barcacel
Vitantiheterodroidsexual Monk-mode MGTOW
-
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2022
- Posts
- 1,914
light skin and light eyes were created around 10,000-20,000 years ago
there are a lot of gene mutations that can happen in animals, light skin and and light eyes were mutations, humans arived europe 50,000 years ago, at that time we were in the last ice age, at that time nomadic humans subsisted almost entirely on meat from reindeer and other migratory game. Long-distance hunting increased the death rate among men and decreased the polygyny rate (polygyny was very popular before). —only the ablest hunters could provide for more than one woman and her children because women had almost no food autonomy. The result: a surplus of women on the mate market; intense rivalry among them for male attention; and strong selection for eye-catching female features. Such features became more frequent with succeeding generations, eventually forming what is now seen as the “European” phenotype. Women are more prone to be born with lighter skin, blonde hair and light eyes than males (they also have less body hair which is an indicator that humans lost their fur this way also):
i want you to look at 50,000 years ago in this, this is poorly graphed because this only measures if the child was a female, obviously if you are monogamous you are less likely to have a female child and the chart would see it as females reproducing less than men:
as you can see above, 50,000 years ago we started to be monogamous because of the ice age, but then the ice age ended 11,500 years ago and agriculture was created by men who had ligter skin, lighter eyes and lighter hair:
then men with lighter skin, lighter eyes, lighter hair, bigger brains and weaker bodies started to practice polygyny with black women and white women thanks to the economic benefits of their new inventions, created using their better brains, leaving thosands of black men unable to reproduce, i want you to take a look at 10,000 years ago:
also this was bound to happen because the earth has been becoming colder over millions of years and that has increased brain size:
blog on this:
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2022/10/european-hair-eye-and-skin-color.html
@LL maxi @PLA1092 @Balding Subhuman @Neurotic @suigintwo @Made in Heaven @huaus @Misogynist Curry 卐 @CrippledByLonelines @Pajeetsingh
there are a lot of gene mutations that can happen in animals, light skin and and light eyes were mutations, humans arived europe 50,000 years ago, at that time we were in the last ice age, at that time nomadic humans subsisted almost entirely on meat from reindeer and other migratory game. Long-distance hunting increased the death rate among men and decreased the polygyny rate (polygyny was very popular before). —only the ablest hunters could provide for more than one woman and her children because women had almost no food autonomy. The result: a surplus of women on the mate market; intense rivalry among them for male attention; and strong selection for eye-catching female features. Such features became more frequent with succeeding generations, eventually forming what is now seen as the “European” phenotype. Women are more prone to be born with lighter skin, blonde hair and light eyes than males (they also have less body hair which is an indicator that humans lost their fur this way also):
these two graphs show the number of men (left) and women (right) who reproduced throughout human history, i want you to take a look at 10,000 years ago:
8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man
An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.
psmag.com
then men with lighter skin, lighter eyes, lighter hair, bigger brains and weaker bodies started to practice polygyny with black women and white women thanks to the economic benefits of their new inventions, created using their better brains, leaving thosands of black men unable to reproduce, i want you to take a look at 10,000 years ago:
these two graphs show the number of men (left) and women (right) who reproduced throughout human history, i want you to take a look at 10,000 years ago:
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
"All this began to change about 10,000 years ago when those humans who began to adopt agriculture became more numerous and more powerful than their wandering relatives. This transition from mobile hunting and gathering to sedentary agriculture was the most violent in human history. The fossil record shows that, as a percentage of total population, more men died from war in these years than in any other time in human history, including World War I and World War II.
Those conquered but not killed in these battles usually became slaves, and those slaves were not equally distributed among the victors. Only the richest and most powerful families could afford to buy and keep slaves, so as the size and complexity of these societies grew from city-states into empires, a familiar pattern took shape. Anthropologist Dr. Laura Betzig explained that in any large ancient empire “powerful men mate with hundreds of women, pass their power on to a son by a legitimate wife, and take the lives of men who get in their way.”
And so polygamy became the dominant human mating pattern for thousands of years. This only began to change with the advent of Christianity — as monogamous as the Romans and Greeks were among citizens, sex with slaves was accepted and even encouraged. But it's not as if Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount and then every European became monogamous the next day. It took time, centuries even, for the Church to impose or, really, reimpose, monogamy on the West, but it did eventually become the norm."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/when-did-monogamy-become-the-norm
https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
"All this began to change about 10,000 years ago when those humans who began to adopt agriculture became more numerous and more powerful than their wandering relatives. This transition from mobile hunting and gathering to sedentary agriculture was the most violent in human history. The fossil record shows that, as a percentage of total population, more men died from war in these years than in any other time in human history, including World War I and World War II.
Those conquered but not killed in these battles usually became slaves, and those slaves were not equally distributed among the victors. Only the richest and most powerful families could afford to buy and keep slaves, so as the size and complexity of these societies grew from city-states into empires, a familiar pattern took shape. Anthropologist Dr. Laura Betzig explained that in any large ancient empire “powerful men mate with hundreds of women, pass their power on to a son by a legitimate wife, and take the lives of men who get in their way.”
And so polygamy became the dominant human mating pattern for thousands of years. This only began to change with the advent of Christianity — as monogamous as the Romans and Greeks were among citizens, sex with slaves was accepted and even encouraged. But it's not as if Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount and then every European became monogamous the next day. It took time, centuries even, for the Church to impose or, really, reimpose, monogamy on the West, but it did eventually become the norm."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/when-did-monogamy-become-the-norm
also this was bound to happen because the earth has been becoming colder over millions of years and that has increased brain size:
blog on this:
https://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2022/10/european-hair-eye-and-skin-color.html
@LL maxi @PLA1092 @Balding Subhuman @Neurotic @suigintwo @Made in Heaven @huaus @Misogynist Curry 卐 @CrippledByLonelines @Pajeetsingh
Last edited: