Mediterranean peoples share history, culture and genetics.

[Balikesir]

This shouldn't be a shocking revelation. Mediterranean was once one country under roman empire

After the western empire fell. The east stood strong for another millennium.

Here is a research paper discussing why the Mediterranean lands are similar in admixture.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm4247

TLDR: During roman empire Greeks from all over hellenistic lands would migrate to core roman lands. This would be Italian peninsula, Sicily, Anatolia and levant.

Greeks in Syria - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Greeks in Israel - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

North Africa - Greeks, Cyrenaica, Colonization | Britannica

North Africa - Greeks, Cyrenaica, Colonization: The natural contacts of Cyrenaica were northward with Crete and the Aegean world. In the late 12th century bc Sea Peoples landing in Cyrenaica armed the Libyans and with them attempted unsuccessfully an invasion of Egypt. Cyrenaica’s coast was...

www.britannica.com

African Greeks - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Other places are common sense.
Here is a map of hellenic peoples during hellenistic period so you understand how big of a population they were.

On this forum however is a sizeable user base that believes once you enter Turkey you will see black people, fully distinct from their neighbors. This is impossible because Southern Italy and Turkey share most of their DNA because of the previously mentioned Greeks.

Closest populations to southern Italy.

Here is a paper that discovered Tuscany is the region most closely resembling the TR population.

The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PMC

We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ostrzeżenie o przekierowaniu

People put words in my mouth that I have an evil motive. No. How is science evil? Isn't it a joke that Turks are mostly non Turkic?
Example

The people who say this aren't typically from the Mediterranean. They are Americans who don't know who their father is. Yet such a person knows my ancestry? Don't be ridiculous.

It was Italians that created the ideology of Mediterraneanism. An ideology that stood its time.

Mediterraneanism - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Sergi claimed the Nordics had made no substantial contribution to pre-modern civilization, noting that "in the epoch of Tacitus, the Germans ... remained barbarians as in prehistoric times

And this is the point. If white nationalists accepted that Italians have a connection to peoples outside of Europe. Then they would admit that we aren't subhumans. They would admit that our 'lowly race' impacted history. They would admit that the bedtime stories they read to their kids about Alexanders conquest of Anatolia is connected to us. Not them.

I will get hate and bombardment by these people. The truth must be spoken. Even if I'm alone in this.

Disclaimer. Because I know that they will put words in my mouth and invent lies. I do not agree that Turks are European. It is a fact that Italy and Turkey share most of their genes. It is not my opinion.

What makes Mediterranean peoples hate each other is religion and history. If you make your identity purely on genetics, then you will have to admit that Turks are European. It is Americans that soil forums with their racial and genetics identity discussions because they are culturally and traditionally removed from europeans. Sometimes also linguistically. This is why they support a genetically based identity.

And no one is speaking about eastern turkey. Why would I be speaking about kurds or Armenians. Don't be nonsensical. Eastern turkey is not anatolia.

@joocel52 @ReconElement @Ubermenschvirtues @anandkonda @DarkStar

 

[joocel52]

This shouldn't be a shocking revelation. Mediterranean was once one country under roman empire

dont forget also about phoenician colonization throught the mediterranean during iron age, the establishments of greek elites thourhgt the near east during the hellenistic era, and ofc greek colonies in italy, north africa, anatolia, and other regions during classical times

The people who say this aren't typically from the Mediterranean. They are Americans who don't know who their father is. Yet such a person knows my ancestry? Don't be ridiculous.

And this is the point. If white nationalists accepted that Italians have a connection to peoples outside of Europe. Then they would admit that we aren't subhumans. They would admit that our 'lowly race' impacted history. They would admit that the bedtime stories they read to their kids about Alexanders conquest of Anatolia is connected to us. Not them.

I will get hate and bombardment by these people. The truth must be spoken. Even if I'm alone in this.

Disclaimer. Because I know that they will put words in my mouth and invent lies. I do not agree that Turks are European. It is a fact that Italy and Turkey share most of their genes. It is not my opinion.

What makes Mediterranean peoples hate each other is religion and history. If you make your identity purely on genetics, then you will have to admit that Turks are European. It is Americans that soil forums with their racial and genetics identity discussions because they are culturally and traditionally removed from europeans. Sometimes also linguistically. This is why they support a genetically based identity.

And no one is speaking about eastern turkey. Why would I be speaking about kurds or Armenians. Don't be nonsensical. Eastern turkey is not anatolia.

true, admitting turks and other med populations display a great genetic similarity to italy and greece will mean they are not subhuman and are equal to the white race, which would be suifuel for white nationalists. the reason syrian rapefugees are a problem in italy for example is cause of their retarded culture, not cause they are syrian
good post

 

[DarkStar]

true, admitting turks and other med populations display a great genetic similarity to italy and greece will mean they are not subhuman and are equal to the white race, which would be suifuel for white nationalists. the reason syrian rapefugees are a problem in italy for example is cause of their retarded culture, not cause they are syrian
good post

Syrians are genetically different, they have more Natufian and INF the same as other Levantines, though ofc they have some ANF

When i’m speaking of Meds being White/European, i’m speaking about more “continental” ones like mainland Italians(south is by region), especially up North, North-Central Iberians, French etc.

I do agree and stated that many southern coastal populations genetically drift, and as shown on a PCA are an intermediary between Europeans and MENA+Kavkaz

You can see it here:

this lines up with both what me and @Balikesir have sort of been saying, that West Anatolians(likely what is drifted) and Greek Islanders+Sicilians are sort of that intermediary.

And OP, would you mind highlighting specifically the thing about Turkish(west anatolian)genes being 80% similar to Italian ones?

 

[DarkStar]

which would be suifuel for white nationalists

I think what we can take from this, is that to many normies and even WN, Italians at least North-Central ones and not some coastal populations

And again, I often find its “jooz” such as yourself who push these dialectics online and push for this. Most Europeans agree that most are White/their fellow European

 

[Balikesir]

dont forget also about phoenician colonization throught the mediterranean during iron age, the establishments of greek elites thourhgt the near east during the hellenistic era, and ofc greek colonies in italy, north africa, anatolia, and other regions during classical times

We have excavations of Bronze age Greeks that were half Phoenician. In turkey a Phoenician was vital to a Greek city state.

Miletus - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Thales of Miletus - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Phoenicians are closest to Jews

true, admitting turks and other med populations display a great genetic similarity to italy and greece will mean they are not subhuman and are equal to the white race, which would be suifuel for white nationalists. the reason syrian rapefugees are a problem in italy for example is cause of their retarded culture, not cause they are syrian
good post

. Similar in turkey. Syrians should be able to pass in Eastern turkey but there they are hated as much as they are in the west. It is because of culture and behavior.

 

[user2]

When i’m speaking of Meds being White/European, i’m speaking about more “continental” ones like mainland Italians(south is by region), especially up North, North-Central Iberians, French etc.

I do agree and stated that many southern coastal populations genetically drift, and as shown on a PCA are an intermediary between Europeans and MENA+Kavkaz

You can see it here:

Whiteness in a European context is not defined solely based off genetics; it's a cultural and (mainly) historical identity that goes beyond genetic composition. Southern Europeans have been recognized as part of the European racial group in global discussions about race regardless of minor genetic influences.

Southern Europeans are included in the broader white European racial category because of their shared historical identity with Northern and Central Europeans, even if slight genetic variation is still present

 

[DarkStar]

Phoenicians are closest to Jews

I always was told it’s Lebanese

View attachment 1345069

. Similar in turkey. Syrians should be able to pass in Eastern turkey but there they are hated as much as they are in the west. It is because of culture and behavior.

Well yeah, but they also pass in East Turkey and I think should be closer

 

[DarkStar]

Whiteness in a European context is not defined solely based off genetics; it's a cultural and (mainly) historical identity that goes beyond genetic composition. Southern Europeans have been recognized as part of the European racial group in global discussions about race regardless of minor genetic influences.

Southern Europeans are included in the broader white European racial category because of their shared historical identity with Northern and Central Europeans, even if slight genetic variation is still present

Yup, always were even by the NSDAP of all people:

The text seems to categorize the European races in descending orders in the Nazi racial hierarchy: the Nordic(including the Phalic sub-race, a subgroup of the Nordic race), Mediterranean, Dinaric, Alpine, and East Baltic races.[5

 

[user2]

Yup, always were even by the NSDAP of all people:

You think I don't know that?

What makes Mediterranean peoples hate each other is religion and history. If you make your identity purely on genetics, then you will have to admit that Turks are European. It is Americans that soil forums with their racial and genetics identity discussions because they are culturally and traditionally removed from europeans. Sometimes also linguistically. This is why they support a genetically based identity.

I'm not denying that we do share small amounts of DNA, however we are European, and that is what sets us apart

 

[Balikesir]

And OP, would you mind highlighting specifically the thing about Turkish(west anatolian)genes being 80% similar to Italian ones?

Are you referring to which population is their ancestor? That would be hellenistic Greeks.

You see they are closest to greek Islands and greek anatolia.

 

[Balikesir]

always was told it’s Lebanese

Lebanese fall out of the cluster because of their bedouin. They are still mostly Phoenician though.

 

[DarkStar]

Are you referring to which population is their ancestor? That would be hellenistic Greeks.

View attachment 1345071View attachment 1345072

You see they are closest to greek Islands and greek anatolia.

Italians should still be close to the Latini/Iron Age Romans, i’ve seen stuff on it

Also, look at this:

Tenney Frank's "Orientalization" Refuted

In 1916, American historian Tenney Frank published an article called "Race Mixture in the Roman Empire" , which is quoted all over the web b...

italianthro.blogspot.com

I think it’s mainly talking about the claim that North Africans and Levantines re-populated Rome

Will share more later

 

[Balikesir]

think it’s mainly talking about the claim that North Africans and Levantines re-populated Rome

Will share more later

I read this too. Italy used to be northern shifted before the arrival of greek and levant migrants.

Look at this etruscan breakdown.

Modern Italians shift towards etruscans again because of german settlers.

Look how far Italy imperial is to etruscan. It is very interesting how quickly the population of Italy changed after the fall of Rome.

 

[Ubermenschvirtues]

 

[Trident]

View attachment 1346363

would pass as Jewish as well

 

[joocel52]

View attachment 1346363

would pass as Jewish as well

Truth

 

[Neutraliy]

Modern Turkey:
Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Caucasian 32.92
2 South_Central_Asian 13.38
3 European_Early_Farmers 11.78
4 Near_East 10.05
5 European_Hunters_Gatherers 6.76
6 Tungus-Altaic 5.68
7 South_East_Asian 4.00
8 Ancestral_Altaic 3.92
9 North_African 3.78
10 East_Siberian 2.86
11 South_Indian 1.89
12 Melano_Polynesian 1.53
Source: https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?226479-Turkish-GEDmatch-results-(Central-Anatolian)


Hitties
Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Anatolian_NF 47.26
2 Caucasus_HG 34.77
3 Near_East 14.50
4 European_HG 3.12
Source: https://www.theapricity.com/forum/showthread.php?321584-Hittite-GEDmatch-results-(1750-BC)

@DarkStar
Modern turkey is heavily racemixed

 

[Neutraliy]

View attachment 1345053

Modern continental greek is like 25% slavic
If you compare with ancient greek then you could see 45 degree shift toward east slavic cluster among the greek plot

 

[DarkStar]

View attachment 1346363

Truth

JFL no way, as a Jew sure but as a Gulf Arab or Palestinian which this implies no way

 

[SyrianSchizoSage]

JFL no way, as a Jew sure but as a Gulf Arab or Palestinian which this implies no way

Gulf Arabs no
Palestinian definitely he looks really Levantine lol.

 

[SyrianSchizoSage]

This shouldn't be a shocking revelation. Mediterranean was once one country under roman empire

View attachment 1344974

After the western empire fell. The east stood strong for another millennium.

View attachment 1344981

Here is a research paper discussing why the Mediterranean lands are similar in admixture.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm4247

TLDR: During roman empire Greeks from all over hellenistic lands would migrate to core roman lands. This would be Italian peninsula, Sicily, Anatolia and levant.

Greeks in Syria - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Greeks in Israel - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

North Africa - Greeks, Cyrenaica, Colonization | Britannica

North Africa - Greeks, Cyrenaica, Colonization: The natural contacts of Cyrenaica were northward with Crete and the Aegean world. In the late 12th century bc Sea Peoples landing in Cyrenaica armed the Libyans and with them attempted unsuccessfully an invasion of Egypt. Cyrenaica’s coast was...

www.britannica.com

African Greeks - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Other places are common sense.
Here is a map of hellenic peoples during hellenistic period so you understand how big of a population they were.
View attachment 1344991

On this forum however is a sizeable user base that believes once you enter Turkey you will see black people, fully distinct from their neighbors. This is impossible because Southern Italy and Turkey share most of their DNA because of the previously mentioned Greeks.

View attachment 1345003
View attachment 1345025
Closest populations to southern Italy.

Here is a paper that discovered Tuscany is the region most closely resembling the TR population.

The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PMC

We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ostrzeżenie o przekierowaniu

People put words in my mouth that I have an evil motive. No. How is science evil? Isn't it a joke that Turks are mostly non Turkic?
Example
View attachment 1345009

The people who say this aren't typically from the Mediterranean. They are Americans who don't know who their father is. Yet such a person knows my ancestry? Don't be ridiculous.

View attachment 1345024

It was Italians that created the ideology of Mediterraneanism. An ideology that stood its time.

Mediterraneanism - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

And this is the point. If white nationalists accepted that Italians have a connection to peoples outside of Europe. Then they would admit that we aren't subhumans. They would admit that our 'lowly race' impacted history. They would admit that the bedtime stories they read to their kids about Alexanders conquest of Anatolia is connected to us. Not them.

I will get hate and bombardment by these people. The truth must be spoken. Even if I'm alone in this.

Disclaimer. Because I know that they will put words in my mouth and invent lies. I do not agree that Turks are European. It is a fact that Italy and Turkey share most of their genes. It is not my opinion.

What makes Mediterranean peoples hate each other is religion and history. If you make your identity purely on genetics, then you will have to admit that Turks are European. It is Americans that soil forums with their racial and genetics identity discussions because they are culturally and traditionally removed from europeans. Sometimes also linguistically. This is why they support a genetically based identity.

And no one is speaking about eastern turkey. Why would I be speaking about kurds or Armenians. Don't be nonsensical. Eastern turkey is not anatolia.

@joocel52 @ReconElement @Ubermenschvirtues @anandkonda @DarkStar

I don't think Levantines are "white" tbh we are not close to Euros

 

[Blackpill Monk]

Levantines are "white"

Saar we are White saar

 

[Thaway]

View attachment 1346363

Both brown, honestly.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

All this is water to everyone who isn't a pan-european wignat race autist perpetually stuck in a basement with eyes glued to save evropa twatter pages all day.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

 

[SyrianSchizoSage]

Saar we are White saar

what the actual fuck?
You can't read?
Are you dyslexic?

 

[SyrianSchizoSage]

View attachment 1579944

based.
Stormfrontcels will tell you Europeans created everything while most Greek Scholars learned from Semites and some notable Greeks have Semitic ancestry like Euclid and others

 

[Sir Waco]

powerfvl

 

[Hoodpreet]

All this is water to everyone who isn't a pan-european wignat race autist perpetually stuck in a basement with eyes glued to save evropa twatter pages all day.

Nigga I'm a curry and even I can tell he cherry-picked the G25 data. See:

"(No_EE)" - No East Eurasian. He got these results by removing the East Eurasian component from the Turkish sample, despite that being a substantial component of their ancestry and one that, when included, significantly impacts their clustering. Actual studies show most Turks are genetically closer to Kavkaz and Iranians than they are to Greeks:

View attachment 1579944

None of this debunks the fact that there was significant Hellenistic influence on modern Europe; this is like saying that since Proto-Indo-European linguistic and cultural patterns influenced us curries, they could not have influenced Europe (when the fact is that they influenced both).

It also misrepresents the Greek view of Northern Europeans. They did indeed see the Persians and Egyptians as more cultured than the barbarians of the North, but they also saw the former groups as feminine and submissive to authority (hence Herodotus's "golden mean" quote, where he describes the olive-skinned Greek man as being the happy medium between the uncultured yet hardy pale-skinned Northerner and the cultured yet effeminate dark-skinned Easterner/Southerner). When it came down to it, they sooner chose to group themselves with the barbarians than the Persians, hence coming up with the concept of Europe as a distinct continent from Asia (despite both belonging to a contiguous landmass) and drawing the borders where they did

 

[Lonely Slav]

This shouldn't be a shocking revelation. Mediterranean was once one country under roman empire

After the western empire fell. The east stood strong for another millennium.

Here is a research paper discussing why the Mediterranean lands are similar in admixture.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm4247
TLDR: During roman empire Greeks from all over hellenistic lands would migrate to core roman lands. This would be Italian peninsula, Sicily, Anatolia and levant.

Greeks in Syria - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Greeks in Israel - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

North Africa - Greeks, Cyrenaica, Colonization | Britannica

North Africa - Greeks, Cyrenaica, Colonization: The natural contacts of Cyrenaica were northward with Crete and the Aegean world. In the late 12th century bc Sea Peoples landing in Cyrenaica armed the Libyans and with them attempted unsuccessfully an invasion of Egypt. Cyrenaica’s coast was...

www.britannica.com

African Greeks - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Other places are common sense.
Here is a map of hellenic peoples during hellenistic period so you understand how big of a population they were.

On this forum however is a sizeable user base that believes once you enter Turkey you will see black people, fully distinct from their neighbors. This is impossible because Southern Italy and Turkey share most of their DNA because of the previously mentioned Greeks.

Someone of Turkish ancestry is clearly not genetically native to Europe (with the possible exception of Western coastal or European Turk outliers). By genetic distance, a Greek or Italian is closer to a Frenchman or other Southern European than to a Turk:

Modern Turks as a whole are a different peoples whose ethnogenesis resulted in Central/Eastern Anatolians mixing with Central Asian Turkic invaders. They're around half medieval Ottoman, who were 20-30% East Asian and the remainder primarily Eastern Iranian. You proved this yourself here (albeit in a really shitty way):

And since those empires were run by actual European warriors and bureaucrats, I'd be more prudent about any hypothesis over "Turkish" proximity.

Here is a paper that discovered Tuscany is the region most closely resembling the TR population.

The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PMC

We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Kennisgeving voor omleiding

You retard, the paper explicitly states that Turks show closer values to their nearby Balkan and Caucasus neighbors, followed by Tuscans.

The genetic similarity in the regional dataset was further tested with Wright's fixation index (FST), which revealed that the closest relationship of the TR population, in order of magnitude, is with the eastern and western neighboring populations, followed by Tuscan people in Italy. These results are therefore consistent with high levels of BLK, CAU, EUR, and Middle Eastern admixture (Fig. 2B).

For fuck's sake, read the F-stat heatmap before you talk out of your arse:

Biggest idiot on this entire fourm award. Can't blame you though, it's not your fault you're inbred (as per your own study):

The results show that the genetic structure of present-day Anatolia was shaped by historical and modern-day migrations, high levels of admixture, and inbreeding.

We determined that 50% of TR individuals had high inbreeding coefficients (≥0.0156) with runs of homozygosity longer than 4 Mb being found exclusively in the TR population when compared to 1000 Genomes Project populations.

The practice of consanguineous marriage is frequent in Turkey, especially in the eastern provinces (4). This should, in principle, help to facilitate disease gene discovery, as the increased frequency of homozygosity among members of inbred populations has led to the identification of many disease genes (5–8).

I will get hate and bombardment by these people. The truth must be spoken. Even if I'm alone in this.

Disclaimer. Because I know that they will put words in my mouth and invent lies. I do not agree that Turks are European. It is a fact that Italy and Turkey share most of their genes. It is not my opinion.

What makes Mediterranean peoples hate each other is religion and history. If you make your identity purely on genetics, then you will have to admit that Turks are European. It is Americans that soil forums with their racial and genetics identity discussions because they are culturally and traditionally removed from europeans. Sometimes also linguistically. This is why they support a genetically based identity.

Does it strike as a surprise that nationalists would be pissed off at the incessant lies and slanders that go against every shred of evidence? All we aim to do is point out a genetic component to a divide that already exists due to socio-cultural factors. There is a clear stark divide between the two shores of the mediterranean. There always has been, culturally, historically, and genetically. This isn't new. Both American and non-American Mediterranean peoples have pointed this out(and many Europeans themselves don't like Turks).

Now, why don't you take your idiotic platitudes and stick them all the way up your fucking ass?

Both brown, honestly.

How will you ever recover from the fact that southern Italians have ten times the achievements of Scandinavia, all the Celtic nations combined, and Iberia, while being genetically sandwiched between the profiles of Homer and Plato on one side and Caesar and Augustus on the other?

And I shan't overlook the shitload of sexual frustration and envy you've likely developped for Southern Italians thanks to Luigi Mangione. You truly are a bleached negro driven by sheer existential seething. Sad!

Still waiting for actual scientific and historical evidence that Greeks are "oriental," but when one's IQ hovers closer to the Indian average than to Europeans' I guess it's implausible to expect more.

It's also ironic that you label me as a "race autist" when you beleive fringe theories nobody IRL takes seriously. I'm sure I mog you both mentally and physically, so it hardly matters to me anyway.

Nigga I'm a curry and even I can tell he cherry-picked the G25 data. See:

"(No_EE)" - No East Eurasian. He got these results by removing the East Eurasian component from the Turkish sample, despite that being a substantial component of their ancestry and one that, when included, significantly impacts their clustering. Actual studies show most Turks are genetically closer to Kavkaz and Iranians than they are to Greeks:

Great catch, Hoodpreet!

Truth be told, G25 Italian samples are at odds with academic literature regardless; either Italians are too southern shifted or southern Balkaners and Iberians are too northern shifted. Either way, they don't help him out here since they don't represent actual Italians. Western Anatolians still ought to be more distant due to Levantine and Caucasus admixture even without the East Eurasian component.

 

[Blackpill Monk]

what the actual fuck?
You can't read?
Are you dyslexic?

Sandnigger rambling

 

[Blackpill Monk]

based.
Stormfrontcels will tell you Europeans created everything while most Greek Scholars learned from Semites and some notable Greeks have Semitic ancestry like Euclid and others

Saar we Semites have created European civilization saar

 

[Sir Silentium]

Great sources

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Someone of Turkish ancestry is clearly not genetically native to Europe (with the possible exception of Western coastal or European Turk outliers). By genetic distance, a Greek or Italian is closer to a Frenchman or other Southern European than to a Turk:
View attachment 1580347

Modern Turks as a whole are a different peoples whose ethnogenesis resulted in Central/Eastern Anatolians mixing with Central Asian Turkic invaders. They're around half medieval Ottoman, who were 20-30% East Asian and the remainder primarily Eastern Iranian. You proved this yourself here (albeit in a really shitty way):


And since those empires were run by actual European warriors and bureaucrats, I'd be more prudent about any hypothesis over "Turkish" proximity.


You retard, the paper explicitly states that Turks show closer values to their nearby Balkan and Caucasus neighbors, followed by Tuscans.

For fuck's sake, read the F-stat heatmap before you talk out of your arse:
View attachment 1580262

Biggest idiot on this entire fourm award. Can't blame you though, it's not your fault you're inbred (as per your own study):





Does it strike as a surprise that nationalists would be pissed off at the incessant lies and slanders that go against every shred of evidence? All we aim to do is point out a genetic component to a divide that already exists due to socio-cultural factors. There is a clear stark divide between the two shores of the mediterranean. There always has been, culturally, historically, and genetically. This isn't new. Both American and non-American Mediterranean peoples have pointed this out(and many Europeans themselves don't like Turks).

Now, why don't you take your idiotic platitudes and stick them all the way up your fucking ass?


How will you ever recover from the fact that southern Italians have ten times the achievements of Scandinavia, all the Celtic nations combined, and Iberia, while being genetically sandwiched between the profiles of Homer and Plato on one side and Caesar and Augustus on the other?
View attachment 1580362

And I shan't overlook the shitload of sexual frustration and envy you've likely developped for Southern Italians thanks to Luigi Mangione. You truly are a bleached negro driven by sheer existential seething. Sad!


Still waiting for actual scientific and historical evidence that Greeks are "oriental," but when one's IQ hovers closer to the Indian average than to Europeans' I guess it's implausible to expect more.

It's also ironic that you label me as a "race autist" when you beleive fringe theories nobody IRL takes seriously. I'm sure I mog you both mentally and physically, so it hardly matters to me anyway.


Great catch, Hoodpreet!

Truth be told, G25 Italian samples are at odds with academic literature regardless; either Italians are too southern shifted or southern Balkaners and Iberians are too northern shifted. Either way, they don't help him out here since they don't represent actual Italians. Western Anatolians still ought to be more distant due to Levantine and Caucasus admixture even without the East Eurasian component.

Tales from the mum's basement

 

[Pikacel]

I didn’t realise there were so many threads about this