Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Is Kingdom Come Deliverance II really as bad as people say?

title


  • Total voters
    11
Excalibur

Excalibur

.is Coal Miner
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Posts
9,693
Online time
1d 5h
I just finished the first game, and while I didn't like some aspects, such as the side quests, which are mostly just fetch quests, and the anticlimactic and unsatisfying ending, I really enjoyed the game and its historical authenticity, and would like to see the conclusion of the story. Apparently the sequel is fully woke unlike the first game, with the inclusion of faggotry and a nigger in 15th century Central Europe, but is it really unplayable slop as some say?
 
Yes

 
Not sure, I only played the first. I remember the lockpicking minigame really stumped me at first

don’t know if I’ll ever get around to the second game
 
the nigger is annoying but I wouldn’t call the game unplayable
 
Yes

Been watching a few videos on the game. Apparently the kikes in the game treat you like cattle and even call you a goy, but you're still forced to side with them and save them from the pogrom jfl
 
I Dont Know i Just played Kingdom Come deliverance I And It was great
 
I played the first one. God, the combat was straight fucking aids, and 99% of the combat consisted of blocking. It was genuinely annoying trying to memorize the combat. Like, I could understand if the combat was supposed to be new and realistic, but why the fuck would I want it to be? I want to tread across Bohemia and demolish anyone and not get demolished by a town guard, and let's not forget about healing. God, that's so fucking annoying to maintain. Like, genuinely, why do I have to play this game for more than an hour to gain the ability to heal? No offense, I like Henry; he seems like a cool character, but the first game sucks major ass.
 
I played the first one. God, the combat was straight fucking aids, and 99% of the combat consisted of blocking. It was genuinely annoying trying to memorize the combat. Like, I could understand if the combat was supposed to be new and realistic, but why the fuck would I want it to be? I want to tread across Bohemia and demolish anyone and not get demolished by a town guard, and let's not forget about healing. God, that's so fucking annoying to maintain. Like, genuinely, why do I have to play this game for more than an hour to gain the ability to heal? No offense, I like Henry; he seems like a cool character, but the first game sucks major ass.
I agree that the combat in the game is quite clunky, and imo it becomes pretty simple to downright exploitable once you learn to prefect block and master strike. By the late game, if you play your cards right, you should be pretty much unstoppable. With maxed stats, a longsword and the best gear in the game, I was able to take on entire gangs of heavily armored bandits or cumans up to 5 or 6 strong with relative ease.
As for the healing mechanic, I liked it tbh and thought it suited the game. It shouldn't be like Skyrim where you can just open your inventory and spam healing potions whenever you're on the edge of death. It teaches the player that sometimes it’s necessary to flee in order to live to fight another day.
 
I just finished the first game, and while I didn't like some aspects, such as the side quests, which are mostly just fetch quests, and the anticlimactic and unsatisfying ending, I really enjoyed the game and its historical authenticity, and would like to see the conclusion of the story. Apparently the sequel is fully woke unlike the first game, with the inclusion of faggotry and a nigger in 15th century Central Europe, but is it really unplayable slop as some say?
Idk I’m poor
 
Yes

Been watching a few videos on the game. Apparently the kikes in the game treat you like cattle and even call you a goy, but you're still forced to side with them and save them from the pogrom jfl
Who cares, Henry's faction are the "bad guys" they're literally bandits, heretics, Jews and robber barons. Sigismund's faction (the antagonist) are the good guys who actually end up winning in history but because Czech faggots made this game, we have to play it from their faggot perspective
 
The nigger is more of a caricature, like Alberto Barbosa or the "We wuz kangz" meme, a joke character who gets basic historical facts wrong while larping as an enlightened scholar (He says that Venice has a king, which is false and he also says that the Golden Horde was ruled by Timur, also blatantly false :feelskek: )There's also a priest who mocks him for his obsession with white women

The game itself is good, the woke shit doesn't show up much and you can kill most of the gay characters, definitely not unplayable, improves on the first in several ways, overall easier than the first because the combat is less clunky and completely streamlined
 
MC is a fag, that's all i need to know to avoid it.
 
Been watching a few videos on the game. Apparently the kikes in the game treat you like cattle and even call you a goy, but you're still forced to side with them and save them from the pogrom jfl
Did you try KCD2 yet? Also, how was KCD1 in your opinion?
 

Similar threads

N
Replies
27
Views
1K
XUn0rth0doxS0rrowsX
XUn0rth0doxS0rrowsX
T
Replies
8
Views
1K
AmadeusCelibatus
AmadeusCelibatus
Tetsuya
Replies
13
Views
2K
Spice
Spice

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top