Serious I Don't Want Libertarianism, I Want Incel-Based Feudalism

[LifeIsTrash]

In my Libertarian phase, I often blamed my inceldom on the welfare state and socialism. I thought if we had a true libertarian society, there would be a certain segment of the population in abject poverty (those with time preferences higher are than interest rates) and no welfare state to accomodate them. I would then have my pick of these women with my abundant salary, especially since I'd pay less in taxes to finance this welfare state. I now realize even this isn't enough. Every time I hear about or see a hot girl, it always turns out they come from money, they come from CASH. It's the tattooed trashy whores that come from poverty, IN GENERAL. Although Libertarianism would be much better than our current cucked society, it's not the ideal system, the ideal system is a feudalist society where Incels are the landed aristocracy.

Under my system, there would be no "social mobility" beyond ranked hierarchy depending on what cel you are. Truecels would be at the top, followed by incels, then low-tier normies, etc. Chads would be the bottom level peasant slave class. Stacies would be property of the truecels with Beckys being paired with regular incels.

All commerce would be owned by the incel nobility. Even if a Chad genius wants to start a company, the most he can be is a corporate advisor to a member of the landed aristocracy.

 

[Antorian]

One of the aspects I find most attractive about monarchy is that its honest. You can clearly see who is behind this or that policy, and who should be blamed or rewarded for what they did. Meanwhile in republics we have to play this nightmarish "follow the money" hide-and-seek to find out who is behind the most recent change of politics in the state/country.

"Republics at least gives you the illusion of social mobility!"

I would rather a system that is honest about why I probably won't reach the upper classes without some serious help than one that deceives me into thinking that its all on my shoulders and therefore its my fault if I stay as lower class.

 

[LifeIsTrash]

One of the aspects I find most attractive about monarchy is that its honest. You can clearly see who is behind this or that policy, and who should be blamed or rewarded for what they did. Meanwhile in republics we have to play this nightmarish "follow the money" hide-and-seek to find out who is behind the most recent change of politics in the state/country.

"Republics at least gives you the illusion of social mobility!"

I would rather a system that is honest about why I probably won't reach the upper classes without some serious help than one that deceives me into thinking that its all on my shoulders and therefore its my fault if I stay as lower class.

Social mobility is actually the highest in a Libertarian Monarchy.

I was always pro-Monarchy, I just wanted a Libertarian-Monarchy.

Now I want a feudalist monarchy.

 

[_meh]

Wouldn't be bad buying female slaves.

Be the master and have your female serf.

Perhaps one each so other men don't get angry, state regulation is needed here.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Makes sense, it’s redistributing wealth based on genetic wealth to equalize everything.

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

Makes sense, it’s redistributing wealth based on genetic wealth to equalize everything.

You have no right here to talk about economics, jew rat

 

[LifeIsTrash]

Wouldn't be bad buying female slaves.

Be the master and have your female serf.

Perhaps one each so other men don't get angry, state regulation is needed here.

Former thots would be common property to be leased out as prostitutes, with proceds going to the federal military. Each incel will have at least one personal wife, but possibly more.

 

[_meh]

Former thots would be common property to be leased out as prostitutes, with proceds going to the federal military. Each incel will have at least one personal wife, but possibly more.

That would still mess up with the ratio unless if there are more women than men.

 

[LifeIsTrash]

That would still mess up with the ratio unless if there are more women than men.

How so? It's very possible for a small elite subset of men to have multiple wives without messing up the overall ratio.

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Third worldcels can always go ER to form groups like ISIS and Boko Haram with backing from intelligence agencies. In that sense they're better off than first worldcels with no better option than to LDAR

 

[_meh]

How so? It's very possible for a small elite subset of men to have multiple wives without messing up the overall ratio.

From the get-go, the chances of getting a son or daughter is a 50/50 chance. Some ratios may skew higher or lower.

 

[LifeIsTrash]

From the get-go, the chances of getting a son or daughter is a 50/50 chance. Some ratios may skew higher or lower.

And what does that have to do with what I said?

 

[_meh]

And what does that have to do with what I said?

The multiple wives thing won't fly unless if you still desire sexual inequality. Also, because in most given nations, there's usually a 50-50 split between males and females or unless if an IVF procedure is handled (to give a better/favorable ratio).

 

[LifeIsTrash]

The multiple wife thing won't fly unless if you still desire sexual inequality. Also, because in most given nations, there's usually a 50-50 split between males and females or unless if an IVF procedure is handled (to give a better/favorable ratio).

As I said, if a very small % of men have multiple wives that won't do anything to overall ratios.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

You have no right here to talk about economics, jew rat

My bad, didn’t know Jews can’t talk about economics.

 

[LifeIsTrash]

My bad, didn’t know Jews can’t talk about economics.

Most of the great economists were Jewish. Keynes and Galbraith are exceptions.

Jews have Marx, Hayek, Ludwig Von Mises, Paul Krugman, Ayn Rand, Murray Rothbard, Milton Friedman, etc.