Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Ban pedophelia discussion entirely for moral and or optics related purposes?

Ban pedophelia discussion entirely for moral and or optics related purposes?


  • Total voters
    127
  • Poll closed .
Fat Link

Fat Link

What you are looking for is what is looking.
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Posts
12,476
Ban pedophelia discussion entirely for moral and or optics related purposes?
 
Aoc
 
nah I don't care about pedo's but this place should be pro free speech tbh and people hate us anyway so I don't see the use of this.
 
What do you mean by pedophilia. Nowadays according to normshits liking any girl under the age of 18 is pedophilia
 
the quran says if she bleeds you can marry and fuck her
mohammed himself pbuh consummated aisha's marriage when she was a 9yo jb:bigbrain:
 
Last edited:
the quran says if she bleeds you can marry and fuck her
1640809708057


CUNNY, CUNNY, SWEET AND TASTY!
GIVE IT TO ME! PLEASE BE HASTY!
LICK IT, KISS IT, TEASE IT, TASTE IT!
EAT IT QUICKLY! DO NOT WASTE IT!
FAT OLD HAGS JUST CANT COMPARE
TO LITTLE GIRLS THAT CANT GROW HAIR!
LOOK AT ALL THAT UNRIPE MEAT!
HOW IT SENDS ME INTO HEAT!
I WONT EVER LET HER LOOSE!
I GET DRUNK OFF LOLI JUICE!
EVERY DAY I WANT IT MORE!
I CAN'T STAND THESE WRINKLY WHORES!
GIVE ME CUNNY! GIVE IT FAST!
GIVE IT NOW! I CANNOT LAST!
CUNNY CUNNY
SLICK WITH HONEY
GRIPS SO TIGHT
IT'S CUTE AND FUNNY
:panties:
1640809748019
 
Depends on what you count as pedophilia
a 21 year old saying how he is attracted to 16 year old or 40 year old posting loli pictures and talking about 7 year olds
 
No, it shouldn't be banned

I am a proud hebephile and ephebophile
 
Pedo related content could be an attack vector to get the host or registrar to cut off this site. Switching the forum to another takes time and money and for what, so that some edgeposters can get their kicks posting IT bait content? Not worth it imo.
 
Fuck no, just lol at moralfags that care about muh optics and muhh innocent teenage girls that would happily push you into an arena of pitbulls if given the chance
 
Yes. Ban it, it's fine to say chad gets younger girls but straight up pedo posts shouldn't be allowed.
 
"People" will inevitably cherry-pick these discussions and the worst members of the forum and then use them to attack the forum as a whole.
Moralfags would rather jail a thousand innocents than let one guilty man run free.
Personally, I don't think it should be banned, purely for the sake of free speech. But it's gonna make it harder to keep the site running in the long term.
 
i could care less about pedos or agecucks tbf
 
Im not into kids but i love seeing age cucks and IT getting pissed off from it
 
Might as well ban discussing feminists in that case. Agecuck discussion = anti-feminist discussion = pedophilia (ie. in modern terms attraction to a prime aged post-pubescent foid) discussion. They're all concepts derived from first wave feminism
 
Ban pedophelia discussion entirely for moral and or optics related purposes?
What you define pedophilia? saying you attracted to a fully developed 14 year old girl imo is not while saying you're attracted to a 9 year old underdeveloped girl is legit faggot shit since there's no difference between her and a pretty boy her age.
 
Pedo related content could be an attack vector to get the host or registrar to cut off this site. Switching the forum to another takes time and money and for what, so that some edgeposters can get their kicks posting IT bait content? Not worth it imo.
 
No. The vilification of pedophilia is a "Normie" trait.

Simple:

Why are "certain people" incapable of understanding that pedophilia does not equal child molestation?

The word "natural" can be defined as "Being in accordance with or determined by nature." Nature is further defined as "The basic or inherent features of something."

Pedophilia is "natural" in the sense that pedophiles have an inherent, biological attraction to children. It is a part of their nature. It was determined for them. It is much the same as an adult being attracted to another adult of similar age. The only exception for pedophiles is that they are attracted to people of different age.

Understandably, this is difficult for someone with a different nature to understand. But pedophilia is neither right nor wrong - It is just their biology. Personal morals are irrelevant to facts.
 
What you define pedophilia? saying you attracted to a fully developed 14 year old girl imo is not while saying you're attracted to a 9 year old underdeveloped girl is legit faggot shit since there's no difference between her and a pretty boy her age.
there's nothing wrong with either
 
nah I don't care about pedo's but this place should be pro free speech tbh and people hate us anyway so I don't see the use of this.
You’re probably right. :feelshehe:
 
yes ban that shit bro.
We don't need more glowies
 
moral reasons ?!
pfft
what are we in the public relations business ?

incels giving a fuck about being viewed as moral is the same as escorts fearing dicks.

ppl need to get blackpilled about lolis and see them as the dog fuckin cock carousel haremmaxing attention whore sluts they are.

no reason to white knight.

today it's agecuckism tomorow it's ads for soylent
 
I don’t partake in pedo tall but I’m free speech
 
pedo discussion chases off potential new members from incel forums.
 
I'm an ephebophile myself but I think any discussion related to that can easily be taken as pedophilia by outsiders and used against us and to take the forum down.

I'm pro free speech but free speech currently does not exist outside this forum, so it cannot be maintained inside it without suffering the bane of law.
 
I don't really give a shit about baby shitters baby shtting. I actually think sex is the source of all evil in the world and women are to blame for not keeping their legs closed.

I'm not having kids so why should I care about other peoples kids? :feelsEhh:

Give me a reason to care about society.. or don't and enjoy my pessimistic existence, my sadistic enjoyment of humanities suffering and my wishes for a nuclear holocaust.
 
Pedo, hepe or ephebophile discussions must be moved to the Lounge or Sewers but it must be banned from Inceldom discussion. It has nothing to do with Inceldom. Those who think the opposite haven´t swallowed their daily blackpills.

We have seen that suicide related stuff afected this forum. The same would be if pedo discussions are still allowed. The day of tomorrow a newspaper can use the excuse of pedophilia to shut down this forum.

Infact: An infiltrator can comes here and do that kind of threads to give incels bad reputation and an excuse to be chased.

Those who said that there´s freedom of speech in this forum are lying. Homo/trans stuff that is the elephant in the room of inceldom is not allowed, any sign of bluepill in a thread is a reason of ban despite MOST INCELS ARE BLUEPILLED and now they want to shut down escortcelling discussions because is bragging despite they can go and work as delivery man weekly to afford their escorts. :feelswhat:


Just more fuel for the fire, IT is already labelling all of us as pedophiles thanks to you retards.
[Even though a lot of us here are not whatsoever.]
I for one have no desire to be lumped with pedophiles at all period.

My age range for foids is 18+

Pedos already have their own separate independent forums and I for one don't want to see inceldom becoming synonymous with pedophilia. Pedos are not our allies at all whatsoever.

I want a relationship with a woman not a small child, I understand the anger, frustration, or desperation in general concerning other mens lives but pedophilia isn't the answer and solution to anything. The real world isn't going to be one where men are given state mandated lolis, you might as well get that out of your heads right now. We have enough problems as it is where we don't need to be lumped up with pedophiles also.

I understand that in ancient times concerning society or civilization things were very different historically speaking, however, the social stigma or taboo of sexual age is with us now where I don't see that changing whatsoever anytime soon as it has become firmly cemented in the modern psyche where it will probably remain as such for a very long time. There's really no use fighting against it as that is a losing battle that cannot be won, we should just focus on adult aged women considering that is the greatest problem anyways.
trying to ascend said:
Its not about moral issues, its that it makes no sense for an incel to support it.

What difference it makes to an incel if AOC is 22 or 12? No one, he is not going to fuck a foid, regardless of their age, he will be rejected by ALL all of them. So why would he want to lower the AOC? If underage foids are attracted to him, grown ones are too, and he is a major fakecel.

Only thing reducing AOC does, is let chads destroy foids pussy earlier and with no social stigma
The object is to destroy or at the very least minimalize female sexual hypergamy so that a majority of men can have wives and girlfriends creating a healthier society, in a healthy society where a majority of mens sexual needs are fulfilled pedophilia is not even an afterthought on the social radar. In a healthy society a majority of men have girlfriends and wives to then create families with raising their own children or offspring. The object is to create a society that ensures a majority of mens needs are being met and fulfilled, pedophilia isn't the answer, it's a twisted perverted fetish of the sexually deprived.

While we're discussing this we might as well approach rape as well now that I'm thinking about it. Is rape biologically evolutionary and natural? It is, however, that doesn't mean it's practical on a large scale or even remotely desirable at an individual level.

Let's say you rape a woman into sexual intercourse, you have your way with her between twenty to sixty minutes and you get off, well, that's the only satisfaction you'll get out of that beyond the fear of being caught by others in the process. You'll never receive a woman's respect, trust, affection, or voluntary mental attention through rape, I think in the end all of us want to be respected by women beyond the release of sexual intercouse where we're miserable because we're not socially respected. There's more to relationships with women beyond sexual gratification and you can't get any of that through rape, the gratification through rape is short in duration concerning overall satisfaction, and really we need more beyond just that which rape cannot provide.

Everybody wants to be a shock jockey but very few actually think about all of this beyond just saying things to sound edgy and contrarian. The best sexual relationship state is when women come to men willingly and voluntarily by their own decision mental thought processes, you can't get that with rape or pedophilia, you just can't. It isn't the same, and ultimately if you indulge in either activity you will never be fully satisfied, neither brings satisfaction where instead you'll just feel even worse about yourself than you were originally.
 
Last edited:
Can you please define pedophilia? Does admitting that a 13 yo girl 5'10 with large breast is very attractive - pedophilia? A 48 yo guy from my job started to betabux 22 yo foid, and alot of coworkers consider it poedofilia. Is it really it?
For me pedo is being attracted to a pre pubescent child: 11 and south. If we agree on that, yes, I'm for banning it. The risks for the forum and for the members are not worth it. Also, I would ban all the "go ER" stuff for the same reason.
 
Can you please define pedophilia? Does admitting that a 13 yo girl 5'10 with large breast is very attractive - pedophilia? A 48 yo guy from my job started to betabux 22 yo foid, and alot of coworkers consider it poedofilia. Is it really it?
For me pedo is being attracted to a pre pubescent child: 11 and south. If we agree on that, yes, I'm for banning it. The risks for the forum and for the members are not worth it. Also, I would ban all the "go ER" stuff for the same reason.
For practicality purposes we're talking about what the MSM + normies who can potentially destroy our site typically define as "pedophelia" which means the fucking or fondling of any girl even a second under the age of 18. :feelsUgh:
 
As long as people aren’t actually breaking law(photos) then it shouldn’t make too many fucks. Foids wanna make the whole internet that you can’t say you wanna b-ng a 17 year old
 
For practicality purposes we're talking about what the MSM + normies who can potentially destroy our site typically define as "pedophelia" which means the fucking or fondling of any girl even a second under the age of 18. :feelsUgh:
I'm not sure about that, as age of consent in most of the world is 14-16.
 
nah I don't care about pedo's but this place should be pro free speech tbh and people hate us anyway so I don't see the use of this.
 
I'm not sure about that, as age of consent in most of the world is 14-16.
The rest of the world’s opinion doesn’t matter as far as our ongoing survival as a website is concerned friend. :feelshehe:

Only what ZOG USA presently cares about and considers the law.
 

Similar threads

Pajeetsingh
Replies
197
Views
4K
copemaxx9002
copemaxx9002
RegularManlet
Replies
9
Views
443
RegularManlet
RegularManlet
D
Replies
13
Views
444
gymletethnicel
gymletethnicel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top