Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Feminists need to standardize their views

Giracel

Giracel

Paraguaymaxxing
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 31, 2025
Posts
3,410
Online time
2d 5h
Even a cursory examination of feminist ideology reveals manifold contradictions. I might make a more high-effort thread on this eventually but I just wanted to put some thoughts down for now.

To begin with, we can consider these examples:
  • Pornography: empowering for women to produce yet misogynistic and objectifying for men to watch
  • Clothing/attire: advocate for wearing revealing clothing but also complain about how "the male gaze" is objectification
  • Islamism: support the most repressive culture for women in the name of tolerance (I have spoken extensively about this already)
  • Expected male behavior: want men to be "chivalrous" but also think patriarchy is oppression and thereby demand independence
  • Age dynamics: will vilify men for dating even a few years younger while themselves chasing older men
These are the ones that I can think of currently.
 
Because feminism isn't an ideology it's just self interest. There is no contradiction in what they say because the only thing they say is what benefits themselves, that is the rule and if you understand that then every single thing here makes sense.
 
There's one standard to feminism that always applies:

Females: gimme gimme gimme gimme gimme
 
Because feminism isn't an ideology it's just self interest. There is no contradiction in what they say because the only thing they say is what benefits themselves, that is the rule and if you understand that then every single thing here makes sense.
I fully agree but I also feel like this risks giving them a free pass. It's more destructive to call out granular/specific contradictions than defer to broad generalizations. And I want everything I say to have maximum ideological damage.
 
I fully agree but I also feel like this risks giving them a free pass. It's more destructive to call out granular/specific contradictions than defer to broad generalizations. And I want everything I say to have maximum ideological damage.
Debating single points with logic does not work with females. They will always attack the messenger, not the message.

The only way their free pass can be revoked is males need to stop being simps kissing their ass.
 
Radfems are opposed to most of these besides revealing clothes
 
Rules for thee but not for me
 

Similar threads

FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
189
Views
4K
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV
cathuluelitist
Replies
4
Views
752
cathuluelitist
cathuluelitist
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
18
Views
2K
nihilum
nihilum
Oneitiscel
Replies
9
Views
381
Anonymoutron
A

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top