Predators can be cruel but there is no malice in them and the torture does not last for very long. Children/shitty prople on the other hand often abuse animals for hours and destroy their body so badly to the point of being unrecognizable. I saw pictures of a dog roasted to the point he had no eyelids anymore and could't even sleep for fuck's sake. Only humans reach this level of atrocity. Peta are radicals but at least they kill fast and painlessy. Killing and torturing are absolutely not in the same category.
I think animals should be killed after being tortured. When you talk about the dog being roasted and having no eyelids, that makes me feel nauseated. That shouldn't be allowed to live, in a similar vein as the disfigured and pregnant shouldn't be allowed in public.
I'd suggest not defending PETA in any way, though. They are an adjunct to the feminine cause, a group that rose up due to a lack of issues for foids to complain about. And foids must always seem to be the victim or advocating for some victim, even if they must make one up out of thin air.
How far do you think animal cruelty is down on the list of issues human beings must address? It's not even in the top 1,000.
And yet animal cruelty is considered a felony that gives decades in prison. Is this OK by your book?
And so much of that justification is in the cruel one's feelings. Did he enjoy it? Did he feel a sense of power? Then he is a monster who must be kept out of society.
The same people who cry for animal crueltists to be punished so harshly are the ones who think viewers of CP should be punished depending on whether they got a boner from it.
That's what you sound like when you talk about "malice," the intent of the actor.
You have to admit that old civilizations had a better handle on how to run society. They had thousands of years of experience behind them and didn't try to do such things as give women political power, criminalized foods, and anthropomorphized animals in media in order to get the audience to feel sympathy for animals.
Can you imagine what an Ancient Roman would think to look on society today -- the demonization of meat, cruelty-free farms, and free-range growing of chickens? That costs money, by the way. It makes meat more expensive at no benefit to anything. This is a recent phenomenon.
ANY sympathy toward animals will lead to animal activism. And remember, the end goal of animal activism is to keep men from eating meat at all, to force them to consume meat replacements that are 100% xenoestrogens. When in fact the human body is designed to eat meat.
When you side with PETA, you are siding with these women and "men."
The bully is as evil as the animal abuser because both behaviours are directed towards beings that did NOTHING to the abuser and don't improve his life apart from the sadistic satisfaction of destroying something they deem unworthy.
And no, the "evil" of animals is in no way as brutal and malicious as the evil of foids. Femoids lie, use double standards, gaslight incels so that they disappear from their sight, are hypocritical to nausesting levels and have zero empathy while still claiming incels are the psychos.
Bullying and animal abusing are deeply linked. Look at this
Yes, there is probably a link but you don't punish something as a crime because it's an adjunct to another, actually harmful act. Maybe murderers like watching horror movies. You don't criminalize horror movies then, but murder is still wrong.
And remember, animal cruelty is punishable as a felony but bullying is still accepted as a healthy part of keeping ugly men depressed and demotivated.
We incels should side with animals and exterminate humanity instead.
You are a human being.
Don't hate yourself like a noodlewhore.
Human beings are the greatest form of life on the planet; they have strayed way, way too far recently.
Animals don't want to exterminate humanity.
In fact, they have no cognition at all.