Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Every men's issue is transformed into a people's issue and made irrelevant

deleted fren

deleted fren

Everything burns
-
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
43,115
Online time
2h 25m
Whenever things primarily negatively effect women, you always have these "bro it's the people, not just men" feminist retards who completely ruin any discussion that could be bad.


For example, we know now that men with college degrees have similar unemployment rates to men with no college degrees. Yet, what is the response? "People" this,"people that," almost no one is pointing out the obvious that it's because dei and gender quotas have ensured women have an advantage while men are disadvantaged. Most are blaming whatever boogieman of "it's low class vs high class bro"

Women are high class you fucking retard. Men are low class. Women have been positioned above men via equity programs and now we're seeing the results. Yet you cowards are too terrified to address the elephant in the room. You'd rather blame some other man that you can fantasize about commiting violence against
 
Yep they try to make male problems and everyone problem and especially a foid problem since they always try to make foids out to be the victim
 
Yep they try to make male problems and everyone problem and especially a foid problem since they always try to make foids out to be the victim
Yep. "Erm, actually women have it worse"
 
Whenever things primarily negatively effect women, you always have these "bro it's the people, not just men" feminist retards who completely ruin any discussion that could be bad.


For example, we know now that men with college degrees have similar unemployment rates to men with no college degrees. Yet, what is the response? "People" this,"people that," almost no one is pointing out the obvious that it's because dei and gender quotas have ensured women have an advantage while men are disadvantaged. Most are blaming whatever boogieman of "it's low class vs high class bro"

Women are high class you fucking retard. Men are low class. Women have been positioned above men via equity programs and now we're seeing the results. Yet you cowards are too terrified to address the elephant in the room. You'd rather blame some other man that you can fantasize about commiting violence against
i swear if i see one more smug ass reddit top comment like "correction: people are broken" :feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat:
 
Men aren’t seen much as humans for that

That’s why normroaches do this
 
women totally suffer from loneliness and competition as well bro. it's the patriarchy bro
 
The problem is almost never "people", its mostly specific categories of people
Most often, that specific category is "women", or "jews" or "leftists"
 
i swear if i see one more smug ass reddit top comment like "correction: people are broken" :feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat:
reddit is the most gynocentric and misandrist out of any platform. They censor any studies/statistics they don't like and take some woman's ramblings as absolute truth vs literal facts. Rage fuel fo even lurk it.

women totally suffer from loneliness and competition as well bro. it's the patriarchy bro
:lul:
 
women totally suffer from loneliness and competition as well bro. it's the patriarchy
ngl I'm ashamed of myself because for a long time I lazily believed the whole idea of social media and technology alienating people and destroying society. Then one day I woke up and asked myself, why tf would women be affected? thar doesn't even make sense. It's another tradcope right wing Contradiction. They claim both:

1. social media destroys socializing for everyone
2. Women are receiving more attention than ever through social media (aka more socialization opportunity)

This is a complete violation of the law of non Contradiction and also a modal collapse. The second claim can not be true if the first is true necessarily.

There is no female doomer content, literally me, Ryan goosling, feels edit content for foids for a reason - they arent suffering ffs.

By tradcopees own definition only a minority of people in society can be affected negatively by technology - low status males. 50% of society profits from it (women), 20% of men profit, so it can only be a male minority that gets fucked. In my gumball ass brain I was literally thinking women have trouble making friends and relationships. I should be bolted to a barn door and ditched in the ocean holy fuck.

Anyway there is actual research out there thar shit like echo chambers, social media addiction etc are not real and that claims about social media affecting number of friends etc are biased through selection bias. As insane as that sounds, most people in society are fine with their life. Americans also report high levels of job satisfaction. Don't trust normies when they complain about their life, complaining is a fork of virtue signaling. Many times I made the mistake of thinking some online person had life similar as shit as me but upon talking they lived much better. Don't make that mistake. Negativity bias is real. Normies love negative shit way more than positive.
 
ngl I'm ashamed of myself because for a long time I lazily believed the whole idea of social media and technology alienating people and destroying society. Then one day I woke up and asked myself, why tf would women be affected? thar doesn't even make sense. It's another tradcope right wing Contradiction. They claim both:

1. social media destroys socializing for everyone
2. Women are receiving more attention than ever through social media (aka more socialization opportunity)

This is a complete violation of the law of non Contradiction and also a modal collapse. The second claim can not be true if the first is true necessarily.

There is no female doomer content, literally me, Ryan goosling, feels edit content for foids for a reason - they arent suffering ffs.

By tradcopees own definition only a minority of people in society can be affected negatively by technology - low status males. 50% of society profits from it (women), 20% of men profit, so it can only be a male minority that gets fucked. In my gumball ass brain I was literally thinking women have trouble making friends and relationships. I should be bolted to a barn door and ditched in the ocean holy fuck.
From a leftoid:

Screenshot 3

"No, you are wrong, dude. They just 'handled' it better. :soy: "

Just ignore the fact that they literally worship serial killers. These soys will invent any excuse to mask that foids' strong bond with each other is out of their hatred for men, rather than some "shared struggles."
 
From a leftoid:

View attachment 1510963
"No, you are wrong, dude. They just 'handled' it better. :soy: "

Just ignore the fact that they literally worship serial killers. These soys will invent any excuse to mask that foids' strong bond with each other is out of their hatred for men, rather than some "shared struggles."
Damn, male femenists are something else. To be fair though, woman and men do study different things. The current labor market is tough and that is why networking is extremely important these days. So many of the good jobs are not even being posted online.
 
Damn, male femenists are something else. To be fair though, woman and men do study different things. The current labor market is tough and that is why networking is extremely important these days. So many of the good jobs are not even being posted online.
Networking can be tough only because you're ugly.
 
Good thread,

This is a brutal blackpill, since it indirectly admits how men aren't seen as human really:blackpill:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top