CMV: I don't believe rape is psychologically traumatizing to heterosexual holes

[Involuntarily]

It was directed to @RREEEEEEEEE, should have put some spaces between the two posts for context.



Actually yes, if you still believe in moral absolutes, then you are still blue pilled and have not fully swallowed the black pill, there is no "right" or "wrong", its all subjective.

A man like yourself would probably consider marrying a 13 year old immoral, but go back far enough in the past, and if you were born in those times, a man of your faith would see no problem with it, and would consider it morally good to do, morality changes with era's and even geography, whats "good" in one country is "bad" in another and everyone thinks their version of morality is "better" and "the actual right one".

Morality is inherently blue pilled.

Sorry I blocked him since his posts are retarded. I wish it showed that you quoted him but put it in spoilers. The forum got way better after I blocked some retarded posters. Do not reason with that blue pilled, feminist libtard.

 

[FemaleInventionsLOL]

I think there are two reasons male-on-heterosexual-hole rape has been portrayed as this traumatizing event.

1. Heterosexual men don't relate to being penetrated (in general), so the thought of it makes them extremely uncomfortable. They don't have the mindset of wanting to be penetrated, so the comparison they draw in their minds is anal penetration. But it's not the same thing, as shown by the fact that holes have no problem being penetrated under numerous circumstances.

2. Men are vulnerable to hole tears, not realizing they are a manipulation tactic. They think that because holes act really upset about something, it means it's actually a big deal. But holes will literally make every bit as much of a melodramatic fuss about their husband not taking them to the lake as they will about being raped.




Point 1 is also why male heterosexuality is seen as so disgusting and evil and oppressive. In general, it's the man doing the penetrating and the hole being penetrated. This means that the male has the active role and the hole has the passive one.

As male intelligence evolved, they started to try to empathize with the passive partners, and it led to this mistaken belief that penetration must be horrible for holes and that men should be apologetic for their sexuality.

But it's not horrible for holes.

But after some convincing, holes agreed that it really does suck when a man they find unattractive performs sex acts on them without paying for it. And now, like with so many other things, holes being raped is a crime against humanity.

Just like holes being hit. And holes being insulted. And holes being catcalled (by unattractive men). And holes being looked at with sexual interest (by unattractive men). And holes hearing terminology that they don't like.

 

[ManletHalfCurry]

Mount Everest height IQ post, @BlkPillPres is correct, this thread along with his own https://incels.is/threads/comparing...l-male-rape-is-fallacious-4-inceltears.94749/ have completely destroyed the idea that rape could be traumatic to a foid at all, and yes IT will never ever touch this.

 

[Reddit_is_for_cucks]

Giga high iq post.

Chad fucks girls in a more hardcore fashion than a rapist but it’s still acceptable because he has a attractive face.

The difference between rape and using a prostitute is 200 bucks.

Jfl cucks cant refute this logic

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

It was directed to @RREEEEEEEEE, should have put some spaces between the two posts for context.



Actually yes, if you still believe in moral absolutes, then you are still blue pilled and have not fully swallowed the black pill, there is no "right" or "wrong", its all subjective.

A man like yourself would probably consider marrying a 13 year old immoral, but go back far enough in the past, and if you were born in those times, a man of your faith would see no problem with it, and would consider it morally good to do, morality changes with era's and even geography, whats "good" in one country is "bad" in another and everyone thinks their version of morality is "better" and "the actual right one".

Morality is inherently blue pilled.

Morality is not bluepilled. Murder is objectively wrong, unless it is justified, like during times of war. It's only immoral to marry a 13 year old if you do not wait an additional 5 years to consummate the marriage. If you have a 14 year old son, and somebody has a 14 year old daughter, it's completely fine to say that you will let them marry each other at 18 years old, if they both agree.

 

[Deleted member 1780]

I believe it can be traumatizing. I just don't really care however. I don't see any benefit to myself in caring about what happens to some foid.

 

[Reddit_is_for_cucks]

Who said anything about seeing a picture, you fucking paint chip-eating clown?

Learn how to make proper analogies, idiot. You couldn't get a single question correct on the SAT.

You are the absolute worst, most moronic arguer I have ever encountered in all my years on the internet. Congrats.

