E
SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com
Blackpill lonely men are significantly less conventionally attractive than non-lonely men, no differences in conventional attractiveness/loneliness for women.
journals.sagepub.com
I can't read it. How did they gauge attractiveness?
D
Height and skin colour
E
idk i can't see the study
From the abstract:
A study of the relation between objective ratings of physical attractiveness and loneliness showed that 30 very lonely male participants scored significantly lower on attractiveness than did 30 least-lonely male participants. No such differences were found for female participants.
Read that, IncelTear? Still think it's incel's perceptions?
A study of the relation between objective ratings of physical attractiveness and loneliness showed that 30 very lonely male participants scored significantly lower on attractiveness than did 30 least-lonely male participants. No such differences were found for female participants.
Read that, IncelTear? Still think it's incel's perceptions?
E
but muh anecdotal evidence!!!!111
water is wet but normies deny science
Jfl. Facts mean nothing in the presence of normie emotions
E
they believe in this idea that everyone is socially equal
They, like me, are gonna ask "How did this study objectively quantify 'attractiveness'?" Without a solid answer for that, the study doesn't mean very much.
E
I’m sure they did something
Makes sense, but the study only had 30 study subjects.SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
Hardly accurate. Decile ratings? This miniscule-ass testing pool?
But not entirely worthless. What you can say for a fact here is that 3 random women managed to pick out the lonely men by their subjective interpretation of ugliness, and 3 random men were unable to see any ugliness at all in women, regardless of loneliness.
E
I think there’s a bigger paper I found somewhere
How did you find that link?
Fire is hot
E
The sky is blue
Ethnics are dead
E
Chads are having sex
?
E
So how do I access papers that way? How did you do it?
IT:
"Bbbb..uuut those very lonely scrubs only want 10 out of 10 Stacey's. If they adjusted their standards and went for 300lbs attractive beckies they wouldn't be so lonely". I bet those misognyst men are all 500lbs each, stink and don't shower as well."
Last edited:
E
IT:
but I know 5’2 balding facially deformed autistic indian janitors who became slayers by being confident
Ugly=lonely
E
Water=wet
C
Makes sense. Those men were lonely for a reason and we all know what it is.SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class research journals
Subscription and open access journals from SAGE Publishing, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
E
Ugliness
Only men can suffer of loneliness
E
Femcels are volcels
They aren't even volcels because many of them are married and have active sex lives. They just can't get chad to commit
E
I’m talking about people such as nuns
Did you figure out how he got the weird link to have that display on the side?
Brootal
"objective ratings of physical attractiveness" implies that theyre lonely because theyre ugly and not the other way around, that is that being lonely makes them unattractive
Honestly its kind of expected, if youre ugly you cant get a gf thus youre lonely
"objective ratings of physical attractiveness" implies that theyre lonely because theyre ugly and not the other way around, that is that being lonely makes them unattractive
Honestly its kind of expected, if youre ugly you cant get a gf thus youre lonely
Guys who dress well truly swim in pussyIT:
but I know 5’2 balding facially deformed autistic indian janitors who became slayers by being confident
Wow, social scientists amaze me once more for discovering the obvious.
Paste the url into that website or the doi which is an index system for papers, basically those numbers, it's barcode.
They keep doing it don't they, these experts need a title & a bunch of funding to tell you what the part of society affected by their research already know.
E
and this was before tinder
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
