Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Ban Discussion Megathread


I could see how Weed, VST, and whogivesafucc (all 5-6) could end up incel, but not this guy. Depending on what's behind the paint, that's probably the closest to a Chad we've had here.

Regardless, he's still an incel if he's somehow actually involuntarily celibate - and it doesn't look like he ever claimed otherwise.
 
i see him watching threads, whats his story
He admitted he even messaged the mods that he had ascended and they simply told him not to reveal it and he'd be fine.
The mods here are 100% okay with fakecels, you just can't personally mention it. It doesn't matter if it's common knowledge that you're currently in a LTR, nor if it's common knowledge that you constantly have sex and do kinky acts with your SO, so long as you're not personally bragging about it, you're good.
 
He admitted he even messaged the mods that he had ascended and they simply told him not to reveal it and he'd be fine.
The mods here are 100% okay with fakecels, you just can't personally mention it. It doesn't matter if it's common knowledge that you're currently in a LTR, nor if it's common knowledge that you constantly have sex and do kinky acts with your SO, so long as you're not personally bragging about it, you're good.
that is not being a fakecel. being a fakecel is claiming to be incel while not being one.
 
i see him watching threads, whats his story

He got banned for a story that he sent by PM, wherein he claimed to have lost his virginity at 14 and to have a girlfriend at present. Others have said that he only recently ascended and fabricated that story to get banned (he spent probably 10 hours a day here - he might have just been trying to find a way to stop posting).

Regardless, he was still a pretty good poster. It's hard to figure out what exactly his angle was, though. Genuine incel? Bored LARPer with severe social anxiety and a Kierkegaard/Pessoa-tier fondness for inventing personalities and acting them out? Something else?
 
that is not being a fakecel. being a fakecel is claiming to be incel while not being one.
So if he ever claimed that he was an incel after messaging you guys that he ascended, you would have banned him? Nah, we both know that wouldn't have happened. I mean, CFM claims to be incel on a daily basis, and hes had sex more times than the Chads on this forum.
 
Fakecel genocide when?
 
I could see how Weed, VST, and whogivesafucc (all 5-6)
VST and whogivesafuc 5-6/10????

Learn how to rate man, lol.

whogivesafuc is chadlite tier (7/10) and VST aint nothing bellow 6.5/10.
 
VST and whogivesafuc 5-6/10????

Learn how to rate man, lol.

whogivesafuc is chadlite tier (7/10) and VST aint nothing bellow 6.5/10.

There's nothing outstandingly wrong with Gives (i.e. obviously not truecel-tier), but he's definitely not a Chadlite. That's already around 90th percentile attractiveness. His FWHR isn't all that good (fairly long midface + narrow skull), his jaw isn't especially strong, and his forehead is rounded and small relative to the rest of his face. Seems to be around 5.5-6.

It's hard to tell exactly what VST is from a profile shot and a 45° pic with his jaw turned up, but it seems like he's around 6/10, maybe 6.5. He's probably the mogger of the infamous trinity.
 
There's nothing outstandingly wrong with Gives (i.e. obviously not truecel-tier), but he's definitely not a Chadlite. That's already around 90th percentile attractiveness. His FWHR isn't all that good (fairly long midface + narrow skull), his jaw isn't especially strong, and his forehead is rounded and small relative to the rest of his face. Seems to be around 5.5-6.

Seriously you MUST BE an Lookism.net autist to think that whogivesafuc has average looks.

whogivesafuck looks are good enought to SLAY. AVERAGE looking man (5.5/10) CANNOT slay, unless they are whites (depending on the geographic location) or very talls, like 6 foot in Brasil. whogivesafuck is only 1 PSL point bellow Orb who is a known 8/10 solid chad.

Or you dont even leave your house. One of the two.
 
Seriously you MUST BE an Lookism.net autist to think that whogivesafuc has average looks.

whogivesafuck looks are good enought to SLAY. AVERAGE looking man (5.5/10) CANNOT slay, unless they are whites (depending on the geographic location) or very talls, like 6 foot in Brasil. whogivesafuck is only 1 PSL point bellow Orb who is a known 8/10 solid chad.

