The responsibility of males under Teutonic European "chivalry" (worship) is to make sure all female sexual urges lead to positive outcomes for women, even if it means negative outcomes for men or the unlawful female sexual impulses lead to illicit behaviors that have just overall negative effects for both sides. Thus, for example, serial monogamy is considered to be perfectly moral, while polygyny is completely unacceptable and evil. This means that women are free to constantly look for ways to move on from their current spouse or boyfriend, while it's just completely diablerie for a man to have several girlfriends or to have sex with women other than his wife. And, when women commit wrongdoing, they are morally treated like toddlers and are shielded from punishment, in spite of this they are still given the freedom to make potentially fatal decisions without adult supervisior decisions that men will pay for when they go wrong. This manifest as women given far lighter sentences for crimes and are not truly required to uphold contracts, nonetheless, any company that discriminated against contracts signed by women would face severe consequences, even if it would also face difficulties in enforcing those agreements. A pregnant woman can abort a baby or give it away but if she decides to keep it she can demand child support and deny the baby a father. The feminine defect is the cause of this since it induces the male defect which is intractably effective in spite of the fact letting women take the costs of their decisions leads to intolerably bad outcomes. So men have to take the cost of women’s decisions which usually wouldn't be a defect for the latter sex but now is one because of the social implications it creates.
And, it makes moral sense for the father and mother to be married through shotgun relationships with the father being obligated to provide for his wife and kid and the mother being required to respect and submit to the husband. If women could be recognized as autonomous individuals on par with men, the concept that a single mother is on her own would likewise make moral sense. However, when we actually did this, the outcome was surplus women giving birth to fatherless infants in the rain in kennels. So, under unregulated chivalry, pregnancy obligates men but not women so you'll have low prenuptial chastity and thus low civilizational output.
The assumption that adult women are mature and capable of making responsible decisions about sex and reproduction is the process that gives impetus to the main male defect which is caterance to the hyperbolic infantilization done by women. Males have to pick up the pieces when it becomes vulgarly obvious that women are not able to make responsible decisions about reproduction yet they lack the authority to (because of the legal implication) stop women from making poor choices. -
(I talk about this defect more abstractivly here -https://incels.is/threads/gynocracy-is-simultaneously-a-paedocracy.866352/)
And, even if we could try to ameliorate the costs of those bad decisions, these decisions are still terribly harmful and should never have been permitted. Take Germany as an example. What if the men defended German women? The women would call them sexists, racists and say that "they don need no man!". So we can't actually do anything to placate the woman worship which is something that has ruined the lies of at least a billion men.
TLTR illustration:
And, it makes moral sense for the father and mother to be married through shotgun relationships with the father being obligated to provide for his wife and kid and the mother being required to respect and submit to the husband. If women could be recognized as autonomous individuals on par with men, the concept that a single mother is on her own would likewise make moral sense. However, when we actually did this, the outcome was surplus women giving birth to fatherless infants in the rain in kennels. So, under unregulated chivalry, pregnancy obligates men but not women so you'll have low prenuptial chastity and thus low civilizational output.
The assumption that adult women are mature and capable of making responsible decisions about sex and reproduction is the process that gives impetus to the main male defect which is caterance to the hyperbolic infantilization done by women. Males have to pick up the pieces when it becomes vulgarly obvious that women are not able to make responsible decisions about reproduction yet they lack the authority to (because of the legal implication) stop women from making poor choices. -
(I talk about this defect more abstractivly here -https://incels.is/threads/gynocracy-is-simultaneously-a-paedocracy.866352/)
And, even if we could try to ameliorate the costs of those bad decisions, these decisions are still terribly harmful and should never have been permitted. Take Germany as an example. What if the men defended German women? The women would call them sexists, racists and say that "they don need no man!". So we can't actually do anything to placate the woman worship which is something that has ruined the lies of at least a billion men.
TLTR illustration:
