(I've only joined in august, I'm a total grey, I could be wrong and this post could totally be water, but I do want to share my perspective and reasoning).
In our community, it's common to see sex as the ultimate proof of love a woman can offer.
I've read somewhere -- I believe it was the book "why incels are right & you are wrong" by Castle -- that incels do not only want to experience sex contrary to what normies are thinking, they want the full experience : the emotional and physical (non-sexual) closeness and intimacy, but that sex was the ultimate proof of love a women could give you.
I've also been seeing so many normies talk about sex like it is "the most intimate things two souls could do".
But I believe it is wrong.
Even if women are more selective with their partners, and that would underlie that seeing her naked is a huge privilege that can be interpreted as this ultimate proof, it is not.
How can you believe that a women giving access to her body is the ultimate proof of love if she has been fucked multiple times ?
Even if she is virgin, and interested in you, she certainly had urges of wanting to have sex with someone else before, at least one person if not more, just because of those people's good looks (body or face). It isn't only reserved to you, in thoughts or acts, thus it cannot be that almighty proof.
Normies mistake instinctual attraction for love, because they have been so deprived of that intimacy that they think it is a privilege. They wouldn't think that if they were good looking and had multiple occasions of having intercourse. They would see that thing as normal, regular, instead of this worshipped : "the most intimate things two souls could do".
Society has convinced people that seeing someone naked is intimacy, when it is actually instincts based off arousal of someone's physical traits.
Love, the monogamous "stay forever with your partner" promoted by society is actually the contrary. It's a constant fight against human nature and urges to reproduce (or at least trick the brain into believing it you did) because subjectively (or it can even be objectively true objectively) you prefer what you partner brings you or how you feel with them (which contradicts the bluepilled propaganda also promoted by this society that love is unconditional), that there are more benefits being in this relationship than in a one night stands, and also because you do not want to make your partner or even yourself upset or feeling other negative emotions as well out of empathy and/or logic.
Again might be totally water.
In our community, it's common to see sex as the ultimate proof of love a woman can offer.
I've read somewhere -- I believe it was the book "why incels are right & you are wrong" by Castle -- that incels do not only want to experience sex contrary to what normies are thinking, they want the full experience : the emotional and physical (non-sexual) closeness and intimacy, but that sex was the ultimate proof of love a women could give you.
I've also been seeing so many normies talk about sex like it is "the most intimate things two souls could do".
But I believe it is wrong.
Even if women are more selective with their partners, and that would underlie that seeing her naked is a huge privilege that can be interpreted as this ultimate proof, it is not.
How can you believe that a women giving access to her body is the ultimate proof of love if she has been fucked multiple times ?
Even if she is virgin, and interested in you, she certainly had urges of wanting to have sex with someone else before, at least one person if not more, just because of those people's good looks (body or face). It isn't only reserved to you, in thoughts or acts, thus it cannot be that almighty proof.
Normies mistake instinctual attraction for love, because they have been so deprived of that intimacy that they think it is a privilege. They wouldn't think that if they were good looking and had multiple occasions of having intercourse. They would see that thing as normal, regular, instead of this worshipped : "the most intimate things two souls could do".
Society has convinced people that seeing someone naked is intimacy, when it is actually instincts based off arousal of someone's physical traits.
Love, the monogamous "stay forever with your partner" promoted by society is actually the contrary. It's a constant fight against human nature and urges to reproduce (or at least trick the brain into believing it you did) because subjectively (or it can even be objectively true objectively) you prefer what you partner brings you or how you feel with them (which contradicts the bluepilled propaganda also promoted by this society that love is unconditional), that there are more benefits being in this relationship than in a one night stands, and also because you do not want to make your partner or even yourself upset or feeling other negative emotions as well out of empathy and/or logic.
Again might be totally water.
