Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel Are normies really this stupid when it comes to sexual attraction?

  • Thread starter RobertGarnicasAPedo
  • Start date
RobertGarnicasAPedo

RobertGarnicasAPedo

Robert Garnica = Princess_Kitty14. He's a pedo.
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 2, 2023
Posts
998
Online time
1d 22h
I have always been completely baffled by the inability of normies to understand the most rudimentary aspects of reality.

This shit is so fucking simple. It's the most simple, obvious shit on earth, yet they either don't understand it, or pretend not to.

1. "Just go for women in your league, bro."

Where the fuck did normies get the idea that ugly people are more attracted to other ugly people? Do these fucking morons really think that what you look like determines who you want to fucking have sex with?

Of course, there's the alternate explanation, which is that normies understand that "go for women in your league, bro" means that you are looking for someone who will SETTLE FOR YOU.

But here's the thing: Why the fuck do these retarded normies never make the connection between settling and SHE DOESN'T FIND YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE? How the fuck do they not think of this?!

Perhaps they DO know this, and they just don't care? How the fuck do they not care about this?

Furthermore, how the fuck are they planning on having sex? They're really all right with the fact that they're going to have to turn out the lights and imagine their ugly girlfriend or wife is somebody better looking in order to get off?

Why even be heterosexual?


2. "Just be rich, bro."

Do these fucking dipshits just not care that a woman being with you for your money means she does not find you SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE, or do they think women find men with money SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE?

Do you think the fucking whore you're paying to fuck you is turned on because she knows you're going to pay her? Do you normie retards seriously think that's what happens?

This just in: Women do not need to be aroused to have sex. Most sex that women have with men involves the woman not being aroused and just taking a dick. Do normies just not care about this?

Women are not "attracted" to money, although they would way rather have sex with any form of money than the vast majority of men. Women would rather stick rolls of dollar bills in their vagina than a 4-inch penis from a sub-Chad.


3. "Just be confident, bro."

The same people who love soyence never looked at the studies that show "confidence" comes from success, not vice versa. When you don't succeed, you won't be confident. When you do, you will. Furthermore, "confidence" with women just means psychopathy in the form of arrogance. Confidence is NOT a good thing.


4. "Just have a great personality, bro."

A "great personality" to women is an immoral personality. Women are attracted to BAD traits in men. They are attracted to psychopathy. Having a "great personality" is NOT a good thing. Even the dorks who think they're being reasonable by saying "looks get you in the door, but personaliteehee makes them stay" are utter retards. No, the only personaliteehee that makes them stay is psychopathy. They will stay in relationships with legitimately abusive psychopaths and complete douchebags. They will NOT stay in relationships with good men, unless it's to use them for sperm donors.


5. "Go outside and look at all of the ugly people in relationships."

This does nothing to disprove that you can not ATTRACT women when you're ugly, because most women are with men THEY DO NOT FIND ATTRACTIVE. The women who do have sex with these men they don't find attractive just lie there and take the penis.

6. "Attraction is multifaceted and complex."

NO IT'S NOT. It is the simplest thing in existence. There is nothing less complex than sexual attraction. No matter how much you WANT it to be complex, it's not. Nor are PEOPLE complex. People are simple. The fact that women are always telling us how "complex" they are just shows what utter navel-gazing narcissists they are. I am not remotely complex. The fact that women think they're complex proves they're nothing like me.
 
Most of them are. Red pillers think they have it all figured out.
 
Society is based on falsehood and hypocrisy
 
Shaniqua doesn't have to settle, but we do?
 
Couldn't have said it better bro. These normies are so retarded when it comes to nuance it makes me wonder how they got positions of power in governments.
 
Always good to see another RobertGarnicasAPedo thread
 
1. "Just go for women in your league, bro."

She’s wears makeup and has a higher SMV because vagina

2. "Just be rich, bro."

Am literally in debt right now 😕🔫

3. "Just be confident, bro."

Maybe in my fantasies…….

4. "Just have a great personality, bro."

There’s no such thing as a personality

5. "Go outside and look at all of the ugly people in relationships."

JUST GO TO DER WALMART BRAHH

6. "Attraction is multifaceted and complex."

🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
 
“You gotta have hella game bruh”
 
Go for women in "our league" while both parties aren't sexually attracted to each other, and women will just be women.

Our sole purpose is just betabuxxing to keep her intact, in the so-called relationship, and most of the time, she tries to overpower you, makes mockery statements to imply that you are a loser for not fulfilling all of her needs, even though you're always working your ass off (because money isn't enough), while fantasizing about Chads 24/7. Then, she leaves you when she's financially independent. No sexual attraction = no love.

At the end of the day, we're programmed to be attracted to beautiful things. Ugly people like us are just unfortunate to be born, but even then, the females have it way easier in life, higher SMV than 100 ugly men combined. Obviously, we aren't allowed to ask for a beautiful woman who will love us, in our dream, because we are INCELS, because many of us are nothing but a genetic catastrophe (inbred, disabilities, ugliness, disproportionate and underdeveloped body, etc.). It's still retarded to say that ugly people will love ugly people, even though we're living in this modern world, where beauty standards are pushed into the media, and feminism is rampant.

Normies don't know what the fuck they are talking about. And as soon as we stop giving her the attention, she just leaves. Modern women.
Never even began, too bad.
 
I have always been completely baffled by the inability of normies to understand the most rudimentary aspects of reality.

This shit is so fucking simple. It's the most simple, obvious shit on earth, yet they either don't understand it, or pretend not to.

1. "Just go for women in your league, bro."

Where the fuck did normies get the idea that ugly people are more attracted to other ugly people? Do these fucking morons really think that what you look like determines who you want to fucking have sex with?

Of course, there's the alternate explanation, which is that normies understand that "go for women in your league, bro" means that you are looking for someone who will SETTLE FOR YOU.

But here's the thing: Why the fuck do these retarded normies never make the connection between settling and SHE DOESN'T FIND YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE? How the fuck do they not think of this?!

Perhaps they DO know this, and they just don't care? How the fuck do they not care about this?

Furthermore, how the fuck are they planning on having sex? They're really all right with the fact that they're going to have to turn out the lights and imagine their ugly girlfriend or wife is somebody better looking in order to get off?

Why even be heterosexual?


2. "Just be rich, bro."

Do these fucking dipshits just not care that a woman being with you for your money means she does not find you SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE, or do they think women find men with money SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE?

Do you think the fucking whore you're paying to fuck you is turned on because she knows you're going to pay her? Do you normie retards seriously think that's what happens?

This just in: Women do not need to be aroused to have sex. Most sex that women have with men involves the woman not being aroused and just taking a dick. Do normies just not care about this?

Women are not "attracted" to money, although they would way rather have sex with any form of money than the vast majority of men. Women would rather stick rolls of dollar bills in their vagina than a 4-inch penis from a sub-Chad.


3. "Just be confident, bro."

The same people who love soyence never looked at the studies that show "confidence" comes from success, not vice versa. When you don't succeed, you won't be confident. When you do, you will. Furthermore, "confidence" with women just means psychopathy in the form of arrogance. Confidence is NOT a good thing.


4. "Just have a great personality, bro."

A "great personality" to women is an immoral personality. Women are attracted to BAD traits in men. They are attracted to psychopathy. Having a "great personality" is NOT a good thing. Even the dorks who think they're being reasonable by saying "looks get you in the door, but personaliteehee makes them stay" are utter retards. No, the only personaliteehee that makes them stay is psychopathy. They will stay in relationships with legitimately abusive psychopaths and complete douchebags. They will NOT stay in relationships with good men, unless it's to use them for sperm donors.


5. "Go outside and look at all of the ugly people in relationships."

This does nothing to disprove that you can not ATTRACT women when you're ugly, because most women are with men THEY DO NOT FIND ATTRACTIVE. The women who do have sex with these men they don't find attractive just lie there and take the penis.

6. "Attraction is multifaceted and complex."

NO IT'S NOT. It is the simplest thing in existence. There is nothing less complex than sexual attraction. No matter how much you WANT it to be complex, it's not. Nor are PEOPLE complex. People are simple. The fact that women are always telling us how "complex" they are just shows what utter navel-gazing narcissists they are. I am not remotely complex. The fact that women think they're complex proves they're nothing like me.
half of pregnancies are unintentional even in 1st world countries. And half of these unwanted pregnancies get aborted. So 15-20% of the people on street you walk past were result of animal sex without thinking. This alone proves that most people are on autopilot and more importantly for this thread, that attraction is the most basic thing there is. Two people meet, they attract, penis = hard, vagina = wet -> 50% of pregnancies are accidents. These pregnancies required zero thought, zero planning, zero charisma. It is raw unfiltered instinct. People are not hard to understand.

Now, normies are often in denial about this because it is unflattering to admit that you would hop on a 15 inch dick in ten seconds if opportunity presented, or for men to admit that they would fuck 88 year old grandma if she flashed her pussy at them in super market, but thats reality.

More about what you wrote: They dont get AF/BB. Even on this forum many dont get it. If she is only with you for your money, she is not attracted to YOU as a person. Same for status. Heck we could even go as far as saying even looks are not who you are. After all your looks can change without you changing as a person. So you are never liked for YOU but only for proxies that are mistaken for you. In spite of how simple this is to understand, almost nobody does. It baffles me.

For instance, many incels even on here constantly conflate LTR with raw sexual attraction, which doesnt require LTR. Relationships are always an L for the guy, even for chad. Yet people talk about looksmaxxing to get relationship, as if relationship is the best thing you can achieve with a woman. It is inane. Anyone who promotes or implies that relationships are good for men is a foid worshipper. Why? Simple, because they think that average woman is such a net positive in her very existence that just being around her is like getting HP boost somehow.

It is putting women on divine pedestal where female halo is some divine blessing. In reality women are a fucking drain, they suck the life out of you and every guy that has been in LTR will tell you that.

That's why "alpha fucks" instead of settling for being a "beta buxx" - because after experiencing countless women and experimenting with LTR, chad realizes that women are parasitic entities and that it is better to rid himself of the vile creature ASAP after his mightly flesh sword has been dipped in the pussy, which he does by disposing of the cum dumpster at MC Cheesies by telling her to pick up his (non existant) order, only to go pedal to the metal in his hellcat the moment she closes the door, leaving her bedazzled ass in some parking lot at 2AM, smelling like his semen.

Hence, we have studies showing that it is sexually successful men that are more "misogynistic" than incels.


All of this also applies to your other points. For instance, "go outside you can see ugly men in relationships" - yes. We never claimed this was not possible. Notice, "relationships" again. We never said that ugly guys can not be betabuxxers. The specific claim that somehow nobody understands, not on incels.is, not redpillers, not bluepillers trying to debunk us, is this: There are men, the majority of men, who can only get starfish sex with a woman that hates them, by bribing that women into being with them. Once the bribes stop, she is gone.

And then there are men who exude such raw sexual radiation that women will give them sex relatively quickly, often within minutes of meeting them, no bribe required. Naturally, it is preferable to be the second type, which was dubbed "Chad" upon formation of the concept.
Seeing ugly men in relationships does not debunk this, it affirms it. You will not see a truly attractive man in a relationship, because relationship are slave contracts for ugly men, ugly by women's standards mind you. Most women would be ugly too if they were men. Ugly just means de-selected by women.

Could a Chad get an LTR? Yes. Do they in praxis? No. Consider that nearly every single foid pop song is about being dumped by chad and getting over him, re-finding your power as a woman after getting dumped bla bla. A select number of guys are plowing through significant enough numbers of women to make these common pop lyrics resonate with the majority of the female populace. Two threads to add on to that:



tl;dr: Women dont learn from getting used as cumrag by chad. Why? Because attraction is primal. Do fat people stop eating after being told slop is unhealthy? No. They return to the cheesecake factory over and over despite hating themselves for being fat and incapable of controlling their own behavior. Alpha Widowed by Ronald McDonald.

However, the frustration remains, but instead of punching up and attacking chad, these women then take out their anger on buxxers, that's the conclusion from the second thread. In the old days of MRA shit online they used to call these men "emotional tampons" because women use them to vent frustrations about "abusive" chad, only to return to chad one day later and swallow his cum in back of his truck.

So there is nothing complex about sexual attraction, just as there is nothing complex about the desire to eat tasty food. Whoever has the means, read looks (or right gender) can indulge freely in these pleasures. Women can be whores in their prime and do so amply - "going through my bad girl era teehee" - "finally came out of my hoe phase few years ago" - whereas most men rot in their cope bunker, janking it to anime girls and writing impotent rage rants online about how society sux and they supposedly hate women (they dont, they worship women).

Most of these loosers later, in mid 20s to early 30s, get buxxed and then become smug faced boomers who drop unsolicited wise-cracklings on people like us, exactly of the manner that OP listed out. Fuck these people, they are scum, may their dominatrix wifes step on their balls 1000 times, crushing them into a slurry of torn membrane and blood. But who am I kidding, these retards would probably enjoy that shit.
 
Last edited:
half of pregnancies are unintentional even in 1st world countries. And half of these unwanted pregnancies get aborted. So 15-20% of the people on street you walk past were result of animal sex without thinking. This alone proves that most people are on autopilot and more importantly for this thread, that attraction is the most basic thing there is. Two people meet, they attract, penis = hard, vagina = wet -> 50% of pregnancies are accidents. These pregnancies required zero thought, zero planning, zero charisma. It is raw unfiltered instinct. People are not hard to understand.

Now, normies are often in denial about this because it is unflattering to admit that you would hop on a 15 inch dick in ten seconds if opportunity presented, or for men to admit that they would fuck 88 year old grandma if she flashed her pussy at them in super market, but thats reality.

More about what you wrote: They dont get AF/BB. Even on this forum many dont get it. If she is only with you for your money, she is not attracted to YOU as a person. Same for status. Heck we could even go as far as saying even looks are not who you are. After all your looks can change without you changing as a person. So you are never liked for YOU but only for proxies that are mistaken for you. In spite of how simple this is to understand, almost nobody does. It baffles me.

For instance, many incels even on here constantly conflate LTR with raw sexual attraction, which doesnt require LTR. Relationships are always an L for the guy, even for chad. Yet people talk about looksmaxxing to get relationship, as if relationship is the best thing you can achieve with a woman. It is inane. Anyone who promotes or implies that relationships are good for men is a foid worshipper. Why? Simple, because they think that average woman is such a net positive in her very existence that just being around her is like getting HP boost somehow.

It is putting women on divine pedestal where female halo is some divine blessing. In reality women are a fucking drain, they suck the life out of you and every guy that has been in LTR will tell you that.

That's why "alpha fucks" instead of settling for being a "beta buxx" - because after experiencing countless women and experimenting with LTR, chad realizes that women are parasitic entities and that it is better to rid himself of the vile creature ASAP after his mightly flesh sword has been dipped in the pussy, which he does by disposing of the cum dumpster at MC Cheesies by telling her to pick up his (non existant) order, only to go pedal to the metal in his hellcat the moment she closes the door, leaving her bedazzled ass in some parking lot at 2AM, smelling like his semen.

Hence, we have studies showing that it is sexually successful men that are more "misogynistic" than incels.


