G
This thread has 102 replies
Im stupid and ugly lepre but my threads are most succesfull
Napoleon.
it is over for loweffortiq cels
I can't answer this, as it would be a borderline personal attack.
It is a brutal pill.
You can describe how they act.
You are high IQ and high in testosterone.
@MarriedAndLookin4Fun
The fakecel users on here...
Well generally speaking, it would be users who seem to begin arguing with and insulting others here at every given opportunity, to the point where I begin to wonder why they use this forum if they hate seemingly everyone here so much. A runner up would be users who seem to be pathologically driven to gatekeeping.
It's even worse when they turn out to be the biggest fakecels themselves. It makes it seem like they're only here to get people banned because they're assholes or working with IT.
I agree with all these except for @FACEandLMS and @HighTGymcel being low iqLow IQ posters:
There are more to be added, but I can't seem to recall them right now.
- @Insomniac (low effort; doesn't add anything to the conversation)
- @Blacktarpill (low effort)
- @Ritalincel (lowest effort fag I've EVER seen in ANY forum)
- @FACEandLMS (he's actually high IQ, but his posts tend to rely too much on sarcasm and meme)
- @HighTGymcel
- @Napoleon de Geso (not truly low iq, but only babbles about lolis an underage girls)
High IQ posters:
- @SchrodingersDick (probably the poster with the best content and writing)
- @Eugenicist (has good thoughts, but can be very verbose. A reader really needs to pay attention to understand what the guy is trying to convey. Nonetheless he's very intuitive)
- @BlkPillPres (Has some good thoughts, but there are one or two fallacies)
- @RageAgainstTDL (he doesn't post here much anymore, but he's very good)
- @wereqryan I am VERY smart! Goes without saying tbh.
Join date copers
whats wrong with protecting someone from becoming a whore? brick iq
this guy is the lowest iq member
JoinedMar
That's only if you use different scales for each race, which in our globalised age I don't think makes much sense. Whites are just more likely to score higher on the looks scale, but white 6/10 = Asian 6/10.
Wrong with "protecting" teen girls from men of culture, and thats what OVERprotective brothers and dad are doing
how are you advocating teen girls acting like whores on an incel forum?
Teen girl in loving relation with man of culture is whore for you?
you think a guy posting on an incel forum at night is worth their time? JFL
Absolute majority of them are just cunts. But special ones maybe could be found, but then overprotective daddies and brothers are problem
Typical "overprotective" brothers still let their whore sisters dress like sluts and fuck chads, but they'll rush to the rescue when she squeals about a sub6 grabbing her ass or calling her a slut.
no, that is called a cuck.
H
thx bro same goes to you
those who have IQ lower than 85
JFL you can't actually believe this, have you not seen any of the studies
That's literally my point
Your point was that a 5/10 white looks better than a 5/10 ehtnic, which is just not possible or they'd not be both 5/10. The advantage whites have is that they are on average more likely to be born with better looking generics compared to other races.
I don't think I ever visit this forum when sober.
we've already been over this man. We're not "worshiped" for being white, we're seen as gullible cucks to extract money from because frankly that's what most white men are. If what you're saying is true one would surely expect that whites would slay in rich as well as poor asian countries, yet they don't. I've tried it myself, I don't get any matches in Japan or even China
Your format of what it means to be 5/10 makes no sense and ironically justifies my argument, because you are literally saying that in order for an asian to truly be 5/10 he has to be more white in his features, that is the end result of your argument, if you are saying that the races aren't judged seperately based on their own criteria, and there is an absolute standard of criteria for 5/10, 6/10, etc, then I would not ask
What is that standard and which race meets that standard more
The obvious answer is that the standard is one that revolves around caucasoid features, so YOU ARE essentially just arguing that white genetics are the standard of looks
Let me be specific, if a 5/10 asian man is only really 5/10 if he looks as good as a 5/10 white man, then you are basically arguing that a "more white looking" asian man would be a 5/10, which has literally been my entire point, white men are by default better looking because the universal standard for attractiveness revolves around the white race
I never said that he necessarily has to be more white in his features, just better looking. Not all good looking features are necessarily related to white people, even if many are. For example there are things like height, frame, hair and so on that are not exclusive to us. You can use separate rating systems according to the person's race if you want to and in that case you'd be right, but I don't think it makes much sense in our globalised age where all races are abundantly available to women t the same time and without a problem.
JFL dude, are you even listening to yourself, lets be specific to get rid of all this BS subjectivity
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "BETTER LOOKING"
We both know full well you mean more white looking, because by "better looking" you mean features closer to that of a caucasoid, but let me let you answer for yourself, what do you mean by "better looking"
Would you say that typical "asian eyes" (slanted, small, etc) are less attractive than typical "white eyes"
If so, what is the difference between saying that an Asian has to be "better looking" and saying that an asian has to be "more white looking"
Aren't you honestly just beating around the bush with semantics here?
They aren't exclusive, but they are typical, typically an asian man's penis is smaller than a white man's penis or black man's penis, so when women are saying they want an asian man who is better in that department, its essentially no different than stating they want an asian man who is LESS ASIAN
That's my point, you are just arguing semantics right now, saying that women want a man who is "more attractive" or "better looking" is just vague semantic BS when we know full well the criteria for those vague statements REVOLVES AROUND RACIAL DIFFERENCES
The end result is that an "asian man" who has less typical asian features, and more typical white features, is more attractive/better looking
Now your tone is really starting to get on my nerves and you better stop playing the part of the mind reader if you aren't able to, how sad that even if I had made examples it seems you still were not able to grasp what I was talking about. Stop putting words into my mouth and "answering for me", as you wrote yourself. Something like a headful of hair, a good frame or a non-recessed chin, just to name a few, are all traits that are not particularly associated to the white race, so not all handsome traits can exclusively be associated with caucasic people.
I am not arguing semantics because I am not only talking about Asians here and for example blacks, ethnics and even Latinos can often mog whites in the frame and penis size department. I was obviously speaking in general and in reference to our globalised society, where there's plenty of race variety which doesn't only consist of whites and Asians. The funniest part is that is that you didn't seem to notice that I was agreeing with you about white features being on average more attractive than other races.
What do you mean by "good frame", you definitely don't mean a frame typical of an asian man
What do you mean by "non-recessed chin", asian chins are pretty feminine in nature (typically), especially when compared to whites
The only trait you pointed out that isn't typical to a race is a headful of hair, but most traits are expressed in extremes within a race, which makes one race a "better choice" than an other race
You are just arguing semantics right now and you know
If you are arguing the semantic BS I see you doing now, then you aren't really agreeing with me, its like saying - "Yes whites are seen as more attractive but that doesn't mean the standard for attractiveness are white traits", that doesn't make any sense
Dude I'm done at this point, believe what you want
ME
Perhaps it is still not clear to you but I am not exclusively talking about whites and Asians since, you know, they are not really the only two races available on this planet. I believe I have repeated it enough times already and can see no reason beside intellectual dishonesty why you wouldn't be able to grasp it at this point. Are Asians on average the leat attractive populace among the main ones? Yes, I definitely agree. Does that automatically make whatever you say correct? I don't see how it would. Am I supposed to feel guilty about being white and randomly say that you are right because I feel bad for Asians? I don't think so, I will just state things how they are.
Moreover hair is very important and chin recession doesn't necessarily have to do with femininity.
As I said, white traits are in general more attractive but are not the sole influencer of beauty because there are plenty of other features that are not exclusive to us and greatly affect one's looks. If you want you can use separate scales and rate people according to their race but I don't see the point in doing that when a woman can just walk the street and see all these guys at once and close to each other.
D
what type of white are you?
The not-Chad type
How is that? Soy cuck type or actualy an incel
Thanks man.Low IQ posters:
There are more to be added, but I can't seem to recall them right now.
- @Insomniac (low effort; doesn't add anything to the conversation)
- @Blacktarpill (low effort)
- @Ritalincel (lowest effort fag I've EVER seen in ANY forum)
- @FACEandLMS (he's actually high IQ, but his posts tend to rely too much on sarcasm and meme)
- @HighTGymcel
- @Napoleon de Geso (not truly low iq, but only babbles about lolis an underage girls)
High IQ posters:
- @SchrodingersDick (probably the poster with the best content and writing)
- @Eugenicist (has good thoughts, but can be very verbose. A reader really needs to pay attention to understand what the guy is trying to convey. Nonetheless he's very intuitive)
- @BlkPillPres (Has some good thoughts, but there are one or two fallacies)
- @RageAgainstTDL (he doesn't post here much anymore, but he's very good)
- @wereqryan I am VERY smart! Goes without saying tbh.
Lifefuel.
beta defense mechanism nglThanks man.
ngl i dont have an option tbh and hes right im pretty low effort.
D
no shit, thats why you are on here
whats your subrace? mediterrean, nordic, anglo?
Low effort yes, i don't think you're low iq though
Tbh... Im the same
Tbh
@Weed
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
