you are falling back into morality by claiming that something being deleterious to the well being of society is in fact "bad", for why should anyone care if society is hurt or not?
JFL again proving my point, you guys literally can't think of anything outside of the framework of morality, nobody is falling back into a moral argument, you can simply only process things under a convenient lense of "right" and "wrong" so you are percieving the argument as you already want it to be, its like confirmation bias
What I meant was something more obvious, but it will go over your head, and over
@based_meme head too
SELFISHNESS
When people say they want a safe and stable society, they don't literally mean society, they mean
THEMSELVES
Think about phrases like "protect the environment" or "save the planet"
Those things will do just fine no matter what, what humans mean by those phrases are "
PROTECT HUMANITY (AS IN MYSELF AND MY CHILDREN)" and "
SAVE OUR SPECIES (AS IN MYSELF AND MY CHILDREN)"
Global warming (if its as bad as people say) isn't really going to do shit to the planet, the planet will survive and change, its US that will die, all the "save the planet" BS, is nothing but
SELF INTEREST AND SELF PRESERVATION MASQUERADING AS ALTRUISM
Which reminds me of that George Carlin joke:
I actually believe many women and many Chads are going to hell because of their licentious behavior, which makes me kinda of the oddball man out here but you have to admit it's a perspective with an untapped potential
It has zero potential, moralfaggotry is for illogical fools
First off, the bible has be edited and re-written so many times, I've even heard about a scroll that said hell isn't even an eternal place and everbody gets out at some point, and that scroll was purposefully covered up by the vatican and remains in their archives, so hell might not even be an issue, they'll do their time and they'll join you in heaven all the same
Also God sending people to hell for being immoral is the greatest irony, as he created humans with the capacity to be immoral in the first place
Imagine of you were speaking to a coder who created an AI Bot in Python, he purposefully adds a function to its library that makes it create errors, but he introduces a probability mechanic that allows it to choose whether or not it can use that function, now what would you think of the coder if he said he's going to run that AI bot in a simulation where it gets endlessly deleted and recreated for it executing functions the coder purposefully gave it the ability to do
Lets go even more abstract and mention that
IT IS THE CODER THAT IS DECIDING WHAT IS AN ERROR OR NOT, because since the coder creates the world in which the bot interacts, he defines the rules
The coder could choose to simply define the error data and something else that could be utilized in some way, but the coder chose not to do so
I hope you get the point I'm making, think of what SIN IS, trying and think about it abstractly, its a set of rules that only has meaning because God decided so
Do you not see the weird irony of God defining "fornication" (
AN ACT CONSISTING OF THE OUR SOLE MEANS OF REPRODUCTION) as a "sin" within the simulation he created, why go out of your way to do that as a creator, it doesn't make sense, why wouldn't you make procreation happen through other means, then fornication being a sin would make sense
Like i said in the previous post, worrying about the "good of society" is a moral question in itself
It really isn't, your bias is just so strong that you
LITERALLY CAN'T process reality outside the framework of morality, its really sad for an incel to be so limited in their thinking, were supposed to be the ones who aren't NPC's, but you are really no different than a normie, you are just mad you are missing out on all of the fun they are, so your cope is that they will suffer for eternity afterwards
).
