FemaleInventionsLOL
Mean words MONSTER.
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 445
Vaporiform on reddit pulled a classic hole just now when I brought this up with it via PM: It said, "there's no point in continuing this," and blocked me, despite my numerous challenges to it to defend the position that male-on-female rape is so psychologically traumatizing to heterosexual holes.
This is what literally every hole on the planet does when confronted with logic that disproves its idiotic misconceptions. Holes "drop it" and block you...oftentimes a "byeeeee!" is its closing statement. Willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance, thy name is, "hole."
Anyway, my position is as follows: If rape is so bad for a hole that it can be likened to a heterosexual man getting anally raped by other men, why are so many holes prostitutes? And why are so many holes gold diggers?
Prostitute: For a fee of a few hundred dollars or so, a hole will let any man fuck some or all of its holes, no matter how much it is repulsed by the customer. It is disgusted as it does it. It doesn't get wet. It certainly doesn't get aroused. But it's SO not a big deal that the hole will willingly do it for a few hundred bucks. And usually, it will do this MANY TIMES for as long as it sees this act as its best source of income.
Gold-digger: In exchange for impressing friends with its status and access to the financial security and luxury a wealthy man can provide, a hole will settle for a man it would never in a million years otherwise fuck. It finds the man repulsive, but it will fuck the man for the rest of its life in exchange for this access to wealth.
There isn't a heterosexual man on the face of the earth who would let a man fuck him in the ass for the rest of his life just to have access to wealth.
There also isn't a heterosexual man alive who would prostitute himself to other men. It would take an outrageous sum of money to get a man to even consider spreading his legs and taking it in his ass JUST ONCE.
A few hundred dollars, and repeated transactions of this nature? Not a fucking chance in hell.
So clearly, then, male-on-heterosexual-hole rape is not akin to male-on-heterosexual-male rape. Yes, the hole is "consenting" to the sex in the aforementioned circumstances, but ONLY because of the money involved, and ALWAYS to WHOEVER has the money, regardless of how much it does not want to have sex with him.
The physical and psychological processes are fundamentally the same; a hole is engaging in sex it truly does not want to have. The only difference is, in prostitution/gold-digging, the hole gets a financial reward for the disgusting act.
And that money is apparently the difference between "OMG, psychological trauma, scarred for life, WORST CRIME EVAR," and, "hey, you gotta do what you gotta do, baby. It's a livin', sweetie."
I don't buy it. I think it's just another (and longer tenured) example of society telling holes that every inconvenience that happens to them, big or small, is a crime against humanity, and they are victims of a horrible crime because of it.
I suspect that a man raping a heterosexual hole is more akin to a hole raping a heterosexual man. Perhaps a disgusting-looking hole tied you up and stroked your penis until you involuntarily came.
Would you be scarred for life?
I know I wouldn't. I would think, "ewww, gross. I'm going to take a shower." I would also think, "heh, I guess she found me irresistible. At least SOMEBODY does."
And that's it. No sobbing about how traumatized I am about a member of the sex I'm attracted to forcing me to fuck it when I didn't find it attractive.
It would be a nuisance, yes. Uncomfortable, sure. "I'm ruined, I need a therapy group?" Pfffft.
And of course, because holes always keep up this subtext that sex acts on them are dirty and evilly invasive, people think men must earn sex from a hole, and they must take every precaution to ensure that the hole is taken care of and all of its emotional needz are met. It's like their vaginas are crystal wrapped in tissue paper. No sudden movements, and be sure to be gentle and apologetic every step of the way.
Apologize for your disgusting and violent male sexuality!
Meanwhile, as men, we don't take hole heterosexuality as an assault on us...unless they're NOT aiming it at us, which is the case for incels.
"You're hot" is flattering to us. "I want to fuck you" is a good thing, even if it comes from a 300-pound, deformed hillbilly hole.
Men raping heterosexual holes should still be illegal, as it's a form of theft, but it should not be viewed as this egregious, traumatizing act. You can not expect us to take your "no" that seriously when you all have a price tag.
This is what literally every hole on the planet does when confronted with logic that disproves its idiotic misconceptions. Holes "drop it" and block you...oftentimes a "byeeeee!" is its closing statement. Willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance, thy name is, "hole."
Anyway, my position is as follows: If rape is so bad for a hole that it can be likened to a heterosexual man getting anally raped by other men, why are so many holes prostitutes? And why are so many holes gold diggers?
Prostitute: For a fee of a few hundred dollars or so, a hole will let any man fuck some or all of its holes, no matter how much it is repulsed by the customer. It is disgusted as it does it. It doesn't get wet. It certainly doesn't get aroused. But it's SO not a big deal that the hole will willingly do it for a few hundred bucks. And usually, it will do this MANY TIMES for as long as it sees this act as its best source of income.
Gold-digger: In exchange for impressing friends with its status and access to the financial security and luxury a wealthy man can provide, a hole will settle for a man it would never in a million years otherwise fuck. It finds the man repulsive, but it will fuck the man for the rest of its life in exchange for this access to wealth.
There isn't a heterosexual man on the face of the earth who would let a man fuck him in the ass for the rest of his life just to have access to wealth.
There also isn't a heterosexual man alive who would prostitute himself to other men. It would take an outrageous sum of money to get a man to even consider spreading his legs and taking it in his ass JUST ONCE.
A few hundred dollars, and repeated transactions of this nature? Not a fucking chance in hell.
So clearly, then, male-on-heterosexual-hole rape is not akin to male-on-heterosexual-male rape. Yes, the hole is "consenting" to the sex in the aforementioned circumstances, but ONLY because of the money involved, and ALWAYS to WHOEVER has the money, regardless of how much it does not want to have sex with him.
The physical and psychological processes are fundamentally the same; a hole is engaging in sex it truly does not want to have. The only difference is, in prostitution/gold-digging, the hole gets a financial reward for the disgusting act.
And that money is apparently the difference between "OMG, psychological trauma, scarred for life, WORST CRIME EVAR," and, "hey, you gotta do what you gotta do, baby. It's a livin', sweetie."
I don't buy it. I think it's just another (and longer tenured) example of society telling holes that every inconvenience that happens to them, big or small, is a crime against humanity, and they are victims of a horrible crime because of it.
I suspect that a man raping a heterosexual hole is more akin to a hole raping a heterosexual man. Perhaps a disgusting-looking hole tied you up and stroked your penis until you involuntarily came.
Would you be scarred for life?
I know I wouldn't. I would think, "ewww, gross. I'm going to take a shower." I would also think, "heh, I guess she found me irresistible. At least SOMEBODY does."
And that's it. No sobbing about how traumatized I am about a member of the sex I'm attracted to forcing me to fuck it when I didn't find it attractive.
It would be a nuisance, yes. Uncomfortable, sure. "I'm ruined, I need a therapy group?" Pfffft.
And of course, because holes always keep up this subtext that sex acts on them are dirty and evilly invasive, people think men must earn sex from a hole, and they must take every precaution to ensure that the hole is taken care of and all of its emotional needz are met. It's like their vaginas are crystal wrapped in tissue paper. No sudden movements, and be sure to be gentle and apologetic every step of the way.
Apologize for your disgusting and violent male sexuality!
Meanwhile, as men, we don't take hole heterosexuality as an assault on us...unless they're NOT aiming it at us, which is the case for incels.
"You're hot" is flattering to us. "I want to fuck you" is a good thing, even if it comes from a 300-pound, deformed hillbilly hole.
Men raping heterosexual holes should still be illegal, as it's a form of theft, but it should not be viewed as this egregious, traumatizing act. You can not expect us to take your "no" that seriously when you all have a price tag.
Last edited: