azakhan
OG failure
★
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2019
- Posts
- 3,934
too much written for me to read but I think it's high iq post
Nice! I didn't know you did.Yep, high iq thread. I've been saying this to him for a while now. Easily one of the lowest iq biggest copers on the forum.
Yep. His threads are pseudo-intellectual and the low IQ userbase eats it up. Jfl.Yeah, he hates me because I always used to call out his contrarian edgelord bullshit in his threads
heh.Black pil pres is not unintelligent but he does love the aroma of his own shit.
High IQ, bro. I don't even open his threads anymore, I know I'm going to get slapped in the face with more pseudo-intellectual walls of text.I always pay attention in those "who's the highest iq user" threads to see who says blkpllpres
Then I know that person's an idiot
Hes just another pseudo intellectual passing by.
He'll be gone in a month.
Oh and OP
View attachment 228833
Pseudo-intellectual eh? Is that why Universities use my papers.
I don't put people on ignore but I can see why you would do that. It comes in handy. Anyway, you're welcome.from
OP's entire persona of being a "muhh high IQ poster" is one of cringe.
Truly high IQ people are never "self-proclaimed" to be high IQ, they are recognised as being High IQ by others without having to literally call themselves high IQ.
So Newton wasn't high IQ because he always boasted about his intelligence
His intelligence was noticed through his theory's. Not because he boasted about them.
You on the other hand are a self proclaimed Intelligent person on a forum for lonely autistic men with supposed papers to your name that you still won't link to. The fact that you're comparing him to you is fucking hilarious.
Keep making yourself look like more of a joke GrAYcel
Newton was smart but at the time the bar was set much lower.
Had me and him conversed if would be obvious I am of greater intellect.
In the 1600s you just had to say "if i get hit by a house it will hurt more than if I'm hit by a feather". Newton was smart but at the time the bar was set much lower. Had me and him conversed if would be obvious I am of greater intellect.
This deformed guy compared himself to volcel Isaac Newton the most intellectually accomplished man in history!
I'm done, btw I'm reporting you, you're just a flamer at this point.
damn you live up too your name. you DESTROYED @BlkPillPres nglI will start off this thread by saying BlackPilPres is easily one of if not the most intellectually stunted users of this forum. The man posts low-IQ post after low-IQ post and I highly disregard him as even a fellow human being. He is clearly coping with his whole "ego death" ideology.
BlackPilPres argues that the only reason incels seek validation is because of our "egos". We value ourselves to be higher than we really are, we believe we "deserve" things which others have. Since we live in an atheistic-materialistic-deterministic Universe any ideas relating to self-worth and justice are fictional and only exist to serve our egos as emotional beings. Thus the truth to happiness and fulfillment is to give up our egos, accept we are cosmic dust in a meaningless Universe, and take life for how it goes in an attempt to maximize our personal pleasure. According to BlackPilPres this ideology has freed up from seeking validation. BlackPilPres made a post a while ago arguing he doesn't care whether he picks up a women at the club or hires a prostitute because it's the equivalent between hunting your own food or buying your own food. Only the hunters ego, his innate desire to feel worthy and valuable, forces him to hunt as opposed to buy his own food. BlackPilPres has given up on attempting to validate himself with immaterial awards while all the rest of us foolish chase "love", "affection", and "validation"
I do agree with BlackPilPres that we live in a deterministic and meaningless Universe. It is true that ideas about self-worth, justice, and observance are immaterial nonsense; however, he is wrong that "validation" is immaterial and illusory. Validation is a very real emotional need and to say that you don't need it anymore because you killed your "ego" is akin to monks saying they don't need food anymore because they reached Nirvana. BlackPilPres's subconscious knows he would be far much happier had he be able to let his ego grow and satisfy it with cheerful and enthusiastic validation from female cohorts. BlackPilPres deep down knows by killing his ego he's killing a massive source of potential joy and pleasure for his life. BlackPilPres's essence is no different than chemically castrating yourself and arguing your on the same level as Chad because "I don't need sex like the others anyway". While "morality" and "worth" are subjective immaterial ideas, love, affection, and validation are not. They are emotional needs designed by evolutionary biology to drive us to reproduction. You can not merely turn these motions off with enough mental gymnastics. To take his simile of the hunter vs grocery shopper. Imagine if you lived in a world where everybody was either a hunter or a hunter wannabe. Men who couldn't hunt were considered losers and the successful hunters got to keep the best meat for themselves. Does BlackPilPres really mean to state that in this world he would be just as happy being one of the food purchases as he would being the top hunter because after-all, his nonexistent ego doesn't depend on validation? BlackPilPres ideology is probably smart to adopt when you live in the state we do but unfortunately it is a sour grape's cope of which one's subconscious knows it is futile.
TLDR - This idea that you can disconnect your happiness from validation is non-sense
I see.Had me and him conversed if would be obvious I am of greater intellect.
Ancient Greece was a very advanced civilization. blcpillpres wasn’t talking back when we were hunters and gatherers.Firstly I will begin by saying I only called you an intellectualcel in the beginning of my post to foster a civil discussion. You are far from that. You post some of the biggest garbage on this forum and are near the same level of inceltears.
Second, I take back what I said first, you're trolling. I realized that after reading your "rapist" analogy" and your "barbarian tribe" analogy which is easily refutable. This idea that female validation is a modern society concept is so stupid I think you have to be trolling, the Greeks talked about the benefits of being physically attractive with women and spoke of its "natural superiority". I am not going to write much more because I know you agree with me but get some sort of rush from these posts.
Great civil discussion by shitting on other users, @MENSA_IQel. But this doesn't mean your arguments have no merit. I still agree with @BlkPillPres's point that validation is mostly socialized and is subjective to each person. There is no universality of the concept of validation. Which is why it has differed from era to era. However, @MENSA_IQcel's argument can relate to the precedence of biology on culture. Not to say one has complete dominance over the other, but biology can't exist without culture and vice versa. Biology has been around much longer than culture has and infact, influence our ancestors to a much greater extent than culture (again i'm not saying one has dominance over the other). If you were to tell our ancestors what Greek love was, they'd hit you right on the head with a club.
Because you threw the first punch.Why should I not shit on him when he responds to my posts with "LOW IQ LOW IQ LOW IQ"
Listen I don't have any grasp of Aristotelian Logic or even basic argumentation. I just say a bunch of axioms and hope we can agree to disagree (im not a fence sitter). But I wouldn't attack them for not totally agreeing with all my points.I will start off this thread by saying BlackPilPres is easily one of if not the most intellectually stunted users of this forum. The man posts low-IQ post after low-IQ post and I highly disregard him as even a fellow human being. He is clearly coping with his whole "ego death" ideology.
Means he seems full of himselfheh.
yes i got thatMeans he seems full of himself
Because you threw the first punch.
Listen I don't have any grasp of Aristotelian Logic or even basic argumentation. I just say a bunch of axioms and hope we can agree to disagree (im not a fence sitter). But I wouldn't attack them for not totally agreeing with all my points.
I guess calling yourself, "high iq" is perceived by users as quite pretentious. Also it is kind of justified furthermore by the fact that you have a history of insulting other users for not being intelligent as you. Now again, its not to discredit any of your arguments.He threw the first punch me. My original thread was "I want to start off this thread by recognizing blackpill pres as a high IQ user, he's clearly intellectually gifted and makes high IQ after high IQ post". After he insulted me I changed it to what it is now.
I guess calling yourself, "high iq" is perceived by users as quite pretentious. Also it is kind of justified furthermore by the fact that you have a history of insulting other users for not being intelligent as you. Now again, its not to discredit any of your arguments.
mogs everything else in life, in some cases life itself
fuck you bitch ass mutha fucka imma rough youView attachment 231518
@BlkPillPres and @MENSA_IQcel in a nutshell tbh
@MountainGorilla guess what ur a nigger hahah gotem
fuck you bitch ass mutha fucka imma rough you
too high iq for me
View attachment 231518
@BlkPillPres and @MENSA_IQcel in a nutshell tbh
@MountainGorilla guess what ur a nigger hahah gotem
Probably some old 4chan thread or just around. I don't look for these tbh.What the actual fuck. What kind of parenting is this.
Where do you find these fucking videos
View attachment 231527
If you're saying I'm overvaluing it, it's not my opinion, it's that of billions of normies, chads and stacies.
The 2nd vid I posted was great. I think its your looksmatch ded srs
1. Appeal the majority
2. Oh, so now the judgements and beliefs of normies count for something, but when it comes to every other thing we call them blue pilled NPC's and disregard what they are saying
We know through scientific observation that pair-bonding is the most valuable and most rewarding human experience
because we can observe it being valued above all sorts of other successes by multitudes of people who experience it
What you're doing is spouting the simple-minded MGTOW cope.
You are coping by arguing that through mental gymnastics; you can reprogram your biology to not want these experiences anymore, and that not wanting those experiences make up for the lack of them, to not suffer the consequences of lacking such.
@BlkPillPres
The majority of influence that makes you want these experiences IS PROGRAMMING, its socialization, this is an example I keep using because you love obsessed fools just can't think abstractly:
If you were born in a raider tribe thousands of years ago, claiming a woman for your wife from a raided village would have been the norm, you would not have given any fucks about whether she "loved you" or not, that's the point, most of what you think and feel IS SOCIALIZATION
You are just refusing to understand this, accept it, and then realize that these experiences aren't something you "need", they are what you were taught to need
I can't imagine a day without using my computer for entertainment, work, etc, THERE IS NO INNATE BIOLOGICAL NEED TO USE COMPUTERS (you might as well say that there is based on your logic, seeing as we all can't do without technology today), its learnt behaviour, I was born in a technological age, taught to use these tools and became accustomed to using them everyday
Absent of that upbringing I would not feel a "need" to use my computer
Serious question: DO YOU THINK MEN THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO JUST ACCEPTED REJECTIONS FROM WOMEN?
They were like - "oh well, she doesn't want to pair bond, and I need these emotional attachments, so I guess I'll just do without sex"
Obviously no, they took them by force, so how the fuck does "pair bonding" become a biological necessity when there was no basis for those traits to evolve, men were raping like crazy, there were no laws, no jails, no nothing, do you think men were just getting down on one knee and offering bitches flowers in the cave man days?
Like come on dude, you know what you're saying makes no sense, I've went over this so many times already
There's no biological basis for any forced consensual means of courtship (as in "without "love" you won't want to court"), "pair bonding" has never been a requirement, so we would never have evolved to "crave it"
If you look in the animal world even when females reject the male, the male pursues and mounts her regardless, very few species give a fuck about consent
[Hard To Swallow Edition] Your Desire For "Genuine" "Love" & "Affection" Is Socialized NOT Biological
I seriously think this mindset I see so many men expressing is due to socializing, masculinity itself has been feminized, and that's the trick of it all, all men are going around telling themselves - "this is what a man wants" based on the standard of masculinity they were raised and socialized...incels.is
there was no basis for those traits to evolve
You rape a woman, what do you think happens next?
A pair-bonded couple will be extremely more successful in having and raising children, than a runaway pregnant slave
mogs everything else in life
YOU ARE BLUEPILLED if you think women will happily breastfeed and take care of incel babies, to think so is some "women are the empathetic gender!" low IQ bluepill shit. Every incel knows how they were treated by their female caretakers, teachers etc. growing up. Not good.
Women would rather DIE than bear children from unwanted men. Women reflexively flinch in disgust at the idea of sub-8 men passing on their genes.