NSFW Dead leftists pics to make your day! Crying lefties included
Total Leftard Death, Total Feminist Death. You all will burn in hell on earth
We need to bump this thread with more dead lefties.
I'm a leftist but I hate feminists. It seems like everyone is a feminist. All of my teachers except ~3 believed foids are superior some even stating it outright.
Kill leftists and feminists with ovens and and forcefully shoving tapeworms into them to starve them, while taunting them with food
Never. Never fucking leftie, they all are bad and feminist
Based Pinochet is fucking saint, i want to piss on the graves of his victims hard
I am not a feminist.
Breivik removed 77 monkeys jfl, best swimming summer camp
Yes but you should leave retarded ideology. Every real leftist is feminist, they gave foids rights and deserve to be burned alive
Same.
Why? You want women to have rights? There is no such a thing like a leftism without rights for women
I want them to work hard jobs and serve in the army. The right pander to women and enforce slave gender roles on men.
I want them to lose all their rights and to be our slaves
Feminists are lesfags, I can’t find any feminist woman who genuinely loves men, or has a partner who isn’t a cuck
Would be better if they all were sex havers
Economic leftist or social leftist? I seriously hope you don’t support fags, immigration, etc.
Dude Palestinians are not leftists
These are kurds not playstationians. Suruç bombing
Only the christcuck right does. I support a true patriarchy in which foids are property of men. Also, why would you trust foids with roles that suited towards men? That’s retarded and inefficient
Last edited:
All leftist regimes throughout history have championed foid rights.
L
good riddance
Everytime a feminist dies, the world becomes a little better.
Drop a piano and then a safe on leftists. Paint a wall to look like a tunnel that continues the road so they'll run straight into it. Pull their ties really hard and release so it zig-zags. Make brooms take the shape of their frames.
You'll work yourself to death while your female counterpart does nothing and sits at home. Hardly a patriarchy
That's not a true patriarchy then
No it's not. Women are not any less intelligent than men. They are just lazy and complacent. Gender roles were invented and enforced by women because they got the easier end of the deal.
Leftist moment:
Based. Women should be our slaves working shit Jobs and fucking
That is exactly my point. They should work in coal mines and oil rigs like the men do! And not just the management sector of those jobs, but the physically demanding labor.
"Why would you trust foids with roles that suited towards men? That’s retarded and inefficient"
Implies two things:
He doesn't want women to work (Women worship and underestimation)
He is fine with men working to death and dying in the army, however.
They are indeed less intelligent and also physically weaker. Gender roles reflect evolutionary trends.
I don't care if I get to beat them, fuck them and be their god when I get home. Much better than working with foids and trusting them with my life.
It is as men are the only ones who can participate in society and involve themselves in public affairs, while foids are completely powerless. The fact that you trust foids with tasks in which men have an evolutionary advantage is laughable.
Men literally evolved for physical tasks and fighting foids didn’t. Force foids to work men’s jobs and we’ll only see a dip in productivity and a rise in workplace accidents.
No scientific basis for that. All pseudoscience
Gender roles were never consistent throughout. Men in the 1700s who cried were not "unmanly"
The only thing that stayed consistent was men serving women
Your opinion. I find working hard jobs while my female counterparts do nothing deeply humiliating.
And she leeches off your labor, you'll die to protect her
True/complete patriarchy will benefit men in every way
So you want to kill other men and work yourself to death to pander to women?
Women in the past also frequently participated in laborious tasks btw.
People of different races differ vastly in strength. Did that stop them from creating civilizations?
Do bullets discriminate?
Do drones care about your muscle mass?
I assure you, a good round of 5.56 will put a hard stop to even the strongest of men.
Wouldn't women working just as hard as men benefit society overall?
You cannot argue productivity will decrease when there are nearly twice as many workers who are nearly equally as capable.
>Rise in workplace accidents
Its proven that women get into less car accidents than men. You're okay with men getting smashed by 10 ton steel bars, but oh no not women
based
Foids have lower spatial intelligence on average, that's a fact. You sound like a male feminist.
Cope. With few exceptions, foids have always been powerless and completely dependent on men to survive. Giving them the opportunity to work for a living is one of the factors that has led to mass hypergamy.
You’d really trust a foid with your life? View her as your comrade? I’m starting to doubt your judgement about foids.
It is perfectly fair for foids to have no influence on society and merely act as sex providers and child bearers for their husbands. Full equality for foids is retarded and only makes them inferior men.
It’s biology genius. I could care less what foids think
For example? The only ones that come to mind are agriculture and manufacturing. I doubt that foid miners or construction workers were ever widespread, and for good reason.
That is not the point. Foids are not psychologically capable of fighting a war and will quickly crumble under the pressure. Many men also do, but not to the same extent as foids.
Yes, I'm sure the traditionally male dominated work spaces will become so efficient with the sudden influx of foid workers who have little to no interest whatsoever in the field and will start whoring around and attracting orbiters and white knights.
I don't care what happens to foids. The problem is forcing foids to think and behave like men, which will never end well. Could you imagine forcing men to behave like women? Sure some of them will be decent workers, but in most cases they will be inferior workers who lack competence.
Last edited:
Sex differences in intelligence - Wikipedia
YOUR coping.
Women voted 75 years before they were legally allowed to in 1918
A new document has surfaced which shows British women, of all classes, voting in 1843, some 75 years before they received the parliamentary franchise in 1918. History professor, Sarah Richardson, explains what this discovery means and how it was possible.
www.telegraph.co.uk
>powerless
Women allowed to murder their husbands, husbands beating their wives is cope, the reverse is true
Women brags to judge about beating her husband (Him being powerless to do anything)
View: https://www.scribd.com/doc/171964524/Wife-Brags-to-Judge-About-Beating-Her-Husband-for-Fifth-Time-During-Trial-1900
Women were already pleased in 1970 as they felt more ""privilege" would strip them of their preferential treatment
View: https://www.scribd.com/document/229918209/86-of-Women-Felt-They-Already-Had-the-Right-to-Live-as-They-Pleased-in-1970-and-Did-Not-Support-the-Feminist-Movement
More wives deserted their husbands than vice versa, even though women commit the most dv
View: https://www.scribd.com/document/230509575/More-Wives-Deserted-Husbands-Than-Vice-Versa-in-1909
False molestation claims
View: https://www.scribd.com/document/231416590/False-Molestation-Against-Fathers-on-the-Rise-1986
Women were allowed to open businesses even in the early 1800s
men WHO FOUGHT BACK against their wives were punished
WIves being legally able to hit their husbands
The Legal Subjection of Men - Wikisource, the free online library
DEFINITION IS PATRIARCHY
patriarchy
1. a society in which the oldest male is the leader of the family, or a society…
Which never existed. The head of one nation might be male, but they almost never change laws for male interests.
Woman boasts about beating husband
View: https://www.scribd.com/document/171545379/Woman-Horsewhips-Husband-and-Boasts-About-It-Newspaper-in-Second-Incident-of-Man-Whippings-1906
15 of the most powerful women in history
History's most powerful female leaders, ranked.
bigthink.com
Have you heard of Joan De Arc?
Women fight wars more frequently than men (Women are powerless gentle bullshit debunked)
Queens on Attack
Would putting more women in power lead to less war? For queens at least, the answer is no.
psmag.com
>Completely dependent on men to survive
That's because they can parasite off male labor.
I want women to die and bleed the same as men. More women in the military would drastically decrease male deaths if anything.
Full equality is better for us than it is for them.
Women would have to work instead of leeching of their husbands
Women would have to work in coal mines are relieve the burdens placed on men
Women would have to take accountability for their crimes
Women's grades would be slashed (Biased female rating)
Male rape recognized
Male biology (according to you) = dying and slaving away for foids
Pit brow women - Wikipedia
Show me the papers.
Is he any less human?
Are his feelings any less valuable?
What makes him expendable compared to women?
Most of us would crumble too.
>Psycholgy argument
Why don't screen people of both genders then? Since it's all about psychology not about gender. But noooo...
Do men really want to work 9-5?
Or is it out of necessity?
A true egalitarian society will ensure that men and women will be treated as equals in the workplace and no indecent behaviour will be tolerated!
Women molded men into what they are. Male behavior is literally directly influenced by female behavior, the opposite is not true
>Behave like men was never consistent
The article literally mentions that men have superior spatial intelligence, the only type of intelligence that truly matters.
Regardless, "masculinist" communists like you are a small minority as far as communists go, and history has shown that the USSR and the Eastern Bloc in general benefited women and were pioneers of feminism. Hell, it’s funny that you cry about the expandability of men in wars when in WW2 the Soviets sent millions of men to die on frontlines barely equipping and training them while foids were limited to support roles and rarely ever saw combat.
Thanks to christcuck slave morality, the West was well on its way to becoming cucked in the 19th century. In ancient Athens, women were legally considered property, were not allowed to be educated and were completely excluded from public life.
Exceptions do not disprove the rule. War is a masculine activity and there’s nothing wrong with that. Also, initiating a war as head of state is not the same as fighting in one.
Foids for the most part make bad soldiers. They’d be liabilities if anything.
Why have equal rights with foids when you can have institutionalized male supremacy like in ancient Athens? Abolishing all their rights and reducing their legal status to the property of men is the only way to keep them in check. Let them live their own lives free of male influence and they will be encouraged to be whores more than ever.
Don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.
Doesn’t exist and shouldn’t either.
Foids will always be whores no matter what. I thought this was common knowledge on this forum.
In all other mammals, males are the dominant and aggressive sex. It is foolish to believe that men and women are mentally identical by default.
Regardless, "masculinist" communists like you are a small minority as far as communists go, and history has shown that the USSR and the Eastern Bloc in general benefited women and were pioneers of feminism. Hell, it’s funny that you cry about the expandability of men in wars when in WW2 the Soviets sent millions of men to die on frontlines barely equipping and training them while foids were limited to support roles and rarely ever saw combat.
Last edited:
Men are slightly more creative. Ok. That does not mean women cannot perform basic tasks.
And the men?
They were conscripted, forced to work hard labor, and forced to provide for their wives by law
Btw, these articles completely debunk the existence of """patriarchy"""
Women's in-group bias is 4.5 times larger than men's, men have an out-group bias.
Male behavior is influenced by female behavior, but not the opposite
Robert Briffault - Wikipedia
How can patriarchy exist, when women effectively mold men?
kys, you're literally proving my point, you want to kill other men to pander to women. You're a woman worshipper.
And conscripts? Do unwilling men make good soldiers?
Did the starving men in Stalingrad make good soldiers?
Did the child soldiers serving in nazi germany make good soldiers?
Lyudmila Pavlichenko - Wikipedia
Again, do bullets care about your upper body mass?
Contradiction to your statement below
Never happened, male supremacy never existed. Its a cope revenge fantasy made up by right-wing men. Gender roles were literally created by women. Did women need the vote? No they didn't. In fact they opposed it because it came with the draft which they evaded anyway.
Retarded argument, if psychology is the argument, not sex
Then every conscript should be psychologically screened then.
You're ok with men getting blasted to bits, but not women. You worship and protect women like every right winger.
True gender equality is greatly beneficial for men.
It is. I know they are. In true equality, women wouldn't be whores, just like men, because society will treat female sexuality just like male sexuality
>Dominant
Literally killing each other for the approval of females
Thats a consequence of the great purge and not communism itself.
Im a MRA. Im not a commumist. I would be apolitical if not for the mrm.
Communists claimed that men oppressed women into slave gender roles. Its the very opposite.
Communism did not fail btw. Despite what some copers say
@GeckoBus
Heil Christ Heil HitlER Long Live Saint Elliot
yes you made good points. I am tired of pointing people to the sources on this, most of them can be found in this thread dump of mine:Men are slightly more creative. Ok. That does not mean women cannot perform basic tasks.
And the men?
They were conscripted, forced to work hard labor, and forced to provide for their wives by law
Btw, these articles completely debunk the existence of """patriarchy"""
Women's in-group bias is 4.5 times larger than men's, men have an out-group bias.
Male behavior is influenced by female behavior, but not the opposite
Robert Briffault - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
How can patriarchy exist, when women effectively mold men?
kys, you're literally proving my point, you want to kill other men to pander to women. You're a woman worshipper.
And conscripts? Do unwilling men make good soldiers?
Did the starving men in Stalingrad make good soldiers?
Did the child soldiers serving in nazi germany make good soldiers?
Lyudmila Pavlichenko - Wikipedia
Again, do bullets care about your upper body mass?
Contradiction to your statement below
Never happened, male supremacy never existed. Its a cope revenge fantasy made up by right-wing men. Gender roles were literally created by women. Did women need the vote? No they didn't. In fact they opposed it because it came with the draft which they evaded anyway.
Retarded argument, if psychology is the argument, not sex
Then every conscript should be psychologically screened then.
You're ok with men getting blasted to bits, but not women. You worship and protect women like every right winger.
True gender equality is greatly beneficial for men.
It is. I know they are. In true equality, women wouldn't be whores, just like men, because society will treat female sexuality just like male sexuality
>Dominant
Literally killing each other for the approval of females
Thats a consequence of the great purge and not communism itself.
Im a MRA. Im not a commumist. I would be apolitical if not for the mrm.
Communists claimed that men oppressed women into slave gender roles. Its the very opposite.
Communism did not fail btw. Despite what some copers say
@GeckoBus
also this great website with tons of sources:
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
greenpill.net
Women were always allowed to work in all fields, exception being the ones they truly couldnt or didnt want to do - soldiers, giga hard labor. But even in fields we tend to think of as hard labor, women were represented in significant numbers - mining, agriculture, brewing was dominated by women for a long time, women had a monopoly on alcohol production.
The law has also always favored women, the earliest records of law make room for alimony payments the man has to pay to his wife upon divorce:
Alimony - Wikipedia
This is also a great book with many sources:
467.2 KB file on MEGA
The idea that women were historically oppressed is a male fantasy. We like to think that we can somehow dominate women, that women are somehow inferior to us. And yet, our fantasies mostly boil down to us literally just killing other men, competing with other men, taking all the burdens of life upon us while our dearly beloved neets at home, birthing us children we provide her through great, performance sex. Does not sound like oppression to me jfl. Besides, even in the 1800s, women were providing 40-50% of household earnings, as you can read (with sources) on the greenpill.net website:
Aside from this, there is a bunch of evidence pointing to women having a giga fucking in-group preference compared to men, which essentially turns them into mafia organization that single male cant do shit against:
Women Opposed Female Rights, Not Men [Study]
video View: https://youtu.be/WQpC_5Ha7Ng PDF from video is attached here: https://mega.nz/file/8vdG0JqK#0_5wwaI_fB_wgON5h3wwM8utFrk-YwENUoWs7YtlJA4 TLDR - women know their privileges and power. Voting rights for women seemed to take that power from them, and make them equal to men...
incels.is
It is also remarkable that women are the onces enforcing the classic gender norms of the man being the provider and the woman the receiver:
Mothers Push Gender Stereotypes More Than Fathers, Study Reveals
The gender stereotype that says “boys don’t cry” is being perpetuated implicitly by mothers more than fathers, a new University of Guelph study has revealed. Prof. Kristel Thomassin found mothers may…
news.uoguelph.ca
When you read the greenpill article and then look at other shit like this:
EARLY FEMINISTS WANTED WOMEN TO WORK LESS - NOT MORE -> REPLY OR U GAY
"The desire to free oneself from work was common to all classes and both sexes. Dr Joanna Bourke of Birkbeck College, London, has studied the diaries of 5,000 women who lived between 1860 and 1930. During that period, the proportion of women in paid employment dropped from 75 per cent to 10...
incels.is
You realize that women literally invented what we tend to think of as "traditionalism" because it benefited them at the time. Women during the industrial revolution fought tooth and nail to get out of the workforce, only to claim they had been kept out of it for millennia by men, 2 generations later.
Early feminists literally rallied under the banner that women, especially mothers, should not have to work. Thats why legal texts like the irish constitution literally have laws stating that mothers ought not to work. It was foid worship, not oppression. Imagine the US congress passed a law that fathers should not be allowed to work, to "protect them" from the perils of labor. It would be absurd.
It is a fucking joke. The whole white picked fence shit, where the guy provides for his wife and kids on one income - thats a pipedream that existed for a few decades of extreme prosperity. For most of history, people had to live in piles, sharing space and dividing labor between as many people as possible.
Women had to work, children had to work, it was a matter of survival. We are just going back to that.
Btw, women back then were not retarded. They knew they had privileges, and they defended those privileges. Contrary to popular belief, women opposed female rights back in the day. They knew that rights = responsibilities. Beforehand, women could not even be held legally liable for procuring debt or other crimes - the husband was punished for his wives crimes instead. This is what is truly meant by the often misused idea that "men owned their wives." When a dog mauls a child, do we charge the dog with a crime? Or the owner? If you "own" your wife and she is legally incapable of being guilty, who do you think is gonna be responsible for her shit? Yes, you.
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
greenpill.net
Oh you think, I can just beat her ass. No. If you beat her ass, you are blamed. If she beats your ass, you are blamed too. Society is inherently gynocentric:
Tradcopers BTFO again - In Past Husbands were punished for getting beaten by Wife
Historical sources and their analysis in academic literature establish that intimate violence has been a cause for concern stemming from at least England’s medieval times. While men-as-perpetrators of violence on wives or female partners could be prosecuted or subject to public exposure...
incels.is
Here is another good thread with sources where this is detailed:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/edyrf5/a_compilation_of_evidence_debunking_feminist/
Women Opposed Female Rights, Not Men [Study]
video View: https://youtu.be/WQpC_5Ha7Ng PDF from video is attached here: https://mega.nz/file/8vdG0JqK#0_5wwaI_fB_wgON5h3wwM8utFrk-YwENUoWs7YtlJA4 TLDR - women know their privileges and power. Voting rights for women seemed to take that power from them, and make them equal to men...
incels.is
Again, if you have followed along so far and you get the in-group preference shit aka
- that men have negative bias towards men but have positive bias towards women
- that women have positive bias towards women and negative bias towards men AS WELL
- that both genders worship women but detest men
Then the above makes perfect sense. You beat your wife as the man - you are guilty. She beats you - you are guilty.
We still see this today when society constantly takes womens side over mens side, in the most ridiculous fashion. Like how they complain about the amount of women being killed, speaking of "an epidemic of female murders" when 90% of homicide victims are male.
There are such avalanche tier amounts of information on this topic, debunking the idea that women were historically somehow oppressed and men "dominated" women, I can't even get started. The YT channel "a shield for men" does insane in depth work on this, always providing countless sources for all his claims:
Society is build on male exploitation. Anyone who glories in women leeching off men in the sense of, "oh women are so weak ho ho, they need us, we are superior to women ho ho" does not get it. Just gender swap. Imagine a bunch of men leeched of other men for free, and these other men did nothing. In fact, they felt EMPOWERED by the other men leeching off them. They felt "masculine" by surrendering their resources, time, mental energy to these other men. It would be madness.
But anyway, I have said enough. I think the idea that gender relations in our time or anywhere globally are substantially different from the past is ridiculous and usually not founded in any historical analysis. People can point to ancient greece for example and claim women had no rights, but they fucking ignore that 90% of people back then had no rights. The vast majority of roman and greek people did not even have citizenship. Like 10% of society had rights, everyone else was a slave.
Further, some societies, like the spartans, were known for liberal treatment of women and being cucked by their women. This is another pattern you can readily observe - the more "masculine" the society, the more hostile it is towards men. Modern examples are places like russia, oven glorified by right wingers as this, "masculine trad country," while having a giga high male suicide rate. Or look at ethnics, who literally go ER on you when you insult their mom. The more stereotypically masculine a society is, the more men suffer from increased male on male violence and competition, depression and suicide rate.
Your "masculine" male ancestors were also coping alcoholics btw. Yes, they did physical labor and they coped by smoking and drinking to die earlier from it. To feel empowered by such drudgery and physical slavery is mental illness. "Oh look im destroying my body so the goddess can validate me, im so masculine and strong ho ho" - while never wondering where he got these ideals from in the first place. Who shames you when you dont follow these? And why?
Why can you loose the man card but not the woman card?:
Masculinity is an actual social construct and More - Studies
"You're not a real woman!" Said no one ever. Why? Why does that only work on men? The answer is two-fold 1. women have inherent value, you can't loose your woman card because being a woman is synonymous with having female flesh. 2. masculinity as its propagated by women and society largely...
incels.is
You can not take a womans confidence and identity away, since it is grounded in being female. But a man can be a soy, a nu-male, a beta, a neckbard, an incel - notice the amount of insults alone that exist to shame men into compliance, whereas there are almost none for women.
Anyway, enough. I am working myself over this. If you want, just grab a copy of "the manipulated man" by esther vilar, a foid, who wrote about all of this shit in 1970. She didnt have access to any of the data I provided, but her claims all line up perfectly with the now available historical and empirical findings. I am actually shocked, since I am currently re-reading her book and I didnt even realize how close she was. She must have written from experience as a woman.
Good Night.
Ancient Sparta was utterly insane place, I was flabbergasted when history or geography foid teacher started giving on what these niggas were up to (up until then my only understanding of that society was from that meme movie), first wikipedia article I could find:
Women in ancient Sparta - Wikipedia
*Note, Spartan schools were brutal as fuck, being raised at home was a huge privilege.
Wtf lmao, expectations:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Prc1UfuokY
Reality:
Literally 1:1 as it is today, all men save for few genetically or materially (richfag parents, generational wealth) privileged are slaving in shit jobs while all intellectual and cozy office jobs are hogged by women.
Again, 1:1 as it is today, it's always women enforcing all societal stigmas first and foremost, rest of soyciety just follows.
Of course they were openly lesbo too, it's like playing bingo at this point.
There is tonne of shit like this about sparta.
Ancient Sparta was utterly insane place, I was flabbergasted when history or geography foid teacher started giving on what these niggas were up to (up until then my only understanding of that society was from that meme movie), first wikipedia article I could find:
Women in ancient Sparta - Wikipedia
*Note, Spartan schools were brutal as fuck, being raised at home was a huge privilege.
Wtf lmao, expectations:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Prc1UfuokY
Reality:
View attachment 1282914
Literally 1:1 as it is today, all men save for few genetically or materially (richfag parents, generational wealth) privileged are slaving in shit jobs while all intellectual and cozy office jobs are hogged by women.
Again, 1:1 as it is today, it's always women enforcing all societal stigmas first and foremost, rest of soyciety just follows.
Of course they were openly lesbo too, it's like playing bingo at this point.
There is tonne of shit like this about sparta.
giga iq reply and also beyond kekfuel. Oh my patriarchy! Women were so oppressed that they didn't have to go through traumatic torture, eugenics sexual mind control abuse like the evil men, who were clearly suppressing them! Like imagine a society where foids were systematically raised to be sex slaves for men, it would be insane. Interesting that this has never happened, instead we just see variations of women controlling men. Shieet its almost like women are the dominant gender?
Mothers Push Gender Stereotypes More Than Fathers, Study Reveals
The gender stereotype that says “boys don’t cry” is being perpetuated implicitly by mothers more than fathers, a new University of Guelph study has revealed. Prof. Kristel Thomassin found mothers may…
news.uoguelph.ca
I also heard that athenians would say like, the spartans only fuck their wifes in the dark and the wifes cut their hair short, cuz spartan men are so gay and used to fucking men, that they cant get hard for women. Oh yeah, its in the article you linked JFLLLLLLLLL:
NO COMMENT HOLY KEKKKK
Every "masculine trad" society is exactly like this, it just varies in degrees. Look places like russia, which are held up as "trad" and "masculine" - giga foid worship, giga high male suicide rate etc. These socities are always giga foid worshipping and ultra hostile to men.
Look at islam and the middle east for another example. Any ethnic will tell you, insulting someones mom is the worst shit in these socities. And the male on male hostility is giga high. They even do the spartan thing about fucking little boys in the ass.
The myth of male privilege in muslim countries
There's this myth that only women are oppressed in muslim countries and men are privileged. we all know the myth that male privilege exists in the western world or that men were privileged during history which are not true. well this isn't true for muslim nations either. Here's some...
incels.is
Bacha bazi - Wikipedia
Also this thread, which shows that the typical extremely violent vigilante justice against men was prevalent in the west too just a century ago:
Domestic violence was never accepted. Wife beaters used to be just as hated as child molesters a century ago
A lot of people (including feminists) perpetuate this myth that until the 1970s, domestic violence was ignored by society, ignored by police and ignored by judges and it was seen as something between the husband and wife that wasn’t our business. This is a myth. The idea that society ignored and...
incels.is
They used to mutilate, lynch and abuse "wife beaters," contrary what we are told today. Just like you can see new videos of men getting tortured and killed coming out of south america, russia, asia and africa every day on gore sites. Its hilarious to me when people talk about the supposed golden age of patriarchy that somehow existed in the past. Nigga, there are tons of societies all around us that literally live like people used to live in the west. Billions of people in the world have never even used internet:
Press release
Thats a sample size of BILLIONS
BILLIONS OF HUMANS LIVING LIKE WE USED TO IN 1800s.
And what are their societies like? Hyper violent shitholes, giga male disposability, ultra foid worship, especially towards moms.
I swear we will go back to something like that in the west. I have some hypothesis. I think they will ban more and more sexual outlets for guys. Homosexuality will increase as guys get less pussy but they will blame the jews or something. The jew is just a market force responding to demand from larger population. Just like the spartan men resorted to fucking each other in the ass, so western men will resort to fucking each other, because women wont put out, and any other releases like porn will be blocked by foids.
However, paradoxically men as a whole will be blamed for this, thus spiking male on male hostility. Men will start abusing, bullying and committing increasingly violent acts of vigilante justice against other men, which will be supported by society. We already see the beginnings of this now, with all the pedo hysteria, pedo hunting groups, men calling each other ever new names signifying a "lack of masulinity" (i.e. soy, manchild, neckbheard, incels etc).
Womens standing and power will increase proportionally to this. The more men compete and fuck each other up, the more women profit, so they incentivize male-on-male violence. The right wingers right now won't see this coming. They think it will be a good thing. Notice how the current developments contradict each other, but they never mention this:
One one hand, there is increasing censorship of porn and other things. On the other, homosexuality and other shit is increasing. This is not because of polarization, these are two sides of the same coin. Both are effects of increasing anti-male sentiment in society. Society is not becoming less degenerate, there is just a power shift in favor of women. Notice for example, people only care about male homosexuals and trannies, not lesbians. All the aggression is aimed at male degenerates. All the trad-cucks and so called "manosphere" dudes online, which are wrongly labeld as anti-female power, are actually the biggest foid worshippers.
These anti foid podcasts make millions of female halo, and the women even admit this publicly. The foids that go on podcasts like whatever openly admit they make like 80k dollars for one time going on there. Andrew Tate made his money by using foid halo.
Look here where a foid admits it at 16:34:
View: https://youtu.be/5mygPV1gtbw?t=994
Notice how neither side blames women, they just worship women in different ways by pushing more attention, more resources etc in their way.
Women know this, they are not dumb. Thats why they agree to be "roasted" on these podcasts. They know men better than men know women.
Like, men dont get this: One of womens biggest manipulation methods is triggering the man into a reaction she can control.
Thats why they dress like hoes to fuck with their dad, thats why they bring bad guys home. Thats why they love drama shows and start shit over nothing - women LOVE drama, because to a woman, all attention is positive attention. They always profit, and they know it. So all of this "calling out" of women does nothing, its just covert foid worship.
Notice that through history, men have always complained about foids, but never did shit about it. They wrote books, they talked trash, but at the end of the day, they always were afraid to actually act on it. Barking dogs dont bite is like the biggest thing when it comes to male vs female relations. Women DO, men BARK.
From this we can easily infer the direction society is headed - it can only be one of more foid worship and increase anti-male hostility. It has never changed. Thats why women in the past initially opposed female rights and even shit like abortion. From their perspective, these were massive L's. Only when women understood that they could profit from this shit too, they accepted it.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
