Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

CMV: I don't believe rape is psychologically traumatizing to heterosexual holes

  • Thread starter FemaleInventionsLOL
  • Start date
FemaleInventionsLOL

FemaleInventionsLOL

Mean words MONSTER.
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
445
Vaporiform on reddit pulled a classic hole just now when I brought this up with it via PM: It said, "there's no point in continuing this," and blocked me, despite my numerous challenges to it to defend the position that male-on-female rape is so psychologically traumatizing to heterosexual holes.

This is what literally every hole on the planet does when confronted with logic that disproves its idiotic misconceptions. Holes "drop it" and block you...oftentimes a "byeeeee!" is its closing statement. Willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance, thy name is, "hole."

Anyway, my position is as follows: If rape is so bad for a hole that it can be likened to a heterosexual man getting anally raped by other men, why are so many holes prostitutes? And why are so many holes gold diggers?

Prostitute: For a fee of a few hundred dollars or so, a hole will let any man fuck some or all of its holes, no matter how much it is repulsed by the customer. It is disgusted as it does it. It doesn't get wet. It certainly doesn't get aroused. But it's SO not a big deal that the hole will willingly do it for a few hundred bucks. And usually, it will do this MANY TIMES for as long as it sees this act as its best source of income.

Gold-digger: In exchange for impressing friends with its status and access to the financial security and luxury a wealthy man can provide, a hole will settle for a man it would never in a million years otherwise fuck. It finds the man repulsive, but it will fuck the man for the rest of its life in exchange for this access to wealth.

There isn't a heterosexual man on the face of the earth who would let a man fuck him in the ass for the rest of his life just to have access to wealth.

There also isn't a heterosexual man alive who would prostitute himself to other men. It would take an outrageous sum of money to get a man to even consider spreading his legs and taking it in his ass JUST ONCE.

A few hundred dollars, and repeated transactions of this nature? Not a fucking chance in hell.

So clearly, then, male-on-heterosexual-hole rape is not akin to male-on-heterosexual-male rape. Yes, the hole is "consenting" to the sex in the aforementioned circumstances, but ONLY because of the money involved, and ALWAYS to WHOEVER has the money, regardless of how much it does not want to have sex with him.

The physical and psychological processes are fundamentally the same; a hole is engaging in sex it truly does not want to have. The only difference is, in prostitution/gold-digging, the hole gets a financial reward for the disgusting act.

And that money is apparently the difference between "OMG, psychological trauma, scarred for life, WORST CRIME EVAR," and, "hey, you gotta do what you gotta do, baby. It's a livin', sweetie."

I don't buy it. I think it's just another (and longer tenured) example of society telling holes that every inconvenience that happens to them, big or small, is a crime against humanity, and they are victims of a horrible crime because of it.

I suspect that a man raping a heterosexual hole is more akin to a hole raping a heterosexual man. Perhaps a disgusting-looking hole tied you up and stroked your penis until you involuntarily came.

Would you be scarred for life?

I know I wouldn't. I would think, "ewww, gross. I'm going to take a shower." I would also think, "heh, I guess she found me irresistible. At least SOMEBODY does."

And that's it. No sobbing about how traumatized I am about a member of the sex I'm attracted to forcing me to fuck it when I didn't find it attractive.

It would be a nuisance, yes. Uncomfortable, sure. "I'm ruined, I need a therapy group?" Pfffft.

And of course, because holes always keep up this subtext that sex acts on them are dirty and evilly invasive, people think men must earn sex from a hole, and they must take every precaution to ensure that the hole is taken care of and all of its emotional needz are met. It's like their vaginas are crystal wrapped in tissue paper. No sudden movements, and be sure to be gentle and apologetic every step of the way.

Apologize for your disgusting and violent male sexuality!

Meanwhile, as men, we don't take hole heterosexuality as an assault on us...unless they're NOT aiming it at us, which is the case for incels.

"You're hot" is flattering to us. "I want to fuck you" is a good thing, even if it comes from a 300-pound, deformed hillbilly hole.

Men raping heterosexual holes should still be illegal, as it's a form of theft, but it should not be viewed as this egregious, traumatizing act. You can not expect us to take your "no" that seriously when you all have a price tag.
 
Last edited:
I love your posts

Agreed 100%l I used to think they hated rape because their monkey brains think they’ve just been impregnated with poor genes and will be incapacitated for a year and risk death without a reliable provider/caretaker and will be doomed to raise a kid that might not even survive and most likely will not reproduce. Then enter huamnity’s Experiment on how foids behave when getting fucked by men of poor genetic quality: prostitutes.. rape can be considered an almost inconsequential side effect of walking around estrogen frauded SMV frauded and advertising fertility.. just an unwanted but manageable side effect.

I like how you referred to holes as “it” throughout the post. Nice touch,
 
Last edited:
I hope your mum and sister gets raped by a retarded creep who hides in his basement.

When they get raped, please don't view it as a egregious, traumatizing act.

I wouldn't.

Your appeal to the "mom" emotion is meaningless, by the way. Even if we were biased in favor of our mothers, that would only mean that we aren't rational when it comes to that.

You might wuv your mommy and want to murder anyone who lays a finger on her even if she was being a cunt, but that doesn't mean it's OK to murder people for giving a woman the slap she deserves.
 
I wasn't expecting you to feel anything. You're mentally sick.

You're an idiot with no argument whatsoever. You know you're losing the argument as soon as you have to resort to "appeal to emotion."

You're like those dolts who try to argue in favor of the death penalty with, "wut if someone killed ur family memberz, huh?!?! U would want da murderer to die."

Get lost, you fucking moron.
 
Not meaningless. You call them holes. In that case Your mom is a hole. You believe holes should be raped and shouldn't view it as a traumatizing act. In that case, I do hope your mom gets raped. And if you don't feel uncomfortable at the thought of that then congratulations you're officially a mentally retarded creep.

Only a sub-50 IQ imbecile like you doesn't see how laughably fallacious that is.

Newsflash, you unfathomable dolt: The morality of something is not determined by your irrational, biased feelings.
Not meaningless. You call them holes. In that case Your mom is a hole. You believe holes should be raped and shouldn't view it as a traumatizing act. In that case, I do hope your mom gets raped. And if you don't feel uncomfortable at the thought of that then congratulations you're officially a mentally retarded creep.


Can you argue with a mad man?

Sorry I don't argue with mad people. I only let them know they are mad.

And by the way, dipshit: Why the fuck would I care if other people referred to my mom as a "hole?" Are you one of those pathetic white knights who gets triggered if some random dude goes, "your mom's a whore" or says he fucked your mom?

You are the lowest IQ poster on here.
 
LMFAO!

It's not my fault that you're too ugly and disgusting for girls to look at bruh!

It's pretty obvious this turd came over here from IT.

The reason you are upset is you subconsciously realize that everything we say is true. And you can't handle the truth. That's where the cognitive dissonance comes into play for morons of your ilk.
 
high IQ as you always are OP

although I did just read that hookers often get therapy because ugly men pay for their services LOL
 
Exactly, You are an imbecile. That's why you can't get laid and believe in raping women.


The reason am upset is retards like you give incels a poor public image.

Nice one.

You're on your way to getting banned. You couldn't even make it to 60 posts before blowing your cover. Your retardation speaks for itself.
 
Truth that women should be raped? Nah, that's something only a freak will accept as truth.

Point to where I said women "should be raped."

You're a fallacy machine.
 
I think you are deluded.


So in order words women should thank you when you rape them.

That would be how an utter retard would interpret that part.

Dude , that you can't get laid doesn't mean you should turn to a psychopath.

You have to be a psychopath to not fly off the deep end at some random guy saying words about your mother?

You're a fucking lunatic.

That's the point dum ass. You wouldn't care because......... Wait for it........... You're a retard. You're mentally sick!

No, nobody who isn't a babbling imbecilic lunatic like you would give a shit if some random dude used words about his mother.

They're only words, you fucking nitwit. Words are harmless.

Also, why the fuck should I be protective of my mother when she is responsible for putting me in this hellhole? You have to be one special kind of doofus to think that you owe your mother for that.
 
Your the one who is going to be banned.
You publicly encourage the rape of women.
Incels.is doesn't need retards like you.

Straw man after straw man from a fallacy-spewing dolt.

Not once did I publicly encourage the rape of women.

You, on the other hand, are an IT invader. You're on borrowed time.
 
Words are harmless, really?

Then don't get angry when a hot girl calls you an ugly disgusting slime.

That would be an attack on me, and I would have every reason to be angry.

I have no reason to be angry at some guy who never met my mother saying random shit about her.

You're a joke.
 
LMFAO!

Creep, if a hot girl who never met you but saw your disgusting pic and she called you ugly, please don't take it serious. Be happy. She's saying the truth. You are ridiculously ugly.

Who said anything about seeing a picture, you fucking paint chip-eating clown?

Learn how to make proper analogies, idiot. You couldn't get a single question correct on the SAT.

You are the absolute worst, most moronic arguer I have ever encountered in all my years on the internet. Congrats.
 
Who said anything about seeing a picture, you fucking paint chip-eating clown?

Learn how to make proper analogies, idiot. You couldn't get a single question correct on the SAT.

You are the absolute worst, most moronic arguer I have ever encountered in all my years on the internet. Congrats.
Its over for lowiqcels :feelstastyman:.
 
This is a proper analogy:

*Don't rape women. No means no.

*Incels are not rapists.

* You are mentally deranged

* You are just disgustingly ugly. Cope.


It's not my fault hot girls see you as worthless trash dude. Cope.
All girls see me as worthless trash because of my inferior genetics, but that’s okay. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
 
This is a proper analogy:

*Don't rape women. No means no.

*Incels are not rapists.

* You are mentally deranged

* You are just disgustingly ugly. Cope.


It's not my fault hot girls see you as worthless trash dude. Cope.

You're done.
 
1545821244450


Seriously tho, rape (and everything that you physically force onto another person) is obviously bad, m'kay ?
@UglyBigEyedIncel , you need to learn that despite the apparences 70% on the posts here are just people venting or being satirical. You probably already know that but I just wanted to make sure.
Make peace, fellow abominations :feelshaha:
 
Last edited:
You're ugly.

You keep calling him ugly wtf, that’s not an argument. You’re mocking him for not being able to get laid but presumably you can’t either otherwise what are you doing here?
 
View attachment 75015

Seriously tho, rape (and everything that you physically force onto another person) is obviously bad, m'kay ?
@UglyBigEyedIncel , you need to learn that despite the apparences 70% on the posts here are just people venting or being satirical. You probably already know that but I just wanted to make sure.
Make peace, fellow abominations :feelshaha:

The point is that male-on-heterosexual-hole rape is bad in the same way theft is bad. But it makes no sense to claim it's so psychologically traumatizing when so many holes are perfectly willing to fuck men who repulse them so long as they get paid.

We don't cry over holes getting their purses stolen, and we shouldn't cry over them getting raped either.
 
Micheal jackson

Edit: LMAO @UglyBigEyedIncel Got banned already! :lul:
 
Last edited:
The point is that male-on-heterosexual-hole rape is bad in the same way theft is bad. But it makes no sense to claim it's so psychologically traumatizing when so many holes are perfectly willing to fuck men who repulse them so long as they get paid.

We don't cry over holes getting their purses stolen, and we shouldn't cry over them getting raped either.
I get your point. It's obviously very bad. But it is currently sometimes treated as if it was equivalent to murder or worse. Heck, sometimes females murderers get less time that male rapists. In many countries women don't even need to have proof and a bunch of males are sentences to decades and have their lives ruined because of this. Things are obviously skewed against males currently, you can't even discuss these things without being automatically branded as someone who codones rape. For instance you never condoned rape in your post, yet you got that kind of reaction.
Just to be clear, Mr. FBIcel / ITcel watching this thread, no one is condoning rape here, just debating the severity with which it is treated, the way it is not rationalized enough in some cases, leading for instance to guys getting their lives destroyed without any evidence.
 
Its worse to get raped as a man because you feel your manhood has been taken away. As a foid you can always just reconcile it with the fact that you're weak and helpless so there was nothing you could have done.
 
to any female who ever has been raped before and reads this post

youre used to taking dicks in your fanny so what harm is one more?

there is far worse mental trauma that you will thankfully never experience because you werent born with a Y chromosome.

get over it, cunt.
 
@FemaleInventionsLOL

I made a post about this very thing because I got tired of seeing the BS comparison being made in arguments, comparing Male on Male homosexual rape to Male on Female heterosexual rape.

https://incels.is/threads/comparing...l-male-rape-is-fallacious-4-inceltears.94749/

You included something important here I left out in the post, a nice question that forces people to shut up and question the logic of arguing that rape for women is so psychologically traumatic.

"If its so psychologically traumatic, then how come there are millions of women around the world alright with subjecting themselves to it so long as payment is involved?"

Also like you pointed it, its not even payment in the extremes of wealth, which is even then a heterosexual man would not even consider getting fucked in the ass for, its for a few hundred dollars per man, per man who they are not sexually aroused by and don't want to fuck, just like in a rape, but because they are receiving a few hundred dollars all that "extreme psychological trauma" can now be "tolerated" JFL.

Incel Tears avoid posts like these, they can't really argue the logic of it. No wonder you got blocked, your post here is the nail in the coffin that is missing from my post, I should have also included this but I didn't really think of it, I included a lot of points but this should have been the last point in the post to really prove how much BS it is. But I guess it never came to mind because my focus was on the absurdity and unfairness of the comparison, rather than how the trauma itself isn't actually real. Great post.

I did however make one thread closely related to this - https://incels.is/threads/its-over-even-for-rapists.94560/

But my focus was more on the fact that "over exposure" to sexual stimulus due to how women's sex lives are today makes it virtually impossible for the average rapist to sufficiently psychologically traumatize the average women, I didn't even thnk about the prostitution aspect of it, and how something that is allegedly intolerable magically becomes tolerable when a few hundred dollars is thrown into the mix.

A quote for the ages:
You can not expect us to take your "no" that seriously when you all have a price tag.

I made a post today on a different topic which normies can't argue against because the logic is spot on - https://incels.is/threads/normies-l...ired-to-realize-their-core-motivations.97039/
 
Well rape isnt about sex its about power. In a sense, rape isnt much different to being held prisoner against your will and being forced to shit yourself or eat food off the floor. Obviously the violation of your own body adds an extra element of trauma. If i got raped in the ass by a man I would be pretty fucked up about it mentally.

As far as your argument goes even something as degenerate as being a prostitute can be a choice. Prostitutes can choose not to have sex with a man. At least the ones who are legal prostitutes and don't fear their pimp wrecking their shit can make that choice.

I mean yeah women enter relationships for security and money but that's almost as biological as looks. Women have needed men to protect them since we were apes swinging from trees. But I guess that's a whole other argument.

Anyway my point on rape is that comparisons to trading security/wealth for sex dont hold firm because rape is about power and lack of choice. I don't think any of your arguments really challenge that.
 
Well rape isnt about sex its about power. In a sense, rape isnt much different to being held prisoner against your will and being forced to shit yourself or eat food off the floor. Obviously the violation of your own body adds an extra element of trauma. If i got raped in the ass by a man I would be pretty fucked up about it mentally.

As far as your argument goes even something as degenerate as being a prostitute can be a choice. Prostitutes can choose not to have sex with a man. At least the ones who are legal prostitutes and don't fear their pimp wrecking their shit can make that choice.

I mean yeah women enter relationships for security and money but that's almost as biological as looks. Women have needed men to protect them since we were apes swinging from trees. But I guess that's a whole other argument.

Anyway my point on rape is that comparisons to trading security/wealth for sex dont hold firm because rape is about power and lack of choice. I don't think any of your arguments really challenge that.

So prisoners are more mentally traumatized than female rape victims?, because they lack power and control over their lives more than any other individual?

I call BS, if someone held me against my will and forced me to eat my shit I would be more angry and murderous than I would be "traumatized", I would not be thinking - "I could never live this down", I'd be thinking - "man am I going to fucking torture this guy to death when I get the chance". If I got fucked in the ass by force though, now I'd be thinking "I could never live this down", I'd want to kill myself more than I'd want to kill the rapist, and that's because RAPE IS ABOUT SEX.

So stop with the BS, you sound like a complete blue pilled normie, you haven't thought your argument through, if lack of control and power is truly the traumatic aspect of a rape, then women should be more traumatized by so many other aspects of their lives, for example their menstruation cycle, their hormones make them frustrated and irritable, they bleed from their vagina, they get painful cramps all over their body, they get bloating, some even get diarrhea from it JFL.

They have no control over themselves mentally or physically FOR VARYING INTERVALS, EVERY MONTH, FOR BASICALLY THEIR ENTIRE LIVES. So by your logic aren't women supposed to be even more traumatized by existing itself, something that is a natural biological function for them is powerlessness and lack of control in its truest sense, not imposed by another, but imposed by nature, by reality itself.

Lets not forget about the powerlessness that comes with being the physically weaker sex, women always have to ask men all the time to perform tasks for them that are physical ("open this bottle for me", "fix that for me", etc because they often lack the phsyical strength for the task).

A WOMEN'S VERY EXISTENCE IS POWERLESSNESS AND LACK OF CONTROL so your argument makes no damn sense at all, if we go by your logic, just existing as a woman is the most traumatic thing a human can experience psychologically.
 
to any female who ever has been raped before and reads this post

youre used to taking dicks in your fanny so what harm is one more?

there is far worse mental trauma that you will thankfully never experience because you werent born with a Y chromosome.

get over it, cunt.
 
It's not the same.

Please validate the statement or STFU, I'm tired of seeing lazy pointless posts like this, if you aren't willing to elaborate and validate an argument then don't bother making it.
 
Please validate the statement or STFU, I'm tired of seeing lazy pointless posts like this, if you aren't willing to elaborate and validate an argument then don't bother making it.
They think and act pragmatist. This is rational so i can't say that they are fine with rape.
And this is totally fine.
 
This thread is too high IQ I dont want to interup
 
High IQ

Women probably love rape if it by an attractive man. Getting raped by an attractive man validates her place as a high SMV femoid. It's only rape when it's done by a man who she feels is beneath her.
 
So prisoners are more mentally traumatized than female rape victims?, because they lack power and control over their lives more than any other individual?

Well Prison is different isn't it. But sure, 20 years in a jail cell could be more traumatic than rape. But it really depends on the individual. A gangbanger probably sees prison as a badge of honour, an innocent taxpayer sent to prison for murder that he didn't do is going to be all kinds of fucked up. It's a bit apples and oranges though... two different types of trauma. I would deal with rape different to prison. If I was raped I would be fucked up because I was powerless and violated. Prison would fuck me up because it would remove me of my freedoms for a long time. I was just drawing a comparison about the "power" element but maybe it wasn't worth it.

I call BS, if someone held me against my will and forced me to eat my shit I would be more angry and murderous than I would be "traumatized", I would not be thinking - "I could never live this down", I'd be thinking - "man am I going to fucking torture this guy to death when I get the chance". If I got fucked in the ass by force though, now I'd be thinking "I could never live this down", I'd want to kill myself more than I'd want to kill the rapist, and that's because RAPE IS ABOUT SEX.

I don't think the way you would internalize being degraded really means much. Rape from a psychological standpoint is always about power my man. Even people who have regular sex commit rape. Rapists aren't all ugly incels are they? Mostly they are normies. It's entirely a power thing. I mean this is the generally accepted view. Even if right now you legalised prostitution and made it free you'd still have rapists.

So stop with the BS, you sound like a complete blue pilled normie, you haven't thought your argument through, if lack of control and power is truly the traumatic aspect of a rape, then women should be more traumatized by so many other aspects of their lives, for example their menstruation cycle, their hormones make them frustrated and irritable, they bleed from their vagina, they get painful cramps all over their body, they get bloating, some even get diarrhea from it JFL.

They have no control over themselves mentally or physically FOR VARYING INTERVALS, EVERY MONTH, FOR BASICALLY THEIR ENTIRE LIVES. So by your logic aren't women supposed to be even more traumatized by existing itself, something that is a natural biological function for them is powerlessness and lack of control in its truest sense, not imposed by another, but imposed by nature, by reality itself.

]Lets not forget about the powerlessness that comes with being the physically weaker sex, women always have to ask men all the time to perform tasks for them that are physical ("open this bottle for me", "fix that for me", etc because they often lack the phsyical strength for the task).

A WOMEN'S VERY EXISTENCE IS POWERLESSNESS AND LACK OF CONTROL so your argument makes no damn sense at all, if we go by your logic, just existing as a woman is the most traumatic thing a human can experience psychologically.

This is all a bit ranty and silly. Like I said... it's about another human being having complete power over you and your lack of choice in the matter.

Anyways tbh bro I got better things to do than argue why rape is traumatic lol. I don't give enough of a shit about women to waste too much time on this. To me it's obvious why rape is traumatic. Let's just agree to disagree.
 
Even people who have regular sex commit rape. Rapists aren't all ugly incels are they?

This argument here is ridiculous

Are you implying that sexual urges end? (your whole "people who have regular sex rape" point doesn't make sense beacuse no shit, they get horny again, sexual urges don't stop after you satisfy them)

Nobody even claimed only ugly or unattractive people rape, that has nothing to do with it being about sex

Even if right now you legalised prostitution and made it free you'd still have rapists.

You'd have a lot less rapists though, there are studies that showed that the more allowed porn was in a society, the more rates of rape went down, imagine if those males had access to actual sex rather than images on a screen, they'd be even more satisfied and less likely to rape. You are stating the obvious as though its this great argument, of course rape will still against, that makes no difference to my argument.

it's about another human being having complete power over you and your lack of choice in the matter.

So NOW the trauma isn't about lack of control and power, its about SPECIFICALLY ANOTHER HUMAN HAVING CONTROL AND POWER OVER YOU?



Anyways tbh bro I got better things to do than argue why rape is traumatic lol. I don't give enough of a shit about women to waste too much time on this. To me it's obvious why rape is traumatic. Let's just agree to disagree.

JFL and now straight into cop out mode

"Lets agree to disagree" is one of the most normie phrases ever and it is often used by women (you are a highly suspected larp).

Its really just a disingenuous statement that often translates into - "I know I can't logically defend my stance, but I like thinking that I'm right, so I'm going to kindly excuse myself from the argument so I don't face an existential crisis and/or have to acknowledge I'm wrong"
 
This argument here is ridiculous

Are you implying that sexual urges end? (your whole "people who have regular sex rape" point doesn't make sense beacuse no shit, they get horny again, sexual urges don't stop after you satisfy them)

Nobody even claimed only ugly or unattractive people rape, that has nothing to do with it being about sex

You'd have a lot less rapists though, there are studies that showed that the more allowed porn was in a society, the more rates of rape went down, imagine if those males had access to actual sex rather than images on a screen, they'd be even more satisfied and less likely to rape. You are stating the obvious as though its this great argument, of course rape will still against, that makes no difference to my argument.

I think you're having trouble reconciling the act of sex with the motivation behind sex. Obviously you can have sex for different reasons, procreation, mutual pleasure, exchange of goods (prostitution). I'm just trying to explain how, quite obviously, rape is a sexual manifestation of power over someone else.

If rape was only about sex or a release of urges then rape in countries with legalized prostitution/porn wouldn't just go down it would disappear completely.

I posit to you to explain me that if rape is NOT about power and is completely about sex, why do people chose to rape over prostitution? And why would people in relationships rape? What possible motivation for rape can be there be when people who can easily have sex for pleasure choose to stuff their cock into some foids dry pussy in the back of an alley? It's not because the act of sex feels better, it's because the psychology of having power over someone is the desire.

So NOW the trauma isn't about lack of control and power, its about SPECIFICALLY ANOTHER HUMAN HAVING CONTROL AND POWER OVER YOU?



I'm not moving goalposts. I thought it would of been obvious that when I said rape is about power I was talking about the rapists power over the person being raped. It's not my fault I had to further clarify it because you came out with, quite frankly, low IQ arguments about bodily autonomy.

JFL and now straight into cop out mode

"Lets agree to disagree" is one of the most normie phrases ever and it is often used by women (you are a highly suspected larp).

Its really just a disingenuous statement that often translates into - "I know I can't logically defend my stance, but I like thinking that I'm right, so I'm going to kindly excuse myself from the argument so I don't face an existential crisis and/or have to acknowledge I'm wrong"

Wtf is normie about not wanting to go in circles about this? I have logically defended my stance. Do I sound emotional or annoyed to you? Because I'm really not. I just wanted to end the disagreement amicably. Now you're calling me a LARP to try to discredit me, now THAT'S a cop out.
 
Ever notice how "sex worker$" have often been 'raped' before? If it's so traumatizing why do they continue to do it?
 
JFL at being this low IQ. It's called rape for a reason. Unless you were talking about drunk sluts with regret?
 
Being tied up a jerked by a female LOL

D
R
E
A
M

Also, you're fucking right. I hate when they do the same comparison and the same fallacy with prostitution. They go on telling how men and women are absolutely equal in terms of sexual needs and then attack prostitution by saying "If you really think getting paid for money is good why don't you get fucked in the ass by men for money?" Yes, they are that stupid and can't even imagine that they should ask "Why aren't you getting paid by women for fucking them?" Because the answer will giga wreck them "BECAUSE WOMEN DON?T PAY ME, I HAVE TO PAY THEM FOR SEX"
Stupid low iq low perspective idiotic cunts
JFL at being this low IQ. It's called rape for a reason. Unless you were talking about drunk sluts with regret?
You are low iq and missed the point. Why is male on female rape considered more traumatic than female on male rape? Why do they link it to male on male rape?
 
Keep in mind some women like rape but just report it cos they are not chad.
 
Ever notice how "sex worker$" have often been 'raped' before? If it's so traumatizing why do they continue to do it?

JFL at being this low IQ. It's called rape for a reason. Unless you were talking about drunk sluts with regret?

Dude its been established long ago you are blue pilled and a religious moralfag (religion is the ultimate blue pill), why do you even bother. The entire point of the post went over your head like you are a normie, because you still have a normie mindset.
 
Dude its been established long ago you are blue pilled and a religious moralfag (religion is the ultimate blue pill), why do you even bother. The entire point of the post went over your head like you are a normie, because you still have a normie mindset.
You either read the post wrong and/or are confusing me with someone else.
 
Dude its been established long ago you are blue pilled and a religious moralfag (religion is the ultimate blue pill), why do you even bother. The entire point of the post went over your head like you are a normie, because you still have a normie mindset.
Having morals is bluepilled? I do indeed approach through my religious views which is why some of my views collide with mainstream views here. But the importance of the blackpill is that looks determine your success in life. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
You either read the post wrong and/or are confusing me with someone else.
It was directed to @RREEEEEEEEE, should have put some spaces between the two posts for context.

Having morals is bluepilled?

Actually yes, if you still believe in moral absolutes, then you are still blue pilled and have not fully swallowed the black pill, there is no "right" or "wrong", its all subjective.

A man like yourself would probably consider marrying a 13 year old immoral, but go back far enough in the past, and if you were born in those times, a man of your faith would see no problem with it, and would consider it morally good to do, morality changes with era's and even geography, whats "good" in one country is "bad" in another and everyone thinks their version of morality is "better" and "the actual right one".

Morality is inherently blue pilled.
 

Similar threads

Grodd
Replies
26
Views
289
Grodd
Grodd
AtrociousCitizen
Replies
20
Views
383
Thaway
Thaway
SlayerSlayer
Replies
10
Views
238
SilverBullet
SilverBullet

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top