WorthlessSlavicShit
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2022
- Posts
- 8,854
What lookism does to a he/him.
Ngl though, it's not bad to have an "Oxford philosopher" writing an article like this.
Hello! I'm Bill D'Alessandro (he/him). My research is mainly on philosophy of science and math, with occasional forays into other territory. Explanation, understanding and modeling in scientific practice are recurring themes in my work. I'm increasingly interested in applied ethics, especially philosophy of AI.
William D'Alessandro (Oxford University) - PhilPeople
William D'Alessandro is a marie skłodowska-curie / ukri postdoctoral fellow at University of Oxford, Faculty of Philosophy. They are interested in Aesthetics, Logic and Philosophy of Logic, and Applied Ethics. Follow them to stay up to date with their professional activities in philosophy, and...
philpeople.org
Ngl though, it's not bad to have an "Oxford philosopher" writing an article like this.
Is It Bad to Prefer Attractive Partners? | Journal of the American Philosophical Association | Cambridge Core
Is It Bad to Prefer Attractive Partners? - Volume 9 Issue 2
www.cambridge.org
Philosophers have rightly condemned lookism—that is, discrimination in favor of attractive people or against unattractive people—in education, the justice system, the workplace, and elsewhere. Surprisingly, however, the almost universal preference for attractive romantic and sexual partners has rarely received serious ethical scrutiny. On its face, it is unclear whether this is a form of discrimination we should reject or tolerate. I consider arguments for both views. On the one hand, a strong case can be made that preferring attractive partners is bad. The idea is that choosing partners based on looks seems essentially similar to other objectionable forms of discrimination.
Boyo specifically destroyed the "personality" bullshit as well.(In particular, the preference for attractive partners is arguably both unfair and harmful to a significant degree.) One can try to resist this conclusion in several ways. I consider three possible replies. The first has to do with the possibility of controlling our partner preferences. The second pertains to attractiveness and ‘good genes’. The last attempts to link certain aspects of attractiveness to a prospective partner's personality and values. I argue that the first two replies fail conclusively, while the third only amounts to a limited defense of a particular kind of attractiveness preference. The idea that we should often avoid preferring attractive partners is thus compelling.