful when someone is attacking my people directly, which is almost always done only by other Europeans, but that doesn't change the fact that we are included in all the anti-white comments I encounter, even though in those we aren't the primary target and can hide behind that to make it hit softer.
The point was that we have nothing to gain from the term "white", and that there are very good reasons to avoid any "pan-white" or "pan-European" illusion.
Feel free to share those:hax:.
I have a dataset of 16 lying around.
Wang,2001,76-81,Shandong Province, China
Hong,2001,65-82,Shandong Province, China
Li,1995,79-89,Guizhou Province, China
Yang,1994,"76,81",Jinan, China
An,1992,"76,84",Guyang County, Inner Mongolia, China
Guo,1991,"76,81",Hunan Province, China
Fan,2007,"96,98",Pucheng County, Shaanxi Province, China
Li,2003,92,Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China
Zhang,1998,"80,85,87",Kuitun Region, Urumqi, China
Yao,1997,92-100,Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, China
Yao,1996,92-98,Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, China
Duan,1995,71-99,Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
Xu,1994,69-83,Shandong Province, China
Sun,1991,69-85,Guizhou Province, China
Ren,1989,75-85,Shandong Province, China
Lin,1991,"71,77,79,96",Hetian Prefecture, Xinjiang, China

I'm sure that many more studies exist beyond these.
I've checked for the urban-rural IQ divide quickly, and the first study that showed up did have a decent difference, but with the mean being around 101-102, which was where suburban children's average was, while city dwellers were at around 106, while rural children were at 96 on average.

You are repeating Lynn's fundamental error: the paper is valid, but it is based on a single county-level sample from Jiangsu (a relatively prosperous province) and therefore cannot be treated as representative of a true national average.
I'd like it if they were stupider than they claim to be, but frankly, their sheer scientific success is making that a hard sell. In a country with average IQ of 85, almost 85% of population would have an IQ under 100.
I might not have been completely clear in the last sentence of that comment, judging by the confusion it seems to have engendered, so to clarify - I am not claiming that China's national average IQ falls in the 70-80 ballpark(that would be ludicrous). Rather, samples in that range do exist, even under relatively favorable conditions, and Lynn simply excluded them. So his dataset is therefore the product of selective citation.
1782726106159
1782726115392


A more realistic national estimate would lie somewhere in the mid-90s.
Given PRC's population, that would give them fewer people with 100+ IQ than Europe (sans Turkey and Russia) would have, along with a much lower GDP per capita (something which correlates with scientific production on a level of 75-85%). Yet, they both produce more scientific papers in general (which admittedly can be skewed and manipulated by them just producing pure junk), as well as more of the top 10% and top 1% most cited scientific research in the world (which would be much harder to fake, especially the latter) than the entirety of Europe even including Turkey and Russia, by a comfortable margin, on smaller GDP per capita and their share is still only growing.

1759064530213-png.1561257
1759068198757-png.1561290
1759068916022-png.1561294


All of that while their per capita scientific productivity is perfectly in line with the Eastern and Southeastern European countries whose GDP per capita is similar to China's, so it's exactly what you'd expect from an IQ 95-100 country with a nominal GDP per capita of around 10,000-20,000, and the PPP one of around 30,000-40,000.

Agreed.
 
For the record, I don't particularly care about being "white" or not, given that the category is mostly a social construct. The same types you've elucidated tend to fixate almost exclusively on skin tone and would happily classify Caucasians, Turks, Ashkenazi/Sephardi Jews, and other light-skinned West Asians as "white". I've even seen some go so far as to classify Gypsies (!) as "white."
So you no longer believe in race realism? Or you still believe in average differences between human populations having a genetic basis, but broad racial categories being a little too arbitrary?

I could sort of see that tbh. I guess for countries that still have a majority of one ethnic group (or a national identity tied to them), where to draw the line in regards to who can be deemed assimilable or not should probably be done on an ethnicity-by-ethnicity level rather than a racial one. But still taking genetics into account ofc. Different deal for New World and multiethnic countries tho; not sure what they should do
 
So you no longer believe in race realism? Or you still believe in average differences between human populations having a genetic basis, but broad racial categories being a little too arbitrary?
Neither. With respect to Europe specifically, there is a considerable difference between, say, Greece and Finland, though a continuum exists between them. But there is a clear gap between Greece and anyone east/south of them, with Cypriots and Jews falling somewhat in the middle of European and MENAs (the former being island dwellers in the "west" west Levant and the latter a diaspora group, both groups being some form of European and West Asian. If anything, I have greater objection to artificially constructed Intra-European or inter-racial categories precisely because of their distinctness from Europeans, like "Imperial Roman" or "East Med".

Phenotypically and culturally, "white" and "European" are largely constructs.
I could sort of see that tbh. I guess for countries that still have a majority of one ethnic group (or a national identity tied to them), where to draw the line in regards to who can be deemed assimilable or not should probably be done on an ethnicity-by-ethnicity level rather than a racial one. But still taking genetics into account ofc.
Probably not, too civcuck for my taste. Unless you mean the assimilation of those like the Greeks of Pontus or the Arvanites, groups that are genetically distinct from Greeks and Albanians who are better understood in terms of language and culture.
Different deal for New World and multiethnic countries tho; not sure what they should do
Replace them with fresh manure from Gujarat and forget about it.
 
Stop self hating bruh
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top