Feel free to find someone who has no common sense like you that would call a woman a virgin when she's had her holes filled with cum after having anal sex and oral sex because of
an old definition of virginity loss that ignores other forms of sex.
I'm not sure why you use "old definition" like an insult.
Anyone can make up a "new definition" for something at any point, making all preceding definitions an "old definition".
For example, I'll do this on the spot right now.
Eye contact is now "eye sex".
If you have ever made eye contact with a girl, you ascended, you are no longer a virgin.
Anyone who disputes this is now an outdated oldfag using OLD definitions which lack common sense.
We have long known eye contact to be sex... its a PENETRATING gaze and you MAKE LOVE WITH YOUR EYES.
All you guys who claim to be celibates but have made eye contact with a girl are FAKECELs.
Modern (((Merriam-Webster))) is cucked
Notice for example incompetent phrasing like "physical sexual contact".
Is there such a thing as non-physical "sexual contact"?
It also doesn't define what the phrase "sexual contact" means.
Dictionaries also inherently defer to the degeneration of language, because we people start to mis-use words, if the mis-use becomes popular for WHATEVER REASON (even moronic ones) they'll start to reflect that.
IE soon "rape" will include making eye contact with a woman without her permission. I estimate by 2030 we'll see that in print.
Following your cucked and low IQ definition of virginity loss we will have to conclude that gays can never lose their virginity unless they have sex with women so gay dudes who never fucked a woman but hundreds of guys are virgins
Correct, their sodomy emulates sex but is not actually sex.
What we see with fellatio/anal is basically metaphorical usage, in the same way you say "
I've never eaten tofu before – you could say I'm a tofu virgin."
Do you lack common sense that you will call them celibates too because of one wrong definition?
Celibacy more traditionally than abstinence from sex also requires abstaining from marrying, and also from abstaining from sexual thought.
Homosexuals don't do that because even when they engage in non-sex acts like fellatio/anal they are still subconsciously having sexual thoughts about fucking women, it just gets twisted up in their heads to target guys instead.
You want to adhere to some definition that obviously ignored other ways of sex because they didn't consider it as such.
By "some definition" you mean the "original authorative definition" I assume?
I'm for inventing new terms, not redefining old ones into ever-broadening absurdities.
Otherwise you get gaze-sex, as above.
Sorry, wizard, but if you had intercourse you're no longer a virgin or celibate.
I agree, but intercourse is only penis-in-vagina.
I have not been involved in fellatio/anal/hand either. My refusal to call those sex-emulators truesex isn't related to me having had them.
You said it, that's the traditional and cucked definition of virginity loss.
There's nothing cucked about traditional ideas about what sexual intercourse is.
Vaginal virginity is obviously the most important kind so it makes sense to prioritize it.
Traditionally it was also the only one there was any kind of realistic test for (hymen vs no hymen) whereas it's much harder to tell hands/anus/mouth "virginity"
It's foolish that you think a person can still be considered "pure" or "celibate" or "virgin" only because they're not having one way of sexual intercourse.
There is only one kind of sexual intercourse: penis in vagina.
Genitalia inside Genitalia. That's it.
Genitalia + Non-Genitalia is sexual intercourse, which involves the sexual components (genitalia of both halves) coming together.
At best we could term these other things "half-sex" or "pseudosex"
I've already given you examples, a girl could be having anal sex with her bf and different boys practicing oral sex on her and you would still call her a virgin because of what some people in the past thought
You're supposed to use your brain and not blindly agree that what other people thought about a subject is right.
We're both using our brains.
My agreement is not blind, I have a philosophical stance on how words should be used.
The "vaginal virgin" as you might put it, is the traditional meaning of "virgin" which should be assumed if used unmodified.
That or we simply abandon "virgin" used without context and always require modifiers to give it context.
