Serious Incels.is rule update: Policy on revenge porn and deepfakes

[TooSomething]

Ok, im going to stop posting my ex's tits.

Noooooo. I was gooning well to them. jfl

 

[TooSomething]

mod is sexhaver, brutal

while I understand the tolerance for prostitutioncels, modding one, really? @24K Link

I am 32 years old and I have NEVER touched tits, vagina, ass, or female skin really. meanwhile this nigga gets RIMMED by STACIES and is a mod. make it make sense

Bro, if you're getting a rimjob you should be banned for that alone, prostitute or not. That shit is gay af.

 

[TooSomething]

Afaik some user here has just recently posted deepfake revenge porn of foids who have allegedly rejected him.

Is that because of this guy?

Understandable regardless.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Bro, if you're getting a rimjob you should be banned for that alone, prostitute or not. That shit is gay af.

maybe though it's also very degrading for the hole to be licking the shit out of your ass maybe that's the allure

 

[TooSomething]

maybe though it's also very degrading for the hole to be licking the shit out of your ass maybe that's the allure

Oh come on, man. That is disgusting af. Could you ever kiss the bitch on the mouth afterward?

Also, it is still gay af to let a foid tingle your anus.

 

[Old Ironsides]

Content Moderation (for Users)

Our longstanding policy against illegal content includes:

• Authentic non-consensual intimate images (“revenge porn”)
• Digital forgeries of non-consensual intimate images (“deepfakes”)
• Threats to disseminate revenge porn and/or deepfakes

Users who violate this policy will be warned or suspended as the case may be.

Content Removal Procedure (for Users and Visitors)

I have found revenge porn and/or deepfakes of myself on Incels.is. How can I request the removal of this content?

You must get in touch with us via the “Contact us” form and submit a valid removal request.

A valid removal request must contain all of the following in writing:

1. Your physical or electronic signature, or that of your authorized representative;
2. An identification of, and information reasonably sufficient for us to locate, the intimate visual depiction of you;
3. A brief statement from you (or your authorized representative) that you have a good faith belief that any intimate visual depiction identified in (2) is not consensual, including any relevant information for us to determine the intimate visual depiction was published without your consent; and
4. Information sufficient to enable us to contact you (or your authorized representative).

After a valid removal request has been submitted, we will remove the intimate visual image within 48 hours, and make reasonable efforts to identify and remove any known identical copies. We reserve the right to ignore all communications from those who repeatedly submit invalid and/or abusive requests.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Question 1: Why are you issuing this policy?

Spoiler: Answer

The notice-and-removal provisions contained in section 3 of the TAKE IT DOWN Act (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 223a) came into effect today (May 19th, 2026). Subsection (a)(2) requires us to provide a notice of the process by which we remove revenge porn and deepfakes. That notice is contained above.

Question 2: How is “revenge porn” defined?

Spoiler: Answer

Strictly in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(h)(1), (2), (5).

Question 3: How are “deepfakes” defined?

Spoiler: Answer

Strictly in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(h)(1), (3), (5).

Question 4: I am outside of the United States and have found an image that violates the laws of my country. Will you remove this content?

Spoiler: Answer

No, unless the image is also unlawful under United States law (or contravenes another site policy). Please follow the content removal procedure outlined above.

Question 5: When will this policy be amended or withdrawn?

Spoiler: Answer

This policy will be amended or withdrawn entirely if any part of the TAKE IT DOWN Act is subsequently held unconstitutional. We do anticipate legal challenges to the TAKE IT DOWN Act under the overbreadth doctrine of the First Amendment, and the vagueness doctrine of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Incels.is is committed to maximizing our users’ freedom of speech and will monitor relevant legal developments.

The FAQ may be updated periodically.

Replies to this initial post should not be construed as part of the policy.

Alright a serious comment now,
@Master @PPEcel @proudweeb I did some research into this and didn't find anything pertaining to voices of a person speaking in a carnal manner. Would this still be roped in under the definitions or is one allowed to make deepfakes of a certain person's voice?

 

[Sir Silentium]

Even if it is free speech, we still got to abide by the law so this site stays up

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

Could you ever kiss the bitch on the mouth afterward?

no of course not. it's a whore, you ain't kissing that in the first place honestly I find kissing in and of itself kinda soy and cucked. either way the point is complete degradation of the femroach but fags probably like it when their asses are played with as a bonus I guess

 

[TooSomething]

no of course not. it's a whore, you ain't kissing that in the first place honestly I find kissing in and of itself kinda soy and cucked. either way the point is complete degradation of the femroach but fags probably like it when their asses are played with as a bonus I guess

A prostitute. Ok then. I still wouldn't let a prostitute lick my asshole.

Remember, she has sucked dick, so there is a chance that she has sperm in her mouth, with which she would be licking your asshole.

There are other ways to degrade her.

You could always piss in her mouth and make her swallow it.

 

[AsiaCel]

A brief statement from you (or your authorized representative) that you have a good faith belief that any intimate visual depiction identified in (2) is not consensual, including any relevant information for us to determine the intimate visual depiction was published without your consent; and
Information sufficient to enable us to contact you (or your authorized representative).

Nigga that legalistic shit is funny in a way. Who uses an authorized figure to represent themselves? Parental guardians? Lmao.

Regardless, I guess the legalistic language does close some loopholes of more vague writings.

Edit: I saw that was also written for visitors, so I guess they can be lawyers or NGOs.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

You could always piss in her mouth and make her swallow it.

good idea

 

[ColderManTruce]

yeah but do you trust him ion trust nobody who gets to krempi stacies on the reg

very true. i think "stacies" might be him joking but idk

 

[rope2cope]

Can you take down the peptides and gambling adverts too

 

[Eastwest404]

Content Moderation (for Users)

Our longstanding policy against illegal content includes:

• Authentic non-consensual intimate images (“revenge porn”)
• Digital forgeries of non-consensual intimate images (“deepfakes”)
• Threats to disseminate revenge porn and/or deepfakes

Users who violate this policy will be warned or suspended as the case may be.

Content Removal Procedure (for Users and Visitors)

I have found revenge porn and/or deepfakes of myself on Incels.is. How can I request the removal of this content?

You must get in touch with us via the “Contact us” form and submit a valid removal request.

A valid removal request must contain all of the following in writing:

1. Your physical or electronic signature, or that of your authorized representative;
2. An identification of, and information reasonably sufficient for us to locate, the intimate visual depiction of you;
3. A brief statement from you (or your authorized representative) that you have a good faith belief that any intimate visual depiction identified in (2) is not consensual, including any relevant information for us to determine the intimate visual depiction was published without your consent; and
4. Information sufficient to enable us to contact you (or your authorized representative).

After a valid removal request has been submitted, we will remove the intimate visual image within 48 hours, and make reasonable efforts to identify and remove any known identical copies. We reserve the right to ignore all communications from those who repeatedly submit invalid and/or abusive requests.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Question 1: Why are you issuing this policy?

Spoiler: Answer

The notice-and-removal provisions contained in section 3 of the TAKE IT DOWN Act (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 223a) came into effect today (May 19th, 2026). Subsection (a)(2) requires us to provide a notice of the process by which we remove revenge porn and deepfakes. That notice is contained above.

Question 2: How is “revenge porn” defined?

Spoiler: Answer

Strictly in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(h)(1), (2), (5).

Question 3: How are “deepfakes” defined?

Spoiler: Answer

Strictly in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(h)(1), (3), (5).

Question 4: I am outside of the United States and have found an image that violates the laws of my country. Will you remove this content?

Spoiler: Answer

No, unless the image is also unlawful under United States law (or contravenes another site policy). Please follow the content removal procedure outlined above.

Question 5: When will this policy be amended or withdrawn?

Spoiler: Answer

This policy will be amended or withdrawn entirely if any part of the TAKE IT DOWN Act is subsequently held unconstitutional. We do anticipate legal challenges to the TAKE IT DOWN Act under the overbreadth doctrine of the First Amendment, and the vagueness doctrine of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Incels.is is committed to maximizing our users’ freedom of speech and will monitor relevant legal developments.

The FAQ may be updated periodically.

Replies to this initial post should not be construed as part of the policy.

Revenge porn of people that won't fuck LOL
Anyway, noted

 

[Lufuce]

Content Moderation (for Users)

Our longstanding policy against illegal content includes:

• Authentic non-consensual intimate images (“revenge porn”)
• Digital forgeries of non-consensual intimate images (“deepfakes”)
• Threats to disseminate revenge porn and/or deepfakes

Users who violate this policy will be warned or suspended as the case may be.

Content Removal Procedure (for Users and Visitors)

I have found revenge porn and/or deepfakes of myself on Incels.is. How can I request the removal of this content?

You must get in touch with us via the “Contact us” form and submit a valid removal request.

A valid removal request must contain all of the following in writing:

1. Your physical or electronic signature, or that of your authorized representative;
2. An identification of, and information reasonably sufficient for us to locate, the intimate visual depiction of you;
3. A brief statement from you (or your authorized representative) that you have a good faith belief that any intimate visual depiction identified in (2) is not consensual, including any relevant information for us to determine the intimate visual depiction was published without your consent; and
4. Information sufficient to enable us to contact you (or your authorized representative).

After a valid removal request has been submitted, we will remove the intimate visual image within 48 hours, and make reasonable efforts to identify and remove any known identical copies. We reserve the right to ignore all communications from those who repeatedly submit invalid and/or abusive requests.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Question 1: Why are you issuing this policy?

Spoiler: Answer

The notice-and-removal provisions contained in section 3 of the TAKE IT DOWN Act (codified at 47 U.S.C. § 223a) came into effect today (May 19th, 2026). Subsection (a)(2) requires us to provide a notice of the process by which we remove revenge porn and deepfakes. That notice is contained above.

Question 2: How is “revenge porn” defined?

Spoiler: Answer

Strictly in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(h)(1), (2), (5).

Question 3: How are “deepfakes” defined?

Spoiler: Answer

Strictly in accordance with 47 U.S.C. § 223(h)(1), (3), (5).

Question 4: I am outside of the United States and have found an image that violates the laws of my country. Will you remove this content?

Spoiler: Answer

No, unless the image is also unlawful under United States law (or contravenes another site policy). Please follow the content removal procedure outlined above.

Question 5: When will this policy be amended or withdrawn?

Spoiler: Answer

This policy will be amended or withdrawn entirely if any part of the TAKE IT DOWN Act is subsequently held unconstitutional. We do anticipate legal challenges to the TAKE IT DOWN Act under the overbreadth doctrine of the First Amendment, and the vagueness doctrine of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Incels.is is committed to maximizing our users’ freedom of speech and will monitor relevant legal developments.

The FAQ may be updated periodically.

Replies to this initial post should not be construed as part of the policy.

Okay

 

[nachtlieder]

pity cause foids revenge nudes are life fuel... .

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Posting deepfakes of ppl you know on the internet is not a good idea yet so many ppl still do it...

Good reminder tbh

 

[Rick prime]

That's an easy rule to follow since I've never had a gf to make revenge porn or deepfakes of.

And even if I did, I ain't stupid like that. xD

But it must make you think how many users here are fakecels and women who wanted this rule?

 

[Rick prime]

Posting deepfakes of ppl you know on the internet is not a good idea yet so many ppl still do it...

Good reminder tbh

It also allows them to doxxx you, whoever you’re posting too, so it technically is a good reminder. Opsec and irrelevancy and Isolationmaxxx is law

 

[Rick prime]

what are they gonna do? throw rocks at me lol

No but if it’s someone you know they could trace em back to you. Especially if others also get the said content from you, again opsec is vital and irrelevancy is key to survival

 

[Rick prime]

Just another example of how we in a puppet matriarchy, You can use AI to deepfake somebody being brutally murdered but a god forbid you do that to deepfake them being fucked.

Yes and you see why Isolationmaxxx is key mental weaponry

 

[TooSomething]

But it must make you think how many users here are fakecels and women who wanted this rule?

eh, no?

 

[LeFrenchCel]

It also allows them to doxxx you, whoever you’re posting too, so it technically is a good reminder. Opsec and irrelevancy and Isolationmaxxx is law

 

[Aventador]

Noooooo. I was gooning well to them. jfl

Hahaha

Oh come on, man. That is disgusting af. Could you ever kiss the bitch on the mouth afterward?

Also, it is still gay af to let a foid tingle your anus.

Apperantly its not uncommon with normies - but still, I could never see someone doing it to me and than kissing me. Fuck no

 

[TooSomething]

Hahaha

Apperantly its not uncommon with normies - but still, I could never see someone doing it to me and than kissing me. Fuck no

I am glad there are still non perverted sanecels out there, man.

This is crazy.

 

[Aventador]

I am glad there are still non perverted sanecels out there, man.

This is crazy.

We sanecels must stick up for one another against the spiritual attacks of the delulucels brother.

 

[fatass30000]

Users repeatedly voted to allow escortcels.

It’s what our bros want.

doesn’t even make sense to ban escortcelling, everyone in the forum can get one. If fucking an escort is ascending then everyone who hasn’t hired one is a volcel for not doing it. I have talked to people who haven’t hired escorts and every single one of them is just too scared and anxious to do it. Whether that be performance anxiety or anxiety that they will get judged for their appearance. But they want to cope with muh “i don’t want to hire one because they’re whores and they have muh stds!!”. If that was true then they wouldn’t be jealous of escortcels and wouldn’t seethe whenever someone mentions it, if they genuinely find fucking an escort disgusting then they wouldn’t be feeling jealousy or hatred towards other users for doing it, they would only feel pity.

 

[cunnylover69]

4chan /r/ was taken down recently for this reason. It seems like the feds are getting serious about these things

 

[THULSA COON]

doesn’t even make sense to ban escortcelling, everyone in the forum can get one. If fucking an escort is ascending then everyone who hasn’t hired one is a volcel for not doing it. I have talked to people who haven’t hired escorts and every single one of them is just too scared and anxious to do it. Whether that be performance anxiety or anxiety that they will get judged for their appearance. But they want to cope with muh “i don’t want to hire one because they’re whores and they have muh stds!!”. If that was true then they wouldn’t be jealous of escortcels and wouldn’t seethe whenever someone mentions it, if they genuinely find fucking an escort disgusting then they wouldn’t be feeling jealousy or hatred towards other users for doing it, they would only feel pity.

I think the reasoning against is that certain users may be such extreme mentalcels like the Virginia tech shooter Cho that even paid whores reject him.

Fucking brutal dude.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

very true. i think "stacies" might be him joking but idk

make no mistake, there are very good looking prostitutes

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

doesn’t even make sense to ban escortcelling, everyone in the forum can get one. If fucking an escort is ascending then everyone who hasn’t hired one is a volcel for not doing it. I have talked to people who haven’t hired escorts and every single one of them is just too scared and anxious to do it. Whether that be performance anxiety or anxiety that they will get judged for their appearance. But they want to cope with muh “i don’t want to hire one because they’re whores and they have muh stds!!”. If that was true then they wouldn’t be jealous of escortcels and wouldn’t seethe whenever someone mentions it, if they genuinely find fucking an escort disgusting then they wouldn’t be feeling jealousy or hatred towards other users for doing it, they would only feel pity.

sure it doesn't make sense to ban, but it should probably be treated with suspicion I think there are levels to this. getting to fuck and degrade a good looking, young whore for cheap is based. overpaying for an old, ugly, flabby, stuck up whore is cucked, especially if it's a non-insignificant portion of your funds. either way, if I'm gon be an incel, I'll value my purity over glorified masturbation I'm already a wizard, a considerable achievement

 

[Extern]

I have found revenge porn and/or deepfakes of myself on Incels.is.

 

[fatass30000]

I think the reasoning against is that certain users may be such extreme mentalcels like the Virginia tech shooter Cho that even paid whores reject him.

anyone who gets rejected by a prostitute deserves a “the biggest truecel on the forum” award at this point” But if i had to guess he probably got rejected because he was jumpy/showed signs of aggression. Most prostitutes have gotten abused at least once so they steer clear of any men that seem like a danger.

 

[fatass30000]

sure it doesn't make sense to ban, but it should probably be treated with suspicion

don’t see why

I think there are levels to this. getting to fuck and degrade a good looking, young whore for cheap is based.

they’re the most expensive ones actually

overpaying for an old, ugly, flabby, stuck up whore is cucked, especially if it's a non-insignificant portion of your funds.

they’re the cheapest

either way, if I'm gon be an incel, I'll value my purity over glorified masturbation I'm already a wizard, a considerable achievement

Imo everyone should have sex once, it really ain’t as good as you think. Once you have it you will also stop thinking about it all the time. It’s basically like you said glorified masturbation.

 

[Urlaubsinsel]

Congress Passes TAKE IT DOWN Act Despite Major Flaws

It would give the powerful a dangerous new route to manipulate platforms into removing lawful speech that they simply don't like, with President Trump himself saying that he would use the law to censor his critics. The bill passed the Senate in February, and it now heads to the president's desk.

www.eff.org

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

they’re the most expensive ones actually

obviously

Imo everyone should have sex once, it really ain’t as good as you think. Once you have it you will also stop thinking about it all the time. It’s basically like you said glorified masturbation.

I'm not thinking about it all the time. inceldom for me is more about the inability to form a family than about getting off

 

[Gaelic-Truecel]

I have many nude videos of women and their real social media pages but they are just for personal enjoyment. I never intended to upload them on here.
It is a big insight into how degenerate the average woman is in society.
Btw these aren't videos I recorded myself.

 

[Gaelic-Truecel]

i would say move this site to a less cucked country but i can't think of any. and also its not like any of us have ex girlfriends to post shit about lol

There are plenty of leaked names of only fans girls.

 

[The Death Devil]

Melania Trump is a skank and I hope that she gets cancer and dies

 

[Chud Norris72]

Are creepshots revenge porn ?

 

[xek000000kk]

Thanks for this, but it sounds like .is is a company.

 

[ColderManTruce]

make no mistake, there are very good looking prostitutes

If you can afford them yes