It seems you probably live in an area where most of them are. I doubt 2000s Europe was already like current
This is funny to say since Old europe (You saying 1990s) had way higher crime rates than we do now I agree generally with the politicans part but I would argue that a lot of it is not that they politicians back then weren't as corrupt but more that we were as unaware of their corruption as we are today bro you are just spouting nonsense europe now is just better for the things you said the only thing it was better in back then was economically. This just goes to show that a lot of you guys just listen to propaganda online instead of searching things up for yourself
Lmao based get replaced in your own country its only the fruits of your actions buddy boyo
Did I say anything wrong though? Dont have anything against europeans but its the fruit of their own actions in both society and in the past, western society now just does not encourage reproduction through feminism, social media, women working and not needing men, and through purity cultures and its opposite slut culture which are both negative for society in forming long term marriages to be able to have kids.
Nothing I said was really leftie either way though things change man thats just how it is if you cant accept it then you'll be stuck in sadness forever you have to learn to look at the good things in life and the bad I dont think theres anything wrong with multiculturalism there are always good and bad things to certain events just gotta accept it for what it is brotherYou say this as if I agree with the leftie stuff, heh
I mean, to be fair the thing that even made me think to make this thread was I was sitting here having a pepsi and a cigarette and it made me think of old Europe.
Not the Pepsi, haha
But more... sitting outside a nice café with a coffee and a cigarette. In a civilised, pleasant society that genuinely feels European in terms of the culture and the people.
Really sad that we seem to be losing that.
What did I do exactly ?
Not you I mean that it's only the fruits of the countries labor making an effect on the poor population on the world who now want to migrate out of their countries which are shitholes due to western intervention ofc you aint do nun still though its not like its a bad thing after all
That's unproven. Many countries recovered just fine from western intervention, and others were shitholes long before western intervention.
It is a bad thing though. I don't benefit from immigration in anyway. The only people who benefit from immigration are the rich capitalists who get cheaper docile labor.
then why are you also replacing countries that never colonized anyone, then? Like Poland or Norway?
No europa for your face
Haha now your tryna justify this brother IQ was never implemented correctly throughout countries buddy read the articles in the end of this https://www.researchgate.net/public...rable_measures_of_cognitive_ability_worldwide
Just because you dont benefit doesnt mean that others dont the people leaving their countries for a better life also benefit life doesnt revolve around you, also this is a bit biased since in a lot of countries like lets say for example the US the population which earns the most are skilled Indian immigrants who come to the country for a better life and just so happen to earn the most it depends on the type of immigration whether its good or bad for YOU. If you really had an issue with rich capitalists getting cheaper labour you'd attempt to solve that issue with capitalists this only really applies when illegal immigrants come into play and still they usually do jobs which dont require skills like construction for example look at UAE they trap immigrants by taking their passports and not letting them travel when they just wanted a better life we should be feeling sympathy for them
Still the fruits of their labour buddy boyo, Both Poland and Norway were tied to the colonization of Africa, though neither of them ever possessed vast, state-run overseas empires. Poland actively attempted to acquire African territories and colonies in the 1930s, while Norway was historically tied to the exploitation of Africa through its unions with Denmark and individual commercial ventures. And still even if they didn't TRY to colonize africa they were still complicit in the injustice therefore should be held accountable
The 1990s were already full of fornication, Chad worship, and foid worship, and society was being prepared for a multicultural future.
The West build itself without these "skilled" indian immigrants, why do we suddenly need them now ? And why are their countries still shitholes if they are so skilled ?
Don't worry comrade, I'm getting ready for the revolution, these kulaks will get forced in the gulags when I take over the world. Just give me 2 more weeks.
Construction requires skill, when you give construction jobs to unskilled people you get McMansions that collapse at the first blow of wind.
I do feel sympathy for them, but I don't let myself be controled by my emotions, and I know immigration only makes the ruling class stronger. It's always the workers who pay the price of immigration.
Basically.
How exactly were they complicit in a way non-European countries weren't? Actually explain so in a way that would be specific to those countries alone, and wouldn't just apply to the entire world, because if the idea is just that they were trading with the countries which did colonize Africans and that makes them complicit, then there would be no country on Earth, not just in Europe, that wouldn't be as well.
.
incels.is
This is such a tired and misleading viewpoint both in regards to Europe and America. Crime was higher back then due to lower economic development, but it was also concentrated in hotspot areas. Now it’s lower overall but it’s also more spread out, due to ethnics also being more spread out compared to the past.