All of this also applies to your other points. For instance, "go outside you can see ugly men in relationships" - yes. We never claimed this was not possible. Notice, "relationships" again. We never said that ugly guys can not be betabuxxers. The specific claim that somehow nobody understands, not on incels.is, not redpillers, not bluepillers trying to debunk us, is this: There are men, the majority of men, who can only get starfish sex with a woman that hates them, by bribing that women into being with them. Once the bribes stop, she is gone.

And then there are men who exude such raw sexual radiation that women will give them sex relatively quickly, often within minutes of meeting them, no bribe required. Naturally, it is preferable to be the second type, which was dubbed "Chad" upon formation of the concept.
Seeing ugly men in relationships does not debunk this, it affirms it. You will not see a truly attractive man in a relationship, because relationship are slave contracts for ugly men, ugly by women's standards mind you. Most women would be ugly too if they were men. Ugly just means de-selected by women.

Could a Chad get an LTR? Yes. Do they in praxis? No. Consider that nearly every single foid pop song is about being dumped by chad and getting over him, re-finding your power as a woman after getting dumped bla bla. A select number of guys are plowing through significant enough numbers of women to make these common pop lyrics resonate with the majority of the female populace. Two threads to add on to that:



tl;dr: Women dont learn from getting used as cumrag by chad. Why? Because attraction is primal. Do fat people stop eating after being told slop is unhealthy? No. They return to the cheesecake factory over and over despite hating themselves for being fat and incapable of controlling their own behavior. Alpha Widowed by Ronald McDonald.

However, the frustration remains, but instead of punching up and attacking chad, these women then take out their anger on buxxers, that's the conclusion from the second thread. In the old days of MRA shit online they used to call these men "emotional tampons" because women use them to vent frustrations about "abusive" chad, only to return to chad one day later and swallow his cum in back of his truck.

So there is nothing complex about sexual attraction, just as there is nothing complex about the desire to eat tasty food. Whoever has the means, read looks (or right gender) can indulge freely in these pleasures. Women can be whores in their prime and do so amply - "going through my bad girl era teehee" - "finally came out of my hoe phase few years ago" - whereas most men rot in their cope bunker, janking it to anime girls and writing impotent rage rants online about how society sux and they supposedly hate women (they dont, they worship women).

Most of these loosers later, in mid 20s to early 30s, get buxxed and then become smug faced boomers who drop unsolicited wise-cracklings on people like us, exactly of the manner that OP listed out. Fuck these people, they are scum, may their dominatrix wifes step on their balls 1000 times, crushing them into a slurry of torn membrane and blood. But who am I kidding, these retards would probably enjoy that shit.
Is it really that hard to hate or despise woman ? ( Her Nature mostly ) , i would treat her like my pfp if i ever get one and she becomes suspicious / nagging . If i was Chad i would abuse the shit out of her , since the System " allows it

yea its gynocentric but if you look a certain way as a Man , all the bullshit goes out the Window :feelsclown:
 
There’s no such thing as a personality
True, the word personality comes feom the Latin word persona which literally means to mask, literally no one allows their true selves to succumb, we're all subconsciously hiding our true mental constitution, I do this all the time, most people don't even know they actually do this since they do it for so long but humans are master at deception and never showing our true feelings that's why you have to read the little microexpressions that we incidentally let out, especially with women. Women are masters at hiding these emotions because they aren't emotional creatures but decisive and psychopathic as systematically displayed by Geckobus long ago.

Human females find male gorillas sexually attractive, they will never reveal this how but you can seem them fluster and tith around Gorillas in real time so you don't even have to ask
 
Do you think normies give a shit bro
 

Similar threads

kantbefixed
Replies
31
Views
1K
clearsmoke
clearsmoke
P
Replies
11
Views
1K
RandomGuy
RandomGuy
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
6
Views
1K
GeckoBus
GeckoBus
parbate2025
Replies
2
Views
877
Hong Xiuquan
Hong Xiuquan

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →