Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Its ALL (((Hollywoods))) fault

NEETAndTidy

NEETAndTidy

STRIKE FIRST. STRIKE HARD. NO MERCY. COBRA KAIcel
-
Joined
May 20, 2018
Posts
15,731
If Hollywood would just cast typical humans in their films incels would be a RARITY but because they use 10/10 muscle Chad's 80% of the time and Stacy's 95%

Peoples standards are OBSURDLY HIGH.

Unless you are a male model you're seen as average or ugly.

ITS NOT FAIR and FORGET being sub 6foot.


REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
 
If Hollywood would just cast typical humans in their films incels would be a RARITY but because they use 10/10 muscle Chad's 80% of the time and Stacy's 95%

Peoples standards are OBSURDLY HIGH.

Unless you are a male model you're seen as average or ugly.

ITS NOT FAIR and FORGET being sub 6foot.


REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE


Plus, Hollywood movies heavily promote a degenerate lifestyle, infidelity and antisocial behavior.
 
true whenever i go to hollywood theres a lot of good looking people there. i like hollywood though.
 
A incel movie would be based.
 
If anything, the looks standards of Hollywood are lower now. Imagine the 60’s with the likes of Paul Newman, Marlon Brando, Robert Redford, Sean Connery, etc. Now you have Chris Pratt and roundface Hemsworth ffs.
 
A incel movie would be based.

That would be a cool thing, but never from Hollywood. They'd prolly cast Chads to play the incels and the whole production crew would be lynched by feminists afterwards, if they dared to portray us in anything but the worst light
 
If anything, the looks standards of Hollywood are lower now. Imagine the 60’s with the likes of Paul Newman, Marlon Brando, Robert Redford, Sean Connery, etc. Now you have Chris Pratt and roundface Hemsworth ffs.
Whole different dynamic. Those guys were on another level. They were still being cast well-past their looks prime, into their 70s and 80s. You think Chris Pratt will get roles at 80? Nah, the Golden Age actors appealed to men more than they appealed to women. You think women dropped panties for John Wayne?? They were first and foremost icons for the male movie-going audience, not sex symbols.
 
That would be a cool thing, but never from Hollywood. They'd prolly cast Chads to play the incels and the whole production crew would be lynched by feminists afterwards, if they dared to portray us in anything but the worst light
Incel "We want a safe space for virgin males." Normies "THEY SAID THEY WANTED TO FUCKING KILL ALL FEMOIDS AND SLIT THE THROATS OF BABIES, GET THEM!"
 
Funny thing is that these juden dogs bring 10/10 actors in their movies and all but these juden themselves are the most subhuman out there with their inbreeding
 
If Hollywood would just cast typical humans in their films incels would be a RARITY but because they use 10/10 muscle Chad's 80% of the time and Stacy's 95%

Peoples standards are OBSURDLY HIGH.

Unless you are a male model you're seen as average or ugly.

ITS NOT FAIR and FORGET being sub 6foot.


REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

True, people tend to believe what they see in films and TV is reality. And they will not make their standards lower (Women don’t need to nowadays).
 
They made one. It's called Frankenstein.
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
Funny thing is that these juden dogs bring 10/10 actors in their movies and all but these juden themselves are the most subhuman out there with their inbreeding
Good observation. Sex sells tbh. They need super attractive people because who wants to watch a movie with a subhuman incel in it
 
:no:

womens standards are high because it was evolutionary beneficial for them to be so. A man can impregnate 100s of women in 9 months but a woman can only have one, and after giving birth she certainly has to care for it while the man doesnt necessarily have to.

Hollywood played no role. The internet did, but only because access of men was more expanded for women.
 
:no:

womens standards are high because it was evolutionary beneficial for them to be so. A man can impregnate 100s of women in 9 months but a woman can only have one, and after giving birth she certainly has to care for it while the man doesnt necessarily have to.

Hollywood played no role. The internet did, but only because access of men was more expanded for women.
Hollywood came first tbh.
 
..and that is irrelevant. The internet made an effect, because of access.
Hollywood was using Chad's before the internet dude. The internet just followed suit
 

Similar threads

Regenerator
Replies
42
Views
2K
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga
SandNiggerKANG
Replies
149
Views
8K
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
L
Replies
36
Views
2K
UnwantedVirgin
UnwantedVirgin

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top