No WTF.
At this rate Ritalincel is gonna get perma'd and I don't think I will be able to cope knowing he'll be gone.
Can't free what cannot be caged
The irony of this comment is that I won't even need to spam "Free Leucosticte", cuz your next ban will also be your last ban
(hopefully)
it does seem that way tbh
What happened again?
Low quality posts/spam.
But he was doing that all the time(not calling his posts low quality, he hasn't changed his posts.) I don't understand that.
Maybe he did it in threads he wasn't supposed to? Mods do delete content now if it's against the rules.
Yes very true , we don't get a chance to express our true selves
Yes very true , we don't get a chance to express our true selves
If we can't express ourselves on a forum, how can we express ourselves to a foid? 
That is the reason we all are incels, we're ugly fucks who can't communicate
That is the reason we all are incels, we're ugly fucks who can't communicate
No, I'm just an ugly fuck.
All the more reason why """personality""" is such a meme. I am living proof of it.
All were missing is just inches of facial boneNo, I'm just an ugly fuck.
lmao
Because other users have complained about it I imagine.
I've seen plenty of users who were annoyed by Ritalincel's spam, especially when their threads get derailed as a result of it.
https://incels.is/threads/please-read-me-this-is-very-important.89938/
So much for le low qualite posts and spam xdd
@Ritalincel
@knajjd
D
that’s in offtopic. also, spamming like a bot was ritalincel’s entire personality in the forum. hopefully we can help him become a contributing member from now on.https://incels.is/threads/please-read-me-this-is-very-important.89938/
So much for le low qualite posts and spam xdd
@Ritalincel
@knajjd
So offtopic threads can be low quality. Let's see when I get warned
MUH PERSONALITY also spam IS SPAM. If ur gonna make a rule then apply it UNIVERSALLY
D
the offtopic subforum is considerably more lax in that respect, obviously. that being said, the rule applies there as well and threads can’t be contentless spam.
What is contentless spam
does "cope" count?
Friendly reminder I got warned and temp banned for reporting posts like this for "report spamming"
hold up, you warned me for making a similarly low-effort post in offtopic
D
this was your thread. this most definitely isn't "similarly low effort".
look at my screenshot above. that, for instance, is defined as "contentless spam".
I asked you to define it, not show me one example.
Also, I got warned for reporting posts like that.
Both are one sentence posts, the only thing that sets them apart is a poll. Both posts invite people to have a discussion on the topic at hand. Your thread is about as low effort, if I made a poll asking yes and no would it have been deleted or would it be up like yours?
I'm all for roasting knajjd but your thread was obviously no content.
I disagree, it described the act of having sex with girls, I elabbed on it in the posts under as well
D
my thread has a question, it has a purpose. people can engage in it. yours has the title "sex" and "sex with girls". you too know that it's spam. don't troll in this thread.
you were reporting dozens of posts including empty quotes and whatnot, not threads. posts like that aren't really considered to be "contentless spam" unless it's done really habitually.
None of that is in the rules. Update the rules. You also owe me %
@SyrianEtnic
Banned for cherry picking?
Banned for cherry picking?
D
I don't understand why those who say "free x" just don't chat with them via Private Messaging, Email or hell even join up to other sites & platforms where "x" is based & free to act? Take Nausea. Just join the platform where he's at & chat with him till your heart's content. Just a suggestion.
the problem is that they're not posting on the incels.is forum
for some reason, the mods can't get this into their head and would rather be autistic about enforcing "muh rules" while calling anyone with actual concern for this site's longevity a drooling retard.Free @Ritalincel
Yes, I agree his comments are not very descriptive. But they are terse and to-the-point. He is also a vigilant cuck spotter and annihilator. If all OG posters who have been here since the fall of /r/incels are getting banned like this, this site will die out. Because there are too many nofappers, standardcels and """mentalcels""" on this forum. @Ritalincel is one of the few old truecels still left here.
D
Then come out & state your protestation as to why you think they were wrong to be banned in the 1st place. I suppose.
So what's your solution? Should the rules only apply to some users? That seems pretty absurd.
how about we don't make up phony rules only for certain users to follow to begin with? That seems pretty logical to my mind. I don't know enough about ritalincel's ban to comment on it, but in the case of Zesto, what happened is nothing short of an injustice.
Moderator man bad! Zesto good boy! Zesto never do wrong!
Every time the question about alts has been brought up, we have answered the same way: alts are allowed, as long as you don't abuse them. When a person abuses their alt privileges, for example by using them to evade bans/warnings, or to troll/LARP, or to harass other users, etc., then we ban the alt and inform the user that they have lost their alt privileges. This has happened to numerous users in the past - Zesto is no different. When they violate that rule by making another alt, they get warned/banned, depending on the severity of the infractions in the past. So, Zesto was informed of exactly what would happen if he decided to make another alt, and then he did it, tried to be sneaky about it, got caught, got banned.
So, where is the injustice? It's all in your head. "I like Zesto! Therefore everyone likes Zesto! Therefore Zesto is good for this community! Therefore he deserves special privileges, and not giving him those privileges is an injustice!" JFL. Stop spewing your heavily biased call-to-arms every chance you get, it's not doing you or Zesto any favors.
Have you ever made an interesting, funny or well-written post in your life? Be honest...
Zesto was one of the most, if not the most appreciated user on this site. Do you deny this fact?
Moderator man bad! Zesto good boy! Zesto never do wrong!
Every time the question about alts has been brought up, we have answered the same way: alts are allowed, as long as you don't abuse them. When a person abuses their alt privileges, for example by using them to evade bans/warnings, or to troll/LARP, or to harass other users, etc., then we ban the alt and inform the user that they have lost their alt privileges. This has happened to numerous users in the past - Zesto is no different. When they violate that rule by making another alt, they get warned/banned, depending on the severity of the infractions in the past. So, Zesto was informed of exactly what would happen if he decided to make another alt, and then he did it, tried to be sneaky about it, got caught, got banned.
So, where is the injustice? It's all in your head. "I like Zesto! Therefore everyone likes Zesto! Therefore Zesto is good for this community! Therefore he deserves special privileges, and not giving him those privileges is an injustice!" JFL. Stop spewing your heavily biased call-to-arms every chance you get, it's not doing you or Zesto any favors.
+1
Moderator man bad! Zesto good boy! Zesto never do wrong!
Every time the question about alts has been brought up, we have answered the same way: alts are allowed, as long as you don't abuse them. When a person abuses their alt privileges, for example by using them to evade bans/warnings, or to troll/LARP, or to harass other users, etc., then we ban the alt and inform the user that they have lost their alt privileges. This has happened to numerous users in the past - Zesto is no different. When they violate that rule by making another alt, they get warned/banned, depending on the severity of the infractions in the past. So, Zesto was informed of exactly what would happen if he decided to make another alt, and then he did it, tried to be sneaky about it, got caught, got banned.
So, where is the injustice? It's all in your head. "I like Zesto! Therefore everyone likes Zesto! Therefore Zesto is good for this community! Therefore he deserves special privileges, and not giving him those privileges is an injustice!" JFL. Stop spewing your heavily biased call-to-arms every chance you get, it's not doing you or Zesto any favors.
And i dont like him and never liked.
That ban was very pleasurable xD
I've said it before and I'll say it again, this is not a popularity contest. Being a prolific user with a large number of orbiters (let's ignore the large amount of haters) is not a factor in whether the rules apply to that user.
He was also one of the most annoying ones. This whole "he was popular so he can bend the rules" thing makes no sense.
Right, but you're portraying my argument as coming from the place of 'I like him so I think he should stay'. That is never what I've said, my entire point has always been that this site will go to shit if you keep banning the quality users (and by quality users I mean those most appreciated by the members of this site, not those I personally appreciate). Rules are meant to serve the members. If the community generally don't have an issue with member x breaking some minor rule, I can't for the life of me understand why any mod in their right mind would ban that user anyway. We're not trying to forge the digital version of the magna charta here.
so ignore him then
Similar threads
Emba
Toxic Femininity
North Dakota Judge Says Abortion Ban Unconstitutional Because Abortion Makes Women Happy
- Shaktiman
- The Lounge
Lurkercel_678
Users who are viewing this thread