Don’t waste your time arguing with cucks man. They are not worth it. They should be up banned on spot.

They are basically females and use female arguing tactics. We all know females don’t operate at a logical level but emotional level.

Female argument is synonymous with fallacies.

Females and cucks are the dumbest creature on this planet. They are lower life form than a ameba.

to any female who ever has been raped before and reads this post

youre used to taking dicks in your fanny so what harm is one more?

there is far worse mental trauma that you will thankfully never experience because you werent born with a Y chromosome.

get over it, cunt.

Lmao exactly! It’s just another dick in their std infested hole. They rode 1000 guys in highschool/college but as soon as a ugly male does it, then then it’s worst then murder wtffff?

If the same guy gave her 500 bucks before doing the deed, she would gladly open her legs and take the money.

These disgusting lying whore deserve to be skinned alive for their dishonesty. Fucking vermin’s have ruined entire generation of males and brainwashed the society.

Female rape shouldn’t even be compared to theft since in theft you lose something of value. What value does a non virgin female has. Her virginity is already gone ,there is nothing to be stolen not even her dignity cuz she is already a worthless whore since she let 100s guys inside her already.

Well rape isnt about sex its about power. In a sense, rape isnt much different to being held prisoner against your will and being forced to shit yourself or eat food off the floor. Obviously the violation of your own body adds an extra element of trauma. If i got raped in the ass by a man I would be pretty fucked up about it mentally.

As far as your argument goes even something as degenerate as being a prostitute can be a choice. Prostitutes can choose not to have sex with a man. At least the ones who are legal prostitutes and don't fear their pimp wrecking their shit can make that choice.

I mean yeah women enter relationships for security and money but that's almost as biological as looks. Women have needed men to protect them since we were apes swinging from trees. But I guess that's a whole other argument.

Anyway my point on rape is that comparisons to trading security/wealth for sex dont hold firm because rape is about power and lack of choice. I don't think any of your arguments really challenge that.

Your argument is stupid. Rape is about sex and not power. Or else anytime a man forcibly overpowers a women, then it wouldnt considered assault or murder.

You are just another brain washed drone. Most women these days are whore who have fucked 1000 of men and they are incapable of being traumatization.

 

[Involuntarily]

I think there are two reasons male-on-heterosexual-hole rape has been portrayed as this traumatizing event.

1. Heterosexual men don't relate to being penetrated (in general), so the thought of it makes them extremely uncomfortable. They don't have the mindset of wanting to be penetrated, so the comparison they draw in their minds is anal penetration. But it's not the same thing, as shown by the fact that holes have no problem being penetrated under numerous circumstances.

2. Men are vulnerable to hole tears, not realizing they are a manipulation tactic. They think that because holes act really upset about something, it means it's actually a big deal. But holes will literally make every bit as much of a melodramatic fuss about their husband not taking them to the lake as they will about being raped.




Point 1 is also why male heterosexuality is seen as so disgusting and evil and oppressive. In general, it's the man doing the penetrating and the hole being penetrated. This means that the male has the active role and the hole has the passive one.

As male intelligence evolved, they started to try to empathize with the passive partners, and it led to this mistaken belief that penetration must be horrible for holes and that men should be apologetic for their sexuality.

But it's not horrible for holes.

But after some convincing, holes agreed that it really does suck when a man they find unattractive performs sex acts on them without paying for it. And now, like with so many other things, holes being raped is a crime against humanity.

Just like holes being hit. And holes being insulted. And holes being catcalled (by unattractive men). And holes being looked at with sexual interest (by unattractive men). And holes hearing terminology that they don't like.

A guy that got cucked was dating a foid like that. None of your post do i disagree with. Warren Buffet IQ

 

[shoji]

OP is a genius

 

[Michael15651]

GigaQuad IQ

 

[BlkPillPres]

Morality is not bluepilled. Murder is objectively wrong

No murder is not objectively "wrong", objectivity has to do with logic, murder is just not suitable within a society that wants to promote stability, laws and codes of conduct, it has always been quite alright to murder others of a different tribe if you go back far enough into our history. Murder is subjectively "wrong" because the term "wrong" in of itself is subjective. Again I keep having to repeat this line - "Just saying something doesn't make it true because you said it, validate your arguments, elaborate, if you are unwilling to validate an argument then don't make it"

What makes murder OBJECTIVELY "wrong"?. Also please see the irony in your wording, it proves that you don't even know how to argue and you are arguing with bias right now, because your argument self affirms itself to be right, because you are invoking morality as something objective in an argument when were assessing the objectivity of morality (this is so meta), I doubt you are even aware of what you're doing or even understand what I'm saying here, so i'll ELABORATE.

Were arguing whether morality is subjective or objective

Your genius method of arguing invokes that morality is objective within the argument when you make statements like - "murder is objectively wrong", thereby defeating the very purpose of having the argument to begin with because the framework for your argument is disingenuous.

I need to try and follow me here if you can, were arguing whether terms like "wrong" or "right" are even objective in nature and you make the argument - "murder is objectively <what were arguing about being objective>"

From my perspective your argument = "Murder is objectively <something subjective>" so it makes no sense to me, your current method of arguing is disingenuous, maybe you aren't doing it on purpose but that's the end result, you are attempting to self affirm the very thing we are arguing about within the argument.

I made a thread somewhat in relation to this morality argument and I think morality is ironically what leads to the degeneracy of human society, because it is subjective, and anyone can decide for themselves whats moral or not, more and more exceptions to degeneracy take place over the years until things that never would have been accepted before are now the norm - https://incels.is/threads/morality-...-corrupt-and-degeneracy-is-flourishing.92510/

The basis of all laws that are good for a society, is logic.

Take murder for example, the law should not be "you should not kill because its bad/evil", it should be - "you should not kill because you also do not want to be killed". We should hate murder as a society because if we allow other people to kill others haphazardly, then we might be next, sounds fucked up but if society ran on cold logic like that, then everything would be more peaceful.

Basing laws on morality is ironically why society is flawed, its because MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE. Even criminal organizations like the Yakuza or the Italian Mob, etc all have "codes of honour", that are things that even the average citizen would agree with. They have their own set of morals, for example the Mob usually doesn't allow killing women and children, its an emotional and subjective "rule", they have let their emotions create an illogical ruleset, but ironically they can kill men, steal from families, sell drugs, etc.

This is the problem with morals, everybody thinks their moral code is "good enough". If we all had to operate on logic, there is no such thing as "my logic" or "your logic", a choice either is logical or it isn't, logic is based on whats objective, not on how something makes one feel. We need a logical society not a moral one, "true morals" are inherent to logic, because logic usually yields the greatest collective rule set

Imagine how much the rates of rape and human trafficking would go down of prostitution was decriminalized, think about it, its completely illogical that paying for sex is illegal, there's no logical reason why it should be, yet despite all the income it would generate for a country if taxable, despite all the people it would alleviate from suffering, society keeps it illegal due to moral reasoning.

You see that slut on instagram, a lot of you moralfags on this site would say that she is being immoral, but you would be wrong. She doesn't kill, she doesn't steal, she doesn't <insert "bad" thing here>. That's her morals, as far as she's concerned "the times have changed" and she can be a slut and "it isn't hurting anyone". She is completely moral FOR THE ERA SHE EXISTS IN.

Again MORALS ARE SUBJECTIVE, they change from person to person, country to country, era to era. Morals are pointless, we need to be driven by logic not morals, morals can be altered and therefore THEY CAN BE CORRUPTED.

It's only immoral to marry a 13 year old if you do not wait an additional 5 years to consummate the marriage.

Dude are you trolling me right now, you have to be trolling, you know this sounds sarcastic right, you literally prove my point of how arbitrary your morality is, how subjective and pointless it is, why did you use 5 years, in some countries the age of consent is 15, and that's modern feminist countries where it is considered women have more power and control over their lives (Sweden), so why didn't you say 2 more years instead of 5 years?. In some states of America the age of consent is 16 so why didn't you say 3 more years instead of 5 years?, in america it is illegal for an individual under 18 to purchase alcohol in a licensed premises, so I can stick my dick in someone who isn't even able to buy their own alcohol?, why didn't you say 8 years instead of 5 years?.

I think you need to google the words "arbitrary" and "subjective" because that is literally what age of consent laws are, your "rules" are the definition of subjective, its like exhibit A - "As long as she reaches a predetermined time stamp of existence, which differs from era to era, and country to country, you can stick your dick in her"

Let me ask you something, if I'm married to a 17 year old, and on the night leading up to her 18th birthday, we are about to have sex for the first time, I penetrate her at exactly 11:59 PM for our current time zone.

1. Was it immoral? because of a 1 minute difference?
2. Did I commit statutory rape because of a 1 minute difference?
3. Are you seeing how subjective and ridiculously convoluted morality truly is?

Sorry I blocked him since his posts are retarded. I wish it showed that you quoted him but put it in spoilers. The forum got way better after I blocked some retarded posters. Do not reason with that blue pilled, feminist libtard.

I'll tell you to unblock him, and to never block anyone, never avoid discource, unless someone is explicitly trolling you (spamming messages at you). One of the most annoying and blue pilled posters I've ever met was Zyros, I argued with him constantly and in every instance he'd make a subjective and/or blue pilled statement and often humble brag, imagine if I had just blocked him, instead of going around making posts about him and posting this image and ranting about it (his post on looksmaxorg):

If I and every other user had just blocked him because he was annoying, he's still be here, we have to keep challenging blue pilled idiots and keep an eye on them at every turn, because most of them slip up and some point, and that's the point where they get kicked out. Also we have to keep pointing out that they are blue piilled, so that no new users ever come in here and get deluded into thinking that this illogical @RREEEEEEEEE is saying BS is what black pill thought is, just as we wouldn't want anyone looking at that Zyros post I place the image for is what a "black piller" thinks about or how an "incels" life is if they just "tried harder".

These guys are blue pilled and egoists, and they need to be pointed out at every turn, never block anyone, always observe, always show them for what they are, this is our place, they should have to block us not the other way around. Blue pillers need to GTFO.

 

[Involuntarily]

I'll tell you to unblock him, and to never block anyone, never avoid discource, unless someone is explicitly trolling you (spamming messages at you). One of the most annoying and blue pilled posters I've ever met was Zyros, I argued with him constantly and in every instance he'd make a subjective and/or blue pilled statement and often humble brag, imagine if I had just blocked him, instead of going around making posts about him and posting this image and ranting about it (his post on looksmaxorg):

View attachment 75167

If I and every other user had just blocked him because he was annoying, he's still be here, we have to keep challenging blue pilled idiots and keep an eye on them at every turn, because most of them slip up and some point, and that's the point where they get kicked out. Also we have to keep pointing out that they are blue piilled, so that no new users ever come in here and get deluded into thinking that this illogical @RREEEEEEEEE is saying BS is what black pill thought is, just as we wouldn't want anyone looking at that Zyros post I place the image for is what a "black piller" thinks about or how an "incels" life is if they just "tried harder".

These guys are blue pilled and egoists, and they need to be pointed out at every turn, never block anyone, always observe, always show them for what they are, this is our place, they should have to block us not the other way around. Blue pillers need to GTFO.

I guess my problem is that I don't want to argue with retards. It makes me so angry. I think he said he would block me so it made no sense for me to keep him on my not blocked list. I made fun of catfish man for being a piss drinker and he probably ignores me too since he hasn't since responded since. Its often reactionary but I think zyros would have been banned anyway. He bragged on other sites too much, hence why he was banned.

 

[BlkPillPres]

I made fun of catfish man for being a piss drinker

Is this true? JFL

 

[Involuntarily]

Is this true? JFL

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/catfishman23-michael-rabadan-drdolittle23-killerryan675.39890/ Looks like its gone now.

 

[BlkPillPres]

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/catfishman23-michael-rabadan-drdolittle23-killerryan675.39890/ Looks like its gone now.

Can find the video, yeah its gone.

"Some of the other incels decided to fuck with him and supposedly PMd him on alt accounts, telling him that they were from the FBI and that he would be arrested unless he....get this....drank his own piss and filmed himself doing it.

Of course, with being the utter exceptional individual he is, he completely fell for it and posted the video. Here it is in all its autistic glory."

I know I think badly of him already but I never thought he was this stupid, he must legit have a mental impairment?

 

[opsec]

https://reddit.com/r/RapeKink.

/thread terminated.