Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

How Hinduism(Brahmanism) destroys the indigenous ancestral faiths of Indian Subcontinent

Blackpill Monk

Blackpill Monk

NON-NT AND HATED BY EVERYONE
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Posts
11,547
Online time
8h 57m
Brahmanism or you commonly known as Hinduism has destroyed the indigenous ancestral/animistic faiths of different tribes, ethnicities and communities of Subcontinent. Hinduism or Brahmanism is basically the strict ethnoreligion for Brahmins and Dwijas(Dwijas means upper caste tribes and group in today modern times, this includes Brahmins and other upper caste tribes and ethnicities). Non Dwijas are called as Avarnas, Maleech etcc by the Brahmanical scripture. In current modern times Dalits (Schedule Caste/Lower Caste), Adivasi(Schedule Tribes) are viewed as Avarnas that is non-Dwijas. Brahmanism or Hinduism destroys the indigenous ancestral faiths of non-Dwijas(Avarnas) by appropriating, hijacking and stealing the indigenous ancestral deities, by labelling thier ancestral deities as a lower avatar of thier Brahmanical Gods or directly taken thier tribal deities and merged with thier Brahmanical fold. By doing this so, they(Dwijas) completely destroyed the independent and indigenous roots and characteristics and then linked up everything to Brahmanism and by doing so so that they can destroyed the independent identity of non-Dwijas and declaring them as lower caste by imposing caste system on them so that they remain slaves of Dwijas (Brahmins and another so called Upper Caste).This shows how Dwijas hijacked appropriate and then destroy the indigenous ancestral faiths of non Dwijas. All they(Dwijas) done it so that they create a false Hindu majority to always stay in power. So basically Dalits and Adivasi aren't Hindu, they have thier own indigenous ancestral faiths independent of Hinduism (Brahmanism) but were forced to club under Hinduism

Brahmanism (Hinduism) is far more dangerous than Abrahamicism because Abrahamicism has replace your roots with thiers and you have chance to revive it later,But Brahmanism appropriate, steal and hijacked your indigenous roots in such a way that it destroying it's indigenous and independent characters, destroying it's independent autonomy and then linked up everything with Brahmanism and thus it completely vanishing your roots and it's extremely difficult to revive it.In simple analogy, Abrahamicism cut down the trees, but Brahmanism destroys the entire roots
 
What you think about Buddhism in relate to this?
 
What you think about Buddhism in relate to this?
Buddhism comes to fight against Brahmanism. And regarding towards indigenous ancestral religion, Buddhism is far better. Buddhism hasn't tried to appropriate, hijacked or forcibly absorbed the indigenous ancestral faiths. On the other hand Brahmanism completely anhilate and destroys the indigenous ancestral faiths of non Brahmins specially non-Dwijas by forcibly hijacked, appropriate and forcibly absorbed, thus destroying the indigenous and independent roots and characteristics and then linked everything to Brahmanism
 
Hinduism isnt owned by brahmans.lol. yeah they were respected. But you had society divided into multiple classes
 
What you think about Buddhism in relate to this?
Siddharth gautam the founder of buddhism was a kshtariya hindu and of warrior class. Who hated violence and left his home and became a saint
 
Alexander should’ve finished the job ngl. Hellenic India would’ve mogged
 
Alexander should’ve finished the job ngl. Hellenic India would’ve mogged
Fr tho. Greco-Buddhism, as was practised in Northwest India for a few centuries, had some of the most sophisticated art and sculpture ever conceived in curryland.

 
Brahmanism or you commonly known as Hinduism has destroyed the indigenous ancestral/animistic faiths of different tribes, ethnicities and communities of Subcontinent. Hinduism or Brahmanism is basically the strict ethnoreligion for Brahmins and Dwijas(Dwijas means upper caste tribes and group in today modern times, this includes Brahmins and other upper caste tribes and ethnicities). Non Dwijas are called as Avarnas, Maleech etcc by the Brahmanical scripture. In current modern times Dalits (Schedule Caste/Lower Caste), Adivasi(Schedule Tribes) are viewed as Avarnas that is non-Dwijas. Brahmanism or Hinduism destroys the indigenous ancestral faiths of non-Dwijas(Avarnas) by appropriating, hijacking and stealing the indigenous ancestral deities, by labelling thier ancestral deities as a lower avatar of thier Brahmanical Gods or directly taken thier tribal deities and merged with thier Brahmanical fold. By doing this so, they(Dwijas) completely destroyed the independent and indigenous roots and characteristics and then linked up everything to Brahmanism and by doing so so that they can destroyed the independent identity of non-Dwijas and declaring them as lower caste by imposing caste system on them so that they remain slaves of Dwijas (Brahmins and another so called Upper Caste).This shows how Dwijas hijacked appropriate and then destroy the indigenous ancestral faiths of non Dwijas. All they(Dwijas) done it so that they create a false Hindu majority to always stay in power. So basically Dalits and Adivasi aren't Hindu, they have thier own indigenous ancestral faiths independent of Hinduism (Brahmanism) but were forced to club under Hinduism

Brahmanism (Hinduism) is far more dangerous than Abrahamicism because Abrahamicism has replace your roots with thiers and you have chance to revive it later,But Brahmanism appropriate, steal and hijacked your indigenous roots in such a way that it destroying it's indigenous and independent characters, destroying it's independent autonomy and then linked up everything with Brahmanism and thus it completely vanishing your roots and it's extremely difficult to revive it.In simple analogy, Abrahamicism cut down the trees, but Brahmanism destroys the entire roots
Keep seething dalit. Even your slave morality cult Buddhism was a product of a high caste Indo Aryan prince.

As for the indigenous religions, they were shit and I wish Indo Aryans had exterminated them completely, instead of absorbing them into their own spiritual corpus.
 
Keep seething dalit. Even your slave morality cult Buddhism was a product of a high caste Indo Aryan prince.

As for the indigenous religions, they were shit and I wish Indo Aryans had exterminated them completely, instead of absorbing them into their own spiritual corpus.
Imagine still using Dalit as an insult, you don’t belong to live in this current moment. Go back to your own time.
 
Imagine still using Dalit as an insult, you don’t belong to live in this current moment. Go back to your own time.
I m ignoring that retard streetshitter pajeet
 
Alexander should’ve finished the job ngl. Hellenic India would’ve mogged
Was never going to happen, India was never a unified political entity ever in its history until very recently. He would’ve bankrupted himself trying to please the hundreds of princes and kings.
 
@DarkStar @wereq @Hoodpreet give a read
 
Buddhism comes to fight against Brahmanism. And regarding towards indigenous ancestral religion, Buddhism is far better. Buddhism hasn't tried to appropriate, hijacked or forcibly absorbed the indigenous ancestral faiths. On the other hand Brahmanism completely anhilate and destroys the indigenous ancestral faiths of non Brahmins specially non-Dwijas by forcibly hijacked, appropriate and forcibly absorbed, thus destroying the indigenous and independent roots and characteristics and then linked everything to Brahmanism
I believe Buddhism was also a revolt against the decadence of the Brahmin elite.

Kind of similar to the Khawarij.
 
I believe Buddhism was also a revolt against the decadence of the Brahmin elite.

Kind of similar to the Khawarij.
How tho, Khawarij emerged during the time of the Sahaba
 
Last edited:
How tho, Khawarij emerged during the time of the Sahaba
What I meant was that they were egalitarians who opposed Qurayshite and even Arab domination of the Caliphate.
 
@BenBerger what do you think about it and give your opinion
 
@BenBerger what do you think about it and give your opinion
This is interesting, yet unfortunately i don't know much about Indian culture.
But the analogy seems important.

When you say:
"Abrahamicism cut down the trees, but Brahmanism destroys the entire roots."
It seems to me that the goy people of say Europe can recover from Abrahamistic religions. In fact the pagan religions of Europe are all alive and kinda coexist. Even the Christianity of Europe adapted to local pre-christian traditions.
But I didn't understand how did Brahmanism destroyed the roots ?
If you have at least some written records of the old cult, then you can always rebuild it, or am i missing something?
 
This is interesting, yet unfortunately i don't know much about Indian culture.
But the analogy seems important.

When you say:
"Abrahamicism cut down the trees, but Brahmanism destroys the entire roots."
It seems to me that the goy people of say Europe can recover from Abrahamistic religions. In fact the pagan religions of Europe are all alive and kinda coexist. Even the Christianity of Europe adapted to local pre-christian traditions.
But I didn't understand how did Brahmanism destroyed the roots ?
If you have at least some written records of the old cult, then you can always rebuild it, or am i missing something?
Bro message me, I will say in DM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →