Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What is the Bible you may ask?

  • Thread starter The_word_made_flesh
  • Start date
T

The_word_made_flesh

Captain
★★★★
Joined
Dec 5, 2023
Posts
1,805
Online time
5h 22m
So first lets talk about what is called at least in western Europe and the US THE 66 book Protestant canon (meaning in Greek ,measuring rod).

The oldest part of the Old Testament also called Tanakh in Hebrew is the Torah which means teachings.
This was given to Moses on Mt Sinai in the 15th century bce or around there and the dating is disputed somewhat but very ancient. This contain the books of Genesis, Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.

Then there are the prophetic books also called the Nevi'im in Hebrew. These include from Joshua and Samuel through middle prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah to later prophets like Malichi.

Then there is the writings or wisdom literature also known as the Ketuvim in Hebrew like Psalms, Proverbs and Ecclesiastes among others.


The Roman Catholic Old Testament includes other books like Maccabees or Tobit or a second book of Ezra. The Eastern Orthodox Church also has a similar canon. There is also most Oriental Orthodox Church which is very large.

  • Old Testament Additions: Includes 1 Enoch, Jubilees, 1-3 Meqabyan (Ethiopian Maccabees, distinct from Catholic/Orthodox Maccabees), 3 Ezra (Second Ezra), and 4 Ezra (Ezra Sutu'el).
New Testament Additions: Contains unique "books of church order" or Sinodos (Qälëmentos, Didesqelya), which are not typically found in other traditions.
so you ask why does the canon vary, different churches developed different traditions. The main reason that the Protestant canon varies is that it sticks with the original Hebrew text or the Tanakh and does not add other books of second Temple Jewish literature. The fact that some books are left out is that they are primarily historical and lack theological content. Like for instance the book of Jubilees which was written by second Temple Ethiopian Jews which gives a complex history of the early world before and a bit after the flood. However the main canon did not include this book mainly because it is a historical account without much theology, and the same with Maccabees. Or more esoteric books like Enoch which are popular with high level Biblical scholars but are not recommended for every day reading by lay people. Some books are disputed as to their authenticity like the Book of Jasher (meaning upright). I would say most protestants would not say books unique the Catholic or Orthodox canons are bad or heretical but are not pragmatic for common reading and reserved for scholars and such.
Are there books left out of the canon that are heretical? Yes , things like the Gospel of Marcion or Thomas or the Gospel of Mary Magdalene among others. These were deemed to be forged attempts at new Gospels.
There are also commentary books like Mishnah, Talmud or Midrash rabah. These books are mainly commentaries on scripture and records of Rabbinical opinions and things like that.
The New Testament which was written from the time shortly after Jesus died and resurrected to about 90-95 ce or ad .
You have the four Gospels, which Gospel is middle English for good spell meaning good news. This was translated from the Greek word Euangelion of the same meaning.
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke tell the life of Jesus from three different perspectives and Johns Gospel is more spiritual and more about the nature of Jesus. The book of Acts is a history of the early Church.
Then are the 13 letters of Paul which are:
  • Romans
  • 1 Corinthians
  • 2 Corinthians
  • Galatians
  • Ephesians
  • Philippians
  • Colossians
  • 1 Thessalonians
  • 2 Thessalonians
  • 1 Timothy
  • 2 Timothy
  • Titus
  • Philemon
There is also the unsigned letter to the Hebrews that is debated if Paul wrote it or was it anonymous but it is regardless the most profound of all the letters in the New Testament. Then there are the non Pauline letters like: James, 1&2 Peter 3 letters of John and the letter of Jude. The New Testament ends with its only prophetic book Revelation written by the apostle John near his own death about 90 or so first century. although there is prophecy in other parts of the New Testament but Revelation is the only strictly prophetic book.


So some final thoughts on the meaning of divine inspiration. Did the Bible and its 66 canonical books fall from heaven. Or did a prophet go into a trance and wake up three hours later saying " I just wrote the book of Isaiah" , no not really ,it did not work like that.

Holy Scripture was a collaboration between a prophet and the Holy spirit and God created people and their life experiences for a special purpose that one day they would one day execute. For instance look at the great detail that the book of Matthew gives to the life of Jesus and Matthew was a tax collector and a tax collector would have been very good a keeping detailed records Moses was the only prophet that spoke with God directly. Most other prophets wrote their own thoughts or visions that were guided by the Holy Spirit.


This here is great resource if you want to get more familiar with the Bible

It has many translations and languages and for beginners at least in English the New King James Version (NKJV) or the English Standard Version (ESV) are a good start.
 
why is this AI generated
 
why is this AI generated
It is not AI generated at all . The whole article was my own words and research. No AI at all was used at any point .
 
The only thing I cut and pasted was Paul's letter just to save time in writing them out but I know then all anyway. The link to Biblegateway . All original !
 
I do not know if you believe in God and if you do, I don't mean to insult you for your faith, but I read the Bible just for the interesting archetypes, the historical value of it, and to better understand the roots of the Judaeo-Christian society I live in. I personally have lost my faith and cannot regain it anymore, but props to you if you have faith... I don't think it's a bad thing to have faith in something, it's what makes you go forward in life in spite of everything.
 
the roots of the Judaeo-Christian society I live in.

IMG 7265


Heniochi were cannibals and stripped the skin off.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/ruh1N7V9LUA?si=LOBDxqp2VFQ-V82f
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top