Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I'm getting tired of incels who are more focused on inceldom than lookism.

Fontaine

Fontaine

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Posts
5,417
The secret of happiness is not sex and love. It's being a fully accepted and esteemed member of a real-life community like the Eagle Scouts. Sex and love are merely bonuses, and in themselves, cannot bring full happiness.

How do you get a pleasant social life? By not being physically deformed or ugly, first and foremost. Halo effect penetrates every aspect of life.

I know this forum is "incels.is" and not "lookism.me", but seeing ugly dudes writing that they'd be happy if only they had a girlfriend is unnerving. You shouldn't be ugly, period.
 
VERY legit theory if we focused on ascending most people here could as long as your eye area isn't shit you probably have a chance to make it with a few surgeries.
 
a lot of would be happy just getting validation for being good looking and having normal social lives where we feel successful
 
I think it's because sex and love only requires one female to be attracted to you, whereas being respected by society requires many people whom deem you valuable i.e. attractive.
 
On the contrary, I'm tired of incels who focus more on lookism than inceldom. Lookism is part of the balckpill/inceldom, but not the whole story. You HAVE to consider the effects that modern feminized society/media/culture has done. Ignoring that is extremely small minded.

Believe it or not, you "frame" and "wrists" have nothing to do with why you're incel, its because you not longer have value as a sub-top-20% male. You're frame and huge nose would've been fine in 1952, or in a society with the morals of 1950s America, pre the-cuckening.
 
a lot of would be happy just getting validation for being good looking and having normal social lives where we feel successful
This

Would be really nice to get a compliment from someone apart from my mother every now and then
 
On the contrary, I'm tired of incels who focus more on lookism than inceldom. Lookism is part of the balckpill/inceldom, but not the whole story. You HAVE to consider the effects that modern feminized society/media/culture has done. Ignoring that is extremely small minded.

Believe it or not, you "frame" and "wrists" have nothing to do with why you're incel, its because you not longer have value as a sub-top-20% male. You're frame and huge nose would've been fine in 1952, or in a society with the morals of 1950s America, pre the-cuckening.
They wrist size cryouts is the most rediculous thing I have ever encountered on this site. Some people legit think they would slay if their wrist were an inch thicker
 
They wrist size cryouts is the most rediculous thing I have ever encountered on this site. Some people legit think they would slay if their wrist were an inch thicker
Indicator of overall frame bro! My frame is keeping me from slaying!

Frame is not one-tenth of face or one-tenth of height with regards to SMV. Its a terrible, unaware cope. Even NT status is more important.

Anyways, the reason why they believe this is because their face and height are good, but just not good enough for modern, western, feminized women. So in the 1950s, with their frame and height, would be totally fine. Culture still is the mass problem.
 
You're frame and huge nose would've been fine in 1952, or in a society with the morals of 1950s America, pre the-cuckening.
Bullshit. Being ugly has always sucked. Ugly boys have always been low status in groups.
 
High IQ:feelsokman:

With enough effort any man can find a girlfriend to give him pity sex but only attractive men receive genuine admiration.
 
Indicator of overall frame bro! My frame is keeping me from slaying!

Frame is not one-tenth of face or one-tenth of height with regards to SMV. Its a terrible, unaware cope. Even NT status is more important.

Anyways, the reason why they believe this is because their face and height are good, but just not good enough for modern, western, feminized women. So in the 1950s, with their frame and height, would be totally fine. Culture still is the mass problem.

You can have skinny wrists, ankles and neck; aslong as you have good shoulder width to waist ratio you will look good. Frame is important but wrist lenght is not. It as no correlation to shoulder witdth and that's what's most important.
 
With enough effort any man can find a girlfriend to give him pity sex
1531851674633
 
They wrist size cryouts is the most rediculous thing I have ever encountered on this site. Some people legit think they would slay if their wrist were an inch thicker
Because wrist size is supposed to be an indicator of how much muscle you can potentially build. Some people seem to peak pretty quickly, others can build lbs with minimal effort
 
This is all true, but female validation is the ultimate status indicator. Evolution had females be able to smell social status like a Lagotto dog can smell truffles. Follow the trail of the inceldom problem and everything else becomes clear.
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
9
Views
485
Lurker1488
Lurker1488
pedrolopezwasright
Replies
7
Views
573
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Samurai
Replies
29
Views
640
underballer
U
Sasukecel
Replies
90
Views
2K
Sasukecel
Sasukecel
SlayerSlayer
Replies
70
Views
2K
lowz1r
lowz1r

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top