Or you dont even leave your house. One of the two.

5.5-6 is not exactly average - the sizes of deviations in a population index like this are the largest as the rating initially moves away from 5 and lessen in magnitude near the tails. Assume ratings are normally distributed (among the youth anyway - it is back-loaded once you consider that most people 30+ get damaged variously by diet, ionizing radiation, and venereal disease).

fig11-11.jpg


In my own ratings, I consider 6/10 to be around 75th percentile, which is around where I'd put Gives. 7/10 is around 90th, 8/10 around 98th, 9/10 exceptionally rare - about 3 SD.

Gives would get mogged many times a day, every day, on any college campus. Nobody at the 75th percentile (high-tier normie) slays on looks alone.

:feelskek: @ "muh 5/10 JBWhite slayer". 5/10 is 5/10. 8/10 is 8/10. Race, as it correlates with matters of purely esthetic phenotype like eye area and nose architecture, can be figured directly into a looks rating as, to restate the issue, race and looks are inseparable when it is exactly their nexus which we are interested in. I'd say that a 50th percentile White is probably comparable to a 60th percentile Ethnic in terms of their absolute appeal to foids, i.e. there's not even a full point of difference if the populations were evaluated separately.
 
Last edited:
Gives would get mogged several times a day, every day, on any college campus. Nobody at the 75th percentile (high-tier normie) slays on looks alone.

No, if you are WHITE and your face is 6/10, you are perfectly able to slay on LOOKS ALONE if you are living in a multiracial country (as Brasil, Bolívia, México or USA). Of course you must be NT and functional in society.

80% of the slayers that i knew IRL in my life were not chads, they were 5' 8" - 5' 11" 6/10 looking NT white guys. I live in the west side of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. And when i say slay i do not mean 5/10 girls and bellow, i mean 6/10 girls and above. They could pick up 7/10 black and mixed females.

I know PERSONALLY an 5' 4" white manlet with an 7.5/10 face dating and 6.5/10 girl with a TOP TIER BODY. I can give you pics if you want.

But i can see that you clearly believe in retarded basement dweller theories (Sub8 law), so thats nothing i can do because mods here do not allow me to create my thread putting down this shit.
 
Last edited:
No, if you are WHITE and your face is 6/10, you are perfectly able to slay on LOOKS ALONE if you are living in a multiracial country (as Brasil, Bolívia, México or USA).

I tacked on an addendum to my post explaining my position on this. I've never been to Brazil, but this is absolutely not the case anywhere I've ever been in the United States. Now, I'm not going to try to invert the issue and claim "JBE" or some other kind of stupid cope, but attractive is attractive, ugly is ugly, mediocre is mediocre (=ugly to foids). I barely ever see WMEF couples and when I do, the foid is usually below the man's looksmatch.

Of course you must be NT and functional in society.

No disagreement here. 5+/10 can do decently with a social circle. The closer to 5 they are, the cockier they'll be about it.

80% of the slayers that i knew IRL in my life were not chads, they were 5' 8" - 5' 11" 6/10 looking NT white guys. I live in the west side of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. And when i say slay i do not mean 5/10 girls and bellow, i mean 6/10 girls and above. They could pick up 7/10 black and mixed females.

I won't contest this either. Most of the slayers I've ever come across were sub-6-foot and slightly above average. Issue is, this set of attributes needs to come together with hyper-NT in order to be viable. Whatever you want to say about Gives, spending 75% of the day here probably indicates that he wasn't perfectly NT. Slaying on looks alone requires that you be 8+/10.

I know PERSONALLY an 5' 4" white manlet with an 7.5/10 face dating and 6.5/10 girl with a TOP TIER BODY. I can give you picks if you want.

Yeah, the biggest slayer at my high school was a 5'3" Mexican dicklet. He was also one of the cockiest faggots I've ever met. Doesn't prove any particular rule (Just Be A Short, Ethnic Gymcel Theory).

But i can see that you clearly believe in retarded basement dweller theories (Sub8 law), so thats nothing i can do because mods here do not allow me to create my thread putting down this shit.

I don't even have a basement available to me. I spend more time outside than I'd like to.
 