Retard has never looked at a per capita breakdown of welfare consumption or crime rates. Also, ethnics form racial voting blocs and protect their own interests while whites are atomized.
Just making shit up.
“All vhypipo are obligated to protect me saar, if they don’t they’re heckin’ COLONIZUHS N SHIET” (even if the white group in question didn’t actually colonize shit).
He won't. Like all of his kind, he simply hates Europeans and is looking for excuses to justify his hatred.
Just report and hope the mods do their job, that's what I did
Norway was a backwater then, and remains a backwater today. They couldn't colonise anything, even if they wanted to.
He's looking out for his own interests, or the interests of people he likes. The odd thing is how he seems to think that he can fool the Westerncels here to go against their interests in favour of his, like we're one argument away from becoming Redditors or something.
I just said what I believe in my opinion you guys are being overly sensitive I dont mean to disrespect you in any way but if you felt disrespected or your feelings hurt you could of told me I would've stopped I just mean to have a discussion nothing more than that
Yes, interwar Poland did attempt to acquire African territories and establish settlements in the early 1930s bradar just search it up. Crime is still concentrated to hotspots and is still linked to lower financial positions. I dont know about the second point but that doesnt seem like such a bad thing. Again your point about not colonizing shit is just not true of course no one owes me anything apparently im the one mad but your getting overly sensitive haha im just saying my view points man no need to crash out
I dont want to punish anybody for anything im just saying that migration usually coming from wanting to seek a better life is the direct cause of countries being fucked up due to western imperialism and colonization, also empirical research consistently demonstrates that illegal immigration does not cause higher crime rates. I don't give a shit about euopeans man do what you want im just highliting how you can't really be mad when its just the chickens coming home to roost
Man you will put your beliefs into mine I dont hate anyone for no reason and I certainly dont hate you I think you gotta be more accepting of other peoples opinions even if it doesnt benefit you being able to understand peoples viewpoints due to their situations you keep puting words into my mouth when I aint say nothin man just tryna talk to people not try and defend my actions again let me restate this I dont hate any group of people for no reason I believe that is an injustice
I agree with your last point unlimited massive immigration of course will never be good it should be constricted but I do still feel empathy for those who try and immigrate but I do agree it needs to be over a long period of time or people will not be able to integrate into society they will instead form their own societies to seperate from the original people which is bad. Also I dont think construction is a skilled job in a sense it just needs skilled leadership to guide the people to do their job properly if anything its one of the most unskilled jobs out there
This is a good viewpoint tbh i'll have to think this through although I was talking about colonization not slavery they were both things that were accepted by society at that time so you cant critique one and disregard the other but from my viewpoint one is still affecting people to this day i.e western colonialism and imperialism and the other is not affecting anyone today which is why one is still having effects to this day (immigration) while the other has not
Basically.
How exactly were they complicit in a way non-European countries weren't? Actually explain so in a way that would be specific to those countries alone, and wouldn't just apply to the entire world, because if the idea is just that they were trading with the countries which did colonize Africans and that makes them complicit, then there would be no country on Earth, not just in Europe, that wouldn't be as well.
And by that same logic, ALL of Islamic world and very large parts of Africa, which traded with and had contacts with Islamic cultures in the north of Africa are responsible and complicit for the Islamic slave trade of Eastern Europeans, which is solely outshined by the trade of West Africans into the Americas (overwhelmingly to LatAm, only a tiny amount of slaves ended up in the US) and up until the 18th century or so was the biggest slave trade in the world, with some land given to Poland being the absolute least they could offer as reparations
"the little-known fact that Eastern Europe was the largest source of slaves in the early modern world after West Africa"
It's honestly unnerving how much and how quickly can history be forgotten:shock:. The upshot of these activities is the little-known fact that Eastern Europe was the largest source of slaves in the early modern world after West Africa (Khodarkovsky 2002, 22). Our understanding of how...
Baits me
How did It go?
“People” like this are exactly why I hate brown scum. Even the most insufferable white nationalists (the foid worshippers) are at least upfront about their views and intentions, unlike this retard who constantly contradicts himself
Mb g
I was expelled for being white by the nigger teachers and nigger staff and had to go to a private school instead. It was completely illegal and no one has been punished for this. Whites are second class citizens in this country, and this was in the early 2010s.
Are you even for real? Dishonest faggot. Niggers just want to morally justify scourging of white countries and get away with it. Nobody owes you anything just because you are dirty ragged nigger. Make your own stuff and fuck off from honest white people, useless subhuman leech.
Buddy calm down I dont even live in Europe others opinions shouldn't make you this mad
