Deleted member 32502
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2021
- Posts
- 845
With these lookism memes around the internet (the "Yes" Chad , countless soyjak variations and incel faces) I got this idea that calling someone a subhuman, incel or ugly is more powerful argument than logic and facts. People don't seem to be too concerned about facts, numbers and logic. I have noticed that most of the time nobody cares if you prove them wrong by providing evidence and argue with logic. It has no effect. But then so many people use looks or inceldom as arguments and it seems to have more power. People spam these soyjak variations everywhere. People invoke Yes Chad.jpg as their argument when necessary. People call you incel if you criticize women on anything. All of these are attacks on someone's appearance or sexual appeal. Coincidence is a funny thing isn't it?
Calling someone a subhuman incel has more impact than pointing out logical fallacies and providing facts. Argumentation is now based on what you look like
Calling someone a subhuman incel has more impact than pointing out logical fallacies and providing facts. Argumentation is now based on what you look like