The so called upper caste pajeets are so delusional, on Twitter they shamelessly claim as Aryan and claiming steppe genes but in reality they looks like a shitskin brown bastard. They are exactly like Black kangers who kang about we wuzz kangs and sheets
Many Kashmiris both Muslim and Hindus shamelessly called themselves as Aryan, due to thier fair skin. Many Kashmiri Muslims are so hateful towards Muslims of others parts of India
Yeah jfl, I have a knack for putting them down
The term "Aryan" literally comes from the Steppe/Yamnaya invaders....
fair skin =/= being White, or even close
I do not have fair skin and I do not consider myself “aryan” in that sense. Aryan originally meant speakers of Sanskrit, which is essentially all of northern curryland.
It’s from Proto Indo Iranians who had nothing to do with cumskins
Exactly, low iq subhuman curries think if some one is white or fair skinned, they assume that they are having Aryans/Steppe Europeans genes. They don't know that Aryans/European are a kind of ethinic group and having a distinct genetic cluster. Even levantines, Berbers, Turks, Central Asians, Arab, East Asians are having fair/white skins, but these don't imply that they are Aryans/European and having Steppe Aryan genes
You just log on Twitter and see this subhuman shamelessly claim, steal and appropriate your Identify, culture. They are worst than Black Kangers
Proto-Indo-Iranians are the first splinter away from the original Indo-Europeans who conquered Iran.
You do know that it says Indo in Indo European. And there is no evidence they were cumskins
It does, because the Indo-Europeans expanded into India - and primarily because it originally was a language group including Sanskrit before being considered an ethnic group. The population originated in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, in modern-day Ukraine and Russia.
Haplogroups R1a and R1b are the most common in Europe are identified with the ancient Indo-Europeans.
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
www.independent.co.uk
No it's Anatolian languages
When and by whom?
No, Europeans and curries have common ancestors of PIE, doesn't mean PIE or Proto-Indo-Iranians (Aryans) were Modern Europeans
Specifically Indo-Iranian of origin, which has fuck all to do with Europeans, because it would have developed in Asia
It's not extinct jfl
No evidence they were cumskins at all there. It’s cumskins appropriating currys and then excluding currys JFL.It does, because the Indo-Europeans expanded into India - and primarily because it originally was a language group including Sanskrit before being considered an ethnic group. The population originated in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, in modern-day Ukraine and Russia.
Haplogroups R1a and R1b are the most common in Europe are identified with the ancient Indo-Europeans.
Of course, R1a's map does have a large presence in India, but that's due to the genetic imprint of the Indo-Europeans who conquered, and eventually mixed, into the population. It's almost exclusively found in upper-caste Brahmins.
The Yamnaya in particular are associated with R1b, and are considered (one of) the original PIE cultures before their expansion.Yamnaya culture - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
In addition, Steppe ancestries are associated with blonde hair.
Similarly, blue eyes have been traced to the "north-west part of the Black Sea region"... sounds familiar?The selection landscape and genetic legacy of ancient Eurasians
The Holocene (beginning around 12,000 years ago) encompassed some of the most significant changes in human evolution, with far-reaching consequences for the dietary, physical and mental health of present-day populations. Using a dataset of more than 1,600 imputed ancient genomes<SUP>1</SUP>, we...
How one ancestor helped turn our brown eyes blue
Everyone with blue eyes alive today – from Angelina Jolie to Wayne Rooney – can trace their ancestry back to one person who probably lived about 10,000 years ago in the Black Sea region, a study has found.
Which were Indo-European?
By Indo-Europeans? Around 2100–1800 BCE, most scholars believe.
They are not, but they are genetically closer to modern Europeans than to modern Indians.
Is it that difficult to understand that the Indo-Europeans orignating from the Pontic-Caspian steppe expanded into nearby Iran, bringing their genes (originating in the Eurasian steppe) more into Asia? American and Canadian culture developed in the Americas, but their founders were Europeans. Do they have nothing to do with Euros because it's in a different continent?
I'm pretty sure I posted quite a few. You might be unwilling to accept genome autism, but the links I posted to blonde hair and blue eyes seem pretty conclusive to me.