Why was @jerrycan dan permed?
 
I could see how Weed, VST, and whogivesafucc (all 5-6) could end up incel, but not this guy. Depending on what's behind the paint, that's probably the closest to a Chad we've had here.

Regardless, he's still an incel if he's somehow actually involuntarily celibate - and it doesn't look like he ever claimed otherwise.
VST and whogivesafuc 5-6/10????

Learn how to rate man, lol.

whogivesafuc is chadlite tier (7/10) and VST aint nothing bellow 6.5/10.
There's nothing outstandingly wrong with Gives (i.e. obviously not truecel-tier), but he's definitely not a Chadlite. That's already around 90th percentile attractiveness. His FWHR isn't all that good (fairly long midface + narrow skull), his jaw isn't especially strong, and his forehead is rounded and small relative to the rest of his face. Seems to be around 5.5-6.

It's hard to tell exactly what VST is from a profile shot and a 45° pic with his jaw turned up, but it seems like he's around 6/10, maybe 6.5. He's probably the mogger of the infamous trinity.
Seriously you MUST BE an Lookism.net autist to think that whogivesafuc has average looks.

whogivesafuck looks are good enought to SLAY. AVERAGE looking man (5.5/10) CANNOT slay, unless they are whites (depending on the geographic location) or very talls, like 6 foot in Brasil. whogivesafuck is only 1 PSL point bellow Orb who is a known 8/10 solid chad.

Or you dont even leave your house. One of the two.
5.5-6 is not exactly average - the sizes of deviations in a population index like this are the largest as the rating initially moves away from 5 and lessen in magnitude near the tails. Assume ratings are normally distributed (among the youth anyway - it is back-loaded once you consider that most people 30+ get damaged variously by diet, ionizing radiation, and venereal disease).

fig11-11.jpg


In my own ratings, I consider 6/10 to be around 75th percentile, which is around where I'd put Gives. 7/10 is around 90th, 8/10 around 98th, 9/10 exceptionally rare - about 3 SD.

Gives would get mogged many times a day, every day, on any college campus. Nobody at the 75th percentile (high-tier normie) slays on looks alone.

:feelskek: @ "muh 5/10 JBWhite slayer". 5/10 is 5/10. 8/10 is 8/10. Race, as it correlates with matters of purely esthetic phenotype like eye area and nose architecture, can be figured directly into a looks rating as, to restate the issue, race and looks are inseparable when it is exactly their nexus which we are interested in. I'd say that a 50th percentile White is probably comparable to a 60th percentile Ethnic in terms of their absolute appeal to foids, i.e. there's not even a full point of difference if the populations were evaluated separately.
No, if you are WHITE and your face is 6/10, you are perfectly able to slay on LOOKS ALONE if you are living in a multiracial country (as Brasil, Bolívia, México or USA). Of course you must be NT and functional in society.

80% of the slayers that i knew IRL in my life were not chads, they were 5' 8" - 5' 11" 6/10 looking NT white guys. I live in the west side of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. And when i say slay i do not mean 5/10 girls and bellow, i mean 6/10 girls and above. They could pick up 7/10 black and mixed females.

I know PERSONALLY an 5' 4" white manlet with an 7.5/10 face dating and 6.5/10 girl with a TOP TIER BODY. I can give you pics if you want.

But i can see that you clearly believe in retarded basement dweller theories (Sub8 law), so thats nothing i can do because mods here do not allow me to create my thread putting down this shit.
I tacked on an addendum to my post explaining my position on this. I've never been to Brazil, but this is absolutely not the case anywhere I've ever been in the United States. Now, I'm not going to try to invert the issue and claim "JBE" or some other kind of stupid cope, but attractive is attractive, ugly is ugly, mediocre is mediocre (=ugly to foids). I barely ever see WMEF couples and when I do, the foid is usually below the man's looksmatch.



No disagreement here. 5+/10 can do decently with a social circle. The closer to 5 they are, the cockier they'll be about it.



I won't contest this either. Most of the slayers I've ever come across were sub-6-foot and slightly above average. Issue is, this set of attributes needs to come together with hyper-NT in order to be viable. Whatever you want to say about Gives, spending 75% of the day here probably indicates that he wasn't perfectly NT. Slaying on looks alone requires that you be 8+/10.



Yeah, the biggest slayer at my high school was a 5'3" Mexican dicklet. He was also one of the cockiest faggots I've ever met. Doesn't prove any particular rule (Just Be A Short, Ethnic Gymcel Theory).



I don't even have a basement available to me. I spend more time outside than I'd like to.
 


I can't tell if he was trying to get banned or just trying to poison the well.


Huh, this is a tough one. His ban appeal makes me feel bad for him but then again I'm not quite sure if I can believe that it was just a joke based on that last sentence because that would've been really unnecessary if it was just a joke.

Is it really possible to be stupid enough to think that telling people to send CP wouldn't result in a high warning?
 
Technically, child porn isn't illegal, since as the dissent in Osborne v. Ohio noted, the statutes criminalizing it conflict with the First Amendment, which is part of the supreme law of the land. Therefore, discussions of it would not count as illegal discussion. It's actually the government that is violating the law by throwing people in prison for those offenses.
lmao coming from you hahahahaa
 
i fear that you must convince your own mod team of that first before us, just as you tried to convince them to nuke the forum entirely after they told you to go away because you were doing a very good job at its administration, but let us not derail this topic. i merely wanted to poke you back since you poked me first, don't take it too seriously.
 
People just didn't know how to take Zesto's comments in the proper spirit. He was just reminding everyone that weeb stuff is a cope to serve all purposes. So for example, if someone said, "I've had a bad day; I feel like roping" and he responded by talking about his waifu, that was to remind everyone that in the larger picture, weeb stuff is the solution to everything.
Jesus Christ, you're a weeb too, of all people? :feelskek:
 
People just didn't know how to take Zesto's comments in the proper spirit. He was just reminding everyone that weeb stuff is a cope to serve all purposes. So for example, if someone said, "I've had a bad day; I feel like roping" and he responded by talking about his waifu, that was to remind everyone that in the larger picture, weeb stuff is the solution to everything.

Lol. He's got me going now. Going to Japanmax brah. He may have a point.
 
People just didn't know how to take Zesto's comments in the proper spirit. He was just reminding everyone that weeb stuff is a cope to serve all purposes. So for example, if someone said, "I've had a bad day; I feel like roping" and he responded by talking about his waifu, that was to remind everyone that in the larger picture, weeb stuff is the solution to everything.
High IQ
 
People just didn't know how to take Zesto's comments in the proper spirit. He was just reminding everyone that weeb stuff is a cope to serve all purposes. So for example, if someone said, "I've had a bad day; I feel like roping" and he responded by talking about his waifu, that was to remind everyone that in the larger picture, weeb stuff is the solution to everything.
This. In my short time here, Zesto was my favourite poster, his posts about his waifu always brought a smile to my face. Seeing someone so positive these days feels like seeing an oasis in a desert.
 
People just didn't know how to take Zesto's comments in the proper spirit. He was just reminding everyone that weeb stuff is a cope to serve all purposes. So for example, if someone said, "I've had a bad day; I feel like roping" and he responded by talking about his waifu, that was to remind everyone that in the larger picture, weeb stuff is the solution to everything.
posting about going to japan and finding a gf is not weeb stuff, that is yellow fever overdrivu.
 
if someone said, "I've had a bad day; I feel like roping" and he responded by talking about his waifu, that was to remind everyone that in the larger picture, weeb stuff is the solution to everything.
That's exactly what I want to hear when Im having a bad day
Someone talking about wanting to fuck their waifu for the 14th time that day
 
Undercover cop.
Nice catch should of stayed hunting on darkweb.
Being an undercover cop and having your only job be using incels.is actually doesn't sound all that bad.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Shaktiman
Replies
23
Views
558
incelerated
incelerated
Shaktiman
Replies
8
Views
208
BlackCel_from_ZA
BlackCel_from_ZA
Moroccancel
Replies
2
Views
276
Morphine . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁
Morphine . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁
GENSHIT CHIMPACT
Replies
38
Views
389
GENSHIT CHIMPACT
GENSHIT CHIMPACT

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top