Discussion Are "incel" and "ugly" more powerful arguments than logic and facts?

[Deleted member 32502]

With these lookism memes around the internet (the "Yes" Chad , countless soyjak variations and incel faces) I got this idea that calling someone a subhuman, incel or ugly is more powerful argument than logic and facts. People don't seem to be too concerned about facts, numbers and logic. I have noticed that most of the time nobody cares if you prove them wrong by providing evidence and argue with logic. It has no effect. But then so many people use looks or inceldom as arguments and it seems to have more power. People spam these soyjak variations everywhere. People invoke Yes Chad.jpg as their argument when necessary. People call you incel if you criticize women on anything. All of these are attacks on someone's appearance or sexual appeal. Coincidence is a funny thing isn't it?

Calling someone a subhuman incel has more impact than pointing out logical fallacies and providing facts. Argumentation is now based on what you look like

 

[shii410]

Legit. Look at how antifa and alt-right love to post pictures of subhuman members of each other. They know that's more powerful than any argument.

 

[Deleted member 32502]

If someone calls you ugly or incel as their argument, there is no coming back from that because nobody cares at that point. Any attempt to be witty, sophisticated or smart is seen as coping and bitterness.

 

[XANDIARIES]

i don't even bother anymore. I wish I was good looking so I could have my arguments looked upon by their merit and not the looks of the person making them

 

[Shigechi]

 

[K9Otaku]

With these lookism memes around the internet (the "Yes" Chad , countless soyjak variations and incel faces) I got this idea that calling someone a subhuman, incel or ugly is more powerful argument than logic and facts. People don't seem to be too concerned about facts, numbers and logic. I have noticed that most of the time nobody cares if you prove them wrong by providing evidence and argue with logic. It has no effect. But then so many people use looks or inceldom as arguments and it seems to have more power. People spam these soyjak variations everywhere. People invoke Yes Chad.jpg as their argument when necessary. People call you incel if you criticize women on anything. All of these are attacks on someone's appearance or sexual appeal. Coincidence is a funny thing isn't it?

Calling someone a subhuman incel has more impact than pointing out logical fallacies and providing facts. Argumentation is now based on what you look like

View attachment 424299
View attachment 424300

This is because Authority-S (S for Sex) has again risen above Authority-L (L for Language). For an explanation, see this:

Credit Masturbation - Have you heard of it?

Last week, I was in Dubai with my folks and I met a curry guy who showed me this thing that is sort of half a book, half a website. I read through some of it and it looks pretty based. It can be accessed in website form here or as a stand-alone PDF document. It is like novel and it explains how...

incels.is

The book linked too above has an interesting and quite blackpilled theory about what you just said.

 

[The Abyss]

Buzzword one word insults & the stigma surrounding them ARE more powerful than logic, facts, statistics & rational arguments.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

With these lookism memes around the internet (the "Yes" Chad , countless soyjak variations and incel faces) I got this idea that calling someone a subhuman, incel or ugly is more powerful argument than logic and facts. People don't seem to be too concerned about facts, numbers and logic. I have noticed that most of the time nobody cares if you prove them wrong by providing evidence and argue with logic. It has no effect. But then so many people use looks or inceldom as arguments and it seems to have more power. People spam these soyjak variations everywhere. People invoke Yes Chad.jpg as their argument when necessary. People call you incel if you criticize women on anything. All of these are attacks on someone's appearance or sexual appeal. Coincidence is a funny thing isn't it?

Calling someone a subhuman incel has more impact than pointing out logical fallacies and providing facts. Argumentation is now based on what you look like

View attachment 424299
View attachment 424300

YES

 

[polar inertia]

Stigmatisation by discrediting the genetics of the peer. Evolutionary Biology with a High School exclusion mindset.
Why discredit what the peer say, when you can skip that and discredit the person.

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

I wish I was good looking so I could have my arguments looked upon by their merit

doesn't work. if you were good looking everyone would just nod at what you said

This is because Authority-S (S for Sex) has again risen above Authority-L (L for Language). For an explanation, see this:

Credit Masturbation - Have you heard of it?

Last week, I was in Dubai with my folks and I met a curry guy who showed me this thing that is sort of half a book, half a website. I read through some of it and it looks pretty based. It can be accessed in website form here or as a stand-alone PDF document. It is like novel and it explains how...

incels.is

The book linked too above has an interesting and quite blackpilled theory about what you just said.

I used to hate people who behaved like that. then I realized everyone behaves like that, some are just better at hiding it than others

 

[JayGoptri]

doesn't work. if you were good looking everyone would just nod at what you said

I used to hate people who behaved like that. then I realized everyone behaves like that, some are just better at hiding it than others

Agreed. What I find is that overtime facial features became associated with being an alpha male and now being good looking somehow boosts the legitimacy of a man (or women's) argument/sentiment/ability to influence other etc. I had some interesting theories about how and when this started and where it is going. Where the world is going...

 

[Deleted member 6753]

Antisemite, nazi, incel, misogny etc are all thought-terminating cliches which immediately stop ppl telling the truth.

 

[fheon]

Why are you even asking this? Normies think nothing of geniuses like Tesla. They respect trailer trash more

 

[Deleted member 33464]

Normalcattle are the real subhumans. They aren't capable of independent thought

 

[CrackingYs]

On reddit I called CNN "fake news" and someone said "shut up you fucking incel". The word has lost all meaning.

 

[Detro]

For sure.
Just look at internet atheism and how the fedora meme single handedly soured most of the internet on them.

 

[BANG]

internet discussions are cringe anyways

 

[Mainländer]

I think the most interesting aspect of it is that when you invert the Chad character and the ugly one in those comics, the meaning gets affected as well. Humans are extremely lookist. Everything is about who says something and not so much about what is being said.

 

[Deleted member 32502]

I think the most interesting aspect of it is that when you invert the Chad character and the ugly one in those comics, the meaning gets affected as well. Humans are extremely lookist. Everything is about who says something and not so much about what is being said.

Yes. You can mock any opinion by claiming ugly subhumans hold that opinion. And you can praise any opinion by claiming Chads hold that opinion

 

[Mainländer]

Yes. You can mock any opinion by claiming ugly subhumans hold that opinion. And you can praise any opinion by claiming Chads hold that opinion

 

[Deleted member 20064]

Yes. It's over.

I think anyone that ignores your arguments and just insults/humillates you using your looks / lack of sexual activity, deserves death in Among Us.

View attachment 424618View attachment 424620

I remember a post of an incel being disturbed that a 19yo chad talked about how much he wanted to rape and do all type of sexual things to a 13yo , and the foid that was listening said to the the incel "Lol anon, are you a virgin or what ? .

 

[dirtykombatcel]

We're evolving backwards to the point that the most primitive, idiotic arguments outdo logic and ration. And its only getting worse.