The Sintashta/Andronovo broke away from the CWC who were basically the first modern Europeans
south slav
All of us are Indo-Europeans: most curries, cumskins, some sands. But the Proto-Indo-Europeans according to kurugan theory were Yamnaya
Which ones? Indo-Iranians who branched off from PIE and developed Aryan word independently. None of rest PIE called themselves Aryan. Aryan was a misnomer term mistakenly attributed to whole of Proto-Indo-European instead of just Proto-Indo-Iranian
Okay? Even modern Arabs and Iranians are genetically closer to whites than curries, does that make them white Europeans? What is the definition of white you're going with?
Yes, but the word self-identification of "Aryan" only would have taken place in Central Asia not Europe. Which means Modern European aren't descendants of Aryans, but just had a common ancestor
How does that make Modern Europeans the descendants of Indo-Iranians? It just means they both had a common ancestor, daughter vs sibling relation
What the fuck are you talking about?? I never stated that they are their descendants. In fact I laugh at some coping WNs whenever they say shit like "my ancestors wrote the Vedas!"
Agreed, wait until WNs learn Aryans worshiped cows, bathed and drank cow piss and thought they were purifying themselvesWhat the fuck are you talking about?? I never stated that they are their descendants. In fact I laugh at some coping WNs whenever they say shit like "my ancestors wrote the Vedas!"
The descendants of Proto-Indo-Iranians are curries, Kurds, Iranians, etc. But that doesn't change the fact that the Proto-Indo-Iranians themselves were genetically European. They were literally Yamnaya + EEF autosomally
And the Yamnaya are associated with the R1b gene. Reposting:
I think that we're having an issue regarding communication and interpretation. I don't necessarily care about usage of the word Aryan (I don't think the Nazis would've considered myself Aryan anyways) and I'm not saying that it was used exclusively to refer to white people (after all, words change over time, and the word Aryan has a history longer than most civilizations) but that the PIEs were "European" (in a physical sense, possessing light skin devoid of much melanin and higher rate of fair hair/eyes) instead.
I mostly mean in the sense that modern Europeans are closer to the core, original PIE Steppe population than their Eastern cousins are, in a genetic and physiological sense.
This once again goes back to our issue communicating... but I could also make the argument that Iranic tribes settled in Europe, before the Migration period, such as the Sarmatians, whose descendants are now the Ossetians. The Romans interacted with them quite often, in fact. But I think that's retarded since I think the Iranian genetic imprint in the areas they settled (besides Ossetia itself) is minimal and irrelevant.
Okay agreed
No not Proto-Indo-Europeans (Yamnaya) maybe Proto-Indo-Iranians (Aryans) maybe
they probably were a mix-match of both tbqh considering that they emerged around the same time the first mutations of blonde hair and blue eyes appearedNo not Proto-Indo-Europeans (Yamnaya) maybe Proto-Indo-Iranians (Aryans) maybe
Yamnaya culture - Wikipedia
Yeah jfl, I'll never understand the mental gymnastics these guys will do.
It does, because the Indo-Europeans expanded into India - and primarily because it originally was a language group including Sanskrit before being considered an ethnic group. The population originated in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, in modern-day Ukraine and Russia.
Haplogroups R1a and R1b are the most common in Europe are identified with the ancient Indo-Europeans.
Of course, R1a's map does have a large presence in India, but that's due to the genetic imprint of the Indo-Europeans who conquered, and eventually mixed, into the population. It's almost exclusively found in upper-caste Brahmins.
The Yamnaya in particular are associated with R1b, and are considered (one of) the original PIE cultures before their expansion.Yamnaya culture - Wikipedia
In addition, Steppe ancestries are associated with blonde hair.
Similarly, blue eyes have been traced to the "north-west part of the Black Sea region"... sounds familiar?The selection landscape and genetic legacy of ancient Eurasians
The Holocene (beginning around 12,000 years ago) encompassed some of the most significant changes in human evolution, with far-reaching consequences for the dietary, physical and mental health of present-day populations. Using a dataset of more than 1,600 imputed ancient genomes<SUP>1</SUP>, we...
How one ancestor helped turn our brown eyes blue
Everyone with blue eyes alive today – from Angelina Jolie to Wayne Rooney – can trace their ancestry back to one person who probably lived about 10,000 years ago in the Black Sea region, a study has found.
They literally were
I thought you said you’re a white nationalist? Or at least in the context of Poland
It's too broad of a term & is just an epithet flung around, with the only criteria as follows:
You've done it, naarthie curries will show up at your doorstep
There's no debate, modern day Europeans aren't Aryan. While the first Aryans could have been genetically European
To which, I shall greet them with this:
Holy fucking copium
