L
Lebensmüder
Soon to be deleted account
★★★
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Posts
- 5,202
When you lost a job back then you easily got a new one. You just moved into a different city and there you got employment. Records mostly didn't exist in the way they nowadays do, so a few years where you relaxed with the money you earned weren't seen as detrimental for future employment. A criminal record didn't matter at all, even if you were sent to prison you could acquire an education/a job/a trade there (and not even that was really a necessity).
The greatest lie is that people will regret fooling/fucking around in their youth, the truth is that these women and chads formed valuable connections by traveling around the world, have experience with other languages/cultures (which is necessary in the globalist shithole that is the modern world) and are more NT/socially versed than you (due to experience and also birth rights) which means that they will get a better job despite having worse grades. A former gifted kid status, a A grade point average in high school or university, etc. - every document is only a supplement, presentability (which means looks/neurotypicality) matters more.
Nowadays even with a perfect CV (no criminal record, etc.) you are most likely encountering severe difficulties in finding a job. And grades don't matter anything (I wish they did because then my future would be brighter), what matters is presentability which is dependent on your amount of holes, your neurotypicality and your looks. Staying in one country and working/studying only one subject diligently is nowadays even frowned upon (especially in the Anglosphere).
And people say "Just adjust to that!" (which implies that all people have the same capabilities to adjust which is simply untrue, because the entire premise of modernity and freedom - the equality of people- is a filthy lie). Last but not least: These cucks never ask themselves "Why?"/"Why should I just adjust to that?"/"Why should I take it for granted and not seek to change it?", the question remains: Why should we perform Herculean tasks for something people a few years ago took for granted?
Back then when average was something that people still valued to some degree. And not a world where there is a dichotomy between winners and losers (a more and more binary world we see nowadays). Without any illusions: Most of us would have gotten a GF when we had a job and this was more than enough, maybe not during hígh school and college, but afterwards. Of course women always whored/fooled around to some degree, but the problem is: They nowadays do it infinitely. There is no wall (even >50 year olds ride the CC).
These future prospects (like settling down/etc.) are nowadays highly unlikely, they aren't there anymore, when there is no guarantee of the work even benefitting us why should we see a need to perform it in the first place? When you say to me "Well you do X for a few years and then you will have married a GF at the age of 25!" I will work hard and fair, but with these conditions I will do the bare minimum to guarantee my survival.
The funny thing is that so(y)ciety says that it doesn't owe you anything (thereby admitting to breaking the social contract specifically for men), but at the same time it feels entitled to your work/money/time/following their ethics/etc., no why should I do something like that?
Work means you do something and get something back (when the reciprocity isn't there it's slavery) and nowadays so(y)ciety says that the "giving back" part is not only optional, but highly unlikely and then it wonders about the demoralization of men. You cannot say "I shit on you!"/"Your payment isn't guaranteed!" and then wonder why people don't want to work for you. Imagine an employer saying that. And yes, so(y)ciety was built to serve both men and women - people don't exist to serve the state/so(y)ciety but rather it's the other way around, the so(y)ciety/state exists to serve YOU as an average man/woman (with inclusion of also those with worse luck), when it isn't it admits that it broke its sole purpose. Last but not least the ideological differences: Why should I improve a system when I not only don't share its values, but actively despise them (on a mutual/reciprocal basis)? I don't identify with a single policy of liberalism.
The greatest lie is that people will regret fooling/fucking around in their youth, the truth is that these women and chads formed valuable connections by traveling around the world, have experience with other languages/cultures (which is necessary in the globalist shithole that is the modern world) and are more NT/socially versed than you (due to experience and also birth rights) which means that they will get a better job despite having worse grades. A former gifted kid status, a A grade point average in high school or university, etc. - every document is only a supplement, presentability (which means looks/neurotypicality) matters more.
Nowadays even with a perfect CV (no criminal record, etc.) you are most likely encountering severe difficulties in finding a job. And grades don't matter anything (I wish they did because then my future would be brighter), what matters is presentability which is dependent on your amount of holes, your neurotypicality and your looks. Staying in one country and working/studying only one subject diligently is nowadays even frowned upon (especially in the Anglosphere).
And people say "Just adjust to that!" (which implies that all people have the same capabilities to adjust which is simply untrue, because the entire premise of modernity and freedom - the equality of people- is a filthy lie). Last but not least: These cucks never ask themselves "Why?"/"Why should I just adjust to that?"/"Why should I take it for granted and not seek to change it?", the question remains: Why should we perform Herculean tasks for something people a few years ago took for granted?
Back then when average was something that people still valued to some degree. And not a world where there is a dichotomy between winners and losers (a more and more binary world we see nowadays). Without any illusions: Most of us would have gotten a GF when we had a job and this was more than enough, maybe not during hígh school and college, but afterwards. Of course women always whored/fooled around to some degree, but the problem is: They nowadays do it infinitely. There is no wall (even >50 year olds ride the CC).
These future prospects (like settling down/etc.) are nowadays highly unlikely, they aren't there anymore, when there is no guarantee of the work even benefitting us why should we see a need to perform it in the first place? When you say to me "Well you do X for a few years and then you will have married a GF at the age of 25!" I will work hard and fair, but with these conditions I will do the bare minimum to guarantee my survival.
The funny thing is that so(y)ciety says that it doesn't owe you anything (thereby admitting to breaking the social contract specifically for men), but at the same time it feels entitled to your work/money/time/following their ethics/etc., no why should I do something like that?
Work means you do something and get something back (when the reciprocity isn't there it's slavery) and nowadays so(y)ciety says that the "giving back" part is not only optional, but highly unlikely and then it wonders about the demoralization of men. You cannot say "I shit on you!"/"Your payment isn't guaranteed!" and then wonder why people don't want to work for you. Imagine an employer saying that. And yes, so(y)ciety was built to serve both men and women - people don't exist to serve the state/so(y)ciety but rather it's the other way around, the so(y)ciety/state exists to serve YOU as an average man/woman (with inclusion of also those with worse luck), when it isn't it admits that it broke its sole purpose. Last but not least the ideological differences: Why should I improve a system when I not only don't share its values, but actively despise them (on a mutual/reciprocal basis)? I don't identify with a single policy of liberalism.
Last edited: