Mentally destroyed by reality
- Jul 21, 2020
One of the lowest IQ discussions I have ever listened to. How can these 2 people claim to be “researchers”, and have almost 0 clue about all the scientific literature that exists on how much looks matter?
The feminist keeps saying male scientists don’t want to find out the truth of what women want by asking them, but there are already many studies that do this. In fact, there are studies that ask women and better studies that even show what women pick. And guess what? It’s all about looks.
Juden Peterstein on the other hand keeps talking about how women see most men as unattractive and says it makes sense so she doesn’t end up with a good looking guy that provides nothing else. However, he doesn’t address that women actually do have sex with these attractive guys but settle for the beta buck provider for his resources (and later cuck him). So maybe he’s just talking about long term relationships, and not pure raw sex with Chad?
Jordan also talks about how “females need to invest more into having kids”, however this argument does not hold when you compare people looking for long term relationships. If you look at the literature, you will see males are just as picky when it comes to picking long term mates. This makes sense because of the risk of being cuckolded and ending up raising another man’s kid.
Funny how Jordan keeps changing the goalposts back and forth to whichever one makes women not look like absolute shit, and whichever one gives males false hope to continue being wagecucks for women and soyciety.
Another day, another fraud by Juden Peterstein. It’s a sad day that even the feminist was more right than him (despite her having no idea how to argue her point or even understand what’s in the scientific literature).